arXiv subjects

Michael Backes

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Backes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

GeoCloak: An Agentic Framework for Semantics-Preserving Geolocation Privacy via Peripheral Clue Manipulation

The rapid advancement of large vision language models (LVLMs) has made geolocation inference from images highly accurate and accessible. This poses serious privacy risks: a passive adversary with black-box LVLM access can infer a user's location from a single photo with no metadata. Existing protection methods rely almost exclusively on adversarial perturbation, which introduces perceptible visual artifacts and utility degradation. We identify the visual-geolocation asymmetry: geolocation-decisive clues, such as street signs, tend to be visually peripheral but dominate location inference. Exploiting this asymmetry, we propose GeoCloak, an agentic framework for semantics-preserving geolocation privacy protection. It acts as a clue-aware planner that analyzes each image to identify geolocation-relevant clues, dispatches targeted semantic edits to directly suppress peripheral clues, and autonomously configures adversarial perturbation to further suppress residual geolocation features, all under iterative utility-aware feedback. We evaluate GeoCloak on four diverse datasets spanning 108 countries and 576 cities against five LVLMs and three inference methods. GeoCloak reduces overall city-level accuracy from 41.2% to 9.9%, approximately half of the best-performing baseline, while achieving substantially superior utility preservation both qualitatively and quantitatively. We hope this work takes a meaningful step toward practical, semantics-preserving geolocation privacy protection, giving users greater control over the location information inadvertently embedded in their shared images.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

MemeTrace: A Multimodal LLM-Based Agent for Safety-Aware Meme Provenance Analysis

Online memes are often carriers of unsafe content such as disinformation and propaganda. Their rapid evolution in response to news events and strong dependence on contextual information make it difficult for platforms and moderators to detect and moderate them effectively. Moreover, existing moderation studies typically classify memes as safe or unsafe based on individual images, lacking the ability to perform broader provenance analysis, i.e., where a meme originates, how it spreads, what cultural symbolism it represents, whether it poses potential risks to society, etc. To bridge this gap, we introduce MemeTrace, a multimodal LLM-based agent that automatically traces the provenance and potential risks of emerging memes. We evaluate MemeTrace on Meme100, a dataset of 100 real-world memes, using both human annotation and automatic metrics. The results demonstrate that MemeTrace substantially outperforms the VLM baseline. More importantly, MemeTrace achieves higher accuracy in detecting unsafe memes, especially those involving disinformation and sensitive content, and remains robust under visual perturbations.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

No Free Efficiency: Revisiting the Trade-off Between Training Efficiency and Model Vulnerability

Training efficiency has become the central driver of recent progress in foundation models. To overcome the massive computational and data requirements of large-scale training, researchers increasingly adopt strategies such as selective data sampling, efficient pre-training, and simplified reinforcement learning pipelines. While these strategies drastically reduce overhead, they prompt a critical, yet neglected question: Is efficiency achieved at the expense of model robustness and security? To our knowledge, we present the first systematic cross-domain investigation of the efficiency-vulnerability trade-off. Across vision and language models, we show that efficiency-oriented training increases susceptibility to adversarial and privacy attacks. We characterize this vulnerability by analyzing the models' internal geometry and functional representations, demonstrating that the evaluated efficient variants consistently exhibit sharper loss geometry together with systematic changes in representational structure. We further extend our analysis to "zero RL training", finding that models trained using simplified RL recipes exhibit substantially greater susceptibility to catastrophic forgetting and more pronounced overconfidence than those trained through conventional alignment pipelines. Our findings suggest that training efficiency is rarely a "free lunch"; rather, the mechanisms that minimize computation can inadvertently compromise safety. We conclude by calling for a paradigm shift toward multi-objective training that jointly optimizes for performance, cost, and security.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

SADRA: Sound Capability-based Access Control System for Resource-Disaggregated Architectures

