arXiv subjects

Roohani Sharma

Publications and source records attributed to Roohani Sharma.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Quasi-polynomial-sized vertex multicut-mimicking networks and kernelization for Vertex Multiway Cut

We give deterministic polynomial-time constructions of vertex multicut-mimicking networks of quasi-polynomial size. Given a graph G, a terminal set T, and a positive integer c, our algorithm constructs a graph with |T|^7 c^{O( log c ) } vertices that preserves every minimum vertex multiway cut value of at most c, for every partition of the terminals. Setting c=|T| gives an exact vertex multicut-mimicking network with |T|^{O( log |T| ) } vertices, resolving an open question of Wahlström [ACM Transactions on Algorithms 2022], who showed a bound of κ^{O( log^3 κ)} for the edge multicut-mimicking variant, where κ:= \sum_{t \in T} |N_G(t)| is the capacity of the terminal set, which was later improved to κ^{O( log^2 κ)} by Anand, Lee, Li and Saranurak [STOC 2024]. As applications of our vertex multicut-mimicking network, we obtain deterministic kernels of size k^{O( log k )} for Vertex Multiway Cut, p^{O(1)} k^{O(log k)} for Vertex Multicut with p requests and |Γ|^{O(1)} k^{O( log k)} for Group Feedback Vertex Set, where k is the deletion budget and Γis a finite group. Our first kernelization result, in particular, resolves an open question by Wahlström [ACM Transactions on Algorithms 2022], which was reiterated in a recent survey on kernelization by Jansen [Computer Science Reviews 2026]. Also, to the best of our knowledge, our kernel for Vertex Multicut is the first one whose size is completely polynomial in p and (quasi-polynomial) super-polynomial only in k. Finally, again using our vertex multicut-mimicking network for graphs, we obtain a hyperedge multicut-mimicking network for hypergraphs, which preserves hypergraph edge-multicuts of size up to c, of size |T|^{O(1)} c^{O(log c)}. Our result removes the dependence on the rank of the hypergraph from the exponent of the size bound, that existed in prior work.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A Polynomial Erdős-Pósa bound for Eulerian digraphs

In [Combinatorica 1996], Reed, Robertson, Seymour and Thomas proved Younger's conjecture dating back to 1973 that states that directed cycles have the Erdős-Pósa property. Specifically, they showed that every directed graph $D$ contains either $k$ arc-disjoint cycles or a set of at most $f(k)$ arcs that intersect every directed cycle. The function $f$, depending only on $k$, is however notoriously large--in fact, not even elementary. The first improvement on this function was only very recently provided by Hatzel, Kreutzer, Milani, and Muzi [FOCS 2024] who showed that $f$ can be taken to be an exponential tower of height $8$. In this work, we improve this function to $O(k^4)$ in the case where the digraph is Eulerian. This also answers an open question by Wahlström [Springer Monographs in Mathematics 2018] who asked explicitly when Eulerian digraphs have a polynomial Erdős-Pósa property. The only other known result about Erdős-Pósa on Eulerian digraphs is a result from Seymour [Combinatorica 1996] who showed that $f(k)=k$ when the Eulerian digraph admits a linkless embedding in 3-space, and such an equality is not possible for general Eulerian digraphs. We also complement our positive result, by showing that the result of Seymour cannot be extended to give a linear bound ($O(k)$) on general Eulerian digraphs, by showing that even on Eulerian digraphs the lower bound for the Erdős-Pósa property is $Ω(k \log k)$.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2026

