arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Priyanka Siddappa

Publications and source records attributed to Priyanka Siddappa.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

CheXFuse: Guided Differential Joint Attention Fusion for Robust Multimodal Chest X-Ray Classification in Data-Scarce Medical Settings

A central challenge in multimodal learning is how to fuse modalities that differ substantially in predictive strength. When one modality provides a much stronger representation than another, indiscriminate cross-modal interaction can introduce weak, redundant, or unstable signals, limiting or even degrading performance relative to the strongest unimodal representation. To address this problem, we propose CheXFuse, a multimodal fusion framework based on Guided Differential Joint Attention (GuDJA). CheXFuse combines image and text token representations within a joint multimodal sequence, where learned token guidance emphasizes informative representations and differential attention reduces less useful attention responses. We evaluate CheXFuse on the Indiana University (IU) Chest X-ray dataset, using binary (normal vs. abnormal) classification as the downstream task. Experiments are conducted under both original-report and masked-report settings, with the latter serving as a controlled stress test under reduced textual informativeness. CheXFuse with GuDJA achieves the strongest mean overall performance across the evaluated baselines and ablations, reaching 95.73% accuracy, 95.79% F1-score, 96.54% recall, and 95.28% sensitivity at 95% specificity (Sens@95Spec) with original reports, and 95.58%, 95.60%, 95.60%, and 94.34%, respectively, under masked reports. These results suggest that GuDJA provides a promising fusion strategy under asymmetric or partially reduced modality informativeness.

cs.CV↗

Alert-List Concordance for Evaluating Imputation Strategies in ICU Sepsis Prediction

Preprocessing is an under-measured reliability risk in clinical prediction: a model can keep a similar AUROC and still change who receives an alert. Imputation quality is commonly evaluated using reconstruction error or aggregate discrimination, neither of which directly measures agreement on which patients are flagged. At a matched alert rate, pipelines with similar aggregate performance can produce different patient lists. This question is especially relevant under the frequent, structured missingness of real ICU records. We therefore introduce alert-list concordance, which asks whether two pipelines identify the same high-risk patients, measured by the Jaccard similarity of their top-k% alert sets with patient-level bootstrap confidence intervals. On PhysioNet/CinC 2019 (40,336 patients, 71.9% missingness), we compare nine imputation strategies and a native-missingness baseline using a fixed XGBoost configuration, fitted and Platt-calibrated separately for each strategy. After Bonferroni correction, 22 of the 28 reconstruction-method pairs showed no statistically significant difference in patient-level AUROC, yet their alert lists overlap at Jaccard 0.518 to 0.750. Similar aggregate discrimination can therefore accompany different patient selections. ForwardFill is a separate outlier, pairing higher discrimination with the lowest overlap in the matrix, 0.40 to 0.45. The broad pattern holds within each hospital system and under six patient-level aggregation rules. At the row level, eight of ten methods fall within an AUROC range of 0.011. In this row-level pipeline, deep imputers did not outperform mean imputation on discrimination, and the sequential implementations cost 5 to 12 times mean imputation in total pipeline wall-clock time on our hardware.

cs.LG↗