arXiv subjects

Michael Neumann

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Neumann.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Operationalizing the EU AI Act in Agile Software Development: A Guideline-Based Approach

Context: The EU AI Act requires providers and deployers of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems to implement documentation, risk management, and human oversight. Agile teams that ship AI features in short iterations lack specific artifacts to discharge these duties, since the regulation's abstract provisions do not map onto the Definition of Done, Sprint Reviews, or working agreements. Objective: We provide agile teams with an actionable compliance instrument: an evaluated guideline that operationalizes EU AI Act obligations as activities integrable into existing agile practice. We further document the translation method behind it so that the approach can be reused for adjacent regulations. Method: Following Design Science Research, we assessed each EU AI Act article along three dimensions. We subsequently classified the articles using a traffic-light scheme and mapped those deemed highly relevant to previously documented pain points of agile teams working with AI. We validated the resulting catalog with practitioners through a survey and 11 additional semi-structured expert interviews, analyzed via qualitative content analysis. Results: The guideline comprises 12 items covering roles and responsibilities, risk and quality management, transparency and traceability, monitoring, and regulatory sandboxes. Practitioners rated the catalog as understandable and relevant; feasibility varied with organizational maturity. Effective adoption towards EU AI Act compliance requires collective ownership across roles and integration into existing agile events rather than parallel compliance processes. Conclusions: The catalog gives agile teams a starting point to transform their delivery practices towards an EU AI Act compliance without dismantling agile practices.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Overcoming Challenges in Agile and DevOps Integration: A Qualitative Study

In response to the growing reliance on Agile and DevOps methodologies for enhancing software delivery speed and quality, this study investigates the persistent challenges and viable solutions associated with their integration. Although Agile promotes iterative development and customer responsiveness, and DevOps emphasizes automation and operational efficiency, their convergence in practice often presents significant organizational, structural, and technical hurdles. This research employs a qualitative methodology grounded in semi-structured interviews with six seasoned industry professionals across Brazil and Germany, each with extensive experience in both Agile and DevOps domains. The study identifies four core categories of integration challenges: Cultural & Organizational Barriers, Structural Constraints, Process \& Method Complexity, and Technical Limitations. Additionally, it offers four major solution domains: Team Structure & Autonomy, Culture & Collaboration, Process & Change Management, and Automation & Infrastructure. The findings underscore the importance of cultural alignment, proactive monitoring, automation, and other practices in mitigating integration friction. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of the Agile-DevOps interface and offer practical insights for software organizations seeking to navigate this complex transition effectively.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Neurodiversity in Agile Teams: Obstacles and Inclusion Barriers

Context: Neurodiversity is increasingly recognized as a valuable dimension of workplace diversity. However, in agile software development teams, the interplay between teamwork practices and the inclusion of neurodivergent employees remains underexplored. Objective: The study aims to explore how teamwork quality in agile software development is currently practiced and discussed in the context of neurodiversity, and to identify organizational barriers that hinder the effective inclusion of neurodivergent developers. Method: We applied a mixed-method approach combining a web content analysis covering Reddit and LinkedIn with 11 semi-structured expert interviews from a corporate neurodiversity network in a German organization. Results: The analysis shows that teamwork practices are highly fragmented and shaped by individual adaptation rather than a shared standard. While agile practices and supportive tools can enable neurodivergent participation, rigid structures, stereotypes, and one-size-fits-all approaches often undermine inclusion. Organizational awareness and tailored adjustments remain insufficient. Conclusion: Agile practices can promote inclusive teamwork, yet their benefits are constrained by rigid organizational structures and limited awareness of neurodiversity. Harnessing neurodiverse strengths demands flexible organizational conditions and tailored support.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

