Niklas Scholz | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Mind the Trust Gap: Identifying (Mis)alignments in Teacher-Student Views Toward Control and Agency in K-12 Classroom AI

As Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based technologies have been integrated into school classrooms where multiple stakeholders (with different roles) interact with each other, it is critical to deeply understand stakeholder views in the classroom. In particular, prior work has not fully uncovered how teachers' and school students' views might or might not align well with each other, especially in K-12 classrooms. We conducted a speed-dating study using storyboards with 16 school students and 15 school teachers in Germany to investigate alignments and misalignments between their views on student-AI decision-making control in K-12 classroom. Through an explicit pair-matching analysis, we found that students and teachers had misaligned views on several key topics, including how much they trust AI and social and emotional aspects of student learning with AI. Findings also revealed the importance of teacher-student relationships outside of AI use that shape stakeholders' views and interactions. We discuss potential reasons for the observed misaligned views and strategies to fill the perspective gaps. This study illustrates the complexities of preferences in teacher-student-AI interactions that depend on the dynamic relations among the stakeholders.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Partnering with AI: A Pedagogical Feedback System for LLM Integration into Programming Education

Feedback is one of the most crucial components to facilitate effective learning. With the rise of large language models (LLMs) in recent years, research in programming education has increasingly focused on automated feedback generation to help teachers provide timely support to every student. However, prior studies often overlook key pedagogical principles, such as mastery and progress adaptation, that shape effective feedback strategies. This paper introduces a novel pedagogical framework for LLM-driven feedback generation derived from established feedback models and local insights from secondary school teachers. To evaluate this framework, we implemented a web-based application for Python programming with LLM-based feedback that follows the framework and conducted a mixed-method evaluation with eight secondary-school computer science teachers. Our findings suggest that teachers consider that, when aligned with the framework, LLMs can effectively support students and even outperform human teachers in certain scenarios through instant and precise feedback. However, we also found several limitations, such as its inability to adapt feedback to dynamic classroom contexts. Such a limitation highlights the need to complement LLM-generated feedback with human expertise to ensure effective student learning. This work demonstrates an effective way to use LLMs for feedback while adhering to pedagogical standards and highlights important considerations for future systems.

cs.CY↗