arXiv subjects

Philipp Ketz

Publications and source records attributed to Philipp Ketz.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Numerical Analysis of Test Optimality

In nonstandard testing environments, researchers often derive ad hoc tests with correct (asymptotic) size, but their optimality properties are typically unknown a priori and difficult to assess. This paper develops a numerical framework for determining whether an ad hoc test is effectively optimal - approximately maximizing a weighted average power criterion for some weights over the alternative and attaining a power envelope generated by a single weighted average power-maximizing test. Our approach uses nested optimization algorithms to approximate the weight function that makes an ad hoc test's weighted average power as close as possible to that of a true weighted average power-maximizing test, and we show the surprising result that the rejection probabilities corresponding to the latter form an approximate power envelope for the former. We provide convergence guarantees, discuss practical implementation and apply the method to the weak instrument-robust conditional likelihood ratio test and a recently-proposed test for when a nuisance parameter may be on or near its boundary.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2022

Allowing for weak identification when testing GARCH-X type models

In this paper, we use the results in Andrews and Cheng (2012), extended to allow for parameters to be near or at the boundary of the parameter space, to derive the asymptotic distributions of the two test statistics that are used in the two-step (testing) procedure proposed by Pedersen and Rahbek (2019). The latter aims at testing the null hypothesis that a GARCH-X type model, with exogenous covariates (X), reduces to a standard GARCH type model, while allowing the "GARCH parameter" to be unidentified. We then provide a characterization result for the asymptotic size of any test for testing this null hypothesis before numerically establishing a lower bound on the asymptotic size of the two-step procedure at the 5% nominal level. This lower bound exceeds the nominal level, revealing that the two-step procedure does not control asymptotic size. In a simulation study, we show that this finding is relevant for finite samples, in that the two-step procedure can suffer from overrejection in finite samples. We also propose a new test that, by construction, controls asymptotic size and is found to be more powerful than the two-step procedure when the "ARCH parameter" is "very small" (in which case the two-step procedure underrejects).

econ.EM↗

arXiv2021

Short and Simple Confidence Intervals when the Directions of Some Effects are Known

We provide adaptive confidence intervals on a parameter of interest in the presence of nuisance parameters when some of the nuisance parameters have known signs. The confidence intervals are adaptive in the sense that they tend to be short at and near the points where the nuisance parameters are equal to zero. We focus our results primarily on the practical problem of inference on a coefficient of interest in the linear regression model when it is unclear whether or not it is necessary to include a subset of control variables whose partial effects on the dependent variable have known directions (signs). Our confidence intervals are trivial to compute and can provide significant length reductions relative to standard confidence intervals in cases for which the control variables do not have large effects. At the same time, they entail minimal length increases at any parameter values. We prove that our confidence intervals are asymptotically valid uniformly over the parameter space and illustrate their length properties in an empirical application to a factorial design field experiment and a Monte Carlo study calibrated to the empirical application.

econ.EM↗