arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Pramod Viswanath

Publications and source records attributed to Pramod Viswanath.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Argus: Orchestrating Cross-Layer GPU Performance Measurements around Semantic Regions

GPU developers and automated optimizers need performance evidence for semantic code regions--such as neural-network operator implementations and pipeline stages--but this evidence is fragmented across profiling tools. Answering a region-level question can require manually constructing probes and program variants, isolating interfering measurements, and mapping evidence to regions and execution contexts. We present Argus, a region-centric measurement planner and runtime that automates this workflow. Clients identify regions with boundary markers and select signals and execution scopes. Argus preserves region identity across compilation, execution, and measurement variants, constructs interference-aware multi-run plans, and orchestrates transformations and profiling across backends. It joins compiler-, hardware-, and system-level evidence using region identity and dynamic execution context, producing reports that record measurement origins and attribution ambiguity. We evaluate Argus across agentic kernel optimization, persistent megakernel optimization, and cross-level PGO. Across 44 persistent-GEMM and attention configurations, Argus improves 39/44 cases and raises AlphaEvolve's geometric-mean speedup from 5.4% to 8.9%. On a persistent TinyLlama-1.1B decode megakernel, an optimization agent reaches 1.65 ms/token with Argus versus 4.92 ms/token without it, producing a kernel $2.1\times$ faster than PyTorch with CUDA Graphs. Finally, Argus-guided cross-level PGO improves compute--communication overlap, increasing throughput by 7% on average across five multi-GPU settings.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

APMM: Automated Parlay Market Maker

Parlays - joint contracts on the simultaneous resolution of several events - are among the most heavily traded products in betting markets, but prediction markets have struggled to offer them natively. In this paper, we offer the full combinatorial family of parlays on top of $M$ binary events, as liquid markets, bounding the market maker loss for subsidizing the markets to $O(M^2)$. Any single parlay attracts few traders, so each is an inherently thin market, and the logarithmic market scoring rule (LMSR) is the natural mechanism for thin markets. But running a separate LMSR for each of the exponentially many parlays forces the market maker to pay for the same information many times over. We show that a market maker which automatically propagates information across related parlays avoids this redundancy. We make three contributions. First, we introduce the automated parlay market maker (APMM), which uses a \emph{hierarchical parameterization}: the state of each low-leg parlay is shared into every higher-leg parlay that contains it, so after pricing one, the new information propagates. Second, we show that when informed trading is concentrated in parlays with few legs, the market maker's worst-case loss is bounded by $O(M^2)$, and the expected loss is bounded by $O(M)$. Third, we validate these bounds in simulation and on historical Kalshi order flow, confirming that real belief updates are dominated by low-leg changes and that APMM's advantage persists under real trading patterns.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Crypto x AI, AI x Crypto: A Survey

The intersection of crypto x AI is spawning papers, products, online posts, and companies. All the surrounding buzz, though, obscures what exactly has been done, what the opportunities and challenges are, and what open questions deserve attention. This survey paper asks what AI can do for blockchain-based technologies (broadly construed as "crypto") (crypto x AI), and vice versa (AI x crypto). We systematize existing work, summarize key takeaways, highlight open research questions, and offer a perspective on pervasive industry misconceptions, concluding that AI and crypto are still in the very early stages of meaningful integration.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

ParlayMarket: Automated Market Making for Parlay-style Joint Contracts

Prediction markets are powerful mechanisms for information aggregation, but existing designs are optimized for single-event contracts. Traders frequently express beliefs about joint outcomes - sports parlays, conditional forecasts, multi-scenario financial bets. Current platforms either prohibit such trades or rely on ad hoc mechanisms that ignore correlation structure, resulting in inefficient prices and fragmented liquidity. We introduce \textbf{\textit{ParlayMarket}}, an automated market-maker for parlay-style joint contracts. The mechanism maintains a shared pairwise exponential-family belief state, so all base and parlay prices are marginals of one coherent distribution. This compresses the $2^M$ outcome space into $O(M^2)$ sufficient statistics and allows one liquidity pool to support an exponentially large family. Our main result characterizes the resulting learning and loss dynamics. Under repeated trading, prices converge to the best pairwise approximation of the true joint distribution. The induced expected market-maker loss grows at most quadratically in the number of base events, rather than exponentially in the number of listed parlays; moreover, this quadratic dependence is worst-case optimal for dense pairwise dependence, since there are $O(M^2)$ independent correlation directions to learn. Parlay trades are essential to this guarantee: they provide direct constraints on joint outcomes and reduce steady-state error relative to learning from marginal trades alone. Experiments on synthetic correlated markets and historical Kalshi combo data confirm the predicted scaling and show that the mechanism remains effective in realistic market-making settings. Our results demonstrate that combinatorial expressiveness does not require combinatorial capital.

