arXiv subjects

Michael Shalyt

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Shalyt.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Ramanujan Challenge Results: AI-Assisted Evaluation Pipeline for Multi-Format Proofs

As AI's mathematical capabilities rapidly improve, meaningful benchmarks are shifting from university-level problems and math olympiads to research-level mathematics. The Ramanujan Challenge is a benchmark comprised of research-level problems in number theory, including unpublished results and open conjectures. It presented concrete formulas for mathematical constants whose correctness can be checked numerically, while their proofs may require non-obvious mathematics. Here, we analyze the Challenge submissions, measuring the relative success of different AI models, Computer Algebra Systems (CAS), and formal tools. We find correct submissions that are conceptually distinct from the official solutions, and a proof of one of the published open conjectures. Evaluating the submissions exposed a second challenge: judging complex proofs reliably at scale. We introduce an AI-assisted evaluation pipeline for natural language proofs, CAS code, and Lean formalizations that assesses semantic and logical correctness. Compared with the conventional one-shot LLM judgment, our pipeline reduces false-positive verdicts on natural language proofs from 23% to 6% and improves judgment accuracy on supporting code from 46% to 58%. This approach provides a methodology for evaluating research-level mathematics at scale, with potential applications across mathematics and AI for science.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

New Directions in Irrationality

Since Apéry's proof of the irrationality of $ζ(3)$, decades of work have explored integrals, hypergeometric identities, and recurrences with exceptional arithmetic properties, to discover the strongest quantitative bounds on irrationality measures for zeta values and related constants. Yet, most findings have relied on specially tailored families of such constructions, making their systematic extension difficult. Here we show how these constructions can be connected and generalized into a common multidimensional structure based on conservative matrix fields (CMFs), enabling a systematic discovery of new irrationality proofs and quantitative bounds for irrationality exponents. CMFs are finite-dimensional cocycles of compatible rational matrix shifts, and are shown to capture all the classical constructions developed since Apéry as one-dimensional trajectories. The initial point encodes the mathematical constants; varying the trajectory within a suitable convergence region produces different approximation schemes for the same constants. We use this structure to improve the irrationality measures of famous constants, yielding for example $μ(ζ(2))<4.62675$ and $μ(ζ(3))<5.4197$, and proving that $1,ζ(3),ζ(4)$ are linearly independent over $\mathbb{Q}$, yielding $μ(Aζ(3)+Bζ(4))<66.3$ for every $(A,B)\in\mathbb{Q}^2\setminus\{(0,0)\}$. The same approach demonstrated over other CMFs provides irrationality proving trajectories for infinitely more mathematical constants. We further construct higher-rank CMFs with explicit initial states for $1,ζ(2),ζ(3),\ldots,ζ(d+1)$, and identify the arithmetic conditions needed to obtain further, higher-order independence results.

math.NT↗

arXiv2026

An Infinite Family of Apéry-like Recurrences for Euler's Constant

Euler's constant $γ$, also known as the Euler-Mascheroni constant, remains one of the most elusive constants in mathematics. Despite extensive study, its irrationality is still unproven, and Apéry-like approximations of it are remarkably scarce. We present a novel identity that expresses $γ$ in terms of a Meijer G-function and its first few derivatives. This identity is then generalized and used to systematically generate infinitely many Apéry-like approximations of $γ$ using a Conservative Matrix Field construction based on the Meijer G-function.

math.NT↗

arXiv2026

Can AI Follow In Einstein's Footsteps?

AI is accelerating physics discovery, but perhaps away from Einstein-level theory building. To understand this gap, we must recognize a striking trend: while being very successful, the most visible AI contributions to physics discovery appear to mirror the historical development of physics, but in reverse. Human discovery in physics progressed, in broad strokes, from ancient pattern prediction, through phenomenological laws such as Kepler's, to principle-based universal theories such as relativity and the Standard Model. On the AI side, prominent contributions to physics discovery point in the opposite direction: early milestones emphasized explicit equation-discovery methods, such as symbolic regression, whereas more recent frontier contributions are powerful predictors such as AlphaFold and GraphCast, which can be remarkably accurate yet do not provide clear theoretical understanding. If this trend continues, AI would become extraordinarily good at prediction but may struggle to ever propose its first serious contender to quantum gravity or other paradigm-level theories. We review the current landscape of AI for physics discovery and highlight a critical missing skill: the ability to pose the right questions or invent the right principles to guide the development of new theories and the tests to falsify them. This mode of discovery has driven many of the deepest advances since the 17th century, where symmetry, simplicity, and new mathematical frameworks guided theory construction before experimental tests. Equipping AI systems with such skills could move them from predicting within known frameworks to proposing the next paradigm-level discovery in physics.

