arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Ronald Xu

Publications and source records attributed to Ronald Xu.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

TwinBridge: Digital Twin-Driven Policy and Reward Transfer for Real-World Reinforcement Learning in Laboratory Robotics

Online reinforcement learning offers an effective approach to precise laboratory manipulation, yet costly real-world demonstrations and limited access to dense process rewards hinder its practical application. We present TwinBridge, a digital twin-driven framework that supplies policy initialization and dense visual rewards for real-world online learning. We construct digital twins by combining 3D Gaussian splatting with physics simulation. Here, simulator states provide task events and geometric progress under physical prerequisites and ordering constraints, yielding rewards for policy pretraining with simulated demonstrations and reinforcement learning. We distill this supervision into a visual reward model. During real-world interaction, its predictions are combined with execution history to compute dense rewards for human-in-the-loop policy refinement. Across five real-world laboratory tasks, TwinBridge achieves a final mean autonomous success rate of 98% with at most 25 minutes of real-world interaction per task. Experiments show that dense rewards improve interaction efficiency over sparse rewards, and simulation-based policy initialization further accelerates learning.

cs.RO↗

BioPRM: Step-Level Consistency Verification of Biological Protocols

Process reward models (PRMs) provide fine-grained supervision for assessing intermediate steps in language-model outputs, but their application to biological protocols presents distinct challenges. Protocol validity depends on both the appropriateness of individual operations and their consistency with the experimental objective and surrounding procedure, while experimental outcomes are typically unavailable during verification. We introduce BioPRM, a contextual process reward model for identifying procedural inconsistencies in structured biological protocols. We construct a supervision corpus from SciRecipe and protocols collected from protocols.io and Bio-protocol using LLM-assisted construction and source-specific review by personnel with biological expertise.

cs.CE↗

Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMs

Most popular benchmarks for comparing LLMs rely on a limited set of prompt templates, which may not fully capture the LLMs' abilities and can affect the reproducibility of results on leaderboards. Many recent works empirically verify prompt sensitivity and advocate for changes in LLM evaluation. In this paper, we consider the problem of estimating the performance distribution across many prompt variants instead of finding a single prompt to evaluate with. We introduce PromptEval, a method for estimating performance across a large set of prompts borrowing strength across prompts and examples to produce accurate estimates under practical evaluation budgets. The resulting distribution can be used to obtain performance quantiles to construct various robust performance metrics (e.g., top 95% quantile or median). We prove that PromptEval consistently estimates the performance distribution and demonstrate its efficacy empirically on three prominent LLM benchmarks: MMLU, BIG-bench Hard, and LMentry; for example, PromptEval can accurately estimate performance quantiles across 100 prompt templates on MMLU with a budget equivalent to two single-prompt evaluations. Moreover, we show how PromptEval can be useful in LLM-as-a-judge and best prompt identification applications.

cs.CL↗

Prompt Exploration with Prompt Regression

In the advent of democratized usage of large language models (LLMs), there is a growing desire to systematize LLM prompt creation and selection processes beyond iterative trial-and-error. Prior works majorly focus on searching the space of prompts without accounting for relations between prompt variations. Here we propose a framework, Prompt Exploration with Prompt Regression (PEPR), to predict the effect of prompt combinations given results for individual prompt elements as well as a simple method to select an effective prompt for a given use-case. We evaluate our approach with open-source LLMs of different sizes on several different tasks.

cs.CL↗