Almost-Uniform Bayesian Convergence to the Truth Is Not Characterized by Countable Additivity on Conditional Hitting Times
We revisit the analysis of Bayesian convergence to the truth under finite additivity in a recent paper by Nielsen (J. Philos. Logic, 2021, doi:10.1007/s10992-020-09569-2) Its principal theorem proves that the posteriors of a probability function converge to the truth almost uniformly if and only if the function has two properties: an approximation property, and so-called countable additivity on conditional hitting times. We show that the two properties are necessary but not sufficient, so that the theorem is false, and we locate the error in its published proof. We construct a merely finitely additive probability function that has both properties and whose posteriors converge to the truth almost surely but not almost uniformly. Three of the paper's four remaining theorems, and its corollary, lose their published proofs as well, two with the failed implication and two to a separate defect that we also identify. Two of the four results we reprove and one we leave undecided; the last is the corollary, which our counterexample does not refute, and which we establish for a family including the counterexample and leave open in general. We also show that almost-sure convergence of posteriors to the truth for every event does not characterize countable additivity. We close with what a repaired characterization of almost-uniform convergence would have to add.