arXiv subjects

Qijia He

Publications and source records attributed to Qijia He.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

What Does Multi-Harness RL Learn? Credit Assignment and Portability in Coding Agents

Agent reinforcement learning (RL) increasingly runs through full execution harnesses, and a multi-harness recipe mixes two choices: exposing the policy to several harnesses, and comparing their rewards inside one relative-advantage group. We isolate the second choice in repository-level coding. From one Qwen3-8B supervised warm start we replay the same frozen task-harness records from Aider, OpenHands, Qwen Code, and SWE-agent, with the same number of updates, under two rules for group-relative policy optimization (GRPO), Within (one group per task-harness pair) and Cross (harnesses pooled within a task), and score every checkpoint with a sealed SWE-bench Verified oracle on four source harnesses and a minimal harness held out of training. The evaluation harness is the dominant variable: across 24,000 sealed evaluations it moves the mean solve rate from 2.14\% to 9.27\%, a factor of 4.3, where the training recipe moves it by 1.16. The grouping rule is not. On the held-out harness, Cross minus Within is +0.25 pp, 95\% confidence interval [-0.48, +1.02], at eight attempts per task, and +0.16 [-0.41, +0.72] pooled over three training seeds whose individual estimates change sign. Each rule's own seed range, 0.42 to 0.45 pp, exceeds the difference between them. Both rules place their largest gains on the same source harness. The pooled advantage carries the harness: an out-of-fold classifier recovers the generating harness from Cross's advantage +4.48 pp above the shuffled-label baseline and from Within's not at all, and the two rules still reach the same held-out score and action distribution inside each harness. Re-collecting half the training data on-policy does not change this. Cross-harness credit yields configuration adaptation and no more portable capability than within-harness credit. Multi-harness RL reports should state the grouping boundary and test under an unseen harness.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

CodeRescue: Budget-Calibrated Recovery Routing for Coding Agents

Coding agents increasingly operate in executable environments where a failed attempt produces actionable feedback rather than merely an incorrect answer. Existing cost-aware systems typically treat such failures as cascade decisions: try a cheap model first, then escalate hard cases to a stronger and more expensive model. In coding, however, execution feedback can also make further cheap-model recovery worthwhile, raising a budgeted deployment question: when should an agent spend more cheap compute, and when should it escalate? We formulate this post-failure decision as recovery routing over heterogeneous actions and train a supervised router from execution rollouts. To make the same router usable under changing budgets, we add a Conformal Risk Control (CRC) layer that selects a deployment-time cost penalty without retraining and provides marginal expected-cost control under exchangeability. Across held-out failures from five coding benchmarks, cheap recovery and escalation exhibit complementary success patterns. The calibrated frontier improves over fixed actions, prompt-only routers, and a binary cascade baseline; in the main GPT-5.4-nano/GPT-5.4 setting, one CRC-calibrated frontier point exceeds always-escalate solve rate while using 35% of its mean recovery cost. Code is available at https://github.com/Qijia-He/agent-budget-control.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

PACT: Privileged Trace Co-Training for Multi-Turn Tool-Use Agents

Multi-turn tool-use agents must reason, call tools, and adapt to observations across several interaction turns. Post-training such agents is challenging, as reinforcement learning often suffers from sparse rewards and weak credit assignment despite matching the prompt-only inference setting, while supervised fine-tuning on expert traces provides dense process supervision but can over-constrain the model to fixed trajectories. To tackle this, we propose PACT, a Privileged trAce Co-Training framework for multi-turn tool-use agents. The key idea is to use expert traces only as training-time optimization signals rather than rollout-time hints. PACT keeps rollout generation prompt-only, then uses expert traces to guide optimization through two complementary signals: a trace-conditioned RL surrogate that evaluates prompt-only rollouts under expert-trace context, and a component-aware SFT loss that supervises reasoning prefixes and tool-calls with annealed strength. To reduce over-reliance on the training-only trace context, PACT further introduces a prompt-only anchoring. We also provide a latent-trace view that connects the two trace-based objectives and explains how expert traces can guide optimization without being used during rollout generation. Experiments on FTRL, BFCL, and ToolHop show that PACT consistently improves over strong SFT- and RL-based baselines, highlighting the value of privileged trace co-training for multi-turn tool-use learning.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Dealing with positivity violations in mediation analysis via weighted controlled effects, with application to assessing immune correlates of protection in antigen-experienced participants

Causal mediation analysis has become an important and increasingly used framework for evaluating candidate immune response biomarkers in vaccine research. A controlled effects approach has been proposed to estimate controlled risk curves under a counterfactual scenario in which the entire study population is vaccinated and their post-vaccination immune responses are set to a range of fixed levels. This framework performs well when the study population is antigenically na\"ive, that is, individuals have not been previously exposed to the antigen, as is common in HIV-1 vaccine research and during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the controlled effects framework becomes more challenging to apply in antigen-experienced populations, where prior vaccination or infection has occurred, as in the case of influenza, dengue, and more recent phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. In such settings, a key identification assumption for valid causal mediation analysis, the positivity assumption, is violated: it is no longer plausible to conceive of a hypothetical intervention that sets a post-vaccination immune marker to a fixed level below an individual's baseline immune level. In this article, we introduce a weighted controlled risk approach that targets a subpopulation for whom there is a prespecified probability of attaining a post-vaccination immune marker level. We further generalize this framework to study contrasts of controlled risks for relevant subpopulations. We demonstrate the validity of the proposed estimators through simulation studies and apply the method to reanalyze post-vaccination neutralizing antibody titers against Omicron BA.4/BA.5 as an immune correlate of COVID-19 in the Coronavirus Variant Immunologic Landscape (COVAIL) trial. R code to implement the proposed method can be found on Github: https://github.com/Qijia-He/weighted_CVE.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