Resource disaggregation separates memory and accelerators from compute nodes and makes them remotely accessible. This improves resource sharing, but also removes the local kernel from the resource-access path. Under an untrusted host, compromised host software may use stale authority, exceed delegated authority, or reuse authority provisioned for another process. Prior work identifies capability-based access control as well suited to these architectures. Our systematization of twenty-two prior capability systems finds that none combines host-independent validation of process authority, authoritative enforcement at the resource, and revocation that remains effective while remote authorization state is stale. We present SADRA, a distributed capability-based access-control system for resource-disaggregated architectures. SmartNIC hardware isolated from host software independently checks every inter-node request at two points, first at the compute node against the requesting process's authority and again at the resource against the current authoritative access state. Linked process, compute, and resource capabilities allow these checks to use local state without coordination on the access path. When distributed authority is revoked, SADRA denies subsequent dependent accesses at the resource without waiting for remote nodes to update, while stale capability state is reclaimed separately. We prove capability safety, authority safety, revocation soundness, and strong isolation for a formal architectural model, and model-check the formalization with SPIN. Our FPGA SmartNIC prototype sustains 89.5 Gbit/s aggregate throughput, within run-to-run variation of a non-enforcing baseline that peaks at 90--91 Gbit/s. Cleanup of a 128-capability subtree completes in 528 ns, while access denial does not depend on completion of that cleanup.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

The Challenge of Identifying the Origin of Black-Box Large Language Models

The tremendous commercial potential of large language models (LLMs) has heightened concerns over their unauthorized use. To address this, we focus on the task of identifying the origin of black-box LLMs. We further propose PlugAE, an effective and efficient identification method that proactively leverages LLM-specific adversarial embeddings and allows users to customize copyright tokens on a targeted query set. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PlugAE outperforms both state-of-the-art model watermarking and fingerprinting methods in accuracy and robustness. We further analyze its stealthiness and reliability from three complementary perspectives and conduct ablation studies under various configurations, confirming its practicality for real-world misuse detection.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Real Money, Fake Models: Deceptive Model Claims in Shadow APIs

Access to frontier large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-5 and Gemini-2.5, is often hindered by high pricing, payment barriers, and regional restrictions. These limitations drive the proliferation of $\textit{shadow APIs}$, third-party services that claim to provide access to official model services without regional limitations via indirect access. Despite their widespread use, it remains unclear whether shadow APIs deliver outputs consistent with those of the official APIs, raising concerns about the reliability of downstream applications and the validity of research findings that depend on them. In this paper, we present the first systematic audit between official LLM APIs and corresponding shadow APIs. We first identify 17 shadow APIs that have been utilized in 187 academic papers, with the most popular one reaching more than 5,900 citations and 58,000 GitHub stars by December 6, 2025. Through multidimensional auditing of three representative shadow APIs across utility, safety, and model verification, we uncover widespread behavioral inconsistency and fingerprint-based evidence consistent with deceptive model claims in a subset of audited endpoints. Specifically, we reveal performance divergence reaching up to 47.21%, significant unpredictability in safety behaviors, and identity verification failures in 45.83% of fingerprint tests. These practices critically undermine the reproducibility and validity of scientific research, harm the interests of shadow API users, and damage the reputation of official model providers. By the time of writing, 4 of the 17 providers have already ceased operations, underscoring the operational volatility of this market. Meanwhile, unverifiable compliance claims and independent model-substitution testing platforms have emerged in the ecosystem, reflecting growing community awareness of this risk.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

"Shut Up and Let Me Enjoy My Otome": Understanding and Measuring the Toxicity in Otome Game Communities

Otome games, a romance simulation genre primarily targeting female, have emerged as a major force in the global gaming market, attracting hundreds of millions of players and billions in revenue. Despite their popularity, otome game communities face pervasive online toxicity, which has been largely unexplored. In this work, we present the first large-scale measurement of toxicity in otome game communities across social platforms. We introduce OtomeSCAN, a framework for collecting, evaluating, and analyzing 620,045 posts from Weibo and Reddit spanning 18 months. To support robust analysis, we manually annotated a ground-truth dataset of 4,308 posts, identifying eight target groups such as players and game developers. We evaluate seven toxicity detectors on the dataset, including general-purpose models and our proposed LLM-based detectors, with our best model achieving F1-scores of 0.82 (Weibo) and 0.78 (Reddit). Our analysis reveals significant platform-based differences in toxicity: 22.20% of otome-related posts on Weibo are toxic, compared to 3.71% on Reddit. Besides, real-world events like in-community conflicts can rapidly escalate toxicity, with toxicity ratios increasing to 37.09% in just 72 hours during an external attack on Weibo. We also flag 191 potential-coordination clusters in otome game communities, 64.40% of which target game developers, with several accounts participating repeatedly across multiple clusters. We hope our work inspires further research on community-specific toxicity and contributes to building healthier online spaces for marginalized gaming communities.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

