arXiv subjects

Rida Laraki

Publications and source records attributed to Rida Laraki.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Constant regret in general games via higher-order optimism

We introduce an uncoupled learning algorithm which, when employed by all players of an arbitrary $N$-player normal form game with up to $K$ actions per player, guarantees $O(N^3\log^2 K)$ individual regret, uniformly over the horizon of play. The proposed algorithm - which we call higher-order optimism with discounting (HOOD) is a variant of optimistic follow-the-regularized-leader (OptFTRL) that combines a discounted $(N+1)$-th order predictor with entropic regularization over a suitable "lifting" of the game's strategy space. This combination of ingredients is purposefully designed to dampen large oscillations of the induced sequence of play in a controlled manner, removing in this way a key stumbling block of previous attempts to achieve constant regret in general games. Our approach bears several striking similarities to the concurrent - and completely independent - work of Liu, Farina, and Ozdaglar (arXiv:2608.31166), who very recently derived an $O(N^{21}\log^{4} K)$ regret bound through the use of higher-order optimism and an exponential moving average estimator.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

What preferences can - and cannot - predict in multi-agent online learning

We examine the interplay between ordinal, preference-based solution concepts in games and the long-run behavior of game dynamics, asking in particular to what extent the combinatorial data of a game -- its preference graph -- determine the outcomes of no-regret learning dynamics -- such as follow-the-regularized-leader (FTRL). In one direction, we show that the skeleton of every dynamically stable set (i.e. the set of pure profiles it contains) must also be preferentially stable, that is, it must be closed under profitable deviations. We then ask the converse question: when do preferences determine the long-run behavior of the players' learning dynamics? We begin by showing that preferences characterize asymptotic stability in the case of subgames -- i.e. subsets of pure profiles obtained by restricting players' action sets. Beyond this case however, the equivalence between dynamic and preferential stability collapses: concretely, we construct a three-player game with a preferentially stable set whose span is dynamically unstable, showing in this way that preferences do not suffice as a criterion of dynamic stability. We then bridge this gap via the notion of resilience under aggregate deviations, an easy-to-check payoff-based condition that guarantees asymptotic stability of arbitrary spans of pure strategies.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Threshold Dynamics and Correlated Prophet Inequalities

Prophet inequalities have become a central tool for analyzing the performance of online algorithms. However, most existing results assume that input random variables are independent, which limits their applicability. Motivated by this gap, we study prophet inequalities under two correlation models induced by a latent state of the world variable $Z$. In the common-base model, the algorithm observes the sequence $Z+X_1,\dots,Z+X_n$. We analyze single-threshold algorithms with the constraint that they always accept the final item, guaranteeing a reward of at least $Z$. When $Z$ is chosen adversarially, we characterize the optimal deterministic algorithm of this form, achieving a competitive ratio of $0.381$. We then show that randomizing improves the guarantee to $0.4$. By a minimax argument, the same ratio is achievable when $Z$ is random. We depart from standard techniques by establishing a stronger lower bound of $0.41$ and an upper bound of $0.475$, ruling out the possibility that this class of algorithms attains the $1/2$ ratio known for independent inputs. The core technical contribution is a new analytical framework that captures the reward dynamics of single-threshold algorithms. We introduce a differential equation characterizing the expected reward of a threshold in the worst-case instance, parameterized by the distribution of the maximum. This equation admits a closed-form and unifies known single-threshold prophet inequalities, yielding a simple threshold-optimality condition applicable to the common-base model. Finally, we study the common-scale model, where inputs take the form $Z\cdot X_1,\dots,Z\cdot X_n$. We show that this minimal multiplicative correlation yields strong impossibility results: no algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio exceeding $1/n$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