Hitting Minors: Stronger Lower Bounds

For a fixed finite collection of graphs $\mathcal{F}$, the $\mathcal{F}$-Minor-Free Deletion problem asks, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, whether there is a set $S\subseteq V(G)$ with $|S|\leq k$ such that $G-S$ contains no graph of $\mathcal{F}$ as a minor. This generalizes Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, and Vertex Planarization, among many others. Baste, Sau, and Thilikos [JCSS 2020, SICOMP 2023] showed that, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), there are collections $\mathcal{F}$ for which the problem cannot be solved in time $2^{o(\mathrm{tw}\log\mathrm{tw})}n^{O(1)}$ on $n$-vertex graphs of treewidth $\mathrm{tw}$, and gave a matching algorithm. We ask whether this super-exponential dependence persists under more restrictive structural parameters. First, we strengthen their lower bound. Assuming ETH, for every fixed $h\geq 6$, $\{P_h\}$-Minor-Free Deletion, where $P_h$ is the path on $h$ vertices, cannot be solved in time $2^{o(t\log t)}n^{O(1)}$, where $t=\mathrm{fvs}+\mathrm{td}$ is the sum of the feedback vertex set number and treedepth of the input graph. These two parameters are incomparable, but both individually upper bound the treewidth. Together with the $2^{O(\mathrm{tw}\log\mathrm{tw})}n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm of Baste, Sau, and Thilikos [SICOMP 2023], our lower bound is tight. In contrast, we show that asymptotically faster algorithms are possible when parameterized by the vertex cover number $\mathrm{vc}$. Specifically, for any finite family $\mathcal{F}$, $\mathcal{F}$-Minor-Free Deletion can be solved in time $2^{O(\mathrm{vc})}n^{O(1)}$. Taken together, our results show that the boundary between single-exponential and super-exponential complexity for this problem lies between the vertex cover number and the feedback vertex set number (plus treedepth).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Solving SAT via Treewidth Backdoors in Linear Time: Beyond Sparsity

The Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) problem is a remarkably expressive computational problem, serving both as a cornerstone of complexity theory and as a unifying language for a wide range of search and reasoning tasks. While $\mathrm{NP}$-complete in general, SAT is well known to be linear-time solvable on instances with bounded treewidth. This motivates the search for "hidden" tree-like structures in formulas---for instance by detecting so-called weak $t$-treewidth backdoors. Such backdoors are sets of $k$ variables that can be assigned in such a way that the remaining instance has treewidth at most $t$ and is satisfiable whenever the original instance is. Ever since Gaspers and Szeider [ICALP 2012] showed that finding a weak $t$-treewidth backdoor for a SAT formula is $\mathrm{W}[2]$-hard with respect to $k$, tractability results have been restricted to structurally sparse formulas---most notably, a linear-time algorithm for $d$-SAT (bounded clause-length SAT) by Fomin, Lokshtanov, Misra, Ramanujan, and Saurabh [SODA 2015] and a non-uniform polynomial-time algorithm when the incidence graph of the input formula belongs to a nowhere-dense graph class (or more generally is $K_{d,d}$-free) by Lokshtanov, Panolan, and Ramanujan [ICALP 2022]. In this paper, we push the tractability boundaries of finding weak $t$-treewidth backdoors beyond sparsity and into the regime of "well-behaved" dense formulas. Aiming towards relaxing structural input restrictions from nowhere-dense to edge-stable graph classes, as featured in the theory of beyond sparsity for FO model checking, or to bounded VC-dimension set systems, we identify signed semi-ladder-freeness as the correct dense structural restriction that establishes the boundary between tractability and intractability along this line.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Tractability of Hard Digraph Cut Problems on Eulerian Instances: Treewidth Reduction and Reducing CMSO to Unbreakable Eulerian Instances

Eulerian digraphs retain the directional structure of general digraphs while exhibiting a symmetry of cuts reminiscent of undirected graphs. We show that this symmetry extends beyond individual cuts to two fundamental techniques in parameterized algorithms for undirected cut problems: treewidth reduction and recursive understanding and randomized contractions. Both of these techniques have proved useful for dealing with undirected graph cut problems as each of them reduces the problem at hand on general undirected instances to ones that have bounded treewidth or that are highly connected, respectively. In this work we prove an edge-cut analogue of the treewidth-reduction theorem of Marx, O'Sullivan, and Razgon [ACM TALG 2013], and an Eulerian analogue of the reduction of CMSO model checking to unbreakable instances due to Lokshtanov, Ramanujan, Saurabh, and Zehavi [ICALP 2018]. Both these results allow us to reduce several problems on general Eulerian digraphs to Eulerian digraphs whose underlying undirected graph has bounded treewidth, or to Eulerian instances that are highly connected, thus bringing to Eulerian digraphs two fundamental tools from the undirected parameterized cut toolkit for which no counterparts are known on arbitrary digraphs. Beyond their structural significance, these results have substantial algorithmic consequences: they yield FPT algorithms for several directed cut problems that are W[1]-hard in general. We show that Directed Multicut and Directed Edge Odd Cycle Transversal are FPT on Eulerian digraphs when parameterized by the solution size and the number of terminal pairs, and just the solution size, respectively. This is in sharp contrast to general digraphs, where the first problem is W[1]-hard even for 4 terminal pairs, and the second is W[1]-hard in general. We also obtain FPT algorithms for Directed Edge Multiway Cut-Uncut and Directed Steiner Cut.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Multiway $f$-Cut is fixed-parameter tractable

