arXiv subjects

Pratishtha Shukla

Publications and source records attributed to Pratishtha Shukla.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Dynamic Operational Reserve Margin Assessment from Risk-Constrained Unit Commitment States

We propose Dynamic Reserve Margin (DRM) as a time-varying operational adequacy metric derived from risk-constrained unit commitment (RCUC) states. DRM quantifies reserve adequacy using the additional generation capacity that committed generators can provide within a 5-minute response window relative to uncertainty and contingency reserve requirements. We introduce a complementary Reserve Risk Envelope (RRE) metric to quantify operational reserve headroom in directly interpretable MW terms. A low-margin duration metric is further developed to quantify the persistence of reserve stress over an operating horizon. We use an IEEE 14-bus example to illustrate these concepts, followed by large-scale RCUC case studies under multiple operating scenarios. Results demonstrate that reserve requirements and ramp-accessible reserve capability can vary substantially across operating conditions, and that commitment decisions adapt to maintain reserve adequacy under changing system conditions. The proposed DRM and RRE metrics provide an interpretable operational characterization of reserve adequacy, reveal reserve accessibility and stress persistence that are not captured by conventional reserve margin metrics.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2026

Finite-Sample Limits of Entropy-Based Structure Identification in Discretized Nonlinear Systems

Discretization fundamentally limits structure identification in stochastic systems. When system stochasticity exceeds the discretization resolution, entropy-based methods lose their ability to distinguish which input drives the output. We study this in Fuzzy Inductive Reasoning (FIR), a nonparametric framework for learning dynamical systems from discretized measurements, where the choice of input variables determines both predictive accuracy and the interpretability of the learned input--output relationships. Entropy-based selection targets explainability, i.e., identifying which variables causally drive the output, while mean-squared-error-based selection targets prediction. We introduce a resolution-stochasticity ratio that governs when entropy-based selection is reliable. Three results follow. First, entropy-based selection is consistent below this threshold but loses discriminative power above it, regardless of sample size. Second, using the entropy-selected variables for prediction instead of the MSE-selected ones incurs a closed-form excess prediction risk that grows with input complexity and shrinks with sample size. Third, reliable identification of the causally relevant inputs requires data that scales with the number of input combinations and inversely with the strength of the entropy signal. The theory is validated on a two-state Markov model and demonstrated on a distribution grid reliability dataset analyzing the impact of infrastructure investment, where the goal is to explain which investments drive reliability improvements rather than merely predict outcomes.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2022

Robust and Scalable Game-theoretic Security Investment Methods for Voltage Stability of Power Systems

We develop investment approaches to secure electric power systems against load attacks where a malicious intruder (the attacker) covertly changes reactive power setpoints of loads to push the grid towards voltage instability while the system operator (the defender) employs reactive power compensation (RPC) to prevent instability. Extending our previously reported Stackelberg game formulation for this problem, we develop a robust-defense sequential algorithm and a novel genetic algorithm that provides scalability to large-scale power system models. The proposed methods are validated using IEEE prototype power system models with time-varying load uncertainties, demonstrating that reliable and robust defense is feasible unless the operator's RPC investment resources are severely limited relative to the attacker's resources.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2021

A Robust Stackelberg Game for Cyber-Security Investment in Networked Control Systems

We present a resource-planning game for cyber-security of networked control systems (NCS). The NCS is assumed to be operating in closed-loop using a linear state-feedback $\mathcal{H}_2$ controller. A zero-sum, two-player Stackelberg game (SG) is developed between an attacker and a defender for this NCS. The attacker aims to disable communication of selected nodes and thereby render the feedback gain matrix to be sparse, leading to degradation of closed-loop performance, while the defender aims to prevent this loss by investing in the protection of targeted nodes. Both players trade their $\mathcal{H}_2$-performance objectives for the costs of their actions. The standard backward induction method is modified to determine a cost-based Stackelberg equilibrium (CBSE) that saves the players' costs without degrading the control performance. We analyze the dependency of a CBSE on the relative budgets of the players as well as on the node "importance" order. Moreover, a robust-defense method is developed for the realistic case when the defender is not informed about the attacker's resources. The proposed algorithms are validated using examples from wide-area control of electric power systems. It is demonstrated that reliable and robust defense is feasible unless the defender's resources are severely limited relative to the attacker's resources. We also show that the proposed methods are robust to time-varying model uncertainties and thus are suitable for long-term security investment in realistic NCSs. Finally, we employ computationally efficient genetic algorithms (GA) to compute the optimal strategies of the attacker and the defender in realistic large power systems.

math.OC↗

arXiv2018

A Cyber-Security Investment Game for Networked Control Systems

We formulate a resource-planning game between an attacker and a defender of a network control system. We consider the network to be operating in closed-loop with a linear quadratic regulator (LQR). We construct a general-sum, two-player, mixed strategy game, where the attacker attempts to destroy communication equipment of some nodes, and thereby render the LQR feedback gain matrix to be sparse, leading to degradation of closed-loop performance. The defender, on the other hand, aims to prevent this loss. Both players trade their control performance objectives for the cost of their actions. A Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibrium (MSNE) of the game represents the allocation of the players' respective resources for attacking or protecting the network nodes. We analyze the dependence of a MSNE on the relative budgets of the players as well as on the important network nodes that must be preserved to achieve a desirable LQR performance. MSNE is computed using nonlinear programming. Results are validated using the New England power system model, and it is shown that reliable defense is feasible unless the cost of attack is very low or much smaller than the cost of protection per generator.

eess.SY↗