cs.CE↗
arXiv2026

Correct Answers from Sound Reasoning: Verifiable Process Supervision for Language Models

Training language models to produce both correct answers and sound reasoning remains an open challenge. Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards typically optimizes only final outcomes, which can improve task accuracy at the expense of reasoning quality, producing inaccurate, incomplete, or inconsistent traces. We propose verifiable process supervision (VPS), a post-training framework that jointly optimizes prediction accuracy and reasoning quality by supervising structured intermediate claims. We first apply supervised fine-tuning to induce a structured reasoning format, enabling deterministic extraction and verification of intermediate claims for process-level rewards. To address the heterogeneous difficulty of reasoning subtasks, we introduce adaptive weighting that prioritizes components with the largest remaining errors, creating an implicit curriculum. We evaluate VPS on chess as a controlled testbed where reasoning steps can be deterministically verified against engine signals. While outcome-only RL improves move accuracy, it sharply degrades reasoning quality, increasing win-rate error by up to 112% and reducing internal consistency by up to 69%. In contrast, VPS preserves accuracy while significantly improving reasoning quality, reducing win-rate error by up to 30% and restoring consistency to near saturation. A reasoning-space analysis further shows that, without a structured prior, outcome-only RL converges to budget-dependent shortcuts rather than sound multi-step reasoning. Beyond chess, we observe the same phenomenon on math reasoning, where outcome-only RL improves accuracy while degrading step-level arithmetic and consistency, whereas VPS maintains both. These results show that VPS enables language models to reason both accurately and reliably in verifiable domains.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Hallucinations on the Board: Tool-Augmented Evaluation of LLM Chess Commentary

Superhuman game engines in domains like chess have made expert-level evaluations easily accessible, yet they communicate what is true without the natural-language explanations that make such expertise educationally useful to experts and non-experts alike. Large language models could, in principle, bridge this gap, but they frequently hallucinate due to limited domain-specific knowledge, and standard reference-based or LLM-as-a-judge frameworks cannot reliably detect these errors. In this work, we present ACT-Eval, an evaluation framework that decomposes chess commentary into atomic claims and routes them to engine-supported tools and expert-annotated gold references to assess factual correctness, conceptual coverage, and move-quality judgment. We release a benchmark of 325 position--move pairs spanning pedagogical, tournament, and critical positions, including 125 positions with expert-verified gold atoms and a five-class error taxonomy. Evaluating leading proprietary and open-weight models, we find that factual hallucinations remain pervasive in chess commentary: GPT-5.4 without tools produces incorrect sub-claims 22.0% of the time, while smaller open-weight models exceed 40%. Although tool augmentation substantially improves factual correctness and move-quality assessment, coverage of expert strategic and tactical ideas remains limited across all models. Human calibration shows that ACT-Eval's factual judgments fall within the observed range of inter-human agreement, while its coverage scores correlate strongly with human assessments of strategic completeness.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

AhaBench: Do Agents Learn from Prior Experience? A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Continual Learning

