arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Reinaldo Inácio

Publications and source records attributed to Reinaldo Inácio.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

NaFeP: first pairing prediction for an unmade 111 iron phosphide, and the pnictogen-height rule inside one compound

Companion to arXiv:2609.10614, which built a physics judge that classifies the gap symmetry of a superconductor candidate from its structure and showed that generation in the wire families re-finds the known canon. Here the judge is applied end to end to the single compound that survived its own screen. From 58 iron-pnictide compositions in the electronic window of BaFe$_2$As$_2$ absent from the Materials Project, a zero-cost literature-and-stability screen leaves one with no bulk synthesis and no band-structure, magnetic or pairing calculation: NaFeP (111-type, P4/nmm, Fe$^{2+}$ d$^6$, arsenic-free). The judge, refined with an explicit Stoner gate and a frame-independent symmetry reader, returns a paramagnetic DFT ground state and an s$\pm$ gap: a clean sign reversal between the hole cylinders at Gamma and the electron sheets at the zone corner, at nesting vector (1/2,1/2,1/2), in every basis and cell tried. Whether the gap is nodeless is where the instrument is tested. The phosphorus height (1.16 Å) lies below the empirical threshold of about 1.33 Åseparating nodal from nodeless pnictides, so the structural rule calls NaFeP nodal. The sealed verdict on a metal-only basis said nodeless; a d+p basis that passes the same gates puts the inner hole cylinder at the node threshold (min|g|/max|g| = 0.07-0.10), and a scan of the phosphorus height reproduces, inside one compound, the ingredients of the height rule: a third hole pocket, a switch of the nesting vector to (1/2,1/2,0), a monotonic approach to the Stoner instability, and near-degeneracy of s$\pm$ and d channels beyond 1.33 Å. The prediction we stand behind is the d+p reading: an s$\pm$ superconductor with a near-nodal inner hole sheet, on the LiFeP side of the rule, with the disagreement between bases reported, not resolved by choice. No Tc is asserted; the discriminating measurement, nodal or nodeless, is stated in advance.

cond-mat.supr-con

Generating is not discovering: a pre-registered physics judge for AI-proposed superconductors, calibrated on six known superconductors and one negative control

Generative models now propose millions of "stable" crystal structures, and their own referees have shown that stability is not discovery; no public benchmark asks whether a candidate has the physics to do a job. For superconductors the job is twofold: to pair, with a definite gap symmetry, and to become wire. We present a physics judge that answers both from a structure alone (DFT+U, a gated Wannier model, the full rank-4 RPA susceptibility on a $24^3$ mesh, the linearized gap equation, an irreducible-representation classifier, a manufacturability funnel) and measure what it says about what generators propose. With answer keys pre-registered before computing, the judge was calibrated on six known superconductors (Nb, Nb$_3$Sn, MgB$_2$, BaFe$_2$As$_2$, La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$, YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$), recovering the expected class in all six after two dated corrections. On the ruthenium analogue of the iron pnictide, with two runs and their criterion pre-registered the day before, it returns a null verdict at the same physical interaction where iron gives s$\pm$ ($λ_1 \le 0.0007$ versus 0.096; critical U 4.17 versus 0.97 eV); the pre-registered equal-alpha run fails the letter of the criterion, and we declare the resolution in favour of absolute U as post-hoc. The funnel reproduces the industrial map with thresholds fixed before running. Three generation audits follow: a descriptor sweep over 150 Materials Project metals re-finds the canon; 1,248 MatterGen structures yield 0 candidates that are new, stable and carry a pairing motif; mechanism filters over 47,893 compounds, validated by a blind hold-out, re-derive the community's analogies: geometry plus d-count is necessary but not sufficient. Generation re-finds what is known; judgment is the bottleneck. We propose a public benchmark over the eleven lists of AI-proposed superconductor candidates, none of which classifies gap symmetry.

cond-mat.supr-con