arXiv subjects

Robert Scholz

Publications and source records attributed to Robert Scholz.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Economic Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Microgrids with Generator Up and Downtime Constraints

Recently there has been a lot of progress in the development of economic nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) schemes for multistage optimal power flow (OPF) problems. However, the additional inclusion of discrete decision variables to model generator runtimes and generator startup costs can amount to large scale mixed-integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs) that are computationally very challenging. This work investigates the practical approach that replaces the nonlinear AC power flow equations by convex quadratic approximations. In combination with the discrete generator dynamics this leads to a mixed-integer quadratically constrained program (MIQCP) which is of significantly lower complexity and can be solved in reasonable time by off-the-shelf solvers such as CPLEX. We further show that simple terminal constraints are not sufficient to guarantee recursive feasibility of the NMPC scheme if constraints on generator runtime and on the number of generator startup events are present. To address this challenge we propose the use of additional time-coupled constraints and prove the resulting recursive feasibility property. Based on the assumption of periodic dissipativity of the underlying system we can prove stability of the proposed controller. To illustrate our results, we present simulations of a realistic 6-bus microgrid under different demand scenarios.

math.OC↗

arXiv2026

Medmarks: A Comprehensive Open-Source LLM Benchmark Suite for Medical Tasks

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) for medical applications remains challenging due to benchmark saturation, limited data accessibility, and insufficient coverage of relevant tasks. Existing suites have either saturated, heavily depend on restricted datasets, or lack comprehensive model coverage. We introduce Medmarks, a fully open-source evaluation suite with 30 benchmarks spanning question answering, information extraction, medical calculations, and open-ended clinical reasoning. We perform a systematic evaluation of 61 models across 71 configurations using verifiable metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge. Our results show that frontier reasoning models (Gemini 3 Pro Preview, GPT-5.1, & GPT-5.2) achieve the highest performance across both benchmarks, most frontier proprietary models are significantly more token efficient than open-weight alternatives, medically fine-tuned models outperform their generalist counterparts, and that models are susceptible to answer-order bias (particularly smaller models and Grok 4). A subset of our evals (Medmarks-T) can be directly used as reinforcement learning environments to post-train LLMs for medical reasoning. Code is available at https://github.com/MedARC-AI/Medmarks

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

When AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark Saturation

Artificial intelligence benchmarks are an important mechanism to measure model progress and guide deployment decisions. However, benchmarks quickly "saturate", making it difficult to differentiate models and diminishing their long-term value. In this study, we define benchmark saturation and analyze it across 60 language model benchmarks using 14 properties that relate to saturation. We find that nearly half of our benchmarks exhibit saturation, with rates increasing with age. Further, we find that resilience to saturation is impacted by expert-curation, not by public test data. Our results suggest that design choices can extend benchmark longevity and inform more durable evaluation approaches.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Who Evaluates AI's Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluations

Foundation models are increasingly central to high-stakes AI systems, and governance frameworks now depend on evaluations to assess their risks and capabilities. Although general capability evaluations are widespread, social impact assessments covering bias, fairness, privacy, environmental costs, and labor remain uneven. To characterize this landscape, we conduct the first comprehensive analysis of social impact evaluation reporting, examining 186 first-party release reports and 248 third-party evaluation sources, supplemented by developer interviews. We find a stark division of labor: first-party reporting is sparse, often superficial, and declining in areas like environmental impact and bias, while third-party evaluators provide broader, more rigorous coverage of bias, harmful content, and performance disparities. However, only developers can authoritatively report on data provenance, content moderation labor, costs, and infrastructure, yet interviews reveal these disclosures are deprioritized unless tied to product adoption or compliance. Current practices leave major gaps in assessing societal impacts, underscoring the need for policies that mandate developer transparency, strengthen independent evaluation ecosystems, and create shared infrastructure for aggregating third-party evaluations.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

Stacked Regression using Off-the-shelf, Stimulus-tuned and Fine-tuned Neural Networks for Predicting fMRI Brain Responses to Movies (Algonauts 2025 Report)

We present our submission to the Algonauts 2025 Challenge, where the goal is to predict fMRI brain responses to movie stimuli. Our approach integrates multimodal representations from large language models, video encoders, audio models, and vision-language models, combining both off-the-shelf and fine-tuned variants. To improve performance, we enhanced textual inputs with detailed transcripts and summaries, and we explored stimulus-tuning and fine-tuning strategies for language and vision models. Predictions from individual models were combined using stacked regression, yielding solid results. Our submission, under the team name Seinfeld, ranked 10th. We make all code and resources publicly available, contributing to ongoing efforts in developing multimodal encoding models for brain activity.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2025

Evaluating the Clinical Safety of LLMs in Response to High-Risk Mental Health Disclosures

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly mediate emotionally sensitive conversations, especially in mental health contexts, their ability to recognize and respond to high-risk situations becomes a matter of public safety. This study evaluates the responses of six popular LLMs (Claude, Gemini, Deepseek, ChatGPT, Grok 3, and LLAMA) to user prompts simulating crisis-level mental health disclosures. Drawing on a coding framework developed by licensed clinicians, five safety-oriented behaviors were assessed: explicit risk acknowledgment, empathy, encouragement to seek help, provision of specific resources, and invitation to continue the conversation. Claude outperformed all others in global assessment, while Grok 3, ChatGPT, and LLAMA underperformed across multiple domains. Notably, most models exhibited empathy, but few consistently provided practical support or sustained engagement. These findings suggest that while LLMs show potential for emotionally attuned communication, none currently meet satisfactory clinical standards for crisis response. Ongoing development and targeted fine-tuning are essential to ensure ethical deployment of AI in mental health settings.

cs.CY↗