Modern language agents are expected to operate over long horizons: they ask follow-up questions, reuse worked examples, handle tool feedback, and adapt to delayed consequences. Most evaluations still reset the agent after a prompt or score only the final state of one trajectory. AhaBench asks a more operational question: when a fixed model receives useful experience, does its later behavior improve under a related evaluation condition where the obvious support has been removed, changed, or delayed? The suite contains three components. Aha-Puzzle tests no-hint exploration after solved hidden-state puzzles; Aha-Euler turns Project-Euler-style mathematical ideas into generated taught/held-out tasks with exact validators; and Aha-Vending, an open-source implementation inspired by Vending-Bench, tests whether a simulated vending agent remains profitable while handling delayed feedback and operational incidents. AhaBench reports a three-part scorecard: Initial Score measures starting competence, Post-Experience Score measures the later empirical outcome, and Learning Lift is their difference. This decomposition is the main empirical message: models that use visible support well, models that reach high post-experience scores, and models that improve most during a run are not always the same. On the common eight-model panel, Claude Opus 4.6 leads aggregate Post-Experience Score at 64.3 and aggregate Learning Lift at +25.8, with Gemini 3.1 Pro close behind at 63.4. The component results explain the split: puzzle traces raise supported scores but often fail to become no-hint exploration behavior; Aha-Euler full teaching reaches 78.6-100.0% while answer-only transfer ranges from 0.0 to 73.9%; and Aha-Vending separates profitable incident handling from bankruptcy and no-order failure. We release benchmark tasks, rubrics, validators, simulator code, and interfaces for evaluating new agents.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

OVIG: Optimistic Verification of AI Training Integrity via Gradient Signals

The rapid growth of AI has increased the demand for domain-specific post-training, while the cost and specialization of accelerator infrastructure push many model owners to outsource this process. Outsourced training lowers operational barriers, but creates a training-integrity gap: the owner receives a checkpoint, logs, and aggregate metrics without direct evidence that the declared training trajectory was faithfully executed. An untrusted provider may have incentives to deviate from that trajectory, either to save computation or to introduce targeted security risks. Auditing such deviations is difficult because floating-point execution on heterogeneous accelerators introduces benign numerical drift, making it hard to distinguish honest replay differences from integrity violations. Existing verification methods either observe training at too coarse a granularity or impose costs and deployment constraints that are impractical at scale. We present OVIG, an optimistic verification framework that audits outsourced post-training using an empirical boundary on gradient differences calibrated from honest heterogeneous replays. OVIG checks opened intervals against this boundary and combines optimistic sampling with a stride parameter $s$, which partitions training into stride-aligned intervals and retains only interval-endpoint evidence. Across shortcut training attacks and targeted manipulation attacks, OVIG maintains $0\%$ ASR on language, vision, and diffusion workloads. On Qwen3, increasing the stride from $s=1$ to $s=2000$ reduces off-chain storage and evidence transmission by $1996\times$ while preserving $0\%$ ASR; at this setting, OVIG incurs only $1.143\times$ total system overhead relative to training without verification. These results show that OVIG provides a practical integrity layer for outsourced AI post-training under heterogeneous execution.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Context-Aware RL for Agentic and Multimodal LLMs

Large language models (LLMs) often fail when answering requires identifying a small but decisive piece of evidence within a long or complex context, such as a single line in a tool trace or a subtle detail in an image. We propose ContextRL, a context-aware reinforcement learning (RL) method that improves long-horizon reasoning and multimodal performance through an \emph{indirect} auxiliary objective. Instead of supervising only the final answer, ContextRL presents the model with a query, an answer, and two highly similar contexts, and rewards it for selecting the context that supports the query--answer pair, thereby encouraging fine-grained grounding. We construct contrastive context data in two domains: for coding agents, trajectories serve as contexts, yielding 1k pairs built via condition filtering; for multimodal reasoning, images serve as contexts, yielding 7K pairs built via generative editing and similarity search. ContextRL achieves average gains of +2.2% over standard GRPO on 5 long-horizon benchmarks, and +1.8% across 12 diverse visual question answering benchmarks. To disentangle the effect of the proposed objective from that of additional data, we compare against data-augmentation baselines that repurpose the same contrastive contexts as standard query--context--answer examples. These baselines provide little to no improvement, showing that the gains arise from the proposed context-selection objective rather than from the contrastive data alone.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

