arXiv subjects

Ruiqing Yue

Publications and source records attributed to Ruiqing Yue.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Ecdysis: Efficient and Effective Training of Runtime Harnesses for LLM Agents

Self-evolving runtime harnesses can substantially improve the capabilities of large language model (LLM) agents and provide a promising paradigm for optimizing agent execution. Existing failure-driven approaches often treat observed agent failures as direct evidence for harness modification. A key challenge in failure-driven harness evolution is that observed failures can reflect either limitations of the underlying model or systematic deficiencies of the harness. Directly optimizing against individual failures can therefore induce model-specific accommodation and impair generalization across tasks and models. We study whether failure evidence accumulated across task instances can provide a more reliable signal for harness training. Our key insight is that failures recurring across distinct tasks provide stronger inductive evidence for systematic harness deficiencies than isolated failures. Based on this insight, we propose Ecdysis, which aggregates failure evidence across task instances before promoting recurring failure patterns into persistent harness evolution, biasing evolution toward repairs that are more likely to generalize beyond individual model behaviors. Ecdysis further employs collaborative failure analysis to refine modification specifications, trading additional evolution-time reasoning for improved modification quality. Across multiple LLMs and benchmarks, Ecdysis improves the reasoning accuracy of evolved harnesses by 18.56% over existing harness evolution while achieving up to 1.84x faster harness training. Ecdysis also enables more data-efficient training. Fine-grained analysis shows that Ecdysis reduces model-specific accommodation during evolution, while the resulting harnesses exhibit stronger cross-LLM generalization and lower inference-time token consumption.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Refusal is Not Safety! Benchmarking Latent Safety Risks of LLM-Driven Content Humorization

Safety defenses for large language models (LLMs) have been extensively studied, with existing approaches focusing on attack detection and refusal mechanisms. Such fixed-form direct refusal strategies may introduce the risk of prefix injection attacks. Recent work has explored a new direction that leverages humor as an indirect refusal mechanism to mitigate over-refusal in jailbreak scenarios and reduce prefix injection risks. However, this approach implicitly assumes that humorous responses are safe. Whether humorization itself introduces safety risks remains unexplored. To address this issue, we conduct an exploratory study involving over 30,000 real-world agent interaction records and 45 stand-up comedians, revealing practical safety concerns in LLM-based content humorization. Motivated by these findings, we propose \textsc{HumorSafe}, a novel framework for evaluating latent safety risk propagation during humorization. \textsc{HumorSafe} enables LLMs to learn harmful humorization patterns and use them to transform benign content into humorous content with safety risks. Across five frontier LLMs, we find that LLMs can introduce stereotypes and toxicity during humorization. We further propose \textsc{HumorPIA}, a prompt injection attack that exploits latent risks in humor-based defenses. \textsc{HumorPIA} preserves the appearance of safe humorous refusal while covertly injecting harmful content, allowing latent risks to evade existing detection mechanisms. Experiments show that it increases toxicity by 3.14$\times$ while maintaining an apparent safety rate of 97.8\% even under defense settings. Our findings highlight a gap in existing LLM safety evaluations under humorized settings.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Spore: Efficient and Training-Free Privacy Extraction Attack on LLMs via Inference-Time Hybrid Probing

With the wide adoption of personal AI assistants such as OpenClaw, privacy leakage in user interaction contexts with large language model (LLM) agents has become a critical issue. Existing privacy attacks against LLMs primarily target training data, while research on inference-time contextual privacy risks in LLM agent memory remains limited. Moreover, prior methods often incur high attack costs, requiring multiple queries or relying on white-box assumptions, which limits their practicality in real-world deployments. To address these issues, we propose a training-free privacy extraction attack targeting LLM agent memory, which we name \textsc{Spore}. \textsc{Spore} is compatible with both black-box and gray-box settings. In the black-box setting, \textsc{Spore} can efficiently extract a small candidate set via a single query to recover the original private information. In the gray-box setting, \textsc{Spore} allows the attacker to leverage multi-ranked tokens for more accurate and faster privacy extraction. We provide an information-theoretic analysis of \textsc{Spore} and show that it achieves high query efficiency with substantial per query information leakage. Experiments on multiple frontier LLMs show that \textsc{Spore} outperforms attack success rate over existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) schemes. It also maintains low attack cost and remains stable across different model parameter settings. We further evaluate the robustness of \textsc{Spore} against existing defense mechanisms. Our results show that \textsc{Spore} consistently bypasses both detection and strong safety alignment, demonstrating resilient performance in diverse defensive settings and real-world safety threats.

cs.CR↗