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2026

On Conservative Matrix Fields: Continuous Asymptotics and Arithmetic

We present the Conservative Matrix Field (CMF) as a tool for the analysis and computation of D-finite functions. We use conservative matrix fields to establish asymptotic properties of families of linear forms in periods, including (but not limited to) multivariate Mellin integrals, via a discrete Levinson-type framework due to Benzaid and Lutz. Finally, we present an experimental analysis of the families of linear forms generated by these objects and formalize the resulting observations as conjectures on their continuous asymptotic and arithmetic properties.

math.NT↗

arXiv2026

The Ramanujan Challenge For AI

To help evaluate the mathematical skills of current AI systems, we present a set of formulas for fundamental mathematical constants. These problems are attractive for AI evaluation because they are concrete and can be checked numerically to arbitrary precision, yet proving them may require non-obvious mathematics. Mathematical constants such as $π$, $e$, Catalan's constant, and special values of the Riemann zeta function have fascinated mathematicians for centuries. The search for formulas evaluating mathematical constants has produced some of the most beautiful mathematics in the field, especially in cases that yield irrationality proofs or fast convergence rates. Ramanujan's legacy is emblematic of this tradition. The list we provide contains two types of problems: formulas whose proofs are known to the authors but will remain encrypted for a short initial period; and formulas that are not yet proven. We are curious to see the achievements of AI in both cases.

math.HO↗

arXiv2026

ASyMOB: Algebraic Symbolic Mathematical Operations Benchmark

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to symbolic mathematics, yet existing evaluations often conflate pattern memorization with genuine reasoning. To address this gap, we present ASyMOB, a high-resolution dataset of 35,368 validated symbolic math problems spanning integration, limits, differential equations, series, and hypergeometrics. Unlike prior benchmarks, ASyMOB systematically perturbs each seed problem using symbolic, numeric, and equivalence-preserving transformations, enabling a fine-grained assessment of generalization. Our evaluation reveals three key findings: (1) most models' performance collapses under minor perturbations, while top systems exhibit an apparent regime shift in robustness; (2) integrated code tools stabilize performance, particularly for weaker models; and (3) we identify examples where Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) fail while LLMs succeed, as well as problems solved only via a hybrid LLM-CAS approach, highlighting a promising integration frontier. ASyMOB serves as a principled diagnostic tool for measuring and accelerating progress toward building verifiable, trustworthy AI for scientific discovery.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

From Euler to AI: Unifying Formulas for Mathematical Constants

The constant $π$ has fascinated scholars throughout the centuries, inspiring numerous formulas for its evaluation, such as infinite sums and continued fractions. Despite their individual significance, many of the underlying connections among formulas remain unknown, missing unifying theories that could unveil deeper understanding. The absence of a unifying theory reflects a broader challenge across math and science: knowledge is typically accumulated through isolated discoveries, while deeper connections often remain hidden. In this work, we present an automated framework for the unification of mathematical formulas. Our system combines Large Language Models (LLMs) for systematic formula harvesting, an LLM-code feedback loop for validation, and a novel symbolic algorithm for clustering and eventual unification. We demonstrate this methodology on the hallmark case of $π$, an ideal testing ground for symbolic unification. Applying this approach to 455,050 arXiv papers, we validate 385 distinct formulas for $π$ and prove relations between 360 (94%) of them, of which 166 (43%) can be derived from a single mathematical object - linking canonical formulas by Euler, Gauss, Brouncker, and newer ones from algorithmic discoveries by the Ramanujan Machine. Our method generalizes to other constants, including $e$, $ζ(3)$, and Catalan's constant, demonstrating the potential of AI-assisted mathematics to uncover hidden structures and unify knowledge across domains.

math.HO↗

arXiv2024

Unsupervised Discovery of Formulas for Mathematical Constants

Ongoing efforts that span over decades show a rise of AI methods for accelerating scientific discovery, yet accelerating discovery in mathematics remains a persistent challenge for AI. Specifically, AI methods were not effective in creation of formulas for mathematical constants because each such formula must be correct for infinite digits of precision, with "near-true" formulas providing no insight toward the correct ones. Consequently, formula discovery lacks a clear distance metric needed to guide automated discovery in this realm. In this work, we propose a systematic methodology for categorization, characterization, and pattern identification of such formulas. The key to our methodology is introducing metrics based on the convergence dynamics of the formulas, rather than on the numerical value of the formula. These metrics enable the first automated clustering of mathematical formulas. We demonstrate this methodology on Polynomial Continued Fraction formulas, which are ubiquitous in their intrinsic connections to mathematical constants, and generalize many mathematical functions and structures. We test our methodology on a set of 1,768,900 such formulas, identifying many known formulas for mathematical constants, and discover previously unknown formulas for $π$, $\ln(2)$, Gauss', and Lemniscate's constants. The uncovered patterns enable a direct generalization of individual formulas to infinite families, unveiling rich mathematical structures. This success paves the way towards a generative model that creates formulas fulfilling specified mathematical properties, accelerating the rate of discovery of useful formulas.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2023

Algorithm-assisted discovery of an intrinsic order among mathematical constants

In recent decades, a growing number of discoveries in fields of mathematics have been assisted by computer algorithms, primarily for exploring large parameter spaces that humans would take too long to investigate. As computers and algorithms become more powerful, an intriguing possibility arises - the interplay between human intuition and computer algorithms can lead to discoveries of novel mathematical concepts that would otherwise remain elusive. To realize this perspective, we have developed a massively parallel computer algorithm that discovers an unprecedented number of continued fraction formulas for fundamental mathematical constants. The sheer number of formulas discovered by the algorithm unveils a novel mathematical structure that we call the conservative matrix field. Such matrix fields (1) unify thousands of existing formulas, (2) generate infinitely many new formulas, and most importantly, (3) lead to unexpected relations between different mathematical constants, including multiple integer values of the Riemann zeta function. Conservative matrix fields also enable new mathematical proofs of irrationality. In particular, we can use them to generalize the celebrated proof by Apéry for the irrationality of $ζ(3)$. Utilizing thousands of personal computers worldwide, our computer-supported research strategy demonstrates the power of experimental mathematics, highlighting the prospects of large-scale computational approaches to tackle longstanding open problems and discover unexpected connections across diverse fields of science.

cs.AI↗