arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Nick Fischer

Publications and source records attributed to Nick Fischer.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Robustifying Sparse Matrix Multiplication

In the seminal sparse matrix multiplication problem the goal is to compute the product of two $n \times n$ matrices when the matrices are sparse, i.e., when the number of nonzeros in the input matrices $m_{in}$ and/or the number of nonzeros in the output matrix $m_{out}$ are much smaller than $n^2$. In this paper, we explore the generalized problem of (approximately) computing the $k$ largest output entries, with an approximation error dependent solely on the smaller entries -- from the viewpoint of sparse recovery, this can be seen as a robust variant of sparse matrix multiplication. Despite the substantial research dedicated to sparse matrix multiplication, almost no existing algorithms are robust in this sense. The one exception is Pagh's algorithm in time $\widetilde O(m_{in} + nk)$ [ITCS'12], and it remained open whether other algorithms can be similarly made robust. Our principal contribution is a black-box reduction from robust sparse matrix multiplication to conventional sparse matrix multiplication with only polylogarithmic overhead. Specifically, we show that any sparse matrix multiplication algorithm with running time $T(n, m_{in}, m_{out})$ can be transformed into a robust algorithm running in time $\widetilde O(T(n, m_{in}, k))$. This reduction leverages an extensive toolkit from sparse recovery, and intriguingly, also involves solving a knapsack-type problem. By plugging in the state-of-the-art algorithm for sparse matrix multiplication by Abboud, Bringmann, Fischer, and K\"unnemann [SODA'24], we achieve significantly improved bounds such as $O((m_{in} + k)^{1.346})$. Notably, in the regime where $k \geq m_{in}^{1.762}$, our reduction culminates in an almost-optimal $k^{1+o(1)}$-time algorithm.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Efficiently Listing Projected Trees, and Equivalence of Listing and Enumeration

The subgraph isomorphism problem and its generalizations such as conjunctive queries, where some nodes are projected, are among the most fundamental problems in graph algorithms and database theory. In this paper, we study the listing and enumeration variants of these problems and present two main results. (1) We present the first algorithms for enumerating projected trees with polynomial preprocessing time ($\widetilde{O}(n^{17.42})$) and polylogarithmic delay ($\mathrm{polylog}(n)$). Prior to this work, all algorithms in the literature required time $\Omega(n^{\Omega(k)} + t)$ or $t \cdot n^{\Omega(1)}$ to list all copies of a $k$-node tree with projections, where $t$ is the number of solutions. Our result generalizes to arbitrary projected hypergraphs, achieving enumeration in preprocessing time $\widetilde{O}(m^{17.42 \cdot \mathrm{subw}(H)})$ and polylogarithmic delay, where $\mathrm{subw}(H)$ is the submodular width of the pattern hypergraph $H$. We heavily rely on fast (rectangular and output-sensitive) matrix multiplication, which we complement by fine-grained lower bounds indicating that any algorithm beating time $\Omega(n^{\Omega(k)} + t)$ must rely on fast matrix multiplication. (2) As our second main result, we present a generic enumeration-to-listing reduction, establishing that listing and enumeration are equivalent under natural assumptions. For (colored) subgraph isomorphism, our reduction transforms any listing algorithm running in time $O(f(n,m) + t \cdot g(n,m))$ into an enumeration algorithm with preprocessing time $O((f(n,m)+g(n,m)+m) \log^2 n)$ and delay $O(g(n,m))$. We utilize this equivalence as a tool for proving our first main result, and we expect that our generic reduction will find many future applications.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

An Optimal Algorithm for Binary Closest String

We revisit the Binary Closest String problem, which asks, given a set of binary strings $X \subseteq \{0, 1\}^n$, to compute a string minimizing the maximum Hamming distance to $X$. A long line of work has focused on parameterized algorithms with respect to the optimal distance $d$, yielding a sequence of improvements from $O^*(d^d)$ through $O^*(16^d)$, $O^*(9.513^d)$, $O^*(8^d)$, $O^*(6.731^d)$ to the current best-known running time of $O^*(5^d)$ [Chen, Ma, Wang; Algorithmica '16]. We present a faster randomized algorithm running in time $O^*(4^d)$. Our result matches a recent fine-grained lower bound [Abboud, Fischer, Goldenberg, Karthik C.S., Safier; ESA '23], and is therefore conditionally optimal. As an extra benefit, our algorithm is remarkably simple.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Node-Weighted Triangles: Faster and Simpler

