arXiv subjects

Ninad Rajgopal

Publications and source records attributed to Ninad Rajgopal.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Frontier Space-Time Algorithms Using Only Full Memory

We develop catalytic algorithms for fundamental problems in algorithm design that run in polynomial time, use only $\mathcal{O}(\log(n))$ workspace, and use sublinear catalytic space matching the best-known space bounds of non-catalytic algorithms running in polynomial time. First, we design a polynomial time algorithm for directed $s$-$t$ connectivity using $n \big/ 2^{Θ(\sqrt{\log n})}$ catalytic space, which matches the state-of-the-art time-space bounds in the non-catalytic setting [Barnes et al., 1998], and improves the catalytic space usage of the best known algorithm [Cook and Pyne, 2026]. Furthermore, using only $\mathcal{O}(\log(n))$ random bits we get a randomized algorithm whose running time nearly matches the fastest time bounds known for space-unrestricted algorithms. Second, we design polynomial time algorithms for the problems of computing Edit Distance, Longest Common Subsequence, and the Discrete Fréchet Distance, again using $n \big/ 2^{Θ(\sqrt{\log n})}$ catalytic space. This again matches non-catalytic time-space frontier for Edit Distance and Least Common Subsequence [Kiyomi et al., 2021].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

On the Power of Interactive Proofs for Learning

We continue the study of doubly-efficient proof systems for verifying agnostic PAC learning, for which we obtain the following results. - We construct an interactive protocol for learning the $t$ largest Fourier characters of a given function $f \colon \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ up to an arbitrarily small error, wherein the verifier uses $\mathsf{poly}(t)$ random examples. This improves upon the Interactive Goldreich-Levin protocol of Goldwasser, Rothblum, Shafer, and Yehudayoff (ITCS 2021) whose sample complexity is $\mathsf{poly}(t,n)$. - For agnostically learning the class $\mathsf{AC}^0[2]$ under the uniform distribution, we build on the work of Carmosino, Impagliazzo, Kabanets, and Kolokolova (APPROX/RANDOM 2017) and design an interactive protocol, where given a function $f \colon \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$, the verifier learns the closest hypothesis up to $\mathsf{polylog}(n)$ multiplicative factor, using quasi-polynomially many random examples. In contrast, this class has been notoriously resistant even for constructing realisable learners (without a prover) using random examples. - For agnostically learning $k$-juntas under the uniform distribution, we obtain an interactive protocol, where the verifier uses $O(2^k)$ random examples to a given function $f \colon \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$. Crucially, the sample complexity of the verifier is independent of $n$. We also show that if we do not insist on doubly-efficient proof systems, then the model becomes trivial. Specifically, we show a protocol for an arbitrary class $\mathcal{C}$ of Boolean functions in the distribution-free setting, where the verifier uses $O(1)$ labeled examples to learn $f$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Distribution-Free Proofs of Proximity

Motivated by the fact that input distributions are often unknown in advance, distribution-free property testing considers a setting where the algorithmic task is to accept functions $f : [n] \to \{0,1\}$ with a certain property P and reject functions that are $η$-far from P, where the distance is measured according to an arbitrary and unknown input distribution $D \sim [n]$. As usual in property testing, the tester can only make a sublinear number of input queries, but as the distribution is unknown, we also allow a sublinear number of samples from the distribution D. In this work we initiate the study of distribution-free interactive proofs of proximity (df-IPPs) in which the distribution-free testing algorithm is assisted by an all powerful but untrusted prover. Our main result is that for any problem P $\in$ NC, any proximity parameter $η> 0$, and any (trade-off) parameter $t\leq\sqrt{n}$, we construct a df-IPP for P with respect to $η$, that has query and sample complexities $t+O(1/η)$, and communication complexity $\tilde{O}(n/t + 1/η)$. For t as above and sufficiently large $η$ (namely, when $η> t/n$), this result matches the parameters of the best-known general purpose IPPs in the standard uniform setting. Moreover, for such t, its parameters are optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors under reasonable cryptographic assumptions for the same regime of $η$ as the uniform setting, i.e., when $η\geq 1/t$. For small $η$ (i.e., $η< t/n$), our protocol has communication complexity $Ω(1/η)$, which is worse than the $\tilde{O}(n/t)$ communication complexity of the uniform IPPs (with the same query complexity). To improve on this gap, we show that for IPPs over specialised, but large distribution families, such as sufficiently smooth distributions and product distributions, the communication complexity reduces to $\tilde{O}(n/t^{1-o(1)})$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

Optimal Testing and Containment Strategies for Universities in Mexico amid COVID-19

