arXiv subjects

Michael Benedikt

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Benedikt.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Interpolation and Query Rewriting

We overview applications of Craig interpolation and Beth definability to simplifying logical expressions or database queries. From the perspective of the theory of interpolation and definability the results give a number of new angles. First, they give a different take on what it means to make definability or interpolation results effective, looking at algorithms that take a proof as input and return an interpolant or explicit definition as output. Secondly, they relate interpolation and definability to preservation theorems in model theory: interpolation and definability theorems are the basis for many "semantics-to-syntax" results, relating a semantic property of a formula to its equivalence with a certain syntactic form. Thirdly, they motivate new forms of interpolation and definability, focusing on syntactic forms that are of interest in databases.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Using LLMs for Explainable, Data-Driven Insight Generation from Time Series

Time series forecasts are widely used in decision-critical domains, where they are rarely consumed without accompanying explanations. Producing such explanations is usually a manual and costly process, and attempts to automate it using large language models often suffer from hallucination when applied to temporal data. We propose a domain-agnostic framework for grounded natural language explanation generation for time series forecasts, illustrated in Figure 1. The framework consists of three components: (i) extraction of structured explanatory factors from historical analyst-written explanations, (ii) evidence-conditioned explanation generation, and (iii) scalable evaluation for readability, logical consistency, and persuasiveness. The design explicitly constrains generation to verifiable evidence, reducing unsupported claims. We evaluate the framework on a financial forecasting case study involving the NASDAQ-100 index and a freight pricing case study using data from Vortexa. Results show that generated explanations approached analyst-written explanations in terms of readability, consistency and persuasiveness. These findings demonstrate that grounded explanation generation for time series forecasting can be achieved at scale without domain-specific fine-tuning.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

How (and when) can you fit examples to logic-based hypothesis classes over infinite structures?

We study fitting problems, sometimes called ``training problems'', where we have a finite sample consisting of inputs and outputs, and we want to know whether there is a function in a certain class that could produce these outputs, exactly or approximately, on the given inputs. We focus on the computational and descriptive complexity of fitting for logically-defined classes in common decidable structures, like the real ordered field and Presburger arithmetic, and also for broader classes defined via combinatorial or model-theoretic properties. We isolate the complexity of these fitting problems, with particular attention to cases where we can use queries in a natural query language over the sample to determine whether a sample is fittable.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Revisiting the Expressiveness Landscape of Data Graph Queries

The study of graph queries in database theory has spanned more than three decades, resulting in a multitude of proposals for graph query languages. We can identify three main families of languages, with the canonical representatives being: (1) regular path queries, (2) walk logic, and (3) first-order logic with transitive closure operators. This paper provides a complete picture of the expressive power of these languages in the context of data graphs. Specifically, we consider a graph data model that supports querying over both data and topology. For example, ``Does there exist a path between two different persons in a social network with the same last name?''. We also show that an extension of (1) with regular path comparisons, augmented with transitive closure operators, can unify the expressivity of (1)--(3).

cs.DB↗

arXiv2026

The complexity of Presburger arithmetic with power or powers

We investigate expansions of Presburger arithmetic, i.e., the theory of the integers with addition and order, with additional structure related to exponentiation: either a function that takes a number to the power of $2$, or a predicate for the powers of $2$. The latter theory, denoted $\mathrm{PresPower}$, was introduced by Büchi as a first attempt at characterizing the sets of tuples of numbers that can be expressed using finite automata; Büchi's method does not give an elementary upper bound, and the complexity of this theory has been open. The former theory, denoted as $\mathrm{PresExp}$, was shown decidable by Semenov; while the decision procedure for this theory differs radically from the automata-based method proposed by Büchi, Semenov's method is also non-elementary. And in fact, the theory with the power function has a non-elementary lower bound. In this paper, we show that while Semenov's and Büchi's approaches yield non-elementary blow-ups for $\mathrm{PresPower}$, the theory is in fact decidable in triply exponential time, similarly to the best known quantifier-elimination algorithm for Presburger arithmetic. We also provide a $\mathrm{NExpTime}$ upper bound for the existential fragment of $\mathrm{PresExp}$, a step towards a finer-grained analysis of its complexity. Both these results are established by analyzing a single parameterized satisfiability algorithm for $\mathrm{PresExp}$, which can be specialized to either the setting of $\mathrm{PresPower}$ or the existential theory of $\mathrm{PresExp}$. Besides the new upper bounds for the existential theory of $\mathrm{PresExp}$ and $\mathrm{PresPower}$, we believe our algorithm provides new intuition for the decidability of these theories, and for the features that lead to non-elementary blow-ups.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Tighter Bounds for Query Answering with Guarded TGDs