Weighted variants of triangle detection are an important object of study because of their prominence in fine-grained complexity. We revisit the Node-Weighted Triangle problem, where the goal is to decide if a vertex-weighted graph contains a triangle whose node weights sum to zero. This problem has been the focus of a celebrated line of work, beginning with a subcubic-time algorithm [Vassilevska, Williams; STOC '06], and culminating in algorithms running almost in matrix multiplication time, $O(\textsf{MM}(n) + n^2\cdot 2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})})$ [Czumaj, Lingas; SODA '07], [Vassilevska W., Williams; STOC '09]. This runtime is almost-optimal, since even detecting an unweighted triangle is conjectured to require matrix multiplication time $\textsf{MM}(n)$. However, the superpolylogarithmic $2^{\Omega(\sqrt{\log n})}$ overhead persists in a world where near-optimal matrix multiplication is possible (i.e., $\textsf{MM}(n) \leq n^2\text{poly}(\log n)$). In this paper, we present a new algorithm solving Node-Weighted Triangle in $O(\textsf{MM}(n))$ time, closing the gap to unweighted triangle detection completely. Remarkably, our algorithm is much simpler than previous approaches, which use involved recursion schemes and communication protocols.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Classifying Identities: Subcubic Distributivity Checking and Hardness from Arithmetic Progression Detection

We revisit the complexity of verifying basic identities, such as associativity and distributivity, on a given finite algebraic structure. In particular, while Rajagopalan and Schulman (FOCS'96, SICOMP'00) gave a surprising randomized algorithm to verify associativity of an operation $\odot: S\times S\to S$ in optimal time $O(|S|^2)$, they left the open problem of finding any subcubic algorithm for verifying distributivity of given operations $\odot,\oplus: S\times S\to S$. Our results are as follows: * We resolve the open problem by Rajagopalan and Schulman by devising an algorithm verifying distributivity in strongly subcubic time $O(|S|^\omega)$, together with a matching conditional lower bound based on the Triangle Detection Hypothesis. * We propose arithmetic progression detection in small universes as a consequential algorithmic challenge: We show that unless we can detect $4$-term arithmetic progressions in a set $X\subseteq\{1,\dots, N\}$ in time $O(N^{2-\epsilon})$, then (a) the 3-uniform 4-hyperclique hypothesis is true, and (b) verifying certain identities requires running time~$|S|^{3-o(1)}$. * A careful combination of our algorithmic and hardness ideas allows us to \emph{fully classify} a natural subclass of identities: Specifically, any 3-variable identity over binary operations in which no side is a subexpression of the other is either: (1) verifiable in randomized time $O(|S|^2)$, (2) verifiable in randomized time $O(|S|^\omega)$ with a matching lower bound from triangle detection, or (3) trivially verifiable in time $O(|S|^3)$ with a matching lower bound from hardness of 4-term arithmetic progression detection. * We obtain near-optimal algorithms for verifying whether a given algebraic structure forms a field or ring, and show that \emph{counting} the number of distributive triples is conditionally harder than verifying distributivity.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Universe Reduction for APSP: Equivalence of Three Fine-Grained Hypotheses

The APSP Hypothesis states that the All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) problem requires time $n^{3-o(1)}$ on graphs with polynomially bounded integer edge weights. Two increasingly stronger assumptions are the Strong APSP Hypothesis and the Directed Unweighted APSP Hypothesis, which state that the fastest-known APSP algorithms on graphs with small weights and unweighted graphs, respectively, are best-possible. In this paper, we design an efficient universe reduction for APSP, which proves that these three hypotheses are, in fact, equivalent, conditioned on $\omega = 2$ and a plausible additive combinatorics assumption. Along the way, we resolve the fine-grained complexity of many long-standing graph and matrix problems with "intermediate" complexity such as Node-Weighted APSP, All-Pairs Bottleneck Paths, Monotone Min-Plus Product in certain settings, and many others, by designing matching APSP-based lower bounds.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Conditionally Tight Algorithms for Maximum k-Coverage and Partial k-Dominating Set via Arity-Reducing Hypercuts