This work sets out a testing and containment framework developed for reopening universities in Mexico following the lockdown due to COVID-19. We treat diagnostic testing as a resource allocation problem and develop a testing allocation mechanism and practical web application to assist educational institutions in making the most of limited testing resources. In addition to the technical results and tools, we also provide a reflection on our current experience of running a pilot of our framework within the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM), a leading private university in Mexico, as well as on our broader experience bridging research with academic policy in the Mexican context.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

Optimally Deceiving a Learning Leader in Stackelberg Games

Recent results in the ML community have revealed that learning algorithms used to compute the optimal strategy for the leader to commit to in a Stackelberg game, are susceptible to manipulation by the follower. Such a learning algorithm operates by querying the best responses or the payoffs of the follower, who consequently can deceive the algorithm by responding as if his payoffs were much different than what they actually are. For this strategic behavior to be successful, the main challenge faced by the follower is to pinpoint the payoffs that would make the learning algorithm compute a commitment so that best responding to it maximizes the follower's utility, according to his true payoffs. While this problem has been considered before, the related literature only focused on the simplified scenario in which the payoff space is finite, thus leaving the general version of the problem unanswered. In this paper, we fill in this gap, by showing that it is always possible for the follower to compute (near-)optimal payoffs for various scenarios about the learning interaction between leader and follower.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2019

Beyond Natural Proofs: Hardness Magnification and Locality

Hardness magnification reduces major complexity separations (such as $\mathsf{\mathsf{EXP}} \nsubseteq \mathsf{NC}^1$) to proving lower bounds for some natural problem $Q$ against weak circuit models. Several recent works [OS18, MMW19, CT19, OPS19, CMMW19, Oli19, CJW19a] have established results of this form. In the most intriguing cases, the required lower bound is known for problems that appear to be significantly easier than $Q$, while $Q$ itself is susceptible to lower bounds but these are not yet sufficient for magnification. In this work, we provide more examples of this phenomenon, and investigate the prospects of proving new lower bounds using this approach. In particular, we consider the following essential questions associated with the hardness magnification program: Does hardness magnification avoid the natural proofs barrier of Razborov and Rudich [RR97]? Can we adapt known lower bound techniques to establish the desired lower bound for $Q$?

cs.CC↗

arXiv2015

On learning k-parities with and without noise

We first consider the problem of learning $k$-parities in the on-line mistake-bound model: given a hidden vector $x \in \{0,1\}^n$ with $|x|=k$ and a sequence of "questions" $a_1, a_2, ...\in \{0,1\}^n$, where the algorithm must reply to each question with $< a_i, x> \pmod 2$, what is the best tradeoff between the number of mistakes made by the algorithm and its time complexity? We improve the previous best result of Buhrman et al. by an $\exp(k)$ factor in the time complexity. Second, we consider the problem of learning $k$-parities in the presence of classification noise of rate $η\in (0,1/2)$. A polynomial time algorithm for this problem (when $η> 0$ and $k = ω(1)$) is a longstanding challenge in learning theory. Grigorescu et al. showed an algorithm running in time ${n \choose k/2}^{1 + 4η^2 +o(1)}$. Note that this algorithm inherently requires time ${n \choose k/2}$ even when the noise rate $η$ is polynomially small. We observe that for sufficiently small noise rate, it is possible to break the $n \choose k/2$ barrier. In particular, if for some function $f(n) = ω(1)$ and $α\in [1/2, 1)$, $k = n/f(n)$ and $η= o(f(n)^{- α}/\log n)$, then there is an algorithm for the problem with running time $poly(n)\cdot {n \choose k}^{1-α} \cdot e^{-k/4.01}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

Selection Lemmas for various geometric objects

Selection lemmas are classical results in discrete geometry that have been well studied and have applications in many geometric problems like weak epsilon nets and slimming Delaunay triangulations. Selection lemma type results typically show that there exists a point that is contained in many objects that are induced (spanned) by an underlying point set. In the first selection lemma, we consider the set of all the objects induced (spanned) by a point set $P$. This question has been widely explored for simplices in $\mathbb{R}^d$, with tight bounds in $\mathbb{R}^2$. In our paper, we prove first selection lemma for other classes of geometric objects. We also consider the strong variant of this problem where we add the constraint that the piercing point comes from $P$. We prove an exact result on the strong and the weak variant of the first selection lemma for axis-parallel rectangles, special subclasses of axis-parallel rectangles like quadrants and slabs, disks (for centrally symmetric point sets). We also show non-trivial bounds on the first selection lemma for axis-parallel boxes and hyperspheres in $\mathbb{R}^d$. In the second selection lemma, we consider an arbitrary $m$ sized subset of the set of all objects induced by $P$. We study this problem for axis-parallel rectangles and show that there exists an point in the plane that is contained in $\frac{m^3}{24n^4}$ rectangles. This is an improvement over the previous bound by Smorodinsky and Sharir when $m$ is almost quadratic.

cs.CG↗