arXiv subjects

Naghmeh Ivaki

Publications and source records attributed to Naghmeh Ivaki.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Automated Vulnerability Injection in Smart Contracts Using Large Language Models

Assessing vulnerability detection tools for smart contracts requires datasets with known ground truth, yet such datasets are scarce and difficult to build by hand. We propose an approach that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to automatically inject vulnerabilities into Solidity smart contracts, and demonstrate it in a case study targeting 49 vulnerability types from OpenSCV. Injected contracts are validated through a multi-step pipeline checking compilation, execution, business logic, and the presence of the intended vulnerability. Applied to real-world contracts from SmartBugs, LLMs generate nearly 1,000 candidate variants; after deduplication and validation, 32 confirmed vulnerable contracts spanning 25 vulnerability types survive (a 16.58% survival rate). Surviving contracts concentrate in structurally simpler targets and vulnerability types with localized syntactic patterns. We report practical challenges including LLMs' non-determinism and the difficulty of preserving contract semantics. We then use the validated contracts to assess three static analyzers, revealing complementary and incomplete coverage profiles. Results show that LLM-based vulnerability injection is feasible, while exposing key limitations in scalability and diversity.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Willing but Unable: Separating Refusal from Capability in Code LLMs via Abliteration

Producing a labeled vulnerable code at scale is a recurring obstacle for learning-based vulnerability detection: mined corpora carry substantial label noise, and existing LLM-based augmentation propagates these inaccuracies because it transforms vulnerable seeds rather than synthesising vulnerabilities from a specification. A complementary route is to start from safe code and ask an instruction-tuned LLM to inject a specified CWE (which would shift the labeling burden from open-ended detection to bounded binary confirmation) but safety-aligned code LLMs systematically refuse such prompts. This paper is a preliminary feasibility study of abliteration, a low-rank weight edit that orthogonally projects out the refusal direction in the residual stream, as a tool to remove this barrier. We use Python and CWE-89 (SQL injection) as a case study, evaluating the Qwen2.5-Coder-Instruct family at 3B, 7B, and 14B parameters on safe samples drawn from PromSec and SafeCoder, replicated three times per condition. We find that (i) refusal on injection prompts is strongly size- and prompt-context-dependent: the 14B refuses 100% of prompts, the 7B refuses 73% of PromSec but only 5% of SafeCoder, whereas the 3B is essentially never blocked; (ii) abliteration reduces refusal to zero or near-zero across all sizes while leaving syntactic validity above 93%, supporting the view that, in this setting, refusal can be detached from measured code-generation capability; and (iii) the post-abliteration injection rate remains capacity-bound (88-97% on the 14B, 89-90% on the 7B, and 25-48% on the 3B) separating willingness, which abliteration unlocks, from capability, which scales with parameters. Vulnerability verdicts are produced by a three-tool detector ensemble (CodeQL, Semgrep, Bandit) followed by manual adjudication by two authors on detector-positive outputs.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

A Systematic Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Healthcare and Emergency Services

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), initially developed for military applications, are now used in various fields. As UAVs become more common across multiple industries, it is crucial to understand how to adopt them effectively, efficiently, and safely. The utilization of UAVs in healthcare and emergency services has evolved significantly in recent years, with these aerial vehicles potentially contributing to increased survival rates and enhanced healthcare services. This paper presents a two-stage systematic literature review, including a tertiary study of 15 review papers and an in-depth assessment of 136 primary publications focused on using UAVs in healthcare and emergency services. The research demonstrates how civilian UAVs have been used in numerous applications, such as healthcare emergencies, medical supply delivery, and disaster management, for diverse use cases such as Automated External Defibrillator (AED) delivery, blood delivery, and search and rescue. The studies indicate that UAVs significantly improve response times in emergency situations, enhance survival rates by ensuring the timely delivery of critical medical supplies such as AEDs, and prove to be cost-effective alternatives to traditional delivery methods, especially in remote or inaccessible areas. The studies also highlight the need for ongoing research and development to address existing challenges, such as regulatory frameworks, security, privacy and safety concerns, infrastructure development, and ethical and social issues. Effectively understanding and tackling these challenges is essential for maximizing the benefits of UAV technology in healthcare and emergency services, ultimately leading to safer, more resilient, and responsive systems that can better serve public health needs.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2023

