arXiv subjects

Minju Yoo

Publications and source records attributed to Minju Yoo.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Beyond Problem Solving: Large Language Models for Emotional and Reflective Support in Mathematics Learning

Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) traditionally focus their adaptive support on cognitive aspects of learning. Although effective, little is known about how such systems can be enhanced by addressing students' emotional states. In particular, the role of mindful interventions for supporting student learning and experiences in adaptive math learning remains underexplored. We developed "Math with Matt", an ITS that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide both cognitive and emotional support in algebra learning. The system offers 1) an LLM-based mindful chat that delivers context-sensitive emotional support through a pedagogical agent Matt, and 2) mindful feedback and hint messages (not just evaluative) to enhance learning experiences and reduce math anxiety. We conducted a classroom study with 7th graders, comparing a Mindful version against a version with cognitive support only. Overall, the ITS reduced executive state-math anxiety and improved students' math learning, though no significant differences emerged between the conditions. However, students with the mindfulness interventions showed higher learning efficiency and well-balanced problem-solving behavior, since they achieve a similar level of math learning with less learning time and fewer requested hints compared to the Cognitive version. Additionally, they reported that the pedagogical agent felt more supportive and caring than students in the cognitive condition. Our study demonstrates the feasibility and scalability of integrating mindfulness into ITSs through LLM-based interactions and positions LLMs as an adaptive, socio-emotional layer within cognitive math tutoring.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

RelianceScope: An Analytical Framework for Examining Students' Reliance on Generative AI Chatbots in Problem Solving

Generative AI chatbots enable personalized problem-solving, but effective learning requires students to self-regulate both how they seek help and how they use AI-generated responses. Considering engagement modes across these two actions reveals nuanced reliance patterns: for example, a student may actively engage in help-seeking by clearly specifying areas of need, yet engage passively in response-use by copying AI outputs, or vice versa. However, existing research lacks systematic tools for jointly capturing engagement across help-seeking and response-use, limiting the analysis of such reliance behaviors. We introduce RelianceScope, an analytical framework that characterizes students' reliance on chatbots during problem-solving. RelianceScope (1) operationalizes reliance into nine patterns based on combinations of engagement modes in help-seeking and response-use, and (2) situates these patterns within a knowledge-context lens that accounts for students' prior knowledge and the instructional significance of knowledge components. Rather than prescribing optimal AI use, the framework enables fine-grained analysis of reliance in open-ended student-AI interactions. As an illustrative application, we applied RelianceScope to analyze chat and code-edit logs from 79 college students in a web programming course. Results show that active help-seeking is associated with active response-use, whereas reliance patterns remain similar across knowledge mastery levels. Students often struggled to articulate their knowledge gaps and to adapt AI responses. Using our annotated dataset as a benchmark, we further demonstrate that large language models can reliably detect reliance during help-seeking and response-use. We conclude by discussing the implications of RelianceScope and the design guidelines for AI-supported educational systems.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Beyond Tools: Understanding How Heavy Users Integrate LLMs into Everyday Tasks and Decision-Making

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for both everyday and specialized tasks. While HCI research focuses on domain-specific applications, little is known about how heavy users integrate LLMs into everyday decision-making. Through qualitative interviews with heavy LLM users (n=7) who employ these systems for both intuitive and analytical thinking tasks, our findings show that participants use LLMs for social validation, self-regulation, and interpersonal guidance, seeking to build self-confidence and optimize cognitive resources. These users viewed LLMs either as rational, consistent entities or average human decision-makers. Our findings suggest that heavy LLM users develop nuanced interaction patterns beyond simple delegation, highlighting the need to reconsider how we study LLM integration in decision-making processes.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

How Do Teachers Create Pedagogical Chatbots?: Current Practices and Challenges

AI chatbots have emerged as promising educational tools for personalized learning experiences, with advances in large language models (LLMs) enabling teachers to create and customize these chatbots for their specific classroom needs. However, there is a limited understanding of how teachers create pedagogical chatbots and integrate them into their lessons. Through semi-structured interviews with seven K-12 teachers, we examined their practices and challenges when designing, implementing, and deploying chatbots. Our findings revealed that teachers prioritize developing task-specific chatbots aligned with their lessons. Teachers engaged in various creation practices and had different challenges; novices in chatbot creation struggled mainly with initial design and technical implementation, while experienced teachers faced challenges with technical aspects and analyzing conversational data. Based on these insights, we explore approaches to supporting teachers' chatbot development and opportunities for designing future chatbot creation systems. This work provides foundational insights from teachers that can empower teacher-created chatbots, facilitating AI-augmented teaching.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

TeachTune: Reviewing Pedagogical Agents Against Diverse Student Profiles with Simulated Students

Large language models (LLMs) can empower teachers to build pedagogical conversational agents (PCAs) customized for their students. As students have different prior knowledge and motivation levels, teachers must review the adaptivity of their PCAs to diverse students. Existing chatbot reviewing methods (e.g., direct chat and benchmarks) are either manually intensive for multiple iterations or limited to testing only single-turn interactions. We present TeachTune, where teachers can create simulated students and review PCAs by observing automated chats between PCAs and simulated students. Our technical pipeline instructs an LLM-based student to simulate prescribed knowledge levels and traits, helping teachers explore diverse conversation patterns. Our pipeline could produce simulated students whose behaviors correlate highly to their input knowledge and motivation levels within 5% and 10% accuracy gaps. Thirty science teachers designed PCAs in a between-subjects study, and using TeachTune resulted in a lower task load and higher student profile coverage over a baseline.

cs.HC↗