arXiv subjects

Oscar H. Ibarra

Publications and source records attributed to Oscar H. Ibarra.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Language Acceptors with a Pushdown: Characterizations and Complexity

We study one-way nondeterministic pushdown automata (NPDA), optionally with reversal-bounded counters. Finite-turn pushdown automata are pushdown automata with a bound on the number of switches between pushing and popping. We give new characterizations for finite-turn pushdown automata, and for finite-turn pushdown automata augmented with reversal-bounded counters. The first is in terms of multi-tape nondeterministic finite automata (NFA), and the second is in terms of multi-tape NFA with reversal-bounded counters. We then use the characterizations to determine the complexity of the languages defined by these automata. In particular, we show that languages accepted by finite-turn NPDA augmented with reversal-bounded counters are in NLOG. For the non-finite-turn case, the languages are in DSPACE($\log^2 n$) and in P. We also look at the space complexity of languages accepted by two-way machines. In particular, we show that every language accepted by a two-way NPDA with reversal-bounded counters that makes a polynomial (resp., exponential) number of input head reversals is in DSPACE($\log^2n$) (resp., DSPACE($n^2$)). This remains true if the pushdown can flip its contents a bounded number of times.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2025

Store Languages of Turing Machines and Counter Machines

The store language of an automaton is the set of store configurations (state and store contents, but not the input) that can appear as an intermediate step in an accepting computation. A one-way nondeterministic finite-visit Turing machine (fvNTM) is a Turing machine with a one-way read-only input tape, and a single worktape, where there is some number $k$ such that in every accepting computation, each worktape cell is visited at most $k$ times. We show that the store language of every fvNTM is a regular language. Furthermore, we show that the store language of every fvNTM augmented by reversal-bounded counters can be accepted by a machine with only reversal-bounded counters and no worktape. Several applications are given to problems in the areas of verification and fault tolerance, and to the study of right quotients. We also continue the investigation of the store languages of one-way and two-way machine models where we present some conditions under which their store languages are recursive or non-recursive.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2024

Techniques for Showing the Decidability of the Boundedness Problem of Language Acceptors

There are many types of automata and grammar models that have been studied in the literature, and for these models, it is common to determine whether certain problems are decidable. One problem that has been difficult to answer throughout the history of automata and formal language theory is to decide whether a given system $M$ accepts a bounded language (whether there exist words $w_1, \ldots,w_k$ such that $L(M) \subseteq w_1 \cdots w_k$?). Decidability of this problem has gone unanswered for the majority of automata/grammar models in the literature. Boundedness was only known to be decidable for regular and context-free languages until recently when it was shown to also be decidable for finite-automata and pushdown automata augmented with reversal-bounded counters, and for vector addition systems with states. In this paper, we develop new techniques to show that the boundedness problem is decidable for larger classes of one-way nondeterministic automata and grammar models, by reducing the problem to the decidability of boundedness for simpler classes of automata. One technique involves characterizing the models in terms of multi-tape automata. We give new characterizations of finite-turn Turing machines, finite-turn Turing machines augmented with various storage structures (like a pushdown, multiple reversal-bounded counters, partially-blind counters, etc.), and simple matrix grammars. The characterizations are then used to show that the boundedness problem for these models is decidable. Another technique uses the concept of the store language of an automaton. This is used to show that the boundedness problem is decidable for pushdown automata that can "flip" their pushdown a bounded number of times, and boundedness remains decidable even if we augment this device with additional stores.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

State Grammars with Stores

State grammars are context-free grammars where the productions have states associated with them, and a production can only be applied to a nonterminal if the current state matches the state in the production. Once states are added to grammars, it is natural to add various stores, similar to machine models. With such extensions, productions can only be applied if both the state and the value read from each store matches between the current sentential form and the production. Here, generative capacity results are presented for different derivation modes, with and without additional stores. In particular, with the standard derivation relation, it is shown that adding reversal-bounded counters does not increase the capacity, and states are enough. Also, state grammars with reversal-bounded counters that operate using leftmost derivations are shown to coincide with languages accepted by one-way machines with a pushdown and reversal-bounded counters, and these are surprisingly shown to be strictly weaker than state grammars with the standard derivation relation (and no counters). The complexity of the emptiness problem involving state grammars with reversal-bounded counters is also studied.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

