Assessing the potential impact of environmental land management schemes on emergent infection disease risks
Financial incentives encourage the plantation of new woodland to increase habitat, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, as a contribution to meeting climate change and biodiversity conservation targets. Whilst these are largely positive effects, it is worth considering that this expansion of woodland can lead to increased presence of wildlife species in proximity to agricultural holdings that may pose an enhanced risk of disease transmission between wildlife and livestock. Wildlife and the provision of a reservoir for infectious disease is particularly important in the transmission dynamics of bovine tuberculosis, the case studied here. In this paper we develop an economic model for predicting changes in land use resulting from subsidies for woodland planting. We use this to assess the consequent impact on wild deer populations in the newly created woodland areas, and thus the emergent infectious disease risk arising from the proximity of new and existing wild deer populations and existing cattle holdings. We consider an area in the South-West of Scotland, having existing woodland, deer populations, and extensive and diverse cattle farm holdings. In this area we find that, with a varying level of subsidy and plausible new woodland creation scenarios, the contact risk between areas of wild deer and cattle increases between 26% and 35% over the risk present with a zero subsidy. This provides a foundation for extending to larger regions and for examining potential risk mitigation strategies, for example the targeting of subsidy in low disease risk areas, or provisioning for buffer zones between woodland and agricultural holdings.