A connectivity function on a finite set $E$ is a function $f\colon 2^E\to\mathbb Z$ that is submodular and symmetric, with $f(\varnothing)=0$. Given a connectivity function $f$ via a value oracle, terminals $t_1,\ldots,t_r\in E$, and an integer $k$, the Multiway $f$-Cut problem asks whether $E$ has a partition $(P_1,\ldots,P_r)$ with $t_i\in P_i$ for every $i$ and $\sum_{i=1}^r f(P_i)\le k$. We prove that Multiway $f$-Cut is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $k$. Cut functions of graphs are connectivity functions, so as a special case we recover the classical result that Edge Multiway Cut in graphs is fixed-parameter tractable. Our proof of correctness is completely elementary, and is arguably the simplest known proof of this fact.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2026

Where Treewidth and Pathwidth Diverge: Towards a Uniform Kernel for Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion

For a constant $η\geq 0$, Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion is the problem of deciding whether, for a given graph $G$ and integer $k$, there is a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$ such that the pathwidth of $G - S$ is at most $η$. The problems Treewidth-$η$ Deletion and Treedepth-$η$ Deletion are defined similarly for the parameters treewidth and treedepth, respectively. A landmark result of Fomin et al. [FOCS, 2012] shows that, for any constant $η$, all three problems admit a kernel on $O(k^{c(η)})$ vertices, where $c(η)$ is a constant depending on $η$. Giannopoulou et al. [ACM TALG, 2017] show that, in some sense, this result is optimal for Treewidth-$η$ Deletion: for $η\geq 2$ and even when parameterizing by the size of a vertex cover $M$ of the input graph, there is no kernel of size $O(|M|^{\frac{η+1}{2}-\varepsilon})$, for any $\varepsilon > 0$. Contrasting this result, they prove that Treedepth-$η$ Deletion admits a uniform polynomial kernel, that is, a kernel of size $O(k^c)$ for a constant $c$ that is independent of $η$. In comparison, the question whether Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion admits a uniform polynomial kernel has been neglected in the literature. As treewidth and pathwidth tend to behave similarly, it is natural to expect that no uniform kernel exists when parameterizing by the size of a vertex cover. Surprisingly, we show this not to be the case. More concretely, we prove the existence of a uniform polynomial kernel for Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion when parameterizing by (1) the solution size $k$ plus the size of a set $M$ such that $G - M$ has bounded treedepth; (2) the (vertex-deletion) distance to pathwidth-$1$ graphs; (3) the distance to the class of graphs with treedepth at most $η+ 1$. This leads us to conjecture that Pathwidth-$η$ Deletion admits a uniform kernel when parameterizing by the solution size $k$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Reducing CMSO to Unbreakable Graphs Cannot be Computable

Lokshtanov, Ramanujan, Saurabh, and Zehavi [ICALP 2018] proved that for any CMSO formula $ϕ$, testing $ϕ$ on arbitrary graphs can be reduced to testing it on $(q,k)$-unbreakable graphs for appropriate parameters. Their proof is non-constructive, and they ask whether it can be made constructive. We prove that this is impossible: specifically, the parameter $q$ cannot be a computable function of $ϕ$.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2026

A Dividing Line for Structural Kernelization of Component Order Connectivity via Distance to Bounded Pathwidth

In this work we study a classic generalization of the Vertex Cover (VC) problem, called the Component Order Connectivity (COC) problem. In COC, given an undirected graph $G$, integers $d \geq 1$ and $k$, the goal is to determine if there is a set of at most $k$ vertices whose deletion results in a graph where each connected component has at most $d$ vertices. When $d=1$, this is exactly VC. This work is inspired by polynomial kernelization results with respect to structural parameters for VC. On one hand, Jansen & Bodlaender [TOCS 2013] show that VC admits a polynomial kernel when the parameter is the distance to treewidth-$1$ graphs, on the other hand Cygan, Lokshtanov, Pilipczuk, Pilipczuk & Saurabh [TOCS 2014] showed that VC does not admit a polynomial kernel when the parameter is distance to treewidth-$2$ graphs. Greilhuber & Sharma [IPEC 2024] showed that, for any $d \geq 2$, $d$-COC cannot admit a polynomial kernel when the parameter is distance to a forest of pathwidth $2$. Here, $d$-COC is the same as COC only that $d$ is a fixed constant not part of the input. We complement this result and show that like for the VC problem where distance to treewidth-$1$ graphs versus distance to treewidth-$2$ graphs is the dividing line between structural parameterizations that allow and respectively disallow polynomial kernelization, for COC this dividing line happens between distance to pathwidth-$1$ graphs and distance to pathwidth-$2$ graphs. The main technical result of this work is that COC admits a polynomial kernel parameterized by distance to pathwidth-$1$ graphs plus $d$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Maximum Partial List H-Coloring on P_5-free graphs in polynomial time

