arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Roberto Colomboni

Publications and source records attributed to Roberto Colomboni.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Regret Bounds for Market Making with Persistent Orders

We study adversarial market making with orders that remain active until execution. The maker operates on two markets: a primary market where orders are made and a secondary market where the resulting positions are hedged. In each round, the maker posts a quote on the primary market before observing both primary and secondary market prices. An order executes when the primary price reaches its quote, and the resulting position is immediately offset at the secondary price. When both price sequences are chosen by an adversary over $T$ rounds, we give a simple deterministic policy with regret of order $\log T$ against the best fixed quote (static comparator) and $\sqrt T$ against the best quote for each submission date (dynamic comparator), plus two terms measuring exposure to future primary and secondary prices. These rates remain optimal even when both exposure terms vanish and lower bounds show that the exposure terms are necessary. Our policy naturally extends to simultaneous bids and asks, where we show that static and dynamic regret are both characterized (up to constant factors) by the exposures terms (where the primary price exposure $V_T^{\mathrm{two}}$ now accounts for both bids and asks) and a term of order $\sqrt{V_T^{\mathrm{two}}\log T}$. Our policy is simple, efficient and fully parameterless. We extend this setting by demonstrating how natural assumptions on the price processes lead to improved guarantees without changing the policy.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

The Price of Partial Information with Switching Costs: A Complete Characterization for Feedback Graphs

We study how switching costs affect minimax regret under partial feedback. Which features of the feedback preserve the $\sqrt T$ rate, and which force the $T^{2/3}$ rate? We address this question in the framework of feedback graphs, which interpolate between full information and bandits: playing an action reveals the losses of its out-neighbors in a known directed graph. Prior work on feedback graphs with switching costs gave algorithms with regret of order $T^{2/3}$, but matching lower bounds only for restricted classes of graphs, leaving the question open. We establish a complete characterization of the minimax regret with switching costs for all feedback graphs: $\widetildeΘ(\sqrt T)$ if the graph is strongly revealing, meaning that every pair of distinct actions has an endpoint that observes the losses of both; $\widetildeΘ(γ^{1/3}T^{2/3})$ for every other observable graph, where $γ$ is the domination number; and linear otherwise. In particular, tournaments, in which every action observes its own loss and each pair of actions is joined by one directed edge, sit at the phase transition: they behave like full information, but deleting the edge of any pair forces the rate $T^{2/3}$. Hence an action that observes all losses is neither necessary nor sufficient for the rate $\sqrt T$. Our algorithm TournamentSteering for the strongly revealing case rests on a new principle: each observed comparison of two actions serves both to estimate losses and to steer play, and the loss reduction from steering pays for the variance of the estimates. For every strongly revealing graph, distributing the comparisons among observing actions keeps this variance, and hence the regret, polylogarithmic in the number of actions, by an argument similar to the greedy construction of logarithmic dominating sets in tournaments.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

A Minimax Analysis of the Last Iterate of the SubGradient Method in Finite Dimension

We study the last iterate of the projected subGradient Method with a constant stepsize for convex $L$-Lipschitz objectives in $\mathbb{R}^d$, minimized over closed convex sets. Assuming that the initial iterate $x_1$ has distance at most $R$ from a minimizer, we establish matching upper and lower bounds on the minimax optimization error at $x_n$, where the infimum is taken over constant stepsizes. Specifically, this error is of order $L\cdot R\cdot\sqrt{\min\{d,\log n\}/n}$. Notably, when the dimension is fixed, the minimax error decays as $1/\sqrt{n}$, without the extra logarithmic factor intrinsic to dimension-free analyses. Our analysis exploits a combinatorial argument based on linear algebra and novel geometric constructions.