The 2nd Workshop on Agile Practice & Research: A Summary and Call For Research

Agile software development has been shaped by the interplay between academic research and industrial practice for over two decades, yet notable gaps persist between both domains. This paper focuses on three research-practice gaps: the theory gap, the time gap, and the transfer gap. To address these, the 2nd Agile Practice & Research Workshop was held at the International Conference on Agile Software Development (XP) 2026 in S\~ao Paulo, Brazil, bringing researchers and practitioners together to identify root causes and develop joint solutions. Building on two preceding sessions in which contributions of participants had been presented, participants engaged in a structured collaborative session, working in small groups on one of the three gaps and reflecting on possible causes and remedies. The organizers synthesized the results into four propositions for improving the research-practice intersection: (1) improving scientific communication, (2) aligning research more closely with emerging industrial needs, (3) creating stronger incentives for sustained collaboration, and (4) integrating educational approaches into research practice. From these, three calls for research were formulated: (a) broader adoption of open science practices for transparency, reproducibility, and cumulative evidence; (b) higher empirical quality standards through stronger theoretical grounding and rigorous design; and (c) more explicit, value-oriented contributions that clearly articulate their practical and scientific relevance. The paper offers both a summary of the workshop and a call to strengthen research-practice collaboration.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Knowing the Rules Is Not Enough: Student Regulatory Awareness and Use of GenAI in Higher Education

Context: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT are increasingly integrated into students learning practices. While previous research mainly examines adoption rates and attitudes, students awareness of institutional regulations and their perceived compliance remain unexplored. Understanding whether regulatory awareness influences student behavior is therefore important as higher education institutions create and apply AI policies. Objective: This study investigates how students awareness of GenAI regulations relates to their perceived compliance and actual usage behavior. Our research objective is to examine the association between regulatory knowledge, GenAI use, and perceived rule conformity among students in computer science related study programs. Method: A survey with 151 undergraduate students in Business Information Systems and E-Government programs at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hannover (Germany) collected data on GenAI usage, tools used, awareness of institutional regulations, and perceived compliance. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, and correlation analyzes were applied. Results: Most students actively use GenAI tools, but over half are uncertain whether their usage complies with institutional regulations. Regulatory awareness shows only weak to moderate associations with actual usage behavior. Students primarily rely on privately accessed GenAI tools rather than institutionally provided solutions. Contributions: The study contributes empirical evidence on the relationship between regulatory awareness and GenAI usage in higher education. Our findings highlight a gap between institutional regulations and student practices and provide insights for educators and institutions on improving policy communication and integrating GenAI more effectively into teaching and learning contexts.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

From Real-World Projects to Research-Oriented Learning: Continuous Improvement of a Master-Level Course in Software Engineering Education

Problem: Despite growing interest in project-based learning, little is known about how a master-level course can be continuously evolved toward research-oriented approaches over several years and how students perceive this development. Method: We conducted a longitudinal mixed-methods study of a master-level course in Information Systems at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hannover (Germany). The analysis covers six years between 2019 and 2025 and draws on teaching evaluations, course documentation, and reflective teaching artifacts. Results: The course evolved from a practice-oriented project format toward a more explicitly research-oriented learning environment. Despite this change, students' perceived course quality remained positive. Authentic projects, external collaboration, lecturer support, structured scaffolding, and visible relevance supported positive student perceptions. Contribution: This paper shows how a master-level course can be continuously evolved toward research-oriented learning while maintaining positive student perceptions. It further identifies the course design decisions that supported this transition.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

A Systematic AI Adoption Framework for Higher Education: From Student GenAI Usage to Institutional Integration

The rapid development of GenAI technologies is transforming learning, assessment, and academic production in higher education. Despite increasing student adoption, many institutions lack operational mechanisms to systematically align regulations and curricula with evolving generative artificial intelligence practices, creating regulatory ambiguity and academic integrity risks. This study investigates how students utilize generative artificial intelligence tools in computer science-oriented disciplines and develops a structured, lightweight framework supporting institutional adaptation to pervasive GenAI usage. We conducted a case study at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hannover (Germany), combining document analysis with an online survey (N = 151) targeting Business Information Systems and E-Government students. Quantitative responses were analyzed statistically, while open-ended responses underwent thematic synthesis. Generative artificial intelligence adoption was widespread, with ChatGPT as the dominant tool. Students primarily used generative artificial intelligence for research assistance, programming support, and text processing. However, substantial policy uncertainty was observed: many students were unaware of or unsure about institutional generative artificial intelligence regulations. Document analysis revealed regulatory gaps, ambiguous terminology, and inconsistencies between formal rules and teaching practices. To address these shortcomings, we propose the AI Adoption Framework for Higher Education, an iterative and operational model integrating document analysis, empirical observation, synthesis of findings, and targeted updates of regulations and curricula. The framework addresses governance, assessment validity, and academic integrity under generative artificial intelligence conditions and provides practical guidance for institutional adaptation.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Teaching Agile Requirements Engineering: A Stakeholder Simulation with Generative AI