Relationships Between Bounded Languages, Counter Machines, Finite-Index Grammars, Ambiguity, and Commutative Regularity

It is shown that for every language family that is a trio containing only semilinear languages, all bounded languages in it can be accepted by one-way deterministic reversal-bounded multicounter machines (DCM). This implies that for every semilinear trio (where these properties are effective), it is possible to decide containment, equivalence, and disjointness concerning its bounded languages. A condition is also provided for when the bounded languages in a semilinear trio coincide exactly with those accepted by DCM machines, and it is used to show that many grammar systems of finite index -- such as finite-index matrix grammars and finite-index ETOL -- have identical bounded languages as DCM. Then connections between ambiguity, counting regularity, and commutative regularity are made, as many machines and grammars that are unambiguous can only generate/accept counting regular or commutatively regular languages. Thus, such a system that can generate/accept a non-counting regular or non-commutatively regular language implies the existence of inherently ambiguous languages over that system. In addition, it is shown that every language generated by an unambiguous finite-index matrix grammar has a rational characteristic series in commutative variables, and is counting regular. This result plus the connections are used to demonstrate that finite-index matrix grammars and finite-index ETOL can generate inherently ambiguous languages (over their grammars), as do several machine models. It is also shown that all bounded languages generated by these two grammar systems (those in any semilinear trio) can be generated unambiguously within the systems. Finally, conditions on languages generated by finite-index matrix grammars and finite-index ETOL implying commutative regularity are obtained. In particular, it is shown that every finite-index EDOL language is commutatively regular.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

Semilinearity of Families of Languages

Techniques are developed for creating new and general language families of only semilinear languages, and for showing families only contain semilinear languages. It is shown that for language families L that are semilinear full trios, the smallest full AFL containing L that is also closed under intersection with languages in NCM (where NCM is the family of languages accepted by NFAs augmented with reversal-bounded counters), is also semilinear. If these closure properties are effective, this also immediately implies decidability of membership, emptiness, and infiniteness for these general families. From the general techniques, new grammar systems are given that are extensions of well-known families of semilinear full trios, whereby it is implied that these extensions must only describe semilinear languages. This also implies positive decidability properties for the new systems. Some characterizations of the new families are also given.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

Generalizations of Checking Stack Automata: Characterizations and Hierarchies

We examine different generalizations of checking stack automata by allowing multiple input heads and multiple stacks, and characterize their computing power in terms of two-way multi-head finite automata and space-bounded Turing machines. For various models, we obtain hierarchies in terms of their computing power. Our characterizations and hierarchies expand or tighten some previously known results. We also discuss some decidability questions and the space/time complexity of the models.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

Space Complexity of Stack Automata Models

This paper examines several measures of space complexity of variants of stack automata: non-erasing stack automata and checking stack automata. These measures capture the minimum stack size required to accept every word in the language of the automaton (weak measure), the maximum stack size used in any accepting computation on any accepted word (accept measure),and the maximum stack size used in any computation (strong measure). We give a detailed characterization of the accept and strong space complexity measures for checking stack automata. Exactly one of three cases can occur: the complexity is either bounded by a constant, behaves like a linear function, or it can not be bounded by any function of the length of the input word (and it is decidable which case occurs). However, this result does not hold for non-erasing stack automata; we provide an example where the space complexity grows proportionally to the square root of the length of the input. Furthermore, we study the complexity bounds of machines which accept a given language, and decidability of space complexity properties.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2020

On Store Languages and Applications

The store language of a machine of some arbitrary type is the set of all store configurations (state plus store contents but not the input) that can appear in an accepting computation. New algorithms and characterizations of store languages are obtained, such as the result that any nondeterministic pushdown automaton augmented with reversal-bounded counters, where the pushdown can "flip" its contents up to a bounded number of times, can be accepted by a machine with only reversal-bounded counters. Then, connections are made between store languages and several model checking and reachability problems, such as accepting the set of all predecessor and successor configurations from a given set of configurations, and determining whether there are at least one, or infinitely many, common configurations between accepting computations of two machines. These are explored for a variety of different machine models often containing multiple parallel data stores. Many of the machine models studied can accept the set of predecessor configurations (of a regular set of configurations), the set of successor configurations, and the set of common configurations between two machines, with a machine model that is simpler than itself, with a decidable emptiness, infiniteness, and disjointness property. Store languages are key to showing these properties.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2019