math.OC↗
arXiv2026

An Efficient Minimax-Optimal Algorithm for Adversarial $m$-Set Bandits

We study adversarial combinatorial bandits with $m$-set actions, where at each round the learner selects $m$ out of $d$ items and observes only the aggregate loss of the selected items. The resulting action set contains $K=\binom{d}{m}$ elements and can therefore be exponentially large. We propose a computationally efficient algorithm that exploits this structure without explicitly enumerating the action set. Against adaptive non-anticipating adversaries, it guarantees, with probability at least $1-δ$, regret against the best action in hindsight of $R_T =O(\sqrt{dT\log(K/δ)}). $ This matches the high-probability regret bound of the finite-action EXP3 with Kiefer-Wolfowitz exploration algorithm of Zimmert and Lattimore, whose direct implementation may require exponential space. Our algorithm instead represents each sampling distribution with $d$ parameters and runs in polynomial time without enumerating the action set. This resolves an open problem posed by Maiti et al. We complement this upper bound with a matching high-probability lower bound. For all sufficiently small $δ$ and all sufficiently large horizons, every randomized algorithm admits an adaptive non-anticipating adversary for which, with probability at least $δ$, $R_T=Ω( \sqrt{dT\log(K/δ)}). $ Thus, the rate is minimax optimal up to universal constants in this regime. In particular, setting $m=1$ shows that the $\log K$ factor in the high-probability regret bound for ordinary $K$-armed bandits against adaptive non-anticipating adversaries is unavoidable. This strengthens the lower bound of Gerchinovitz and Lattimore, closing the remaining $\sqrt{\log K}$ gap between high-probability upper and lower regret bounds.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

From Fairness to Efficiency in Repeated Bilateral Trade

Recently, Bachoc et al. (2026) proposed an axiomatic approach to fairness for repeated bilateral trade. Their resulting objective is a H\''older mean of seller and buyer utilities with non-positive order $λ$, interpolating between Rawlsian fairness at $λ= -\infty$ and Nash fairness at $λ= 0$. Here we study this family of H\''older means in the complementary setting of orders $λ\in (0,1]$, which constitutes a tradeoff between fairness and efficiency, with the weight of efficiency increasing with $λ$, and where $λ=1$ yields the existing gain from trade criterion, focusing solely on efficiency. We obtain an axiomatic characterization of these H\''older means, relying on a Pigou-Dalton principle of transferring from rich to poor. From an online learning perspective, we show that, contrary to the case $λ\le 0$, the problem is unlearnable in full generality, even under seller's and buyer's valuation independence. We focus on seller's and buyer's valuations with distributions having bounded densities, in which case we obtain matching lower and upper bounds on the cumulative regret, of order $\widetildeΘ(T^{2/3})$ with respect to the time horizon $T$. The upper bounds rely on a reconstruction identity where the expected objective is written as a gain-from-trade term plus a two-dimensional integral involving the seller and buyer distribution and survival functions, and a kernel function. For $0 < λ< 1/2$, the strong singularity of the kernel is addressed by two main ingredients. First, we propose a new zooming algorithm that sequentially rejects or refines layers of the set of prices. Second, we propose a tailored decomposition of the two-dimensional integral, enabling us to truncate it with a controlled impact on the truncation error. For $1/2 \le λ\le 1$, the singularity of the kernel is mild enough, so that the existing scouting bandit algorithm, already proposed for the case $λ=1$, can be extended.

math.ST↗
arXiv2026

Sharp Normalized Covariance Bounds and Constant-Stretch Correlated Sampling on the Hypersimplex

We establish the normalized covariance bound conjectured by Anari et al. (2026, Conjecture 3) for fixed-rank external-field measures. Let $d\ge2$ and $m\in[d-1]$. For $w\in(0,+\infty)^d$, let $\mathsf S$ be an $m$-subset of $[d]$ with rank-$m$ external-field law $\mathbb P(\mathsf S=S)=\frac{\prod_{i\in S}w_i}{e_m(w)},S\subseteq[d],|S|=m,$ where $e_m(w):=\sum_{T\subseteq[d], |T|=m}\prod_{\ell\in T}w_\ell$ is the $m$th elementary symmetric polynomial in $w_1,\dots,w_d$. Let $X:=(X_1,\dots,X_d)^\top$ be its indicator vector, i.e., $X_i=\mathbb I\{i\in\mathsf S\},i\in\{1,\dots,d\}.$ Let $Σ:=\mathrm{Cov}(X)$, put $v_i:=Σ_{ii}$ for each $i\in[d]$, and define $v:=(v_1,\dots,v_d)^\top,D:=\mathrm{diag}(v),V:=\sum_{i=1}^dv_i.$ We prove $Σ\succeq D-\frac{vv^\top}{V}.$ This improves the coefficient $1/2$ in the first version of our work (Cesari and Colomboni, 2026, Corollary 1.3) to the optimal universal value $1$. As a first corollary, we improve the coefficient in the pseudoinverse bound of Bacchiocchi et al. (2026, Lemma 2) from $2$ to the optimal value $1$. Specializing this bound to coordinate differences gives an alternative proof of our effective-resistance theorem from the first version of our work (Cesari and Colomboni, 2026, Theorem 1.1). The framework of Anari et al. (2026, Theorem 1 and Corollary 2) also yields unconditional correlated-sampling guarantees with stretch $6$ on the hypersimplex and $12$ on its at-most variant. Unconditional constant-stretch guarantees were first established in the first version of our work (Cesari and Colomboni, 2026, Corollaries 1.4 and 1.5), with constants $16$ and $32$, which we improve here to $6$ and $12$. These improved constants strengthen the positive resolution, established in the first version of our work, of the constant-stretch question posed by Naor et al. (2026, Theorem 2 and Section 5).

