arXiv subjects

Omid Veisi

Publications and source records attributed to Omid Veisi.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Heating in human-HVAC interaction for smart homes: An interdisciplinary overview

As part of HVAC systems, residential heating provides foundational infrastructure for human habitation in cold weather. However, research on how residents interact with HVAC systems, particularly heating systems, remains fragmented across architecture, engineering, informatics, physiology, psychology, sociology, and design. Based on 541 studies from these fields, this review integrates interdisciplinary research on Heating in Human-HVAC Interaction in smart homes.The resulting synthesis is conceptualized through the Situated Interaction Dynamics of control and feedback between users and systems. User-initiated interactions involve monitoring past and present system performance and planning future operation, while system-initiated interactions rely on sensor networks to trigger automation or provide information enabling user action. These interaction dynamics connect Residents' Experience and Practices with Heating in HVAC System Mechanics. Residents' Experience and Practices include thermal comfort and energy management, where thermal comfort involves both individual physiological and psychological experiences of indoor climate and social practices shaped by norms, empathy, and negotiation among cohabitants. Heating in HVAC System Mechanics includes thermal conditions and energy performance. Thermal conditions concern the regulation of air temperature, mean radiant temperature, air velocity, and relative humidity, while energy performance concerns efficiency and environmental impact. This overview highlights four interdisciplinary tensions: sensed versus lived conditions, personalization versus negotiation, efficiency versus health, and automation versus agency. The resulting framework offers a conceptual lens to interpret heating interactions and design Human-HVAC Interaction that balances IEQ-driven healthy thermal conditions, affordability, and sustainability.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Public EV Charging Choices: How Users Trade Off Time, Price, and Renewable Energy

The carbon intensity of electric-vehicle (EV) charging varies over time and place, yet EV charging recommender systems and eco-routing interfaces rarely make this variation actionable for drivers. We investigate how renewable-energy information interacts with two attributes that routinely shape public-charging decisions: travel time and price. Fifty car users completed a within-subjects stated-choice study with three navigation-interface variants, and 10 EV drivers participated in semi-structured interviews. Across the three variants, the share choosing the slower option was 38%, 42%, and 66%, respectively. A paired-sample analysis found that choices differed across variants (Cochran's Q(2) = 11.47, p = .003). When the time-price trade-off was held constant, adding a renewable-energy label increased selection of the slower station from 38% to 66% (exact McNemar test, Holm-adjusted p = .004). Interviews nevertheless showed that renewable energy was usually a secondary consideration: participants evaluated it through situational constraints such as urgency, charging cost, traffic, charger availability, and familiarity with locations. We derive a constraint-first design rationale for renewable-energy-aware charging recommendations: filter options using context-sensitive time and cost constraints, disclose the renewable-energy signal and its uncertainty, and preserve user control rather than relying on a green default alone. Together, the results provide an empirical baseline for research on green charging recommendations, while characterizing stated choices in a small exploratory sample rather than real-world charging behavior.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

AI Ethics and Social Norms: Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities From What to How

Using LLMs in healthcare, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, and Social Computing requires the examination of ethical and social norms to ensure safe incorporation into human life. We conducted a mixed-method study, including an online survey with 111 participants and an interview study with 38 experts, to investigate the AI ethics and social norms in ChatGPT as everyday life tools. This study aims to evaluate whether ChatGPT in an empirical context operates following ethics and social norms, which is critical for understanding actions in industrial and academic research and achieving machine ethics. The findings of this study provide initial insights into six important aspects of AI ethics, including bias, trustworthiness, security, toxicology, social norms, and ethical data. Significant obstacles related to transparency and bias in unsupervised data collection methods are identified as ChatGPT's ethical concerns.

cs.CY↗