In this article we show that Maximum Partial List H-Coloring is polynomial-time solvable on P_5-free graphs for every fixed graph H. In particular, this implies that Maximum k-Colorable Subgraph is polynomial-time solvable on P_5-free graphs. This answers an open question from Agrawal, Lima, Lokshtanov, Saurabh & Sharma [SODA 2024]. This also improves the $n^{O(ω(G))}$-time algorithm for Maximum Partial H-Coloring by Chudnovsky, King, Pilipczuk, Rzążewski & Spirkl [SIDMA 2021] to polynomial-time algorithm.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Protrusion Decompositions Revisited: Uniform Lossy Kernels for Reducing Treewidth and Linear Kernels for Hitting Disconnected Minors

Let F be a finite family of graphs. In the F-Deletion problem, one is given a graph G and an integer k, and the goal is to find k vertices whose deletion results in a graph with no minor from the family F. This may be regarded as a far-reaching generalization of Vertex Cover and Feedback vertex Set. In their seminal work, Fomin, Lokshtanov, Misra & Saurabh [FOCS 2012] gave a polynomial kernel for this problem when the family F contains a planar graph. As the size of their kernel is g(F) * k^{f(F)}, a natural follow-up question was whether the dependence on F in the exponent of k can be avoided. The answer turned out to be negative: Giannapoulou, Jansen, Lokshtanov & Saurabh [TALG 2017] proved that this is already inevitable for the special case of the Treewidth-d-Deletion problem. In this work, we show that this non-uniformity can be avoided at the expense of a small loss. First, we present a simple 2-approximate kernelization algorithm for Treewidth-d-Deletion with kernel size g(d) * k^5. Next, we show that the approximation factor can be made arbitrarily close to 1, if we settle for a kernelization protocol with O(1) calls to an oracle that solves instances of size bounded by a uniform polynomial in k. We also obtain linear kernels on sparse graph classes when F contains a planar graph, whereas the previously known theorems required all graphs in F to be connected. Specifically, we generalize the kernelization algorithm by Kim, Langer, Paul, Reidl, Rossmanith, Sau & Sikdar [TALG 2015] on graph classes that exclude a topological minor.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Parameterized Complexity of Biclique Contraction and Balanced Biclique Contraction

In this work, we initiate the complexity study of Biclique Contraction and Balanced Biclique Contraction. In these problems, given as input a graph G and an integer k, the objective is to determine whether one can contract at most k edges in G to obtain a biclique and a balanced biclique, respectively. We first prove that these problems are NP-complete even when the input graph is bipartite. Next, we study the parameterized complexity of these problems and show that they admit single exponential-time FPT algorithms when parameterized by the number k of edge contractions. Then, we show that Balanced Biclique Contraction admits a quadratic vertex kernel while Biclique Contraction does not admit any polynomial compression (or kernel) under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions. We also give faster FPT algorithms for contraction to restricted bicliques.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Faster Exponential-Time Approximation Algorithms Using Approximate Monotone Local Search