math.PR↗
arXiv2026

No Extra Signals Needed: The Uniform Price of Explainable Information Design

In information design, an informed sender aims to influence a receiver's decision by committing to a signaling scheme. However, optimal signaling schemes often rely on randomization or assign the same signal to disconnected regions of the state space, making them difficult to interpret or communicate. Motivated by these limitations, we focus on explainable information design in the one-dimensional linear setting, where an explainable policy partitions the state space into at most $K$ consecutive intervals and deterministically sends a distinct signal for each interval. We study the price of explainability, defined as the worst-case ratio between the optimal value achieved by an explainable signaling scheme and that achieved by an unrestricted signaling scheme using the same number of signals. Under a uniform prior, Chen et al. [2026] established a tight $2/3$ guarantee when the explainable signaling scheme was allowed to use additional signals. They also showed that the same $2/3$ guarantee holds when both the explainable and unrestricted signaling schemes use at most $K$ signals, provided that utilities are binary-valued and $K \geq 4$, leaving the case of arbitrary bounded utilities open. We resolve this question completely. Under a uniform prior, the price of explainability is exactly $1/2$ for $K=2$ and exactly $2/3$ for every $K \geq 3$. For both regimes, we also show that the corresponding ratios are tight.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

New Bounds for the Last Iterate of the Stochastic subGradient Method

We study the last iterate of the stochastic subgradient method for one-dimensional convex Lipschitz objectives. For a fixed horizon $n$, we consider the standard fixed stepsizes $η=Θ(1/\sqrt n)$. We prove that, for such stepsize policies, under additive i.i.d. subgradient noise with uniformly bounded variance, the last iterate features an optimization error of order $1/\sqrt n$, thereby removing the extra $(\log n)$ factor present in existing generic bounds. On the other hand, we show that without the i.i.d. assumption, the optimization error can be of order $(\log n)/\sqrt n$. Thus, under the uniformly bounded variance assumption alone, the last iterate of SsGM is suboptimal even in dimension one, resolving negatively an open problem posed in Koren and Segal, COLT, 2020.

math.OC↗
arXiv2026

Repeated Bilateral Trade: The Quest for Fairness

We study repeated bilateral trade from a fairness perspective. At each round, a fresh seller-buyer pair arrives, and the platform posts a price before observing the traders' valuations. Trade occurs only if both agents accept the price. Rather than maximizing only the gain from trade, we consider platforms that seek balanced divisions of the generated surplus. We show that natural fairness desiderata lead to a one-parameter Rawls-to-Nash family of fair-gain objectives, obtained by aggregating the seller's and buyer's net gains through nonpositive Hölder means. Unlike the standard gain-from-trade objective and the Rawlsian fair-gain objective studied in prior work, our proposed objectives induce a new statistical structure in which expected rewards are recovered from threshold feedback through a two-dimensional singular-kernel integral identity. This leads to a nonstandard pure-exploration problem whose natural estimators are rectangular double sums with row-column dependence and singular weights. Assuming independent i.i.d. seller and buyer valuation sequences with arbitrary unknown marginals, we characterize the optimal learning rates for the whole Rawls-to-Nash family of fair-gain objectives, giving matching fixed-confidence sample-complexity and regret bounds up to polylogarithmic factors.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Optimal Gap-Dependent Regret for Private Stochastic Decision-Theoretic Online Learning

