arXiv subjects

Nawaf Mohammed

Publications and source records attributed to Nawaf Mohammed.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

When Is the Gini Loading More Prudent? Tail Structure and the Ordering of the Standard Deviation and the Gini Mean Difference

The standard deviation (SD) and the Gini mean difference (GMD) are the two canonical measures of variability used to load premiums, set risk margins and allocate capital, yet no universal ordering between them exists. We show that the comparison is \emph{equivalent} to asking whether the coefficient of variation of the spacing $|X-X'|$ generated by two independent copies of the risk exceeds unity, so that the exponential law -- whose spacing is again exponential -- is the universal knife-edge separating the two regimes. Reading the GMD as twice the maxiance, that is, as a second-order \emph{dual} moment in the sense of Yaari's dual theory, the problem becomes an explicit comparison of primal and dual second-order variability. We derive a closed-form representation of the mean excess function of the spacing in terms of the hazard and reverse hazard rates of $X$, and use it to prove that heavy-tailed behavior -- a decreasing hazard rate or an increasing reverse hazard rate -- yields SD dominance, whereas two-sided light tails yield GMD dominance; within the monotone aging classes, equality characterizes the exponential law. Both regimes are stable under truncation, convolution and mixing, which makes them operational in collective risk and frailty models. We classify the severity, lifetime and frequency distributions of actuarial practice accordingly, quantify the consequences for SD- and Gini-loaded premium principles and for Gini-type tail risk measures, and show that the sign of $\mathrm{SD}-\mathrm{GMD}$ across thresholds furnishes a simple diagnostic for tail aging.

q-fin.RM↗

arXiv2026

The Elliptically Optimal Confidence Interval: A Bivariate Extension of Wilson's Score Method

Constructing a confidence interval for the difference between two independent binomial proportions involves a nuisance direction that is not identified by the estimand. The one-sample Wilson score interval inverts a scalar score test, but has no direct bivariate analogue isolating the difference: inverting the joint normal approximation yields an elliptical region in the unit square, whereas the estimand $p_1-p_2$ is one-dimensional. We define the Elliptically Optimal (EO) confidence interval as the range of $p_1-p_2$ over this region and solve the resulting optimization problem in closed form, obtaining explicit bounds in six mutually exclusive and exhaustive cases. The solution admits a compact characterization: the EO interval is the score interval obtained by maximizing over the nuisance variance rather than estimating it. It is therefore the shortest interval obtained by projecting the elliptical region, and inherits its coverage guarantee. We derive the exact coverage excess, $2[Φ(z\mathcal{R})-Φ(z)]$, where $\mathcal{R}$ is the ratio of the least-favourable to the true standard deviation. The excess vanishes on an explicit line through the parameter space, is bounded by $α$, and is invariant under proportional scaling of the sample sizes. Exact enumeration of the binomial coverage shows that the Wald interval, whose variance estimator is downward biased by a factor $1-1/n$ under balanced allocation, falls below nominal coverage almost everywhere. The EO interval never under-covers under the normal approximation and always yields admissible, non-degenerate bounds. Its price is over-coverage when both proportions are extreme, which we quantify exactly.

math.ST↗

arXiv2026

Joint Exclusivity

We introduce \emph{joint exclusivity} (JE), a flexible extension of mutual exclusivity for non-negative random vectors that prohibits only the simultaneous positivity of all $n$ components. Unlike mutual exclusivity, JE admits a broad class of marginals while retaining a sharp existence criterion. We prove that a JE random vector with prescribed marginals $F_1,\ldots,F_n$ exists if and only if \[ \sum_{i=1}^n \overline{F}_i(0)\le n-1. \] We also provide a canonical face-based construction with freely specified copulas within each face, and show that the trivariate case can elegantly be reduced to a one-parameter family. Finally, we extend the framework through Wang-type distortions and an $m$-exclusivity hierarchy interpolating between mutual exclusivity and JE.

math.ST↗

arXiv2026

VaR at Its Extremes: Impossibilities and Conditions for One-Sided Random Variables

We investigate the extremal aggregation behavior of Value-at-Risk (VaR) -- that is, its additivity properties across all probability levels -- for sums of one-sided random variables. For risks supported on $[0,\infty)$, we show that VaR sub-additivity is impossible except in the degenerate case of exact additivity, which holds only under co-monotonicity. To characterize when VaR is instead fully super-additive, we introduce two structural conditions: negative simplex dependence (NSD) for the joint distribution and simplex dominance (SD) for a margin-dependent functional. Together, these conditions provide a unified and easily verifiable framework that accommodates non-identical margins, heavy-tailed laws, and a wide spectrum of negative dependence structures. All results extend to random variables with arbitrary finite lower or upper endpoints, yielding sharp constraints on when strict sub- or super-additivity can occur.

q-fin.RM↗

arXiv2021

Can a regulatory risk measure induce profit-maximizing risk capital allocations? The case of Conditional Tail Expectation

Risk capital allocations (RCAs) are an important tool in quantitative risk management, where they are utilized to, e.g., gauge the profitability of distinct business units, determine the price of a new product, and conduct the marginal economic capital analysis. Nevertheless, the notion of RCA has been living in the shadow of another, closely related notion, of risk measure (RM) in the sense that the latter notion often shapes the fashion in which the former notion is implemented. In fact, as the majority of the RCAs known nowadays are induced by RMs, the popularity of the two are apparently very much correlated. As a result, it is the RCA that is induced by the Conditional Tail Expectation (CTE) RM that has arguably prevailed in scholarly literature and applications. Admittedly, the CTE RM is a sound mathematical object and an important regulatory RM, but its appropriateness is controversial in, e.g., profitability analysis and pricing. In this paper, we address the question as to whether or not the RCA induced by the CTE RM may concur with alternatives that arise from the context of profit maximization. More specifically, we provide exhaustive description of all those probabilistic model settings, in which the mathematical and regulatory CTE RM may also reflect the risk perception of a profit-maximizing insurer.

q-fin.RM↗