A Unified Framework for Weighted Hypergraphic Networks and Fractional Matching

Network formation theory studies how agents create and maintain relationships, and the stability of those relationships with respect to individual incentives. A central stability concept in this literature is pairwise stability, introduced by Jackson and Wolinsky (1996) for unweighted networks (agents are either connected or not) and later extended by Bich and Morhaim (2020) to weighted networks (connections can have different intensities). In this paper, we pursue two main objectives. First, we extend the notion of stability to networks defined on hypergraphs, where relationships may involve more than two agents simultaneously and where agents face budget constraints on the sum of the intensity of all their connections. We introduce a stability concept that preserves the core intuition of pairwise stability while generalizing it to relationships involving more than two agents, and that accounts for budget constraints. Second, we propose a stronger notion that we call full stability, inspired by stability concepts from matching theory, in which agents are allowed to adjust multiple connections simultaneously rather than through single-link deviations. We give existence results for both stability notions under various assumptions, as well as explicit solutions or algorithms, and provide counter-examples for most cases that do not satisfy those assumptions, establishing an almost complete theory. Our framework provides a unified approach to constrained network formation in hypergraphic settings and builds a conceptual bridge between the theories of weighted network formation and fractional matching.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Selling Privacy in Blockchain Transactions

We study methods to enhance statistical privacy in blockchain transactions. We analyze economic mechanisms for privacy-aware transaction owners whose utility depends not only on the outcome of the mechanism but also negatively on the exposure of their economic preferences. First, we consider an order flow auction, where a user auctions off to specialized agents, called searchers, the right to execute her transaction while maintaining a degree of privacy. We examine how the degree of privacy affects the revenue of the auction and, broadly, the net utility of the privacy-aware user. In this new setting, we characterize the optimal auction, which is a sealed-bid auction. Subsequently, we analyze a variant of a Dutch auction in which the user gradually decreases the price and the degree of privacy until the transaction is sold. We compare the revenue of this auction to that of the optimal one as a function of the number of communication rounds. Then, we introduce a two-sided market - a privacy marketplace - with multiple users selling their transactions under their privacy preferences to multiple searchers. We propose a posted-price mechanism for the two-sided market that guarantees constant approximation of the optimal social welfare while maintaining incentive compatibility (from both sides of the market) and budget balance. This work builds on the emerging literature on privacy-preserving mechanism design, integrating statistical privacy guarantees into economic protocols to capture the impact of information leakage on blockchain users' utility.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

General Matching Games

Matching games is a one-to-one two sided market model introduced by Garrido-Lucero and Laraki, in which coupled agents' utilities are endogenously determined as the outcome of a strategic game. They refine the classical pairwise stability by requiring robustness to renegotiation and provide general conditions under which pairwise stable and renegotiation-proof outcomes exist as the limit of a deferred acceptance with competitions algorithm together with a renegotiation process. In this article, we extend their model to a general setting encompassing most of one-to-many matching markets and roommates models and specify two frameworks under which core stable and renegotiation-proof outcomes exist and can be efficiently computed.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

BAR Nash Equilibrium and Application to Blockchain Design

This paper presents a novel solution concept, called BAR Nash Equilibrium (BARNE) and apply it to analyse the Verifier's dilemma, a fundamental problem in blockchain. Our solution concept adapts the Nash equilibrium (NE) to accommodate interactions among Byzantine, altruistic and rational agents, which became known as the BAR setting in the literature. We prove the existence of BARNE in a large class of games and introduce two natural refinements, global and local stability. Using this equilibrium and its refinement, we analyse the free-rider problem in the context of byzantine consensus. We demonstrate that by incorporating fines and forced errors into a standard quorum-based blockchain protocol, we can effectively reestablish honest behavior as a globally stable BARNE.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

O'Neill's Theorem for Games

We present an analog of O'Neill's Theorem (Theorem 5.2 in [17]) for finite games, which reveals some of the structure of equilibria under payoff perturbations in finite games.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Grading and Ranking Large number of candidates

It is common that a jury must grade a set of candidates in a cardinal scale such as {1,2,3,4,5} or an ordinal scale such as {Great, Good, Average, Bad }. When the number of candidates is very large such as hotels (BOOKING), restaurants (GOOGLE), apartments (AIRBNB), drivers (UBER), or papers (EC), it is unreasonable to assume that each jury member will provide a separate grade for each candidate. Each jury member is more likely to abstain for some candidates, cast a blank vote, or be associated at random, or as a function of its expertise, with only a small subset of the candidates and is asked to grade each of those. Extending the classical theory, we study aggregation methods in which a voter will not be eligible to grade all the candidates, and the candidates are not eligible for the same sets of voters. Moreover, each candidate on which they are eligible, the voter will have the choice between: a blank vote, grade the candidate, or abstain. Assuming single-peaked preferences over the grades, we axiomatically characterise a broad class of strategy-proof grading mechanisms satisfying axioms such as unanimity, anonymity, neutrality, participation or consistency. Finally, when a strict ranking is necessary (to distinguish let say between two borderline papers in a conference), some tie-breaking rules, extending the leximin and majority judgment, are defined and are shown to be equivalent to some strategy-proof grading functions on a richer space of outcome. Our paper will propose new rules, called phantom-proxy mechanisms, to aggregate the votes in the examples above or others, which differ from the usual average mark, that are easily manipulable. Moreover, the phantom-proxy are able to reduce the injustices caused by some candidates juries too generous or severe.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Smooth Fictitious Play in Stochastic Games with Perturbed Payoffs and Unknown Transitions