We study stochastic decision-theoretic online learning with full information and event-level pure differential privacy. A COLT open problem of Hu and Mehta asks to determine the optimal gap-dependent regret rate for stochastic decision-theoretic online learning under pure event-level differential privacy. For $K$ actions, losses in $[0,1]$, and a unique best action separated from the second-best action by gap $Δ_{\min}$, the known lower bound is of order $ \frac{\log K}{\min\{Δ_{\min},\varepsilon\}}, $ or equivalently, up to universal constants, of order \[ \frac{\log K}{Δ_{\min}}+\frac{\log K}{\varepsilon}. \] We give a horizon-free pure-DP algorithm and prove the explicit regret bound \[ \operatorname{Reg}_T \le 1000 \cdot \left(\frac{\log K}{Δ_{\min}}+\frac{\log K}{\varepsilon}\right) \] for every horizon $T$. The numerical constant is not optimized. The algorithm partitions time into blocks of exponentially increasing size, plays a single action throughout each block, and chooses the next action by an exponential mechanism applied to a data-independent random prefix of the previous block. The random prefix converts block regret into a sum, over all prefix lengths, of softmax selection errors. A single entropy-potential argument controls all privacy-dominated large-gap actions at cost $\log K/\varepsilon$.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

A Parametric Contextual Online Learning Theory of Brokerage

We study the role of contextual information in the online learning problem of brokerage between traders. In this sequential problem, at each time step, two traders arrive with secret valuations about an asset they wish to trade. The learner (a broker) suggests a trading (or brokerage) price based on contextual data about the asset and the market conditions. Then, the traders reveal their willingness to buy or sell based on whether their valuations are higher or lower than the brokerage price. A trade occurs if one of the two traders decides to buy and the other to sell, i.e., if the broker's proposed price falls between the smallest and the largest of their two valuations. We design algorithms for this problem and prove optimal theoretical regret guarantees under various standard assumptions.

q-fin.CP↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Pinsker Inequality for Bregman Divergences of Negative Tsallis Entropies

The Pinsker inequality lower bounds the Kullback--Leibler divergence $D_{\textrm{KL}}$ in terms of total variation and provides a canonical way to convert $D_{\textrm{KL}}$ control into $\lVert \cdot \rVert_1$-control. Motivated by applications to probabilistic prediction with Tsallis losses and online learning, we establish a generalized Pinsker inequality for the Bregman divergences $D_α$ generated by the negative $α$-Tsallis entropies -- also known as $β$-divergences. Specifically, for any $p$, $q$ in the relative interior of the probability simplex $Δ^K$, we prove the sharp bound \[ D_α(p\Vert q) \ge \frac{C_{α,K}}{2}\cdot \|p-q\|_1^2, \] and we determine the optimal constant $C_{α,K}$ explicitly for every choice of $(α,K)$.

cs.IT↗
arXiv2026

Online Budget Allocation with Censored Semi-Bandit Feedback

We study a stochastic budget-allocation problem over $K$ tasks. At each round $t$, the learner chooses an allocation $X_t \in Δ_K$. Task $k$ succeeds with probability $F_k(X_{t,k})$, where $F_1,\dots,F_K$ are nondecreasing budget-to-success curves, and upon success yields a random reward with unknown mean $μ_k$. The learner observes which tasks succeed, and observes a task's reward only upon success (censored semi-bandit feedback). This model captures, for instance, splitting payments across crowdsourcing workers or distributing bids across simultaneous auctions, and subsumes stochastic multi-armed bandits and semi-bandits. We design an optimism-based algorithm that operates under censored semi-bandit feedback. Our main result shows that in diminishing-returns regimes, the regret of this algorithm scales polylogarithmically with the horizon $T$ without any ad hoc tuning. For general nondecreasing curves, we prove that the same algorithm (with the same tuning) achieves a worst-case regret upper bound of $\tilde O(K\sqrt{T})$. Finally, we establish a matching worst-case regret lower bound of $Ω(K\sqrt{T})$ that holds even for full-feedback algorithms, highlighting the intrinsic hardness of our problem outside diminishing returns.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2025

