arXiv subjects

Nicolas Balacheff

Publications and source records attributed to Nicolas Balacheff.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

Notes for a study of the didactic transposition of mathematical proof

It is nowadays common to consider that proof must be part of the learning of mathematics from Kindergarten to University1. As it is easy to observe, looking back to the history of mathematical curricula, this has not always been the case either because following an old pedagogical tradition of rote learning proof was reduced to the formalism of a text and deprived from its meaning or, despiteits acknowledged presence anywhere in mathematics, proof did not get the status of something to learn for what it is. On the long way from its absence as such in the past to its contemporary presence as a content to be taught at all grades, proof has had to go through a process of didactical transposition to satisfy a number of different constraints either of an epistemic, didactical, logical ormathematical nature. I will follow a chronological order to outline the main features of this process with the objective to better understand the didactical problem that our current research is facing.

math.HO↗

arXiv2014

Bridging knowing and proving in mathematics An essay from a didactical perspective

The learning of mathematics starts early but remains far from any theoretical considerations: pupils' mathematical knowledge is first rooted in pragmatic evidence or conforms to procedures taught. However, learners develop a knowledge which they can apply in significant problem situations, and which is amenable to falsification and argumentation. They can validate what they claim to be true but using means generally not conforming to mathematical standards. Here, I analyze how this situation underlies the epistemological and didactical complexities of teaching mathematical proof. I show that the evolution of the learners' understanding of what counts as proof in mathematics implies an evolution of their knowing of mathematical concepts. The key didactical point is not to persuade learners to accept a new formalism but to have them understand how mathematical proof and statements are tightly related within a common framework; that is, a mathematical theory. I address this aim by modeling the learners' way of knowing in terms of a dynamic, homeostatic system. I discuss the roles of different semiotic systems, of the types of actions the learners perform and of the controls they implement in constructing or validating knowledge. Particularly with modern technological aids, this model provides a basis designing didactical situations to help learners bridge the gap between pragmatics and theory.

math.HO↗

arXiv2013

cK\cent, a model to reason on learners' conceptions

Understanding learners' understanding is a key requirement for an efficient design of teaching situations and learning environments, be they digital or not. This keynote outlines the modeling framework cK\cent (conception, knowing, concept) created with the objective to respond to this requirement, with the additional ambition to build a bridge between research in mathematics education and research in educational technology. After an introduction of the rationale of cK\cent, some illustrations are presented. Then follow comments on cK\cent and learning. The conclusion evokes key research issues raised by the use of this modeling framework.

math.HO↗