We generalize the monotone local search approach of Fomin, Gaspers, Lokshtanov and Saurabh [J. ACM 2019], by establishing a connection between parameterized approximation and exponential-time approximation algorithms for monotone subset minimization problems. In a monotone subset minimization problem the input implicitly describes a non-empty set family over a universe of size $n$ which is closed under taking supersets. The task is to find a minimum cardinality set in this family. Broadly speaking, we use approximate monotone local search to show that a parameterized $α$-approximation algorithm that runs in $c^k \cdot n^{O(1)}$ time, where $k$ is the solution size, can be used to derive an $α$-approximation randomized algorithm that runs in $d^n \cdot n^{O(1)}$ time, where $d$ is the unique value in $d \in (1,1+\frac{c-1}α)$ such that $\mathcal{D}(\frac{1}α\|\frac{d-1}{c-1})=\frac{\ln c}α$ and $\mathcal{D}(a \|b)$ is the Kullback-Leibler divergence. This running time matches that of Fomin et al. for $α=1$, and is strictly better when $α>1$, for any $c > 1$. Furthermore, we also show that this result can be derandomized at the expense of a sub-exponential multiplicative factor in the running time. We demonstrate the potential of approximate monotone local search by deriving new and faster exponential approximation algorithms for Vertex Cover, $3$-Hitting Set, Directed Feedback Vertex Set, Directed Subset Feedback Vertex Set, Directed Odd Cycle Transversal and Undirected Multicut. For instance, we get a $1.1$-approximation algorithm for Vertex Cover with running time $1.114^n \cdot n^{O(1)}$, improving upon the previously best known $1.1$-approximation running in time $1.127^n \cdot n^{O(1)}$ by Bourgeois et al. [DAM 2011].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

The Complexity of Contracting Bipartite Graphs into Small Cycles

For a positive integer $\ell \geq 3$, the $C_\ell$-Contractibility problem takes as input an undirected simple graph $G$ and determines whether $G$ can be transformed into a graph isomorphic to $C_\ell$ (the induced cycle on $\ell$ vertices) using only edge contractions. Brouwer and Veldman [JGT 1987] showed that $C_4$-Contractibility is NP-complete in general graphs. It is easy to verify that $C_3$-Contractibility is polynomial-time solvable. Dabrowski and Paulusma [IPL 2017] showed that $C_{\ell}$-Contractibility is \NP-complete\ on bipartite graphs for $\ell = 6$ and posed as open problems the status of the problem when $\ell$ is 4 or 5. In this paper, we show that both $C_5$-Contractibility and $C_4$-Contractibility are NP-complete on bipartite graphs.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Problems in NP can Admit Double-Exponential Lower Bounds when Parameterized by Treewidth or Vertex Cover

Treewidth (tw) is an important parameter that, when bounded, yields tractability for many problems. For example, graph problems expressible in Monadic Second Order (MSO) logic and QUANTIFIED SAT or, more generally, QUANTIFIED CSP, are FPT parameterized by the tw of the input's (primal) graph plus the length of the MSO-formula [Courcelle, Information & Computation 1990] and the quantifier rank [Chen, ECAI 2004], resp. The algorithms from these (meta-)results have running times whose dependence on tw is a tower of exponents. A conditional lower bound by Fichte et al. [LICS 2020] shows that, for QUANTIFIED SAT, the height of this tower is equal to the number of quantifier alternations. Lower bounds showing that at least double-exponential factors in the running time are necessary are rare: there are very few (for tw and vertex cover vc parameterizations) and they are for problems that are complete for #NP, $Σ_2^p$, $Π_2^p$, or higher levels of the polynomial hierarchy. We show, for the first time, that it is not necessary to go higher up in the polynomial hierarchy to obtain such lower bounds. We design a novel, yet simple versatile technique based on Sperner families to obtain such lower bounds and apply it to 3 problems: METRIC DIMENSION, STRONG METRIC DIMENSION, and GEODETIC SET. We prove that they do not admit $2^{2^{o(tw)}} \cdot n^{O(1)}$-time algorithms, even on bounded diameter graphs, unless the ETH fails. For STRONG METRIC DIMENSION, the lower bound holds even for vc. We complement our lower bounds with matching upper bounds.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Metric Dimension and Geodetic Set Parameterized by Vertex Cover

