arXiv subjects

Robin Dunn

Publications and source records attributed to Robin Dunn.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Adaptive Off-Policy Inference for M-Estimators Under Model Misspecification

When data are collected adaptively, such as in bandit algorithms, classical statistical approaches such as ordinary least squares and $M$-estimation will often fail to achieve asymptotic normality. Although recent lines of work have modified the classical approaches to ensure valid inference on adaptively collected data, most of these works assume that the model is correctly specified. The misspecified setting poses unique challenges because the parameter of interest itself may not be well-defined over a non-stationary distribution of rewards. We therefore tackle the problem of \emph{off-policy} inference in adaptive settings, where we uniquely define a projected solution over a stationary evaluation policy. Our method provides valid inference for $M$-estimators that use adaptively collected bandit data with a possibly misspecified working model. A key ingredient in our approach is the use of flexible approaches to stabilize the variance induced by adaptive data collection. A major novelty is that the procedure enables the construction of valid confidence sets even in settings where treatment policies are unstable and non-converging, such as when there is no unique optimal arm and standard bandit algorithms are used. Empirical results on semi-synthetic datasets constructed from the Osteoarthritis Initiative demonstrate that the method maintains type I error control, while existing methods for inference in adaptive settings do not cover in the misspecified case.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Universal Inference Meets Random Projections: A Scalable Test for Log-concavity

Shape constraints yield flexible middle grounds between fully nonparametric and fully parametric approaches to modeling distributions of data. The specific assumption of log-concavity is motivated by applications across economics, survival modeling, and reliability theory. However, there do not currently exist valid tests for whether the underlying density of given data is log-concave. The recent universal inference methodology provides a valid test. The universal test relies on maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), and efficient methods already exist for finding the log-concave MLE. This yields the first test of log-concavity that is provably valid in finite samples in any dimension, for which we also establish asymptotic consistency results. Empirically, we find that a random projections approach that converts the d-dimensional testing problem into many one-dimensional problems can yield high power, leading to a simple procedure that is statistically and computationally efficient.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Gaussian Universal Likelihood Ratio Testing

The classical likelihood ratio test (LRT) based on the asymptotic chi-squared distribution of the log likelihood is one of the fundamental tools of statistical inference. A recent universal LRT approach based on sample splitting provides valid hypothesis tests and confidence sets in any setting for which we can compute the split likelihood ratio statistic (or, more generally, an upper bound on the null maximum likelihood). The universal LRT is valid in finite samples and without regularity conditions. This test empowers statisticians to construct tests in settings for which no valid hypothesis test previously existed. For the simple but fundamental case of testing the population mean of d-dimensional Gaussian data with identity covariance matrix, the classical LRT itself applies. Thus, this setting serves as a perfect test bed to compare the classical LRT against the universal LRT. This work presents the first in-depth exploration of the size, power, and relationships between several universal LRT variants. We show that a repeated subsampling approach is the best choice in terms of size and power. For large numbers of subsamples, the repeated subsampling set is approximately spherical. We observe reasonable performance even in a high-dimensional setting, where the expected squared radius of the best universal LRT's confidence set is approximately 3/2 times the squared radius of the classical LRT's spherical confidence set. We illustrate the benefits of the universal LRT through testing a non-convex doughnut-shaped null hypothesis, where a universal inference procedure can have higher power than a standard approach.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2019

A Flexible Pipeline for Prediction of Tropical Cyclone Paths

Hurricanes and, more generally, tropical cyclones (TCs) are rare, complex natural phenomena of both scientific and public interest. The importance of understanding TCs in a changing climate has increased as recent TCs have had devastating impacts on human lives and communities. Moreover, good prediction and understanding about the complex nature of TCs can mitigate some of these human and property losses. Though TCs have been studied from many different angles, more work is needed from a statistical approach of providing prediction regions. The current state-of-the-art in TC prediction bands comes from the National Hurricane Center of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), whose proprietary model provides "cones of uncertainty" for TCs through an analysis of historical forecast errors. The contribution of this paper is twofold. We introduce a new pipeline that encourages transparent and adaptable prediction band development by streamlining cyclone track simulation and prediction band generation. We also provide updates to existing models and novel statistical methodologies in both areas of the pipeline, respectively.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2018

Distribution-Free Prediction Sets for Two-Layer Hierarchical Models

We consider the problem of constructing distribution-free prediction sets for data from two-layer hierarchical distributions. For iid data, prediction sets can be constructed using the method of conformal prediction. The validity of conformal prediction hinges on the exchangeability of the data, which does not hold when groups of observations come from distinct distributions, such as multiple observations on each patient in a medical database. We extend conformal methods to this hierarchical setting. We develop CDF pooling, single subsampling, and repeated subsampling approaches to construct prediction sets in unsupervised and supervised settings. We compare these approaches in terms of coverage and average set size. If asymptotic coverage is acceptable, we recommend CDF pooling for its balance between empirical coverage and average set size. If we desire coverage guarantees, then we recommend the repeated subsampling approach.

stat.ME↗