VFIG: Vectorizing Complex Figures in SVG with Vision-Language Models

Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) are essential for technical illustration and digital design, offering resolution independence and semantic editability. In practice, original vector files are frequently lost, leaving only rasterized versions (e.g., PNG, JPEG) that resist modification, while manual reconstruction is prohibitively expensive. Progress on automating raster-to-SVG conversion has been bottlenecked by two gaps: existing SVG datasets are dominated by icons and decorative graphics that lack the complexity of professional diagrams, and existing benchmarks rely on pixel- or embedding-level similarity that fails to capture structural correctness (e.g., broken connectivity, misplaced arrows). We close both gaps with paired contributions targeting diagram-centric figures (e.g., model architectures, flowcharts, schematics). For training, we introduce VFIG-Data, the largest figure-to-SVG dataset of its kind at 66K pairs, combining real paper figures converted via a describe-and-generate pipeline with programmatic diagrams that supply noise-free supervision over arrow styles, fonts, and geometry. For evaluation, we introduce VFIG-Bench, a structure-aware evaluation suite, paired with VFIG-Bench-OOD, an out-of-distribution set of figures manually curated from highly cited arXiv papers. Beyond pixel and embedding similarity, our protocol reports rubric-based VLM-Judge scores and Elo ratings from pairwise human preference evaluation. Built on these contributions, VFIG is a VLM family trained with a simple-to-complex SFT curriculum followed by RL with rendering-aware rewards. VFIG achieves state-of-the-art open-source performance, outperforming the best open-source VLM baseline by over 30%, and matches Claude Sonnet 4.6 on VFIG-BENCH: Gemini-Judge 78.2% vs. 76.7% and GPT-Judge 87.5% vs. 87.4%. It remains slightly behind the strongest proprietary models GPT-5.2 and Gemini-3.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Rethinking Human Preference Evaluation of LLM Rationales

Large language models (LLMs) often generate natural language rationales -- free-form explanations that help improve performance on complex reasoning tasks and enhance interpretability for human users. However, evaluating these rationales remains challenging. While recent work has relied on binary preference judgments from humans or LLM judges, such evaluations are often opaque and coarse-grained, offering limited insight into what makes one rationale better than another. In this work, we rethink preference evaluation for LLM-generated rationales by asking: (1) What attributes define good rationales? (2) Can human preferences be explained by these attributes? (3) Can attribute-based evaluation overcome the limitations of binary comparisons? We identify a set of key rationale attributes from prior literature and assess them using automatic metrics, LLM judgments, and human annotations. We then analyze two standard human preference datasets MT Bench and Chatbot Arena using SHAP to identify which attributes best explain human preference outcomes. Finally, we re-evaluate model-generated rationales using attribute-specific ELO scores, revealing more nuanced model comparisons and insights. Our findings suggest that fine-grained attribute evaluations can better characterize rationale quality and guide future research toward more interpretable and reliable evaluation practices.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2023

Generalizing the intention-to-treat effect of an active control against placebo from historical placebo-controlled trials to an active-controlled trial: A case study of the efficacy of daily oral TDF/FTC in the HPTN 084 study

In many clinical settings, an active-controlled trial design (e.g., a non-inferiority or superiority design) is often used to compare an experimental medicine to an active control (e.g., an FDA-approved, standard therapy). One prominent example is a recent phase 3 efficacy trial, HIV Prevention Trials Network Study 084 (HPTN 084), comparing long-acting cabotegravir, a new HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) agent, to the FDA-approved daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) in a population of heterosexual women in 7 African countries. One key complication of interpreting study results in an active-controlled trial like HPTN 084 is that the placebo arm is not present and the efficacy of the active control (and hence the experimental drug) compared to the placebo can only be inferred by leveraging other data sources. \bz{In this article, we study statistical inference for the intention-to-treat (ITT) effect of the active control using relevant historical placebo-controlled trials data under the potential outcomes (PO) framework}. We highlight the role of adherence and unmeasured confounding, discuss in detail identification assumptions and two modes of inference (point versus partial identification), propose estimators under identification assumptions permitting point identification, and lay out sensitivity analyses needed to relax identification assumptions. We applied our framework to estimating the intention-to-treat effect of daily oral TDF/FTC versus placebo in HPTN 084 using data from an earlier Phase 3, placebo-controlled trial of daily oral TDF/FTC (Partners PrEP).

stat.ME↗

arXiv2022

NCAGC: A Neighborhood Contrast Framework for Attributed Graph Clustering

Attributed graph clustering is one of the most fundamental tasks among graph learning field, the goal of which is to group nodes with similar representations into the same cluster without human annotations. Recent studies based on graph contrastive learning method have achieved remarkable results when exploit graph-structured data. However, most existing methods 1) do not directly address the clustering task, since the representation learning and clustering process are separated; 2) depend too much on data augmentation, which greatly limits the capability of contrastive learning; 3) ignore the contrastive message for clustering tasks, which adversely degenerate the clustering results. In this paper, we propose a Neighborhood Contrast Framework for Attributed Graph Clustering, namely NCAGC, seeking for conquering the aforementioned limitations. Specifically, by leveraging the Neighborhood Contrast Module, the representation of neighbor nodes will be 'push closer' and become clustering-oriented with the neighborhood contrast loss. Moreover, a Contrastive Self-Expression Module is built by minimizing the node representation before and after the self-expression layer to constraint the learning of self-expression matrix. All the modules of NCAGC are optimized in a unified framework, so the learned node representation contains clustering-oriented messages. Extensive experimental results on four attributed graph datasets demonstrate the promising performance of NCAGC compared with 16 state-of-the-art clustering methods. The code is available at https://github.com/wangtong627/NCAGC.

cs.CV↗