Context: The active involvement of users and customers in agile software development remains a persistent challenge in practice. For this reason, it is important that students in higher education become familiar with good practices in Agile Requirements Engineering during their studies. Objective: Our objective is to enable students to learn how to interact with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) through the use of a stakeholder simulation with AI Personas, while also developing an understanding of the limitations of AI tools in practical contexts. Method: In our courses, we employ a stakeholder simulation using GenAI, in which students conduct interviews with AI Personas through a provided meta-prompt. Based on the outcomes of these interviews, students apply agile practices (e.g., story mapping or impact mapping) to document requirements. The use of GenAI is subsequently reflected upon in a structured group discussion. Results: Through this approach, students gain practical experience by applying state-of-the art agile practices for requirements elicitation and documentation while simultaneously developing an understanding of the technical and ethical limitations associated with the use of generative AI. Conclusion: We have applied this approach over several terms and found that using a meta-prompt provides flexibility, allowing us to remain independent of specific large language model providers.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

From Earthquake Solidarity to Educational Equity: Conceptualizing a Sustainable, Volunteer-Driven P2P Learning Ecosystem at Scale

This study examines the evolution of a grassroots, volunteer-driven peer-to-peer (P2P) educational initiative from an emergency response to the 2023 T\"urkiye earthquake into a sustainable ecosystem that operated for over two years and supported 300+ middle-school learners with 40+ volunteer tutors. Employing an interpretive case study approach, we triangulated data from participant observation, focus groups, questionnaires, and collaborative visioning workshops to investigate the socio-technical dynamics enabling long-term resilience in a fully online, nonreciprocal far-peer tutoring setting. Our findings reveal that while age proximity fosters trust and open communication, it also poses challenges for tutors who must balance peer rapport with instructional authority. Volunteer engagement is driven primarily by intrinsic motives - educational impact and community belonging - while optional micro-earning is envisioned as a practical enabler for long-term sustainability. Tutees report significant gains in confidence, self-expression, and accelerated comprehension, attributing these outcomes to personalized, interactive sessions within a "family-like" safe space that combines academic instruction with socio-emotional support. Notably, tutees view tutors as aspirational role models and express strong intentions to return as tutors themselves, envisioning a self-regenerating cycle of intergenerational reciprocity that carries knowledge and solidarity from generation to generation. Both cohorts call for a dedicated platform featuring integrated scheduling, personalization, feedback, and quality assurance mechanisms. We synthesize these insights into theory-informed implications and five design principles for sustainable P2P learning ecosystems at scale.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Between Policy and Practice: GenAI Adoption in Agile Software Development Teams

Context: The rapid emergence of generative AI (GenAI) tools has begun to reshape various software engineering activities. Yet, their adoption within agile environments remains underexplored. Objective: This study investigates how agile practitioners adopt GenAI tools in real-world organizational contexts, focusing on regulatory conditions, use cases, benefits, and barriers. Method: An exploratory multiple case study was conducted in three German organizations, involving 17 semi-structured interviews and document analysis. A cross-case thematic analysis was applied to identify GenAI adoption patterns. Results: Findings reveal that GenAI is primarily used for creative tasks, documentation, and code assistance. Benefits include efficiency gains and enhanced creativity, while barriers relate to data privacy, validation effort, and lack of governance. Using the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, we find that these barriers stem from misalignments across the three dimensions. Regulatory pressures are often translated into policies without accounting for actual technological usage patterns or organizational constraints. This leads to systematic gaps between policy and practice. Conclusion: GenAI offers significant potential to augment agile roles but requires alignment across TOE dimensions, including clear policies, data protection measures, and user training to ensure responsible and effective integration.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Modelling Interrelations Between Agile Practices: The Agile Map

