arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Rohit Ram

Publications and source records attributed to Rohit Ram.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Interval-censored Transformer Hawkes: Detecting Information Operations using the Reaction of Social Systems

Social media is being increasingly weaponized by state-backed actors to elicit reactions, push narratives and sway public opinion. These are known as Information Operations (IO). The covert nature of IO makes their detection difficult. This is further amplified by missing data due to the user and content removal and privacy requirements. This work advances the hypothesis that the very reactions that Information Operations seek to elicit within the target social systems can be used to detect them. We propose an Interval-censored Transformer Hawkes (IC-TH) architecture and a novel data encoding scheme to account for both observed and missing data. We derive a novel log-likelihood function that we deploy together with a contrastive learning procedure. We showcase the performance of IC-TH on three real-world Twitter datasets and two learning tasks: future popularity prediction and item category prediction. The latter is particularly significant. Using the retweeting timing and patterns solely, we can predict the category of YouTube videos, guess whether news publishers are reputable or controversial and, most importantly, identify state-backed IO agent accounts. Additional qualitative investigations uncover that the automatically discovered clusters of Russian-backed agents appear to coordinate their behavior, activating simultaneously to push specific narratives.

cs.SI

Opinion Market Model: Stemming Far-Right Opinion Spread using Positive Interventions

Online extremism has severe societal consequences, including normalizing hate speech, user radicalization, and increased social divisions. Various mitigation strategies have been explored to address these consequences. One such strategy uses positive interventions: controlled signals that add attention to the opinion ecosystem to boost certain opinions. To evaluate the effectiveness of positive interventions, we introduce the Opinion Market Model (OMM), a two-tier online opinion ecosystem model that considers both inter-opinion interactions and the role of positive interventions. The size of the opinion attention market is modeled in the first tier using the multivariate discrete-time Hawkes process; in the second tier, opinions cooperate and compete for market share, given limited attention using the market share attraction model. We demonstrate the convergence of our proposed estimation scheme on a synthetic dataset. Next, we test OMM on two learning tasks, applying to two real-world datasets to predict attention market shares and uncover latent relationships between online items. The first dataset comprises Facebook and Twitter discussions containing moderate and far-right opinions about bushfires and climate change. The second dataset captures popular VEVO artists' YouTube and Twitter attention volumes. OMM outperforms the state-of-the-art predictive models on both datasets and captures latent cooperation-competition relations. We uncover (1) self- and cross-reinforcement between far-right and moderate opinions on the bushfires and (2) pairwise artist relations that correlate with real-world interactions such as collaborations and long-lasting feuds. Lastly, we use OMM as a testbed for positive interventions and show how media coverage modulates the spread of far-right opinions.

cs.SI

Practical Guidelines for Ideology Detection Pipelines and Psychosocial Applications

Online ideology detection is crucial for downstream tasks, like countering ideologically motivated violent extremism and modeling opinion dynamics. However, two significant issues arise in practitioners' deployment. Firstly, gold-standard training data is prohibitively labor-intensive to collect and has limited reusability beyond its collection context (i.e., time, location, and platform). Secondly, to circumvent expense, researchers employ ideological signals (such as hashtags shared). Unfortunately, these signals' annotation requirements and context transferability are largely unknown, and the bias they induce remains unquantified. This study provides guidelines for practitioners requiring real-time detection of left, right, and extreme ideologies in large-scale online settings. We propose a framework for pipeline constructions, describing ideology signals by their associated labor and context transferability. We evaluate many constructions, quantifying the bias associated with signals and describing a pipeline that outperforms state-of-the-art methods ($0.95$ AUC ROC). We showcase the capabilities of our pipeline on five datasets containing more than 1.12 million users. We set out to investigate whether the findings in the psychosocial literature, developed for the offline environment, apply to the online setting. We evaluate at scale several psychosocial hypotheses that delineate ideologies concerning morality, grievance, nationalism, and dichotomous thinking. We find that right-wing ideologies use more vice-moral language, have more grievance-filled language, exhibit increased black-and-white thinking patterns, and have a greater association with national flags. This research empowers practitioners with guidelines for ideology detection, and case studies for its application, fostering a safer and better understood digital landscape.

cs.CY

Conductance and Influence-Capital: Modeling Online Social Influence

Human interactions are mediated by social influence. During crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, social influence determines whether life-saving information is adopted or immunization campaigns meet their targets. The literature on online social influence presents notable limitations across disciplines. Psychosocial approaches characterize the nature of influence by measuring how social factors impact these phenomena, but lack computational modeling capabilities and rely on slow, non-scalable measurement methods. Conversely, computational approaches, while data-driven, often fail to incorporate critical social factors. Our work bridges this gap through two main contributions. First, we present a data-driven Generalized Influence Model (GIM) incorporating two novel psychosocial-inspired mechanisms: the conductance of the diffusion network and the influence-capital distribution. GIM not only outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches but also corrects the inherent biases introduced by the widely used follower count metric. Second, we empirically test long-held sociological hypotheses regarding influence, social class, and expertise by applying GIM to COVID-19 discussions. We quantify the influence and content veracity for more than 21.5 million X/Twitter users in relation to their professions. Our model suggests that executives, media, and military figures exert greater influence than pandemic-related experts such as life scientists and healthcare professionals. Worryingly, by leveraging existing COVID-19 misinformation datasets, we show that some of the most influential occupations also spread the most misinformation. These findings raise questions about the effectiveness of information dissemination by experts in situations of crisis.

cs.SI

Evently: Modeling and Analyzing Reshare Cascades with Hawkes Processes

Modeling online discourse dynamics is a core activity in understanding the spread of information, both offline and online, and emergent online behavior. There is currently a disconnect between the practitioners of online social media analysis -- usually social, political and communication scientists -- and the accessibility to tools capable of examining online discussions of users. Here we present evently, a tool for modeling online reshare cascades, and particularly retweet cascades, using self-exciting processes. It provides a comprehensive set of functionalities for processing raw data from Twitter public APIs, modeling the temporal dynamics of processed retweet cascades and characterizing online users with a wide range of diffusion measures. This tool is designed for researchers with a wide range of computer expertise, and it includes tutorials and detailed documentation. We illustrate the usage of evently with an end-to-end analysis of online user behavior on a topical dataset relating to COVID-19. We show that, by characterizing users solely based on how their content spreads online, we can disentangle influential users and online bots.

cs.SI

Birdspotter: A Tool for Analyzing and Labeling Twitter Users

The impact of online social media on societal events and institutions is profound; and with the rapid increases in user uptake, we are just starting to understand its ramifications. Social scientists and practitioners who model online discourse as a proxy for real-world behavior, often curate large social media datasets. A lack of available tooling aimed at non-data science experts frequently leaves this data (and the insights it holds) underutilized. Here, we propose birdspotter -- a tool to analyze and label Twitter users --, and birdspotter.ml -- an exploratory visualizer for the computed metrics. birdspotter provides an end-to-end analysis pipeline, from the processing of pre-collected Twitter data, to general-purpose labeling of users, and estimating their social influence, within a few lines of code. The package features tutorials and detailed documentation. We also illustrate how to train birdspotter into a fully-fledged bot detector that achieves better than state-of-the-art performances without making any Twitter API online calls, and we showcase its usage in an exploratory analysis of a topical COVID-19 dataset.

cs.CY