arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Rafał Łabędzki

Publications and source records attributed to Rafał Łabędzki.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Self-Supervised Pretraining of Molecular Graph Encoders with LeJEPA

Self-supervised pretraining has transformed language and vision, but its value for molecular graph neural networks remains contested. We ask whether pretraining on a large unlabelled corpus improves molecular property prediction. We adapt LeJEPA, a predictor-free joint-embedding predictive architecture regularised by Sketched Isotropic Gaussian Regularisation (SIGReg), to molecular graphs, evaluating GPS and Chemprop-style D-MPNN encoders on the Wong et al. [1] antibiotic-activity dataset and ogbg-molhiv using a multi-seed, bootstrap-based protocol. Pretraining improves learned representations but does not robustly improve finetuning. A frozen probe on pretrained embeddings exceeds random initialisation on both tasks (ogbg-molhiv ROC-AUC 0.788 vs 0.665; +0.123), reaching the published self-supervised band, but this does not translate into finetuning gains. On the antibiotic scaffold split, a canonical partition is significant (delta AUPRC +0.041, p = 0.010), but the effect vanishes across five partitions (pooled +0.013, p = 0.095). Finetuning is null on the random split, ogbg-molhiv, and D-MPNN. The representational edge is nevertheless recoverable. Embeddings saturate at ~16-32 effective dimensions, whereas Morgan fingerprints improve to 1024 bits. At matched dimensionality, fingerprints lead validation (0.799 vs 0.782 at 128 dimensions) but trail shifted test scaffolds (0.759 vs 0.788). Truncating embeddings and combining them with a 1024-bit Morgan fingerprint raises ogbg-molhiv ROC-AUC from 0.805 to 0.832 (delta +0.027; 95% CI [+0.003, +0.054]; p = 0.014); an untrained encoder gains nothing (delta -0.003). Thus, pretraining supplies complementary information best realised through feature-level combination, while finetuning gains are weak and partition-dependent.

q-bio.QM↗

Business Utility of Large Language Models as Exploratory Data Analysis Agents

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in analytical workflows, but their suitability as exploratory data analysis (EDA) agents in business settings remains uncertain. In practice, a deployable EDA agent must provide not only useful average performance but also sufficient repeatability to support trust in its outputs. We evaluate this requirement in a controlled, business-relevant benchmark built on an agent-based supply chain simulation. The task is to identify supplier-product combinations responsible for low quality and downstream sales loss by reasoning from indirect operational traces rather than from explicit labels. Fifteen model-variant configurations from eight model families were evaluated under four experimental conditions that varied data representation, prompt clarity, and signal strength, with five trajectories per condition. Outputs were scored against deterministic ground truth using the Jaccard index and assessed through a framework that combines mean score (ms), coefficient of variation (CV), exploratory cross-condition significance tests, and Business utility, a risk-adjusted metric that we propose to summarise quality and repeatability in a single operational measure. The results show that most configurations are not reliable enough for autonomous EDA use, even when their average scores appear acceptable. GPT-5.4 with extra-high reasoning effort achieved the strongest overall profile, with an experiment-averaged ms of 0.8748 and an experiment-averaged Business utility of 0.6952, while the next-best configurations lost substantially more utility after variability discounting. Our findings suggest that evaluation of EDA agents should treat average quality, repeatability, and condition sensitivity as complementary dimensions of operational trustworthiness.

cs.CY↗