Analyzing the Impact of Elusive Faults on Blockchain Reliability

Blockchain recently became very popular due to its use in cryptocurrencies and potential application in various domains (e.g., retail, healthcare, insurance). The smart contract is a key part of blockchain systems and specifies an agreement between transaction participants. Nowadays, smart contracts are being deployed carrying residual faults, including severe vulnerabilities that lead to different types of failures at runtime. Fault detection tools can be used to detect faults that may then be removed from the code before deployment. However, in the case of smart contracts, the common opinion is that tools are immature and ineffective. In this work, we carry out a fault injection campaign to empirically analyze the runtime impact that realistic faults present in smart contracts may have on the reliability of blockchain systems. We place particular attention on the faults that elude popular smart contract verification tools and show if and in which ways the faults lead the blockchain system to fail at runtime. Results show general poor detection and, to some extent, complementary performance by the three tools used. The results also show that several elusive faults are responsible for severe blockchain failures.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2023

OpenSCV: An Open Hierarchical Taxonomy for Smart Contract Vulnerabilities

Smart contracts are nowadays at the core of most blockchain systems, as they specify and allow an agreement between entities that wish to perform a transaction. As any computer program, smart contracts are subject to the presence of residual faults, including severe security vulnerabilities, which require that the vulnerable contract is terminated in the blockchain. In this context, research began to be developed to prevent the deployment of smart contract holding vulnerabilities, mostly in the form of vulnerability detection tools. Along with these efforts, several and heterogeneous vulnerability classification schemes arised (e.g., most notably DASP and SWC). At the time of writing, these are mostly outdated initiatives, despite the fact that smart contract vulnerabilities are continuously being discovered and the associated rich information being mostly disregarded. In this paper, we propose OpenSCV, a new and Open hierarchical taxonomy for Smart Contract Vulnerabilities, which is open to community contributions and matches the current state of the practice, while being prepared to handle future modifications and evolution. The taxonomy was built based on the analysis of research on vulnerability classification, community-maintained classification schemes, and research on smart contract vulnerability detection. We show how OpenSCV covers the announced detection ability of current vulnerability detection tools, and highlight its usefulness as a resource in smart contract vulnerability research.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2020

Using Fault Injection to Assess Blockchain Systems in Presence of Faulty Smart Contracts

Blockchain has become particularly popular due to its promise to support business-critical services in very different domains (e.g., retail, supply chains, healthcare). Blockchain systems rely on complex middleware, like Ethereum or Hyperledger Fabric, that allow running smart contracts, which specify business logic in cooperative applications. The presence of software defects or faults in these contracts has notably been the cause of failures, including severe security problems. In this paper, we use a software implemented fault injection (SWIFI) technique to assess the behavior of permissioned blockchain systems in the presence of faulty smart contracts. We emulate the occurrence of general software faults (e.g., missing variable initialization) and also blockchain-specific software faults (e.g., missing require statement on transaction sender) in smart contracts code to observe the impact on the overall system dependability (i.e., reliability and integrity). We also study the effectiveness of formal verification (i.e., done by solc-verify) and runtime protections (e.g., using the assert statement) mechanisms in detection of injected faults. Results indicate that formal verification as well as additional runtime protections have to complement built-in platform checks to guarantee the proper dependability of blockchain systems and applications. The work presented in this paper allows smart contract developers to become aware of possible faults in smart contracts and to understand the impact of their presence. It also provides valuable information for middleware developers to improve the behavior (e.g., overall fault tolerance) of their systems.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2017

13th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC 2017): Fast Abstracts and Student Forum Proceedings

Fast Abstracts are short presentations of work in progress or opinion pieces and aim to serve as a rapid and flexible mechanism to (i) Report on current work that may or may not be complete; (ii) Introduce new ideas to the community; (iii) State positions on controversial issues or open problems. Student Forum is a vibrant and friendly environment where students can present their work, exchange ideas and experiences, get feedback on their work, get new inspirations and points of view. In addition, the forum stimulates interaction between young researchers, experienced researchers, and industry.

cs.DC↗