For a graph $G$, a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ is called a resolving set of $G$ if, for any two vertices $u,v\in V(G)$, there exists a vertex $w\in S$ such that $d(w,u)\neq d(w,v)$. The Metric Dimension problem takes as input a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and a positive integer $k$, and asks whether there exists a resolving set of size at most $k$. In another metric-based graph problem, Geodetic Set, the input is a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, and the objective is to determine whether there exists a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$ such that, for any vertex $u \in V(G)$, there are two vertices $s_1, s_2 \in S$ such that $u$ lies on a shortest path from $s_1$ to $s_2$. These two classical problems turn out to be intractable with respect to the natural parameter, i.e., the solution size, as well as most structural parameters, including the feedback vertex set number and pathwidth. Some of the very few existing tractable results state that they are both FPT with respect to the vertex cover number $vc$. More precisely, we observe that both problems admit an FPT algorithm running in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(vc^2)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, and a kernelization algorithm that outputs a kernel with $2^{\mathcal{O}(vc)}$ vertices. We prove that unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, Metric Dimension and Geodetic Set, even on graphs of bounded diameter, neither admit an FPT algorithm running in time $2^{o(vc^2)}\cdot n^{\mathcal(1)}$, nor a kernelization algorithm that reduces the solution size and outputs a kernel with $2^{o(vc)}$ vertices. The versatility of our technique enables us to apply it to both these problems. We only know of one other problem in the literature that admits such a tight lower bound. Similarly, the list of known problems with exponential lower bounds on the number of vertices in kernelized instances is very short.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

MaxMin Separation Problems: FPT Algorithms for $st$-Separator and Odd Cycle Transversal

In this paper, we study the parameterized complexity of the MaxMin versions of two fundamental separation problems: Maximum Minimal $st$-Separator and Maximum Minimal Odd Cycle Transversal (OCT), both parameterized by the solution size. In the Maximum Minimal $st$-Separator problem, given a graph $G$, two distinct vertices $s$ and $t$ and a positive integer $k$, the goal is to determine whether there exists a minimal $st$-separator in $G$ of size at least $k$. Similarly, the Maximum Minimal OCT problem seeks to determine if there exists a minimal set of vertices whose deletion results in a bipartite graph, and whose size is at least $k$. We demonstrate that both problems are fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $k$. Our FPT algorithm for Maximum Minimal $st$-Separator answers the open question by Hanaka, Bodlaender, van der Zanden and Ono (TCS 2019). One unique insight from this work is the following. We use the meta-result of Lokshtanov, Ramanujan, Saurabh and Zehavi (ICALP 2018) that enables us to reduce our problems to highly unbreakable graphs. This is interesting, as an explicit use of the recursive understanding and randomized contractions framework of Chitnis, Cygan, Hajiaghayi, Pilipczuk and Pilipczuk (SICOMP 2016) to reduce to the highly unbreakable graphs setting (which is the result that Lokshtanov et al. tries to abstract out in their meta-theorem) does not seem obvious because certain ``extension'' variants of our problems are W[1]-hard.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Parameterized Approximation for Robust Clustering in Discrete Geometric Spaces

We consider the well-studied Robust $(k, z)$-Clustering problem, which generalizes the classic $k$-Median, $k$-Means, and $k$-Center problems. Given a constant $z\ge 1$, the input to Robust $(k, z)$-Clustering is a set $P$ of $n$ weighted points in a metric space $(M,δ)$ and a positive integer $k$. Further, each point belongs to one (or more) of the $m$ many different groups $S_1,S_2,\ldots,S_m$. Our goal is to find a set $X$ of $k$ centers such that $\max_{i \in [m]} \sum_{p \in S_i} w(p) δ(p,X)^z$ is minimized. This problem arises in the domains of robust optimization [Anthony, Goyal, Gupta, Nagarajan, Math. Oper. Res. 2010] and in algorithmic fairness. For polynomial time computation, an approximation factor of $O(\log m/\log\log m)$ is known [Makarychev, Vakilian, COLT $2021$], which is tight under a plausible complexity assumption even in the line metrics. For FPT time, there is a $(3^z+ε)$-approximation algorithm, which is tight under GAP-ETH [Goyal, Jaiswal, Inf. Proc. Letters, 2023]. Motivated by the tight lower bounds for general discrete metrics, we focus on \emph{geometric} spaces such as the (discrete) high-dimensional Euclidean setting and metrics of low doubling dimension, which play an important role in data analysis applications. First, for a universal constant $η_0 >0.0006$, we devise a $3^z(1-η_{0})$-factor FPT approximation algorithm for discrete high-dimensional Euclidean spaces thereby bypassing the lower bound for general metrics. We complement this result by showing that even the special case of $k$-Center in dimension $Θ(\log n)$ is $(\sqrt{3/2}- o(1))$-hard to approximate for FPT algorithms. Finally, we complete the FPT approximation landscape by designing an FPT $(1+ε)$-approximation scheme (EPAS) for the metric of sub-logarithmic doubling dimension.

cs.DS↗