Po Yang | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

DeMMO: Longitudinal and Cross-Disease Modelling of Digital Mobility Outcomes via Multi-Task Learning

Digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) derived from wearable sensors characterise mobility in daily life and offer a promising means of monitoring disease progression. However, existing DMO studies have typically focused on either a single disease or a single visit. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to define and study the practical problem of cross-disease longitudinal DMO modelling. We argue that this problem should satisfy at least two requirements. First, the temporal progression of DMOs should be modelled within each disease, as mobility-limiting diseases evolve over time. Second, multiple mobility-limiting diseases should be modelled jointly, as different diseases affect different aspects of human mobility. To address this problem, we propose DeMMO, an interpretable framework for longitudinal, multi-disease, and multi-outcome learning. Its central technical contribution is an interpretable cross-disease and cross-outcome relation-learning mechanism that infers signed relations directly from learned longitudinal DMO-outcome mappings, thereby enabling selective information sharing across cohorts without requiring paired participants. We evaluate DeMMO on the recently released, large-scale, multicentre Mobilise-D dataset, which presents a challenging modelling setting involving longitudinal observations, multiple clinical outcomes, and four participant-disjoint cohorts representing distinct mobility-limiting diseases. Compared with eight strong structural longitudinal and deep-regression baselines, DeMMO achieves the best overall predictive performance and outperforms the baselines for most individual outcomes. Stability selection further identifies reliable longitudinal DMO patterns that can inform subsequent clinical validation and disease monitoring. The implementation code is available at https://github.com/menghui-zhou/DeMMO.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Accurate prediction is not profitable advice: profit-based evaluation of machine learning nitrogen recommendations in winter wheat

Nitrogen rates for winter wheat are set before the season, under unknown prices and weather. The standard UK advice does not respond to prices, yet recent price swings moved the most profitable rate by tens of kilograms per hectare. Machine learning is often proposed as the fix. However, it is usually judged on prediction accuracy, and accurate prediction does not by itself make the recommended rate more profitable. Our insight is to score nitrogen advice directly by the profit it forgoes on measured yield response curves. We build a test bench on 892 such curves from two long running UK experiments, and sweep the nitrogen to grain price ratio to cover all price scenarios. On this bench, machine learning fails as a predictor. No model recovers the best rate within farm tolerance, and the benchmark noise shows none can. At normal prices, every model also loses to the standard advice on profit. The gain sits elsewhere. A simple correction step applied after the model cuts profit losses by a quarter, while better models and extra features give no gain. The same frozen correction cuts losses by 43% at the second site without any retraining. A hybrid of standard advice plus a damped correction removes bias and trims rare large losses. The same price sweep also prices emission cuts, at a cost comparable to current carbon prices. Machine learning therefore pays as a profit scored correction to standard advice, not as its replacement.

cs.LG↗