arXiv subjects

Michele Fioretti

Publications and source records attributed to Michele Fioretti.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Getting There and Getting In: How Mobility and Sorting Keep Women out of Top Startup Accelerators

Startup accelerators are a leading gateway to venture capital, but top programs often require founders to relocate to a venture hub. From a hand-collected census of U.S. accelerator startups (2008-2011) followed for five years, we estimate a two-sided matching model that separates two channels behind the gender funding gap, geographic mobility and sorting across accelerator tiers. Women raise about 60% less than men over five years; the gap concentrates among non-relocating women, is largest at active-childrearing ages, and vanishes for relocators, while the mobility cost is near zero for men. Removing mobility frictions raises women's match quality but not their tier; reaching the high-funding top tier also requires removing the sorting disadvantage that women face. The 2012 JOBS Act eased the legal barrier and capacity grew tenfold, yet the U.S. VC dollar gap still tripled (2011-2020): closing it needs mobility, sorting, and capacity together.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2024

NGO Activism: Exposure vs. Influence

This paper studies how the timing of NGO activism shapes its effectiveness in influencing corporate behavior. Using data on 2,500 campaigns targeting U.S. firms, we show that campaigns timed at annual general meetings (AGMs) generate large visibility gains but little contemporaneous influence, while campaigns launched before the AGM significantly increase shareholder proposal success and improve firms' environmental and social performance. We develop a dynamic model in which NGOs trade off awareness building and credibility formation, generating a lifecycle in activism from visibility-seeking to influence-oriented engagement. Therefore, NGOs' objectives evolve endogenously to coordinate stakeholder pressure and shape corporate behavior.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2024

Capacity, Technology Portfolios, and the Paradox of Concentration

Does limiting the largest firm's capacity always lower prices? We model firms competing in supply schedules with multiple technologies, each with constant marginal cost up to capacity. In a tractable model, in which capacity and technological efficiency coexist as distinct sources of market power, we find that when the largest firm leads by efficiency, a small transfer of higher-cost capacity to the leader raises concentration yet lowers prices, contrary to standard antitrust intuition. Larger transfers raise prices, restoring standard intuition and tracing a non-monotone price-concentration relation. We prove existence and uniqueness of equilibrium, derive closed-form conditions for when transfers raise or lower prices, and extend the results to other oligopoly models. Evidence from Colombia's wholesale electricity market, where weather shocks shift hydropower capacity across technology-diversified firms, supports the pattern. Counterfactual transfers lower prices up to 30% in the least concentrated markets. We draw implications for capacity caps, divestitures, and mergers.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2022

Sovereign Hold-Up and Technology Adoption: Evidence from the North Sea

Contractual relationships between the state and private firms involving large irreversible investments are vulnerable to sovereign hold-up risk: anticipating that the state can unilaterally revise terms once capital is sunk, firms may underinvest. Causal evidence on this mechanism is scarce because sovereign commitment is typically bundled with broader institutional quality. We overcome this identification challenge by exploiting a natural experiment in the North Sea oil and gas industry. In 1985, a Norwegian Supreme Court ruling declared retroactive changes to petroleum licenses unconstitutional, while the UK retained the discretion to revise contracts. Using granular data on the universe of fields and firms from 1975 to 1995, we estimate the impact of this strengthening of sovereign commitment on the adoption of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR), a major extraction technology requiring large irreversible investments. Firms exposed to the ruling sharply increased EOR adoption and productivity, gaining market share through aggressive portfolio expansion. We find that private firms with preexisting EOR expertise -- rather than state-owned enterprises -- drove this transformation, leveraging this expertise to diversify into riskier geologies and adopt complementary technologies. These findings establish sovereign commitment as a primary determinant of investment and technology adoption. By tying the state's hands, the ruling transformed promises into credible commitments, effectively functioning as an industrial policy that unlocked a trajectory of technological deepening. While such constitutional protections are critical for investment, a global survey of constitutions reveals that only 30.6% of countries prohibit retroactive legislation beyond criminal law.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2021

The Shared Costs of Pursuing Shareholder Values

We study how shareholder values shape firms' costly prosocial actions and who bears their costs. We develop a model in which some shareholders are publicly associated with a firm (e.g., founders or other prominent individual blockholders). When the firm takes a visible action under intense media scrutiny, these shareholders can plausibly claim credit and gain reputation, while diversified institutional investors cannot. The key empirical challenge is that influence is rarely observed: many consequential decisions are not subject to shareholder proposals or votes. We therefore use predetermined annual general meeting (AGM) timing combined with large, sudden crises -- COVID-19 and the invasion of Ukraine -- to generate quasi-experimental variation in attention and attribution, and to study highly visible, high-cost actions that were not legally required at onset. Firms with prominent individual blockholders are more likely to donate or exit when their AGM falls at crisis onset, while firms with large diversified institutional owners are less likely to do so. Consistent with our mechanism, online searches rise for prominent individuals after firm actions but not for institutions. Using an intent-to-treat triple-difference design on the 1,000 largest U.S.-listed firms, we find that exposed firms reduce investment, productivity, and profitability by 1--3\% for up to two years, highlighting the shared costs of pursuing the values of a visible minority.

econ.GN↗