AgentProv: Auditing Agentic LLM API Providers via Tool-use Policy Probes

Commercial LLM APIs advertise a specific foundation model, but the served backbone may be silently substituted, quantized, or wrapped, for example to save deployment costs. All existing audits decide backbone identity from the text-output channel, which is structurally fragile for agentic APIs because modern serving stacks (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Cloudflare Workers AI, LangGraph) discard text and expose only structured actions when the model calls a tool, and provider-injected system prompts can distort text distributions enough that text-channel tests falsely accuse honest providers of substituting the claimed model. We observe that recent agentic post-training internalizes tool-use directly into the weights, opening a new audit channel that the serving stack still exposes and that is largely invariant to deployment context. We introduce Agentic Provenance (AgentProv), the first action-based identity audit for agentic LLM APIs: AgentProv fingerprints a deployed model through its categorical tool-call distribution and decides identity via an MMD permutation test. AgentProv catches every substituted model (100% on 630 evaluated checkpoint pairs), while holding the false-positive rate under system-prompt injection at 7% (vs. 67% for MET and 53% for RUT). On third-party API endpoints, AgentProv's disagreements with MET are consistent with an independent token-count side-channel that detects provider-injected system prompts.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Size, shape, density, and atmospheric limit of (50000) Quaoar revealed from 14 years of stellar occultation

We present results from 28 stellar occultations by the large Trans-Neptunian Object (50000) Quaoar registered between 2018 and 2025. By performing a joint analysis of this occultation data-set, along with other 9 published events, we were able to fit an oblate ellipsoid shape, with equatorial semi-axes, a and b of 566.1+2.5-2.2 km, and a polar semi-axis, c, of 511.2+3.6-3.7 km. It provides an equivalent volumetric diameter of 1094.4 +/- 4.6 km and polar oblateness of 0.097 +/- 0.011. Considering an absolute magnitude of H = 2.79 +/- 0.35, we derive a geometric albedo of pV = 0.125 +/- 0.038. We have derived new upper limits to the surface pressure of a CH4 atmosphere of 0.15 nbar (1-sigma) and 0.65 nbar (3-sigma). We also provide a table with the 36 new astrometric positions for Quaoar. Using the new system mass derived from Weywot's orbit around Quaoar, we calculated a density of 1.760 +/- 0.109 g/cm3. Moreover, from the derived size and rotation period (8.8394 +/- 0.0002 hours (Ortiz et al. 2003)), we calculate that, if Quaoar is in Maclaurin hydrostatic equilibrium state, it would have a density of 1.859 +/- 0.200 g/cm3. This result, within the error bars, is compatible with the value we found. Therefore, this work shows that Quaoar can be a Maclaurin object, being eligible as a dwarf planet.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2026

MultiMem: Measuring and Mitigating Memorization in Multi-Modal Contrastive Learning

Memorization in machine learning models enables high performance on rare in-distribution samples by capturing their atypical patterns. However, it also causes harmful retention of noise and outliers, degrading generalization. While memorization has been extensively studied in both supervised and self-supervised learning in the vision domain, it remains unexplored in multi-modal contrastive learning. We address this gap by introducing MultiMem, the first metric designed to quantify memorization in multi-modal contrastive learning. Through our systematic analysis, we demonstrate that cross-modal semantic misalignment has the strongest influence on memorization, with text being the dominant modality driving memorization, followed by video, image, and audio. We show that targeted augmentations applied across all modalities effectively reduce memorization as measured by our MultiMem metric and improve model performance. Overall, this work establishes the first framework for measuring and mitigating memorization in multi-modal contrastive learning, preventing harmful data retention and contributing to higher-performing models.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