Market Making without Regret

We consider a sequential decision-making setting where, at every round $t$, a market maker posts a bid price $B_t$ and an ask price $A_t$ to an incoming trader (the taker) with a private valuation for one unit of some asset. If the trader's valuation is lower than the bid price, or higher than the ask price, then a trade (sell or buy) occurs. If a trade happens at round $t$, then letting $M_t$ be the market price (observed only at the end of round $t$), the maker's utility is $M_t - B_t$ if the maker bought the asset, and $A_t - M_t$ if they sold it. We characterize the maker's regret with respect to the best fixed choice of bid and ask pairs under a variety of assumptions (adversarial, i.i.d., and their variants) on the sequence of market prices and valuations. Our upper bound analysis unveils an intriguing connection relating market making to first-price auctions and dynamic pricing. Our main technical contribution is a lower bound for the i.i.d. case with Lipschitz distributions and independence between prices and valuations. The difficulty in the analysis stems from the unique structure of the reward and feedback functions, allowing an algorithm to acquire information by graduating the "cost of exploration" in an arbitrary way.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2025

A Tight Regret Analysis of Non-Parametric Repeated Contextual Brokerage

We study a contextual version of the repeated brokerage problem. In each interaction, two traders with private valuations for an item seek to buy or sell based on the learner's-a broker-proposed price, which is informed by some contextual information. The broker's goal is to maximize the traders' net utility-also known as the gain from trade-by minimizing regret compared to an oracle with perfect knowledge of traders' valuation distributions. We assume that traders' valuations are zero-mean perturbations of the unknown item's current market value-which can change arbitrarily from one interaction to the next-and that similar contexts will correspond to similar market prices. We analyze two feedback settings: full-feedback, where after each interaction the traders' valuations are revealed to the broker, and limited-feedback, where only transaction attempts are revealed. For both feedback types, we propose algorithms achieving tight regret bounds. We further strengthen our performance guarantees by providing a tight 1/2-approximation result showing that the oracle that knows the traders' valuation distributions achieves at least 1/2 of the gain from trade of the omniscient oracle that knows in advance the actual realized traders' valuations.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2024

Adaptive maximization of social welfare

We consider the problem of repeatedly choosing policies to maximize social welfare. Welfare is a weighted sum of private utility and public revenue. Earlier outcomes inform later policies. Utility is not observed, but indirectly inferred. Response functions are learned through experimentation. We derive a lower bound on regret, and a matching adversarial upper bound for a variant of the Exp3 algorithm. Cumulative regret grows at a rate of $T^{2/3}$. This implies that (i) welfare maximization is harder than the multi-armed bandit problem (with a rate of $T^{1/2}$ for finite policy sets), and (ii) our algorithm achieves the optimal rate. For the stochastic setting, if social welfare is concave, we can achieve a rate of $T^{1/2}$ (for continuous policy sets), using a dyadic search algorithm. We analyze an extension to nonlinear income taxation, and sketch an extension to commodity taxation. We compare our setting to monopoly pricing (which is easier), and price setting for bilateral trade (which is harder).

econ.EM↗
arXiv2024

Fair Online Bilateral Trade

In online bilateral trade, a platform posts prices to incoming pairs of buyers and sellers that have private valuations for a certain good. If the price is lower than the buyers' valuation and higher than the sellers' valuation, then a trade takes place. Previous work focused on the platform perspective, with the goal of setting prices maximizing the gain from trade (the sum of sellers' and buyers' utilities). Gain from trade is, however, potentially unfair to traders, as they may receive highly uneven shares of the total utility. In this work we enforce fairness by rewarding the platform with the fair gain from trade, defined as the minimum between sellers' and buyers' utilities. After showing that any no-regret learning algorithm designed to maximize the sum of the utilities may fail badly with fair gain from trade, we present our main contribution: a complete characterization of the regret regimes for fair gain from trade when, after each interaction, the platform only learns whether each trader accepted the current price. Specifically, we prove the following regret bounds: $Θ(\ln T)$ in the deterministic setting, $Ω(T)$ in the stochastic setting, and $\tildeΘ(T^{2/3})$ in the stochastic setting when sellers' and buyers' valuations are independent of each other. We conclude by providing tight regret bounds when, after each interaction, the platform is allowed to observe the true traders' valuations.

cs.GT↗