We revisit the classic Maximum $k$-Coverage problem: Determine the largest number $t$ of elements that can be covered by choosing $k$ sets from a given family $\mathcal{F} = \{S_1,\dots, S_n\}$ of a size-$u$ universe. A notable special case is Partial $k$-Dominating Set, where one chooses $k$ vertices in a graph to maximize the number of dominated vertices. Extensive research has established strong hardness results for various aspects of Maximum $k$-Coverage, such as tight inapproximability results, $W[2]$-hardness, and a conditionally tight worst-case running time of $n^{k\pm o(1)}$. In this paper we ask: (1) Can this time bound be improved for small $t$, at least for Partial $k$-Dominating Set, ideally to time~$t^{k\pm O(1)}$? (2) More ambitiously, can we even determine the best-possible running time of Maximum $k$-Coverage with respect to the perhaps most natural parameters: the universe size $u$, the maximum set size $s$, and the maximum frequency $f$? We successfully resolve both questions. (1) We give an algorithm that solves Partial $k$-Dominating Set in time $O(nt + t^{\frac{2\omega}{3} k+O(1)})$ if $\omega \ge 2.25$ and time $O(nt+ t^{\frac{3}{2} k+O(1)})$ if $\omega \le 2.25$, where $\omega \le 2.372$ is the matrix multiplication exponent. From this we derive a time bound that is conditionally optimal, regardless of $\omega$, based on the well-established $k$-clique and 3-uniform hyperclique hypotheses from fine-grained complexity. We also obtain matching upper and lower bounds for sparse graphs. To address (2) we design an algorithm for Maximum $k$-Coverage running in time $$ \min \left\{ (f\cdot \min\{\sqrt[3]{u}, \sqrt{s}\})^k + \min\{n,f\cdot \min\{\sqrt{u}, s\}\}^{k\omega/3}, n^k\right\} \cdot g(k)n^{\pm O(1)}, $$ and, surprisingly, further show that this complicated time bound is also conditionally optimal.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2025

Separations between Oblivious and Adaptive Adversaries for Natural Dynamic Graph Problems

We establish the first update-time separation between dynamic algorithms against oblivious adversaries and those against adaptive adversaries in natural dynamic graph problems, based on popular fine-grained complexity hypotheses. Specifically, under the combinatorial BMM hypothesis, we show that every combinatorial algorithm against an adaptive adversary for the incremental maximal independent set problem requires $n^{1-o(1)}$ amortized update time. Furthermore, assuming either the 3SUM or APSP hypotheses, every algorithm for the decremental maximal clique problem needs $\Delta/n^{o(1)}$ amortized update time when the initial maximum degree is $\Delta \le \sqrt{n}$. These lower bounds are matched by existing algorithms against adaptive adversaries. In contrast, both problems admit algorithms against oblivious adversaries that achieve $\operatorname{polylog}(n)$ amortized update time [Behnezhad, Derakhshan, Hajiaghayi, Stein, Sudan; FOCS '19] [Chechik, Zhang; FOCS '19]. Therefore, our separations are exponential. Previously known separations for dynamic algorithms were either engineered for contrived problems and relied on strong cryptographic assumptions [Beimel, Kaplan, Mansour, Nissim, Saranurak, Stemmer; STOC '22], or worked for problems whose inputs are not explicitly given but are accessed through oracle calls [Bateni, Esfandiari, Fichtenberger, Henzinger, Jayaram, Mirrokni, Wiese; SODA '23]. As a byproduct, we also provide a separation between incremental and decremental algorithms for the triangle detection problem: we show a decremental algorithm with $\tilde{O}(n^{\omega})$ total update time, while every incremental algorithm requires $n^{3-o(1)}$ total update time, assuming the OMv hypothesis. To our knowledge this is the first separation of this kind.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2025

$\ell_2/\ell_2$ Sparse Recovery via Weighted Hypergraph Peeling

We demonstrate that the best $k$-sparse approximation of a length-$n$ vector can be recovered within a $(1+\epsilon)$-factor approximation in $O((k/\epsilon) \log n)$ time using a non-adaptive linear sketch with $O((k/\epsilon) \log n)$ rows and $O(\log n)$ column sparsity. This improves the running time of the fastest-known sketch [Nakos, Song; STOC '19] by a factor of $\log n$, and is optimal for a wide range of parameters. Our algorithm is simple and likely to be practical, with the analysis built on a new technique we call weighted hypergraph peeling. Our method naturally extends known hypergraph peeling processes (as in the analysis of Invertible Bloom Filters) to a setting where edges and nodes have (possibly correlated) weights.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2025