We consider the complexity of the open-world query answering problem, where we wish to determine certain answers to conjunctive queries over incomplete datasets specified by an initial set of facts and a set of guarded TGDs. This problem has been well-studied in the literature and is decidable but with a high complexity, namely, it is 2EXPTIME complete. Further, the complexity shrinks by one exponential when the arity is fixed. We show in this paper how we can obtain better complexity bounds when considering separately the arity of the guard atom and that of the additional atoms, called the side signature. Our results make use of the technique of linearizing guarded TGDs, introduced in Gottlob, Manna, and Pieris. Specifically, we present a variant of the linearization process, making use of a restricted version of the chase that we recently introduced. Our results imply that open-world query answering with guarded TGDs can be solved in EXPTIME with arbitrary-arity guard relations if we simply bound the arity of the side signature; and that the complexity drops to NP if we fix the side signature and bound the width of the dependencies.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Robustness Verification of Graph Neural Networks Via Lightweight Satisfiability Testing

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are the predominant architecture for learning over graphs. As with any machine learning model, an important issue is the detection of attacks, where an adversary can change the output with a small perturbation of the input. Techniques for solving the adversarial robustness problem - determining whether an attack exists - were originally developed for image classification. In the case of graph learning, the attack model usually considers changes to the graph structure in addition to or instead of the numerical features of the input, and the state of the art techniques proceed via reduction to constraint solving, working on top of powerful solvers, e.g. for mixed integer programming. We show that it is possible to improve on the state of the art in structural robustness by replacing the use of powerful solvers by calls to efficient partial solvers, which run in polynomial time but may be incomplete. We evaluate our tool RobLight on a diverse set of GNN variants and datasets.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

A logical approach to concentration

Concentration results say that a sequence of random variables becomes progressively concentrated around the mean. Such results are common in the study of functions of random graphs. We introduce a real-valued logic with various aggregate operators on graphs, including summation, and prove that every term in the language, seen as a random variable on random graphs within the classical Erdős-Rényi random graph model, is concentrated. We prove this for dense and sparse variants of Erdős-Rényi graphs. On the one hand, our results extend the line of work originating with Fagin and Glebskii et al. on zero-one laws for dense random graphs, as well as the zero-one law of Shelah and Spencer for sparse random graphs. On the other hand, they can be seen as a meta-theorem for inferring concentration results on random graphs, and we give examples of such applications.

math.PR↗

arXiv2026

How Expressive Are Graph Neural Networks in the Presence of Node Identifiers?

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a widely used class of machine learning models for graph-structured data, based on local aggregation over neighbors. GNNs have close connections to logic. In particular, their expressive power is linked to that of modal logics and bounded-variable logics with counting. In many practical scenarios, graphs processed by GNNs have node features that act as unique identifiers. In this work, we study how such identifiers affect the expressive power of GNNs. We initiate a study of the key-invariant expressive power of GNNs, inspired by the notion of order-invariant definability in finite model theory: which node queries that depend only on the underlying graph structure can GNNs express on graphs with unique node identifiers? We provide answers for various classes of GNNs with local max- or sum-aggregation.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Analysis of logics with arithmetic

We present new results on finite satisfiability of logics with counting and arithmetic. One result is a tight bound on the complexity of satisfiability of logics with so-called local Presburger quantifiers, which sum over neighbors of a node in a graph. A second contribution concerns computing a semilinear representation of the cardinalities associated with a formula in two variable logic extended with counting quantifiers. Such a representation allows you to get bounds not only on satisfiability for these logics, but for satisfiability in the presence of additional ``global cardinality constraints'': restrictions on cardinalities of unary formulas, expressed using arbitrary decidability logics over arithmetic. In the process, we provide simpler proofs of some key prior results on finite satisfiability and semi-linearity of the spectrum for these logics.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Model Equivalences

We look at equivalence relations on the set of models of a theory -- MERs, for short -- such that the class of equivalent pairs is itself an elementary class, in a language appropriate for pairs of models. We provide many examples of definable MERs, along with the first steps of a classification theory for them. We characterize the special classes of definable MERs associated with preservation of formulas, either in classical first order logic or in continuous logic, and uncover an intrinsic role for the latter. We bring out a nontrivial relationship with interpretations (imaginary sorts), leading to a wider hierarchy of classes related to the preservation of reducts. We give results about the relationship between these classes, both for general theories and for theories satisfying additional model-theoretic properties, such as stability.

math.LO↗

arXiv2025

Constraint-aware Learning of Probabilistic Sequential Models for Multi-Label Classification

We investigate multi-label classification involving large sets of labels, where the output labels may be known to satisfy some logical constraints. We look at an architecture in which classifiers for individual labels are fed into an expressive sequential model, which produces a joint distribution. One of the potential advantages for such an expressive model is its ability to modelling correlations, as can arise from constraints. We empirically demonstrate the ability of the architecture both to exploit constraints in training and to enforce constraints at inference time.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