TAO: Tolerance-Aware Optimistic Verification for Floating-Point Neural Networks

Neural networks increasingly run on hardware outside the user's control (cloud GPUs, inference marketplaces). Yet ML-as-a-Service reveals little about what actually ran or whether returned outputs faithfully reflect the intended inputs. Users lack recourse against service downgrades (model swaps, quantization, graph rewrites, or discrepancies like altered ad embeddings). Verifying outputs is hard because floating-point(FP) execution on heterogeneous accelerators is inherently nondeterministic. Existing approaches are either impractical for real FP neural networks or reintroduce vendor trust. We present TAO: a Tolerance Aware Optimistic verification protocol that accepts outputs within principled operator-level acceptance regions rather than requiring bitwise equality. TAO combines two error models: (i) sound per-operator IEEE-754 worst-case bounds and (ii) tight empirical percentile profiles calibrated across hardware. Discrepancies trigger a Merkle-anchored, threshold-guided dispute game that recursively partitions the computation graph until one operator remains, where adjudication reduces to a lightweight theoretical-bound check or a small honest-majority vote against empirical thresholds. Unchallenged results finalize after a challenge window, without requiring trusted hardware or deterministic kernels. We implement TAO as a PyTorch-compatible runtime and a contract layer currently deployed on Ethereum Holesky testnet. The runtime instruments graphs, computes per-operator bounds, and runs unmodified vendor kernels in FP32 with negligible overhead (0.3% on Qwen3-8B). Across CNNs, Transformers and diffusion models on A100, H100, RTX6000, RTX4090, empirical thresholds are $10^2-10^3$ times tighter than theoretical bounds, and bound-aware adversarial attacks achieve 0% success. Together, TAO reconciles scalability with verifiability for real-world heterogeneous ML compute.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

MINDGAMES: A Live Arena for Evaluating Social and Strategic Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as interactive agents, yet their capacity for social and strategic reasoning over extended interaction remains poorly understood. Existing evaluations rely on static vignettes or single-game benchmarks that cannot capture the sustained, multi-faceted reasoning that real-world multi-agent settings demand. We introduce Mindgames, a multi-game arena and evaluation platform for LLM agents that operationalizes complementary reasoning demands relevant to ``theory of mind'': belief attribution under hidden information, opponent modeling through repeated strategic interaction, cooperative inference under knowledge asymmetries, and sustained deception in social deduction. Built on TextArena, Mindgames provides a unified interaction interface, TrueSkill-based rating, and full trajectory logging across four game environments. We instantiate Mindgames through a 2025 competition cycle hosted at a major AI conference, which assessed 944 submitted agents from 76 teams across four games: Colonel Blotto, Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, Codenames, and Secret Mafia. Our analysis surfaces both agent-level and evaluation-level limitations: brittle rule adherence remains a major bottleneck, top-performing systems repeatedly rely on explicit structural scaffolding, and leaderboard validity differs sharply across environments. In particular, failure-heavy environments can reward robustness to opponent errors as much as strategic ability, with Secret Mafia exhibiting a pronounced error-survival confound in this cycle. We release a dataset of 29,571 multi-agent games with turn-level observations, actions, and rewards, together with MG-Ref, a deterministic offline tournament protocol that scores new agents against a frozen reference pool of top-ranked, low-error Stage~II submissions under the same error-attribution lens used in this analysis.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Deep-OFDM: Neural Modulation for High Mobility

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) is the dominant waveform in modern wireless systems, but suffers performance degradation in high-mobility environments due to Doppler-induced inter-carrier interference and unreliable pilot-based channel estimation. Neural receivers have recently shown strong performance in OFDM systems by learning equalization and detection directly from the received time-frequency grid. However, when channel estimation becomes unreliable, receiver-side learning alone is insufficient to fully recover performance. In this work we introduce DeepOFDM, a learnable modulation framework that augments conventional OFDM with a lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) modulator jointly optimized with a neural receiver. Instead of mapping symbols independently to resource elements, DeepOFDM spreads information across local time-frequency neighborhoods while remaining fully compatible with FFT-based OFDM processing. The learned modulation breaks the rotational symmetry of conventional QAM constellations, enabling the receiver to infer residual phase directly from data symbols. This structure allows reliable operation with sparse pilots and even in fully pilotless settings. Extensive simulations demonstrate improvements in block error rate and goodput under high Doppler, while over-the-air experiments confirm practical feasibility. These results highlight the potential of transmitter-receiver co-design for robust and spectrally efficient AI-native physical layer design.