Agile methods are defined through guidelines comprising various practices intended to enable agile ways of working. These guidelines further comprise a specific set of agile practices aiming to enable teams for an agile way of working. However, due to its wide-spread use in practice we know that agile practices are adopted and tailored intensively, which lead to a high variety of agile practices in terms of their level of detail. Problem: A high variety of agile practices can be challenging as we do not know how different agile practices are interrelated with each other. To be more precise, tailoring and adopting agile practices may lead to the challenge, that the combinatorial use of several agile practices can only be successful to a limited extent, as practices support or even require each other for a effective use in practice. Objective: Our study aims to provide an enabler for this problem. We want to identify interrelations between agile practices and describe them in a systematic manner. Contribution: The core contribution of this paper is the Agile Map, a theoretical model describing relations between agile practices following a systematic approach aiming to provide an overview of coherences between agile practices. The model aims to support practitioners in selecting and combining agile practices in a meaningful way.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

When Less is More: A systematic review of four-day workweek conceptualizations and their effects on organizational performance

Context: Agile IT organizations, which are characterized by self-organization and collaborative social interactions, require motivating, efficient and flexible work environments to maximize value creation. Compressed work schedules such as the four-day workweek have evolved into multiple facets over the last decades and are associated with various benefits for organizations and their employees. Objective: Our objective in this study is to deepen our comprehension of the impact of compressed work schedules on the operational efficacy of IT enterprises, while concurrently developing a comprehensive framework delineating the intricacies of compressed work schedules.Method: We conducted a systematic review of available conceptualizations related to four-day workweek schedules and elaborate on their organizational and social effects. To cover scientific and practice-oriented literature, our review combined a systematic literature review and a web content analysis. Results: Based on the generated insights, we derive a meta-framework that matches conceptualizations and effects, finally guiding the adoption of compressed work schedules based on individual managerial prerequisites and circumstances.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Towards a Closer Collaboration Between Practice and Research in Agile Software Development Workshop: A Summary and Research Agenda

Agile software development principles and values have been widely adopted across various industries, influencing products and services globally. Despite its increasing popularity, a significant gap remains between research and practical implementation. This paper presents the findings of the first international workshop designed to foster collaboration between research and practice in agile software development. We discuss the main themes and factors identified by the workshop participants that contribute to this gap, strategies to bridge it, and the challenges that require further research attention.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

How to Measure Performance in Agile Software Development? A Mixed-Method Study

Context: Software process improvement (SPI) is known as a key for being successfull in software development. Measuring quality and performance is of high importance in agile software development as agile approaches focussing strongly on short-term success in dynamic markets. Even if software engineering research emphasizes the importance of performance metrics while using agile methods, the literature lacks on detail how to apply such metrics in practice and what challenges may occur while using them. Objective: The core objective of our study is to identify challenges that arise when using agile software development performance metrics in practice and how we can improve their successful application. Method: We decided to design a mixed-method study. First, we performed a rapid literature review to provide an up-to-date overview of used performance metrics. Second, we conducted a single case study using a focus group approach and qualitativ data collection and analysis in a real-world setting. Results: Our results show that while widely used performance metrics such as story points and burn down charts are widely used in practice, agile software development teams face challenges due to a lack of transparency and standardization as well as insufficient accuracy. Contributions: Based on our findings, we present a repository of widely used performance metrics for agile software development. Furthermore, we present implications for practitioners and researchers especially how to deal with challenges agile software development face while applying such metrics in practice.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

Agile Culture Clash: Unveiling Challenges in Cultivating an Agile Mindset in Organizations

