arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Prosper Kaggwa

Publications and source records attributed to Prosper Kaggwa.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

On mixed $b$-concatenations of Fibonacci and Lucas numbers that are Lucas numbers

Let $(F_n)_{n\ge0}$ and $(L_n)_{n\ge0}$ denote the sequences of Fibonacci and Lucas numbers respectively. This paper determines all Lucas numbers that can be represented as base $b$ mixed concatenations of a Fibonacci number and a Lucas number. Mathematically, we study of two Diophantine equations $L_n=b^dL_m+F_k$ and $L_n=b^dF_m+L_k$, where $d$ is the number of digits of $F_k$ or $L_k$ in base $b$. To tackle these equations, we combine tools from Diophantine approximation on non-zero linear forms in logarithms and reduction methods based on continued fractions. This allows us to prove that only finitely many such Lucas numbers exist.

math.NT↗
arXiv2025

On concatenations of two $k$-generalized Lucas numbers

For an integer \( k \geq 2 \), the sequence of \( k \)-generalized Lucas numbers is defined by the recurrence relation \( L_n^{(k)} = L_{n-1}^{(k)} + \cdots + L_{n-k}^{(k)} \) for all \( n \geq 2 \), with initial conditions \( L_0^{(k)} = 2 \), \( L_1^{(k)} = 1 \) for all \( k \geq 2 \), and \( L_{2-k}^{(k)} = \cdots = L_{-1}^{(k)} = 0 \) for \( k \geq 3 \). In this paper, we determine all \( k \)-generalized Lucas numbers that are concatenations of two terms of the same sequence and completely solve this problem for \( k \geq 3 \). Our approach combines nonzero lower bounds for linear forms in logarithms, reduction techniques based on the Baker--Davenport method and the LLL-algorithm, together with continued fraction analysis and computational verification using SageMath.

math.NT↗
arXiv2025

On Palindromic forms in the $k$-Lucas sequence composed of two distinct Repdigits

For integers $k \geq 2$, the $k$-generalized Lucas sequence $\{L_n^{(k)}\}_{n \geq 2-k}$ is defined by the recurrence relation \[ L_n^{(k)} = L_{n-1}^{(k)} + \cdots + L_{n-k}^{(k)} \quad \text{for } n \geq 2, \] with initial terms given by $L_0^{(k)} = 2$, $L_1^{(k)} = 1$, and $L_{2-k}^{(k)} = \cdots = L_{-1}^{(k)} = 0$. In this paper, we extend work in \cite{Lucas} and show that the result in \cite{Lucas} still holds for $k\ge 3$, that is, we show that for $k\ge 3$, there is no $k$-generalized Lucas number appearing as a palindrome formed by concatenating two distinct repdigits.

math.GM↗