cs.IT↗
arXiv2026

MEMO: Memory-Augmented Model Context Optimization for Robust Multi-Turn Multi-Agent LLM Games

Multi-turn, multi-agent LLM game evaluations often exhibit substantial run-to-run variance. In long-horizon interactions, small early deviations compound across turns and are amplified by multi-agent coupling. This biases win rate estimates and makes rankings unreliable across repeated tournaments. Prompt choice worsens this further by producing different effective policies. We address both instability and underperformance with MEMO (Memory-augmented MOdel context optimization), a self-play framework that optimizes inference-time context by coupling retention and exploration. Retention maintains a persistent memory bank that stores structured insights from self-play trajectories and injects them as priors during later play. Exploration runs tournament-style prompt evolution with uncertainty-aware selection via TrueSkill, and uses prioritized replay to revisit rare and decisive states. Across five text-based games, MEMO raises mean win rate from 25.1% to 49.5% for GPT-4o-mini and from 20.9% to 44.3% for Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct, using $2,000$ self-play games per task. Run-to-run variance also drops, giving more stable rankings across prompt variations. These results suggest that multi-agent LLM game performance and robustness have substantial room for improvement through context optimization. MEMO achieves the largest gains in negotiation and imperfect-information games, while RL remains more effective in perfect-information settings. All code is open-source and available here: https://github.com/openverse-ai/MEMO

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

TabularMath: Evaluating Computational Extrapolation in Tabular Learning via Program-Verified Synthesis

Standard tabular benchmarks mainly focus on the evaluation of a model's capability to interpolate values inside a data manifold, where models good at performing local statistical smoothing are rewarded. However, there exists a very large category of high-value tabular data, including financial modeling and physical simulations, which are generated based upon deterministic computational processes, as opposed to stochastic and noisy relationships. Therefore, we investigate if tabular models can provide an extension from statistical interpolation to computational extrapolation. We propose TabularMath, a diagnostic benchmark of 114 deterministic problems (233,472 rows) generated from verified programs based on GSM8K and AIME. We evaluate 9 tabular architectures and in-context learning (ICL) with GPT-OSS-120B. On standard regression metrics, TabPFN v2.5 performs remarkably well, achieving R^2=0.998 in-distribution and maintaining positive R^2 even under distribution shift, which is unique among the tabular models we tested. When we measure rounded consistency (exact integer match), a different picture emerges: TabPFN v2.5 drops below 10% on out-of-distribution data, while ICL maintains around 40%. This gap between R^2 and exact-match accuracy suggests that tabular models learn smooth function approximations but struggle to recover precise computational outputs under extrapolation. The two paradigms appear complementary: TabPFN scales efficiently with data; ICL achieves exact computation from few examples. We release all code and data to support further investigation.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

VeRA: Verified Reasoning Data Augmentation at Scale

The main issue with most evaluation schemes today is their "static" nature: the same problems are reused repeatedly, allowing for memorization, format exploitation, and eventual saturation. To measure genuine AI progress, we need evaluation that is robust by construction, not by post-hoc detection. In response, we propose VeRA (Verified Reasoning Data Augmentation), a framework that converts benchmark problems into executable specifications, comprising (i) a natural language template with placeholder slots, (ii) a coherent generator that samples valid configurations, and (iii) a deterministic verifier that validates parameters and calculates the corresponding correct answers for each configuration. From a single seed problem, VeRA automatically creates unlimited verified variants with reliable labels at near-zero marginal cost without human involvement. VeRA operates in two complementary modes. VeRA-E (equivalent) rewrites problems while keeping the underlying logic intact, useful for detecting memorization versus genuine reasoning. VeRA-H (hardened) systematically increases complexity while remaining verifiable, enabling reliable creation and labelling of fresh difficult tasks at the boundary of intelligence. Evaluating 16 frontier models with VeRA, we find: (i) VeRA-E improves evaluation quality and reveals contamination patterns. (ii) VeRA-H enables human-free generation of hard tasks with reliable labels. (iii) VeRA establishes verified benchmarks as a general paradigm. VeRA reconceptualizes benchmarks from static objects used until exhausted, to executable specifications generating fresh, verified instances on demand, enhancing robustness and cost-effectiveness for evaluation. With VeRA, we envision that evaluation in any verifiable domain can scale indefinitely without sacrificing label integrity. To stimulate future research, we have open-sourced all code and datasets.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2025