Recent extensions to dynamic games of the well-known fictitious play learning procedure in static games were proved to globally converge to stationary Nash equilibria in two important classes of dynamic games (zero-sum and identical-interest discounted stochastic games). However, those decentralized algorithms need the players to know exactly the model (the transition probabilities and their payoffs at every stage). To overcome these strong assumptions, our paper introduces regularizations of the systems in (Leslie 2020; Baudin 2022) to construct a family of new decentralized learning algorithms which are model-free (players don't know the transitions and their payoffs are perturbed at every stage). Our procedures can be seen as extensions to stochastic games of the classical smooth fictitious play learning procedures in static games (where the players best responses are regularized, thanks to a smooth strictly concave perturbation of their payoff functions). We prove the convergence of our family of procedures to stationary regularized Nash equilibria in zero-sum and identical-interest discounted stochastic games. The proof uses the continuous smooth best-response dynamics counterparts, and stochastic approximation methods. When there is only one player, our problem is an instance of Reinforcement Learning and our procedures are proved to globally converge to the optimal stationary policy of the regularized MDP. In that sense, they can be seen as an alternative to the well known Q-learning procedure.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

An $\alpha$-No-Regret Algorithm For Graphical Bilinear Bandits

We propose the first regret-based approach to the Graphical Bilinear Bandits problem, where $n$ agents in a graph play a stochastic bilinear bandit game with each of their neighbors. This setting reveals a combinatorial NP-hard problem that prevents the use of any existing regret-based algorithm in the (bi-)linear bandit literature. In this paper, we fill this gap and present the first regret-based algorithm for graphical bilinear bandits using the principle of optimism in the face of uncertainty. Theoretical analysis of this new method yields an upper bound of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ on the $\alpha$-regret and evidences the impact of the graph structure on the rate of convergence. Finally, we show through various experiments the validity of our approach.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

Best-Response Dynamics and Fictitious Play in Identical-Interest and Zero-Sum Stochastic Games

This paper combines ideas from Q-learning and fictitious play to define three reinforcement learning procedures which converge to the set of stationary mixed Nash equilibria in identical interest discounted stochastic games. First, we analyse three continuous-time systems that generalize the best-response dynamics defined by Leslie et al. for zero-sum discounted stochastic games. Under some assumptions depending on the system, the dynamics are shown to converge to the set of stationary equilibria in identical interest discounted stochastic games. Then, we introduce three analog discrete-time procedures in the spirit of Sayin et al. and demonstrate their convergence to the set of stationary equilibria using our results in continuous time together with stochastic approximation techniques. Some numerical experiments complement our theoretical findings.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Level-strategyproof Belief Aggregation Mechanisms

In the problem of aggregating experts' probabilistic predictions over an ordered set of outcomes, we introduce the axiom of level-strategy\-proofness (level-SP) and prove that it is a natural notion with several applications. Moreover, it is a robust concept as it implies incentive compatibility in a rich domain of single-peakedness over the space of cumulative distribution functions (CDFs). This contrasts with the literature which assumes single-peaked preferences over the space of probability distributions. Our main results are: (1) a reduction of our problem to the aggregation of CDFs; (2) the axiomatic characterization of level-SP probability aggregation functions with and without the addition of other axioms; (3) impossibility results which provide bounds for our characterization; (4) the axiomatic characterization of two new and practical level-SP methods: the proportional-cumulative method and the middlemost-cumulative method; and (5) the application of proportional-cumulative to extend approval voting, majority rule, and majority judgment methods to situations where voters/experts are uncertain about how to grade the candidates/alternatives to be ranked.\footnote{We are grateful to Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Roger Cooke, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Herv\'e Moulin, Clemens Puppe and some anonymous EC2021 referees for their helpful comments and suggestions.} \keywords{Probability Aggregation Functions \and ordered Set of Alternatives \and Level Strategy-Proofness \and Proportional-Cumulative \and Middlemost-Cumulative}