A Truly Subcubic Combinatorial Algorithm for Induced 4-Cycle Detection

We present the first truly subcubic, combinatorial algorithm for detecting an induced $4$-cycle in a graph. The running time is $O(n^{2.84})$ on $n$-node graphs, thus separating the task of detecting induced $4$-cycles from detecting triangles, which requires $n^{3-o(1)}$ time combinatorially under the popular BMM hypothesis. Significant work has gone into characterizing the exact time complexity of induced $H$-detection, relative to the complexity of detecting cliques of various sizes. Prior work identified the question of whether induced $4$-cycle detection is triangle-hard as the only remaining case towards completing the lowest level of the classification, dubbing it a "curious" case [Dalirrooyfard, Vassilevska W., FOCS 2022]. Our result can be seen as a negative resolution of this question. Our algorithm deviates from previous techniques in the large body of subgraph detection algorithms and employs the trendy topic of graph decomposition that has hitherto been restricted to more global problems (as in the use of expander decompositions for flow problems) or to shaving subpolynomial factors (as in the application of graph regularity lemmas). While our algorithm is slower than the (non-combinatorial) state-of-the-art $\tilde{O}(n^{\omega})$-time algorithm based on polynomial identity testing [Vassilevska W., Wang, Williams, Yu, SODA 2014], combinatorial advancements often come with other benefits. In particular, we give the first nontrivial deterministic algorithm for detecting induced $4$-cycles.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2025

A Simple Algorithm for Trimmed Multipoint Evaluation

Evaluating a polynomial on a set of points is a fundamental task in computer algebra. In this work, we revisit a particular variant called trimmed multipoint evaluation: given an $n$-variate polynomial with bounded individual degree $d$ and total degree $D$, the goal is to evaluate it on a natural class of input points. This problem arises as a key subroutine in recent algorithmic results [Dinur; SODA '21], [Dell, Haak, Kallmayer, Wennmann; SODA '25]. It is known that trimmed multipoint evaluation can be solved in near-linear time [van der Hoeven, Schost; AAECC '13] by a clever yet somewhat involved algorithm. We give a simple recursive algorithm that avoids heavy computer-algebraic machinery, and can be readily understood by researchers without specialized background.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2025

All-Pairs Shortest Paths with Few Weights per Node

We study the central All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) problem under the restriction that there are at most $d$ distinct weights on the outgoing edges from every node. For $d=n$ this is the classical (unrestricted) APSP problem that is hypothesized to require cubic time $n^{3-o(1)}$, and at the other extreme, for $d=1$, it is equivalent to the Node-Weighted APSP problem. We present new algorithms that achieve the following results: 1. Node-Weighted APSP can be solved in time $\tilde{O}(n^{(3+\omega)/2}) = \tilde{O}(n^{2.686})$, improving on the 15-year-old subcubic bounds $\tilde{O}(n^{(9+\omega)/4}) = \tilde{O}(n^{2.843})$ [Chan; STOC '07] and $\tilde{O}(n^{2.830})$ [Yuster; SODA '09]. This positively resolves the question of whether Node-Weighted APSP is an ``intermediate'' problem in the sense of having complexity $n^{2.5+o(1)}$ if $\omega=2$, in which case it also matches an $n^{2.5-o(1)}$ conditional lower bound. 2. For up to $d \leq n^{3-\omega-\epsilon}$ distinct weights per node (where $\epsilon > 0$), the problem can be solved in subcubic time $O(n^{3-f(\epsilon)})$ (where $f(\epsilon) > 0$). In particular, assuming that $\omega = 2$, we can tolerate any sublinear number of distinct weights per node $d \leq n^{1-\epsilon}$, whereas previous work [Yuster; SODA '09] could only handle $d \leq n^{1/2-\epsilon}$ in subcubic time. This promotes our understanding of the APSP hypothesis showing that the hardest instances must exhaust a linear number of weights per node. Our result also applies to the All-Pairs Exact Triangle problem, thus generalizing a result of Chan and Lewenstein on "Clustered 3SUM" from arrays to matrices. Notably, our technique constitutes a rare application of additive combinatorics in graph algorithms.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2025

The Role of Regularity in (Hyper-)Clique Detection and Implications for Optimizing Boolean CSPs