FrontierCS: Evolving Challenges for Evolving Intelligence

We introduce FrontierCS, a benchmark of 156 open-ended problems across diverse areas of computer science, designed and reviewed by experts, including CS PhDs and top-tier competitive programming participants and problem setters. Unlike existing benchmarks that focus on tasks with known optimal solutions, FrontierCS targets problems where the optimal solution is unknown, but the quality of a solution can be objectively evaluated. Models solve these tasks by implementing executable programs rather than outputting a direct answer. FrontierCS includes algorithmic problems, which are often NP-hard variants of competitive programming problems with objective partial scoring, and research problems with the same property. For each problem we provide an expert reference solution and an automatic evaluator. Combining open-ended design, measurable progress, and expert curation, FrontierCS provides a benchmark at the frontier of computer-science difficulty. Empirically, we find that frontier reasoning models still lag far behind human experts on both the algorithmic and research tracks, that increasing reasoning budgets alone does not close this gap, and that models often over-optimize for generating merely workable code instead of discovering high-quality algorithms and system designs.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2025

MURMUR: Using cross-user chatter to break collaborative language agents in groups

Language agents are rapidly expanding from single-user assistants to multi-user collaborators in shared workspaces and groups. However, today's language models lack a mechanism for isolating user interactions and concurrent tasks, creating a new attack vector inherent to this new setting: cross-user poisoning (CUP). In a CUP attack, an adversary injects ordinary-looking messages that poison the persistent, shared state, which later triggers the agent to execute unintended, attacker-specified actions on behalf of benign users. We validate CUP on real systems, successfully attacking popular multi-user agents. To study the phenomenon systematically, we present MURMUR, a framework that composes single-user tasks into concurrent, group-based scenarios using an LLM to generate realistic, history-aware user interactions. We observe that CUP attacks succeed at high rates and their effects persist across multiple tasks, thus posing fundamental risks to multi-user LLM deployments. Finally, we introduce a first-step defense with task-based clustering to mitigate this new class of vulnerability

cs.CR↗
arXiv2025

SPIN-Bench: How Well Do LLMs Plan Strategically and Reason Socially?

Reasoning and strategic behavior in social interactions is a hallmark of intelligence. This form of reasoning is significantly more sophisticated than isolated planning or reasoning tasks in static settings (e.g., math problem solving). In this paper, we present Strategic Planning, Interaction, and Negotiation (SPIN-Bench), a new multi-domain evaluation designed to measure the intelligence of strategic planning and social reasoning. While many existing benchmarks focus on narrow planning or single-agent reasoning, SPIN-Bench combines classical PDDL tasks, competitive board games, cooperative card games, and multi-agent negotiation scenarios in one unified framework. The framework includes both a benchmark as well as an arena to simulate and evaluate the variety of social settings to test reasoning and strategic behavior of AI agents. We formulate the benchmark SPIN-Bench by systematically varying action spaces, state complexity, and the number of interacting agents to simulate a variety of social settings where success depends on not only methodical and step-wise decision making, but also conceptual inference of other (adversarial or cooperative) participants. Our experiments reveal that while contemporary LLMs handle basic fact retrieval and short-range planning reasonably well, they encounter significant performance bottlenecks in tasks requiring deep multi-hop reasoning over large state spaces and socially adept coordination under uncertainty. We envision SPIN-Bench as a catalyst for future research on robust multi-agent planning, social reasoning, and human--AI teaming. Project Website: https://spinbench.github.io/

cs.AI↗