Personal Danger Signals Reprocessing: New Online Group Intervention for Chronic Pain
Background. Chronic pain affects roughly one in five adults, much of it chronic primary, or nociplastic, pain. Psychological therapy reaches few who need it, and remote programmes produce small, poorly maintained effects. Personal Danger Signals Reprocessing (PDSR) is an eight-week coached online group intervention built on predictive processing, acting at once on the danger prior, on the actions that confirm it, and on the precision assigned to bodily signals. Methods. Of 47 individuals screened with chronic non-cancerous, non-neuropathic pain, 39 women were randomized to PDSR (n = 19) or a waiting list (n = 20). Outcomes were collected at baseline, week 4 and week 8, and pain intensity again at six months in both arms, and analysed with linear mixed-effects models. Results. At week 8 the PDSR group reported lower pain intensity than the waiting list (d= -1.43, 95% CI [-2.10, -0.77]), lower pain interference (d= -1.78 [-2.45, -1.10]) and higher well-being (d = 1.55 [0.89, 2.22]), all p < .001. Catastrophizing , anxiety and insomnia were also lower at week 8; for depression the time-by-group interaction was not significant (p = .151). Fifteen of 19 PDSR participants (79%) achieved at least a 30% reduction in pain and 12 (63%) at least 50%, against 7 (35%) and 3 (15%) on the waiting list. The within-arm gain held at six months: more then 50% of the PDSR group demonstrated complete or near-complete recovery. In an exploratory mediation, catastrophizing at week 4 carried the effect on week-8 pain (indirect effect -1.63 [-2.72, -0.72]). Conclusions. PDSR produced large reductions in pain, interference and psychological comorbidity relative to a waiting list. The trial is small, single-sex, unblinded and waiting-list controlled, so expectancy cannot be separated from the proposed mechanism; an active-controlled trial is the next step.