From learnable objects to learnable random objects

We consider the relationship between learnability of a "base class" of functions on a set $X$, and learnability of a class of statistical functions derived from the base class. For example, we refine results showing that learnability of a family $h_p: p \in Y$ of functions implies learnability of the family of functions $h_μ=λp: Y. E_μ(h_p)$, where $E_μ$ is the expectation with respect to $μ$, and $μ$ ranges over probability distributions on $X$. We will look at both Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning, where example inputs and outputs are chosen at random, and online learning, where the examples are chosen adversarily. For agnostic learning, we establish improved bounds on the sample complexity of learning for statistical classes, stated in terms of combinatorial dimensions of the base class. We connect these problems to techniques introduced in model theory for "randomizing a structure". We also provide counterexamples for realizable learning, in both the PAC and online settings.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Convergence Laws for Extensions of First-Order Logic with Averaging

For many standard models of random structure, first-order logic sentences exhibit a convergence phenomenon on random inputs. The most well-known example is for random graphs with constant edge probability, where the probabilities of first-order sentences converge to 0 or 1. In other cases, such as certain ``sparse random graph'' models, the probabilities of sentences converge, although not necessarily to 0 or 1. In this work we deal with extensions of first-order logic with aggregate operators, variations of averaging. These logics will consist of real-valued terms, and we allow arbitrary Lipschitz functions to be used as ``connectives''. We show that some of the well-known convergence laws extend to this setting.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Decidability of Graph Neural Networks via Logical Characterizations

We present results concerning the expressiveness and decidability of a popular graph learning formalism, graph neural networks (GNNs), exploiting connections with logic. We use a family of recently-discovered decidable logics involving "Presburger quantifiers". We show how to use these logics to measure the expressiveness of classes of GNNs, in some cases getting exact correspondences between the expressiveness of logics and GNNs. We also employ the logics, and the techniques used to analyze them, to obtain decision procedures for verification problems over GNNs. We complement this with undecidability results for static analysis problems involving the logics, as well as for GNN verification problems.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Almost Surely Asymptotically Constant Graph Neural Networks

We present a new angle on the expressive power of graph neural networks (GNNs) by studying how the predictions of real-valued GNN classifiers, such as those classifying graphs probabilistically, evolve as we apply them on larger graphs drawn from some random graph model. We show that the output converges to a constant function, which upper-bounds what these classifiers can uniformly express. This strong convergence phenomenon applies to a very wide class of GNNs, including state of the art models, with aggregates including mean and the attention-based mechanism of graph transformers. Our results apply to a broad class of random graph models, including sparse and dense variants of the Erdős-Rényi model, the stochastic block model, and the Barabási-Albert model. We empirically validate these findings, observing that the convergence phenomenon appears not only on random graphs but also on some real-world graphs.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Monotone Rewritability and the Analysis of Queries, Views, and Rules

We study the interaction of views, queries, and background knowledge in the form of existential rules. The motivating questions concern monotonic determinacy of a query using views w.r.t. rules, which refers to the ability to recover the query answer from the views via a monotone function. We study the decidability of monotonic determinacy, and compare with variations that require the ``recovery function'' to be in a well-known monotone query language, such as conjunctive queries or Datalog. Surprisingly, we find that even in the presence of basic existential rules, the borderline between well-behaved and badly-behaved answerability differs radically from the unconstrained case. In order to understand this boundary, we require new results concerning entailment problems involving views and rules.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2024

Synthesizing nested relational queries from implicit specifications: via model theory and via proof theory

Derived datasets can be defined implicitly or explicitly. An implicit definition (of dataset O in terms of datasets I) is a logical specification involving two distinguished sets of relational symbols. One set of relations is for the "source data" I, and the other is for the "interface data" O. Such a specification is a valid definition of O in terms of I, if any two models of the specification agreeing on I agree on O. In contrast, an explicit definition is a transformation (or "query" below) that produces O from I. Variants of Beth's theorem state that one can convert implicit definitions to explicit ones. Further, this conversion can be done effectively given a proof witnessing implicit definability in a suitable proof system. We prove the analogous implicit-to-explicit result for nested relations: implicit definitions, given in the natural logic for nested relations, can be converted to explicit definitions in the nested relational calculus (NRC). We first provide a model-theoretic argument for this result, which makes some additional connections that may be of independent interest, between NRC queries, interpretations, a standard mechanism for defining structure-to-structure translation in logic, and between interpretations and implicit to definability "up to unique isomorphism". The latter connection uses a variation of a result of Gaifman concerning "relatively categorical" theories. We also provide a proof-theoretic result that provides an effective argument: from a proof witnessing implicit definability, we can efficiently produce an NRC definition. This will involve introducing the appropriate proof system for reasoning with nested sets, along with some auxiliary Beth-type results for this system. As a consequence, we can effectively extract rewritings of NRC queries in terms of NRC views, given a proof witnessing that the query is determined by the views.

cs.LO↗