Is detecting a $k$-clique in $k$-partite regular (hyper-)graphs as hard as in the general case? Intuition suggests yes, but proving this -- especially for hypergraphs -- poses notable challenges. Concretely, we consider a strong notion of regularity in $h$-uniform hypergraphs, where we essentially require that any subset of at most $h-1$ is incident to a uniform number of hyperedges. Such notions are studied intensively in the combinatorial block design literature. We show that any $f(k)n^{g(k)}$-time algorithm for detecting $k$-cliques in such graphs transfers to an $f'(k)n^{g(k)}$-time algorithm for the general case, establishing a fine-grained equivalence between the $h$-uniform hyperclique hypothesis and its natural regular analogue. Equipped with this regularization result, we then fully resolve the fine-grained complexity of optimizing Boolean constraint satisfaction problems over assignments with $k$ non-zeros. Our characterization depends on the maximum degree $d$ of a constraint function. Specifically, if $d\le 1$, we obtain a linear-time solvable problem, if $d=2$, the time complexity is essentially equivalent to $k$-clique detection, and if $d\ge 3$ the problem requires exhaustive-search time under the 3-uniform hyperclique hypothesis. To obtain our hardness results, the regularization result plays a crucial role, enabling a very convenient approach when applied carefully. We believe that our regularization result will find further applications in the future.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2025

Hardness of Median and Center in the Ulam Metric

The classical rank aggregation problem seeks to combine a set X of n permutations into a single representative "consensus" permutation. In this paper, we investigate two fundamental rank aggregation tasks under the well-studied Ulam metric: computing a median permutation (which minimizes the sum of Ulam distances to X) and computing a center permutation (which minimizes the maximum Ulam distance to X) in two settings. $\bullet$ Continuous Setting: In the continuous setting, the median/center is allowed to be any permutation. It is known that computing a center in the Ulam metric is NP-hard and we add to this by showing that computing a median is NP-hard as well via a simple reduction from the Max-Cut problem. While this result may not be unexpected, it had remained elusive until now and confirms a speculation by Chakraborty, Das, and Krauthgamer [SODA '21]. $\bullet$ Discrete Setting: In the discrete setting, the median/center must be a permutation from the input set. We fully resolve the fine-grained complexity of the discrete median and discrete center problems under the Ulam metric, proving that the naive $\widetilde{O}(n^2 L)$-time algorithm (where L is the length of the permutation) is conditionally optimal. This resolves an open problem raised by Abboud, Bateni, Cohen-Addad, Karthik C. S., and Seddighin [APPROX '23]. Our reductions are inspired by the known fine-grained lower bounds for similarity measures, but we face and overcome several new highly technical challenges.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2025

Near-Optimal Directed Low-Diameter Decompositions

Low Diameter Decompositions (LDDs) are invaluable tools in the design of combinatorial graph algorithms. While historically they have been applied mainly to undirected graphs, in the recent breakthrough for the negative-length Single Source Shortest Path problem, Bernstein, Nanongkai, and Wulff-Nilsen [FOCS '22] extended the use of LDDs to directed graphs for the first time. Specifically, their LDD deletes each edge with probability at most $O(\frac{1}{D} \cdot \log^2 n)$, while ensuring that each strongly connected component in the remaining graph has a (weak) diameter of at most $D$. In this work, we make further advancements in the study of directed LDDs. We reveal a natural and intuitive (in hindsight) connection to Expander Decompositions, and leveraging this connection along with additional techniques, we establish the existence of an LDD with an edge-cutting probability of $O(\frac{1}{D} \cdot \log n \log\log n)$. This improves the previous bound by nearly a logarithmic factor and closely approaches the lower bound of $\Omega(\frac{1}{D} \cdot \log n)$. With significantly more technical effort, we also develop two efficient algorithms for computing our LDDs: a deterministic algorithm that runs in time $\tilde O(m \cdot poly(D))$ and a randomized algorithm that runs in near-linear time $\tilde O(m)$. We believe that our work provides a solid conceptual and technical foundation for future research relying on directed LDDs, which will undoubtedly follow soon.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2025

A Faster Algorithm for Constrained Correlation Clustering

In the Correlation Clustering problem we are given $n$ nodes, and a preference for each pair of nodes indicating whether we prefer the two endpoints to be in the same cluster or not. The output is a clustering inducing the minimum number of violated preferences. In certain cases, however, the preference between some pairs may be too important to be violated. The constrained version of this problem specifies pairs of nodes that must be in the same cluster as well as pairs that must not be in the same cluster (hard constraints). The output clustering has to satisfy all hard constraints while minimizing the number of violated preferences. Constrained Correlation Clustering is APX-Hard and has been approximated within a factor 3 by van Zuylen et al. [SODA '07] using $\Omega(n^{3\omega})$ time. In this work, using a more combinatorial approach, we show how to approximate this problem significantly faster at the cost of a slightly weaker approximation factor. In particular, our algorithm runs in $\widetilde{O}(n^3)$ time and approximates Constrained Correlation Clustering within a factor 16. To achieve our result we need properties guaranteed by a particular influential algorithm for (unconstrained) Correlation Clustering, the CC-PIVOT algorithm. This algorithm chooses a pivot node $u$, creates a cluster containing $u$ and all its preferred nodes, and recursively solves the rest of the problem. As a byproduct of our work, we provide a derandomization of the CC-PIVOT algorithm that still achieves the 3-approximation; furthermore, we show that there exist instances where no ordering of the pivots can give a $(3-\varepsilon)$-approximation, for any constant $\varepsilon$. Finally, we introduce a node-weighted version of Correlation Clustering, which can be approximated within factor 3 using our insights on Constrained Correlation Clustering.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2024