Context: In agile transformations, there are many challenges such as alignment between agile practices and the organizational goals and strategies or issues with shifts in how work is organized and executed. One very important challenge but less considered and treated in research are cultural challenges associated with an agile mindset. Although research shows that cultural clashes and general organizational resistance to change are part of the most significant agile adoption barriers. Objective: We identify challenges that arise from the interplay between agile culture and organizational culture. In doing so, we tackle this field and come up with important contributions for further research regarding a problem that practitioners face today. Method: This is done with a mixed-method research approach. First, we gathered qualitative data among our network of agile practitioners and derived in sum 15 challenges with agile culture. Then, we conducted quantitative data by means of a questionnaire study with 92 participants. Results: We identified 7 key challenges out of the 15 challenges with agile culture. These key challenges refer to the technical agility (doing agile) and the cultural agility (being agile). The results are presented in type of a conceptual model named the Agile Cultural Challenges (ACuCa). Conclusion: Based on our results, we started deriving future work aspects to do more detailed research on the topic of cultural challenges while transitioning or using agile methods in software development and beyond.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

Towards A Double-Edged Sword: Modelling the Impact in Agile Software Development

Agile methods are state of the art in software development. Companies worldwide apply agile to counter the dynamics of the markets. We know, that various factors like culture influence the successfully application of agile methods in practice and the sucess is differing from company to company. To counter these problems, we combine two causal models presented in literature: The Agile Practices Impact Model and the Model of Cultural Impact. In this paper, we want to better understand the two facets of factors in agile: Those influencing their application and those impacting the results when applying them. This papers core contribution is the Agile Influence and Imact Model, describing the factors influencing agile elements and the impact on specific characteristics in a systematic manner.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

What You Use is What You Get: Unforced Errors in Studying Cultural Aspects in Agile Software Development

Context: Cultural aspects are of high importance as they guide people's behaviour and thus, influence how people apply methods and act in projects. In recent years, software engineering research emphasized the need to analyze the challenges of specific cultural characteristics. Investigating the influence of cultural characteristics is challenging due to the multi-faceted concept of culture. People's behaviour, their beliefs and underlying values are shaped by different layers of culture, e.g., regions, organizations, or groups. In this study, we focus on agile methods, which are agile approaches that focus on underlying values, collaboration and communication. Thus, cultural and social aspects are of high importance for their successful use in practice. Objective: In this paper, we address challenges that arise when using the model of cultural dimensions by Hofstede to characterize specific cultural values. This model is often used when discussing cultural influences in software engineering. Method: As a basis, we conducted an exploratory, multiple case study, consisting of two cases in Japan and two in Germany. Contributions: In this study, we observed that cultural characteristics of the participants differed significantly from cultural characteristics that would typically be expected for people from the respective country. This drives our conclusion that for studies in empirical software engineering that address cultural factors, a case-specific analysis of the characteristics is needed.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2023

Navigating Cultural Diversity: Barriers and Potentials in Multicultural Agile Software Development Teams

Context: Social aspects are of high importance for being successful using agile methods in software development. People are influenced by their cultural imprint, as the underlying cultural values are guiding us in how we think and act. Thus, one may assume that in multicultural agile software development teams, cultural characteristics influence the result in terms of quality of the team work and consequently, the product to be delivered. Objective: We aim to identify barriers and potentials that may arise in multicultural agile software development teams to provide valuable strategies for both researchers and practitioners faced with barriers or unrealized potentials of cultural diversity. Method: The study is designed as a single-case study with two units of analysis using a mixed-method design consisting quantitative and qualitative methods. Results: First, our results suggest that the cultural characteristics at the team level need to be analyzed individually in intercultural teams, Second, we identified key potentials regarding cultural characteristics providing key potentials such as a individual team subculture that fits agile values like open communication. Third, we derived strategies supporting the potentials of cultural diversity in agile software development teams. Conclusion: Our findings show, that a deeper understanding of cultural influences in multicultural agile software development teams is needed. Based on the results, we already prepare future work to validate the results in other industries.

cs.SE↗