Insertion Operations on Deterministic Reversal-Bounded Counter Machines

Several insertion operations are studied applied to languages accepted by one-way and two-way deterministic reversal-bounded multicounter machines. These operations are defined by the ideals obtained from relations such as the prefix, infix, suffix, and outfix relations, as well as operations defined from inverses of a type of deterministic transducer with reversal-bounded counters attached. The question of whether the resulting languages can always be accepted by deterministic machines with the same number (or larger number) of input-turns (resp., counters, counter-reversals, etc.) is investigated.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2019

On counting functions and slenderness of languages

We study counting-regular languages -- these are languages $L$ for which there is a regular language $L'$ such that the number of strings of length $n$ in $L$ and $L'$ are the same for all $n$. We show that the languages accepted by unambiguous nondeterministic Turing machines with a one-way read-only input tape and a reversal-bounded worktape are counting-regular. Many one-way acceptors are a special case of this model, such as reversal-bounded deterministic pushdown automata, reversal-bounded deterministic queue automata, and many others, and therefore all languages accepted by these models are counting-regular. This result is the best possible in the sense that the claim does not hold for either $2$-ambiguous PDA's, unambiguous PDA's with no reversal-bound, and other models. We also study closure properties of counting-regular languages, and we study decidability problems in regards to counting-regularity. For example, it is shown that the counting-regularity of even some restricted subclasses of PDA's is undecidable. Lastly, $k$-slender languages -- where there are at most $k$ words of any length -- are also studied. Amongst other results, it is shown that it is decidable whether a language in any semilinear full trio is $k$-slender.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2019

On the Density of Context-Free and Counter Languages

A language $L$ is said to be dense if every word in the universe is an infix of some word in $L$. This notion has been generalized from the infix operation to arbitrary word operations $\varrho$ in place of the infix operation ($\varrho$-dense, with infix-dense being the standard notion of dense). It is shown here that it is decidable, for a language $L$ accepted by a one-way nondeterministic reversal-bounded pushdown automaton, whether $L$ is infix-dense. However, it becomes undecidable for both deterministic pushdown automata (with no reversal-bound), and for nondeterministic one-counter automata. When examining suffix-density, it is undecidable for more restricted families such as deterministic one-counter automata that make three reversals on the counter, but it is decidable with less reversals. Other decidability results are also presented on dense languages, and contrasted with a marked version called $\varrho$-marked-density. Also, new languages are demonstrated to be outside various deterministic language families after applying different deletion operations from smaller families. Lastly, bounded-dense languages are defined and examined.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2019

On the Density of Languages Accepted by Turing Machines and Other Machine Models

A language is dense if the set of all infixes (or subwords) of the language is the set of all words. Here, it is shown that it is decidable whether the language accepted by a nondeterministic Turing machine with a one-way read-only input and a reversal-bounded read/write worktape (the read/write head changes direction at most some fixed number of times) is dense. From this, it is implied that it is also decidable for one-way reversal-bounded queue automata, one-way reversal-bounded stack automata, and one-way reversal-bounded $k$-flip pushdown automata (machines that can "flip" their pushdowns up to $k$ times). However, it is undecidable for deterministic Turing machines with two 1-reversal-bounded worktapes (even when the two tapes are restricted to operate as 1-reversal-bounded pushdown stacks).

cs.FL↗

arXiv2017

Variations of Checking Stack Automata: Obtaining Unexpected Decidability Properties