Beating Bellman's Algorithm for Subset Sum

Bellman's algorithm for Subset Sum is one of the earliest and simplest examples of dynamic programming, dating back to 1957. For a given set of $n$ integers $X$ and a target $t$, it computes the set of subset sums $\mathcal S(X, t)$ (i.e., the set of integers $s \in [0\ldots t]$ for which there is a subset of $X$ summing to $s$) in time $O(|\mathcal S(X, t)| \cdot n)$. Since then, it has been an important question whether Bellman's seminal algorithm can be improved. This question is addressed in many recent works. And yet, while some algorithms improve upon Bellman's algorithm in specific parameter regimes, such as Bringmann's $\tilde O(t + n)$-time algorithm [SODA '17] and Bringmann and Nakos' $\tilde O(|\mathcal S(X, t)|^{4/3})$-time algorithm [STOC '20], none of the known algorithms beats Bellman's algorithm in all regimes. In particular, it remained open whether Subset Sum is in time $\tilde O(|\mathcal S(X, t)| \cdot n^{1-\epsilon})$ (for some $\epsilon > 0$). In this work we positively resolve this question and design an algorithm that outperforms Bellman's algorithm in all regimes. Our algorithm runs in time $\tilde O(|\mathcal S(X, t)| \cdot \sqrt{n})$, thus improving the time complexity by a factor of nearly $\sqrt n$. Our key innovation is the use of a result from additive combinatorics, which has not been applied in an algorithmic context before and which we believe to be of further independent interest for algorithm design. To demonstrate the broader applicability of our approach, we extend our ideas to a variant of Subset Sum on vectors as well as to Unbounded Subset Sum.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2024

Sumsets, 3SUM, Subset Sum: Now for Real!

We study a broad class of algorithmic problems with an "additive flavor" such as computing sumsets, 3SUM, Subset Sum and geometric pattern matching. Our starting point is that these problems can often be solved efficiently for integers, owed to the rich available tool set including bit-tricks, linear hashing, and the Fast Fourier Transform. However, for real numbers these tools are not available, leading to significant gaps in the best-known running times for integer inputs versus for real inputs. In this work our goal is to close this gap. As our key contribution we design a new technique for computing real sumsets. It is based on a surprising blend of algebraic ideas (like Prony's method and coprime factorizations) with combinatorial tricks. We then apply our new algorithm to the aforementioned problems and successfully obtain, in all cases, equally fast algorithms for real inputs. Specifically, we replicate the running times of the following landmark results by randomized algorithms in the standard real RAM model: - Sumsets: Given two sets $A,B$, their sumset $A+B=\{a+b:a\in A,b\in B\}$ can be computed in time $\tilde O(|A+B|)$ [Cole, Hariharan; STOC'02]. - Geometric pattern matching: Given two sets $A,B$, we can test whether there is some shift such that $A+s\subseteq B$ in time $\tilde O(|A|+|B|)$ [Cardoze, Schulman; FOCS'98]. - 3SUM with preprocessing: We can preprocess three size-$n$ sets $A,B,C$ in time $\tilde O(n^2)$ such that upon query of sets $A'\subseteq A,B'\subseteq B,C'\subseteq C$, the 3SUM instance $(A',B',C')$ can be decided in time $\tilde O(n^{13/7})$ [Chan, Lewenstein; STOC'15]. - Output-sensitive Subset Sum: Given a size-$n$ (multi-)set $X$ and a target $t$, we can compute the set of subset sums $\{\Sigma(X'):X'\subseteq X,\Sigma(X')\leq t\}$ in output-sensitive time $\tilde O(n+\mathrm{out}^{4/3})$ [Bringmann, Nakos; STOC'20].

cs.DS↗