PeerCheck: Enhancing LLM-Generated Academic Reviews Towards Human-Level Quality

As academic submissions grow, the traditional peer review process struggles to keep up, raising concerns about quality and fairness. A trend of using large language models (LLMs) for assistance has emerged. In this work, we take a critical step toward improving the quality of LLM-generated reviews. We propose the PeerCheck framework, which investigates LLM-human review differences (RQ1) and explores methods to improve LLM-generated review quality (RQ2). We first analyzed the human-written reviews with reviews generated by various LLMs and found that LLMs and humans focus on different terms, e.g., LLMs prioritize theory while humans emphasize methodology and experiments. We further adopt prompt engineering, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and utilize retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to enhance the LLM-generated reviews towards human-level quality. We find CoT significantly improves the quality of LLM reviews, while we discover an unexpected "RAG paradox," i.e., experiments with RAG produce different results for various LLMs and, in some cases, even reduce review quality. Our comprehensive analysis of LLM-generated academic reviews illustrates both possibilities and limitations, contributing to a more effective, human-aligned review system. Our dataset is available on https://github.com/TrustAIRLab/PeerCheck.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Benchmarking Empirical Privacy Protection for Adaptations of Large Language Models

Recent work has applied differential privacy (DP) to adapt large language models (LLMs) for sensitive applications, offering theoretical guarantees. However, its practical effectiveness remains unclear, partly due to LLM pretraining, where overlaps and interdependencies with adaptation data can undermine privacy despite DP efforts. To analyze this issue in practice, we investigate privacy risks under DP adaptations in LLMs using state-of-the-art attacks such as robust membership inference and canary data extraction. We benchmark these risks by systematically varying the adaptation data distribution, from exact overlaps with pretraining data, through in-distribution (IID) cases, to entirely out-of-distribution (OOD) examples. Additionally, we evaluate how different adaptation methods and different privacy regimes impact the vulnerability. Our results show that distribution shifts strongly influence privacy vulnerability: the closer the adaptation data is to the pretraining distribution, the higher the practical privacy risk at the same theoretical guarantee, even without direct data overlap. We find that parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, such as LoRA, achieve the highest empirical privacy protection for OOD data. Our benchmark identifies key factors for achieving practical privacy in DP LLM adaptation, providing actionable insights for deploying customized models in sensitive settings. Looking forward, we propose a structured framework for holistic privacy assessment beyond adaptation privacy, to identify and evaluate risks across the full pretrain-adapt pipeline of LLMs.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

BadBone: Backdoor Attacks Against Backbone Models in Visual Prompt Learning

Prompt learning is a new machine learning paradigm that has attracted ample attention due to its simplicity and proven efficacy. Despite its growing adoption, the security vulnerabilities associated with this paradigm remain underexplored. In this work, we take the first step to propose BadBone, a stealthy and adaptive backdoor attack against prompt learning using bi-level optimization. Instead of backdooring the prompt learning process, we aim to compromise a backbone model such that only target downstream tasks employing prompt learning inherit the backdoor vulnerability. Extensive experiments on three different models and three datasets from various domains show that our targeted/untargeted backdoored models achieve high attack performance while maintaining utility on both pre-training and downstream tasks. Moreover, we evaluate our approach against six state-of-the-art model-level defenses, including Neural Cleanse, ABS, MNTD, NAD, CLP, and D-BR. The results demonstrate that these defenses are largely ineffective against our backdoored models and thus leave the effective defense as an important direction for future work.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

SafeReview: Defending LLM-based Review Systems Against Adversarial Hidden Prompts

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into academic peer review, their vulnerability to adversarial hidden prompts, i.e., adversarial instructions embedded in submissions to manipulate outcomes, poses a critical threat to scholarly integrity. We propose SafeReview, a co-evolutionary adversarial training framework for defending LLM-based peer review systems against such attacks. SafeReview jointly trains a Generator model to create sophisticated attack prompts and a Defender model to preserve review integrity under adversarial manipulation. The Generator is optimized to produce increasingly effective prompt injections, while the Defender is strengthened through preference-based training to maintain consistent reviews between clean and attacked submissions. Experimental results show that SafeReview improves robustness against adaptive prompt injection attacks, better preserves paper ranking under attack, and generalizes across attacker architectures compared with static defenses. These results demonstrate the potential of co-evolutionary training as a foundation for securing LLM-assisted peer review.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective

Generative Foundation Models (GenFMs) have emerged as transformative tools. However, their widespread adoption raises critical concerns regarding trustworthiness across dimensions. This paper presents a comprehensive framework to address these challenges through three key contributions. First, we systematically review global AI governance laws and policies from governments and regulatory bodies, as well as industry practices and standards. Based on this analysis, we propose a set of guiding principles for GenFMs, developed through extensive multidisciplinary collaboration that integrates technical, ethical, legal, and societal perspectives. Second, we introduce TrustGen, the first dynamic benchmarking platform designed to evaluate trustworthiness across multiple dimensions and model types, including text-to-image, large language, and vision-language models. TrustGen leverages modular components--metadata curation, test case generation, and contextual variation--to enable adaptive and iterative assessments, overcoming the limitations of static evaluation methods. Using TrustGen, we reveal significant progress in trustworthiness while identifying persistent challenges. Finally, we provide an in-depth discussion of the challenges and future directions for trustworthy GenFMs, which reveals the complex, evolving nature of trustworthiness, highlighting the nuanced trade-offs between utility and trustworthiness, and consideration for various downstream applications, identifying persistent challenges and providing a strategic roadmap for future research. This work establishes a holistic framework for advancing trustworthiness in GenAI, paving the way for safer and more responsible integration of GenFMs into critical applications. To facilitate advancement in the community, we release the toolkit for dynamic evaluation.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Benchmark of Benchmarks: Unpacking Influence and Code Repository Quality in LLM Safety Benchmarks

The rapid expansion of research in LLM safety presents challenges in tracking advancements, making benchmarks important evaluation infrastructures for identifying key trends and facilitating systematic comparisons. Yet no systematic assessment exists of their code quality and runnability, nor of what factors are associated with the community's adoption of certain benchmarks over others. To address this gap, we conduct a systematic measurement study of 31 LLM safety benchmarks (covering prompt injection, jailbreak, and hallucination) with 382 non-benchmark papers as a control group, combining automated static analysis, human runnability testing (220+ person-hours), and bibliometric analysis. We find that only 39\% of benchmark repositories can run without modification, only 16\% provide flawless installation guides, and a mere 6\% include ethical considerations despite containing potentially harmful content. These deficiencies persist across the study period with no significant improvement. Analyzing adoption factors, we find that benchmark adoption correlates with author prominence and code runnability, but not with code quality standards such as Pylint score and maintainability, suggesting that the community's benchmark selection does not reward higher coding standards. Based on these results, we identify potential safety and reliability concerns. Some safety benchmark repositories openly expose harmful content, such as successful jailbreak responses, without any ethical warning or access control, effectively serving as unguarded attack resources. Furthermore, when benchmarks require ad-hoc modifications to run, downstream safety evaluations across different papers may not be comparable. We present case studies illustrating these concrete consequences and propose a targeted checklist to help benchmark contributors improve code quality, documentation, and ethical practices.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Trust Me, Import This: Dependency Steering Attacks via Malicious Agent Skills

LLM-powered coding agents increasingly make software supply chain decisions. They generate imports, recommend packages, and write installation commands. Prior work showed that these systems can hallucinate non-existent package names, which attackers may register as malicious packages. In this paper, we show that this risk is not only a passive model failure. It can be actively induced through the persistent Skill artifact. We introduce Dependency Steering, an attack paradigm in which a malicious Skill biases a coding agent toward an attacker-controlled package during benign coding tasks. The attack does not require modifying model weights, training data, or user prompts. To construct realistic attacks, we design a Skill-level optimization method that searches for localized semantic edits that preserve the apparent purpose of the original Skill while increasing targeted package generation. Across multiple coding-oriented LLMs and programming benchmarks, Dependency Steering achieves high targeted hallucination rates, transfers across models and task domains, and remains difficult for evaluated Skill scanners and LLM-based auditors to detect. Our results show that persistent agent instructions form an underexplored software supply chain attack surface.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Pop Quiz Attack: Black-box Membership Inference Attacks Against Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) show strong performance across many applications, but their ability to memorize and potentially reveal training data raises serious privacy concerns. We introduce the PopQuiz Attack, a black-box membership inference attack that tests whether a model can recall specific training examples. The core idea is to turn target data into quiz-style multiple-choice questions and infer membership from the model's answers. Across six widely used LLMs (GPT-3.5, GPT-4o, LLaMA2-7b, LLaMA2-13b, Mistral-7b, and Vicuna-7b) and four datasets, our method achieves an average ROC-AUC of 0.873 and outperforms existing approaches by 20.6%. We further analyze factors affecting attack success, including query complexity, data type, data structure, and training settings. We also evaluate instruction-based, filter-based, and differential privacy-based defenses, which reduce performance but do not eliminate the risk. Our results highlight persistent privacy vulnerabilities in modern LLMs.

cs.CR↗