arXiv subjects

Michael Shields

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Shields.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Operator-Informed Gaussian Processes for Complex Helmholtz Wavefields: From Synthetic Benchmarks to In Vivo Brain Elastography

The Helmholtz equation governs time-harmonic wave propagation, and in dissipative media a complex modulus renders its squared wavenumber $\kappa^2$ complex. Inferring such fields from sparse, noisy data calls for solvers that also quantify their own uncertainty. Physics-informed Gaussian-process (GP) regression supplies this by returning a posterior over the solution, yet operator-conditioned formulations have been developed almost exclusively for real-valued fields. We extend operator-informed GP regression to complex-valued Helmholtz problems by realifying the complex operator into an equivalent coupled real block, which enables inference with standard real-valued GP conditioning. The construction admits a family of priors, from a proper diagonal prior to coregionalized and multiscale variants, and conditions on PDE residuals and boundary traces. On benchmark problems in one to three dimensions, the solver is competitive with finite-difference and neural-network baselines at a far smaller interior-constraint budget. Unlike those deterministic baselines, it returns a posterior over the complex wavefield rather than a point estimate. Applied to \textit{in vivo} brain magnetic resonance elastography, a proper multiscale prior reconstructs the shear curl field to a correlation of $0.77$ with measurement, above a $0.75$ target. The gain arises from the multiscale kernel rather than from real--imaginary coupling. We further identify a low-frequency accuracy ceiling set by model mismatch and a posterior uncertainty that is not yet calibrated. Calibrated uncertainty therefore emerges as the central next step for probabilistic wavefield inference in dissipative media.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2026

Effective Dimensionality as an Operator Invariant for Physics-Preserving Constraint Adaptation in Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Physics-Informed Neural Networks inherently suffer from task interference because they rely on a shared parameter space to satisfy both governing differential equations and boundary conditions. We analyze this structural conflict using the Fisher Information Matrix to quantify the effective degrees of freedom ($d_{eff}$) in a physics-constrained model. Unlike the classical $d_{eff}$ which measures how many parameter directions are informed by data against a statistical prior, our $d_{eff}$ measures the dimension of the parameter directions unconstrained by the differential operator. For operators with finite-dimensional kernel, we show that $d_{eff}$ converges to the kernel dimension exactly, independent of network width, depth, or activation function, recasting it from a fit diagnostic into a structural invariant of the underlying continuous operator. For operators with infinite-dimensional kernel, $d_{eff}$ instead measures the network's finite-dimensional representational bandwidth for that kernel rather than recovering an integer invariant. Importantly, $d_{eff}$ also serves as an a priori structural diagnostic. Driving $d_{eff}$ of a well-posed problem to zero certifies that the physics and boundary constraints have absorbed the network's free directions. Building on this characterization, we introduce subspace projection strategies for boundary adaptation. Rather than retraining from scratch, we project parameter updates into the null space of the pre-trained physics operator so that new boundary conditions are satisfied without disturbing the learned physics. Gradient-based fine-tuning can match or exceed this but needs more wall-clock time and tuning, whereas subspace projection delivers near-equivalent quality in seconds to minutes. We validate on linear and nonlinear operators, demonstrating accurate adaptation to initial and boundary shifts and unencountered constraint types.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2026

Can Coding Agents Reproduce Findings in Computational Materials Science?

Large language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous coding agents and have achieved remarkably strong performance on software engineering benchmarks. However, it is unclear whether such success transfers to computational scientific workflows, where tasks require not only strong coding ability, but also the ability to navigate complex, domain-specific procedures and to interpret results in the context of scientific claims. To address this question, we present AutoMat, a benchmark for evaluating LLM-based agents' ability to reproduce claims from computational materials science. AutoMat poses three interrelated challenges: recovering underspecified computational procedures, navigating specialized toolchains, and determining whether the resulting evidence supports a claim. By working closely with subject matter experts, we curate a set of claims from real materials science papers to test whether coding agents can recover and execute the end-to-end workflow needed to support (or undermine) such claims. We then evaluate multiple representative coding agent settings across several foundation models. Our results show that current LLM-based agents obtain low overall success rates on AutoMat, with the best-performing setting achieving a success rate of only 53%. Error analysis further reveals that agents perform worst when workflows must be reconstructed from paper text alone and that they fail primarily due to incomplete procedures, methodological deviations, and execution fragility. Taken together, these findings position AutoMat as both a benchmark for computational scientific reproducibility and a tool for diagnosing the current limitations of agentic systems in AI-for-science settings.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2022

Quantifying the Structure of Disordered Materials

Durable interest in developing a framework for the detailed structure of glassy materials has produced numerous structural descriptors that trade off between general applicability and interpretability. However, none approach the combination of simplicity and wide-ranging predictive power of the lattice-grain-defect framework for crystalline materials. Working from the hypothesis that the local atomic environments of a glassy material are constrained by enthalpy minimization to a low-dimensional manifold in atomic coordinate space, we develop a novel generalized distance function, the Gaussian Integral Inner Product (GIIP) distance, in connection with agglomerative clustering and diffusion maps, to parameterize that manifold. Applying this approach to a two-dimensional model crystal and a three-dimensional binary model metallic glass results in parameters interpretable as coordination number, composition, volumetric strain, and local symmetry. In particular, we show that a more slowly quenched glass has a higher degree of local tetrahedral symmetry at the expense of cyclic symmetry. While these descriptors require post-hoc interpretation, they minimize bias rooted in crystalline materials science and illuminate a range of structural trends that might otherwise be missed.

cond-mat.dis-nn↗

arXiv2021

Imprecise Subset Simulation

The objective of this work is to quantify the uncertainty in probability of failure estimates resulting from incomplete knowledge of the probability distributions for the input random variables. We propose a framework that couples the widely used Subset simulation (SuS) with Bayesian/information theoretic multi-model inference. The process starts with data used to infer probability distributions for the model inputs. Often such data sets are small. Multi-model inference is used to assess uncertainty associated with the model-form and parameters of these random variables in the form of model probabilities and the associated joint parameter probability densities. A sampling procedure is used to construct a set of equally probable candidate probability distributions and an optimal importance sampling distribution is determined analytically from this set. Subset simulation is then performed using this optimal sampling density and the resulting conditional probabilities are re-weighted using importance sampling. The result of this process are empirical probability distributions of failure probabilities that provide direct estimates of the uncertainty in failure probability estimates that result from inference on small data sets. The method is demonstrated to be both computationally efficient -- requiring only a single subset simulation and nominal cost of sample re-weighting -- and to provide reasonable estimates of the uncertainty in failure probabilities.

stat.ME↗