We introduce a model of one-way language acceptors (a variant of a checking stack automaton) and show the following decidability properties: (1) The deterministic version has a decidable membership problem but has an undecidable emptiness problem. (2) The nondeterministic version has an undecidable membership problem and emptiness problem. There are many models of accepting devices for which there is no difference with these problems between deterministic and nondeterministic versions, and the same holds for the emptiness problem. As far as we know, the model we introduce above is the first one-way model to exhibit properties (1) and (2). We define another family of one-way acceptors where the nondeterministic version has an undecidable emptiness problem, but the deterministic version has a decidable emptiness problem. We also know of no other model with this property in the literature. We also investigate decidability properties of other variations of checking stack automata (e.g., allowing multiple stacks, two-way input, etc.). Surprisingly, two-way deterministic machines with multiple checking stacks and multiple reversal-bounded counters are shown to have a decidable membership problem, a very general model with this property.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2017

On Store Languages of Language Acceptors

It is well known that the "store language" of every pushdown automaton -- the set of store configurations (state and stack contents) that can appear as an intermediate step in accepting computations -- is a regular language. Here many models of language acceptors with various data structures are examined, along with a study of their store languages. For each model, an attempt is made to find the simplest model that accepts their store languages. Some connections between store languages of one-way and two-way machines generally are demonstrated, as with connections between nondeterministic and deterministic machines. A nice application of these store language results is also presented, showing a general technique for proving families accepted by many deterministic models are closed under right quotient with regular languages, resolving some open questions (and significantly simplifying proofs for others that are known) in the literature. Lower bounds on the space complexity for recognizing store languages for the languages to be non-regular are obtained.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2016

On Finite-Index Indexed Grammars and Their Restrictions

The family, L(INDLIN), of languages generated by linear indexed grammars has been studied in the literature. It is known that the Parikh image of every language in L(INDLIN) is semi-linear. However, there are bounded semi linear languages that are not in L(INDLIN). Here, we look at larger families of (restricted) indexed languages and study their properties, their relationships, and their decidability properties.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2016

Deletion Operations on Deterministic Families of Automata

Many different deletion operations are investigated applied to languages accepted by one-way and two-way deterministic reversal-bounded multicounter machines, deterministic pushdown automata, and finite automata. Operations studied include the prefix, suffix, infix and outfix operations, as well as left and right quotient with languages from different families. It is often expected that language families defined from deterministic machines will not be closed under deletion operations. However, here, it is shown that one-way deterministic reversal-bounded multicounter languages are closed under right quotient with languages from many different language families; even those defined by nondeterministic machines such as the context-free languages. Also, it is shown that when starting with one-way deterministic machines with one counter that makes only one reversal, taking the left quotient with languages from many different language families -- again including those defined by nondeterministic machines such as the context-free languages -- yields only one-way deterministic reversal-bounded multicounter languages (by increasing the number of counters). However, if there are two more reversals on the counter, or a second 1-reversal-bounded counter, taking the left quotient (or even just the suffix operation) yields languages that can neither be accepted by deterministic reversal-bounded multicounter machines, nor by 2-way nondeterministic machines with one reversal-bounded counter.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2016

On the Complexity and Decidability of Some Problems Involving Shuffle

The complexity and decidability of various decision problems involving the shuffle operation are studied. The following three problems are all shown to be $NP$-complete: given a nondeterministic finite automaton (NFA) $M$, and two words $u$ and $v$, is $L(M)$ not a subset of $u$ shuffled with $v$, is $u$ shuffled with $v$ not a subset of $L(M)$, and is $L(M)$ not equal to $u$ shuffled with $v$? It is also shown that there is a polynomial-time algorithm to determine, for $NFA$s $M_1, M_2$ and a deterministic pushdown automaton $M_3$, whether $L(M_1)$ shuffled with $L(M_2)$ is a subset of $L(M_3)$. The same is true when $M_1, M_2,M_3$ are one-way nondeterministic $l$-reversal-bounded $k$-counter machines, with $M_3$ being deterministic. Other decidability and complexity results are presented for testing whether given languages $L_1, L_2$ and $R$ from various languages families satisfy $L_1$ shuffled with $L_2$ is a subset of $R$, and $R$ is a subset of $L_1$ shuffled with $L_2$. Several closure results on shuffle are also shown.

cs.FL↗