arXiv subjects

Qihang Yan

Publications and source records attributed to Qihang Yan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

MCIQA-2K: A Multi-Dimensional Dataset and No-Reference Quality Assessment Benchmark for Colorized Images

Image colorization is an inherently ill-posed task, since a single grayscale image may correspond to multiple plausible colorized results. Consequently, conventional full-reference image quality assessment (IQA) metrics fail to accurately reflect human perceptual preferences for colorized images. In this paper, we present MCIQA-2K, a large-scale multi-dimensional benchmark specifically designed for no-reference quality assessment of colorized images. We construct a dataset containing 2,000 colorized images generated by five representative colorization models, together with human annotations across three perceptual dimensions: color smearing, semantic color misalignment, and global naturalness. Building upon the proposed benchmark, we further introduce MCIQA, a dedicated multi-branch NR-IQA framework for colorized images. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MCIQA significantly outperforms existing full-reference and no-reference IQA methods on the proposed benchmark, while also exhibiting competitive generalization capability on several widely-used IQA datasets. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/ARBEZ-ZEBRA/MCIQA.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Towards Characterizing Scientific Image Utility and Upgradability

Scientific images function as critical evidence in research communication, yet their integrity faces unprecedented threats from AI-generated content that introduces subtle but consequential errors. Existing evaluation paradigms prove inadequate: perceptual quality metrics poorly correlate with scientific validity, while language models lack domain-specific verification capabilities. To address this gap, we propose the \textbf{S}cientific \textbf{I}mage \textbf{U}tility and \textbf{U}pgradability \textbf{A}ssessment (\textbf{SIU$^2$A}) framework, which introduces two complementary dimensions for scientific image evaluation. \textbf{Utility} encompasses \textit{error detection} (identifying scientific inaccuracies) and \textit{correction feasibility} (assessing whether errors can be reliably repaired). \textbf{Upgradability} measures the quality of correction. We categorize scientific image corruption into four fundamental types: Detail Distortion, Incompleteness, False Content, and Entity Confusion. Based on this taxonomy, we construct SIU$^2$A-Benchmark, a dataset with expert annotations for error identification and repair. The framework implements a two-stage evaluation protocol: the \textit{Utility} stage evaluates error detection capability and repair instruction generation, while the \textit{Upgradability} stage assesses whether corrections faithfully restore scientific validity without compromising existing accurate information. Experiments reveal that current multimodal systems exhibit significant limitations in both scientific error assessment and faithful correction, exposing a fundamental gap between visual perception and scientific usability.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

RACE-Align: Retrieval-Augmented and Chain-of-Thought Enhanced Preference Alignment for Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with accuracy, domain-specific reasoning, and interpretability in vertical domains. Traditional preference alignment methods like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) often overlook the underlying knowledge sources and reasoning logic. This paper introduces RACE-Align (Retrieval-Augmented and Chain-of-Thought Enhanced Alignment), a novel framework designed to address these limitations. RACE-Align systematically constructs a binary preference dataset incorporating external knowledge support and explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, then aligns LLMs using the DPO algorithm. The core innovation lies in its preference data construction strategy: it integrates AI-driven retrieval for factual grounding, enhancing knowledgeability and accuracy, and emphasizes the optimization of domain-specific CoT, treating the reasoning process itself as a key preference dimension. A multi-stage, AI-driven refinement pipeline cost-effectively generates these preference pairs. Experimental validation in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) using Qwen3-1.7B as the base model demonstrates that RACE-Align significantly outperforms the original base model and a model fine-tuned only with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT). Improvements were observed across multiple dimensions, including answer accuracy, information richness, application of TCM thinking patterns, logicality and depth of reasoning, and interpretability. These findings suggest RACE-Align offers an effective pathway to enhance LLMs' knowledge application, reasoning reliability, and process transparency in complex vertical domains.

cs.CL↗