econ.TH↗

arXiv2021

Polytime Algorithms for One-to-Many Matching Games

Matching games is a novel matching model introduced by Garrido-Lucero and Laraki, in which agents' utilities are endogenously determined as the outcome of a strategic game they play simultaneously with the matching process. Matching games encompass most one-to-one matching market models and reinforce the classical notion of pairwise stability by analyzing their robustness to unilateral deviations within games. In this article, we extend the model to the one-to-many setting, where hospitals can be matched to multiple doctors, and their utility is given by the sum of their game outcomes. We adapt the deferred acceptance with competitions algorithm and the renegotiation process to this new framework and prove that both are polynomial whenever couples play bi-matrix games in mixed strategies.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Learning in nonatomic games, Part I: Finite action spaces and population games

We examine the long-run behavior of a wide range of dynamics for learning in nonatomic games, in both discrete and continuous time. The class of dynamics under consideration includes fictitious play and its regularized variants, the best-reply dynamics (again, possibly regularized), as well as the dynamics of dual averaging / "follow the regularized leader" (which themselves include as special cases the replicator dynamics and Friedman's projection dynamics). Our analysis concerns both the actual trajectory of play and its time-average, and we cover potential and monotone games, as well as games with an evolutionarily stable state (global or otherwise). We focus exclusively on games with finite action spaces; nonatomic games with continuous action spaces are treated in detail in Part II of this paper.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

New Characterizations of Strategy-Proofness under Single-Peakedness

We provide novel simple representations of strategy-proof voting rules when voters have uni-dimensional single-peaked preferences (as well as multi-dimensional separable preferences). The analysis recovers, links and unifies existing results in the literature such as Moulin's classic characterization in terms of phantom voters and Barber\`a, Gul and Stacchetti's in terms of winning coalitions ("generalized median voter schemes"). First, we compare the computational properties of the various representations and show that the grading curve representation is superior in terms of computational complexity. Moreover, the new approach allows us to obtain new characterizations when strategy-proofness is combined with other desirable properties such as anonymity, responsiveness, ordinality, participation, consistency, or proportionality. In the anonymous case, two methods are single out: the -- well know -- ordinal median and the -- most recent -- linear median.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

Best Arm Identification in Graphical Bilinear Bandits

We introduce a new graphical bilinear bandit problem where a learner (or a \emph{central entity}) allocates arms to the nodes of a graph and observes for each edge a noisy bilinear reward representing the interaction between the two end nodes. We study the best arm identification problem in which the learner wants to find the graph allocation maximizing the sum of the bilinear rewards. By efficiently exploiting the geometry of this bandit problem, we propose a \emph{decentralized} allocation strategy based on random sampling with theoretical guarantees. In particular, we characterize the influence of the graph structure (e.g. star, complete or circle) on the convergence rate and propose empirical experiments that confirm this dependency.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Stable Matching Games

Gale and Shapley introduced a matching problem between two sets of agents where each agent on one side has an exogenous preference ordering over the agents on the other side. They defined a matching as stable if no unmatched pair can both improve their utility by forming a new pair. They proved, algorithmically, the existence of a stable matching. Shapley and Shubik, Demange and Gale, and many others extended the model by allowing monetary transfers. We offer a further extension by assuming that matched couples obtain their payoff endogenously as the outcome of a strategic game they have to play in a usual non-cooperative sense (without commitment) or in a semi-cooperative way (with commitment, as the outcome of a bilateral binding contract in which each player is responsible for her part of the contract). Depending on whether the players can commit or not, we define in each case a solution concept that combines Gale-Shapley pairwise stability with a (generalized) Nash equilibrium stability. In each case we give necessary and sufficient conditions for the set of solutions to be non-empty and provide an algorithm to compute a solution.

cs.GT↗