arXiv subjects

Nemo Semret

Publications and source records attributed to Nemo Semret.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2022

Dynamics of Bitcoin mining

What happens to mining when the Bitcoin price changes, when there are mining supply shocks, the price of energy changes, or hardware technology evolves? We give precise answers based on the technical forces and incentives in the system. We then build on these dynamics to consider value: what is the cost and purpose of mining, and is it worth it? Does it use too much energy, is it bad for the environment? Finally we extend our analysis to the long term: is mining economically feasible forever? What will the global hash rate be in 40 years? How is mining impacted by the limits of computation and energy? Is it physically sustainable in the long run? From first principles, we derive a fundamental scale-invariant feasibility constraint, which enables us to analyze the interlocking dynamics, find key invariants, and answer these questions mathematically.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2021

Predicting crop yields with little ground truth: A simple statistical model for in-season forecasting

We present a fully automated model for in-season crop yield prediction, designed to work where there is a dearth of sub-national "ground truth" information. Our approach relies primarily on satellite data and is characterized by careful feature engineering combined with a simple regression model. As such, it can work almost anywhere in the world. Applying it to 10 different crop-country pairs (5 cereals -- corn, wheat, sorghum, barley and millet, in 2 countries -- Ethiopia and Kenya), we achieve RMSEs of 5%-10% for predictions 9 months into the year, and 7%-14% for predictions 3 months into the year. The model outputs daily forecasts for the final yield of the current year. It is trained using approximately 4 million data points for each crop-country pair. These consist of: historical country-level annual yields, crop calendars, crop cover, NDVI, temperature, rainfall, and evapotransporation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

Resolving the two envelope paradox

Consider the following game: You are given two indistinguishable envelopes, each containing money. One contains twice as much as the other. You may pick one envelope and keep the money it contains. Having chosen an envelope, you are given the chance to switch envelopes. Should you switch? The intuitive answer is that it makes no difference, since you are equally likely to have picked the envelope with the higher or the lower amount. However, a naive expected value calculation implies you gain by switching, since you have $ 50\% $ chance of doubling and $ 50\% $ chance of halving your current winnings, and so if the first chosen envelope contains X, then switching gives an expected final value of $ (X/2 + 2X)/2 > X $. That seems like a paradox. We prove that the former is the correct answer, and show how the apparent "paradox" can be resolved.

math.PR↗