arXiv subjects

Maxime Jakubowski

Publications and source records attributed to Maxime Jakubowski.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

sheval: An RDF data shapes evaluation tool and test-suite for recursive shapes

Two different languages have been developed to validate RDF data based on the concept of a shape: ShEx and SHACL. In each language it is possible to define a shape that refers to itself, which is called a recursive shape. While in the case of ShEx, the semantics of recursive shapes is well defined and is part of the specification, in the case of SHACL, the semantics of recursive shapes is left to the implementation of the different SHACL engines. Consequently, the different SHACL engines show different behaviours when confronted with recursive shapes. In this paper we present sheval: an evaluation framework consisting of a tool and a test suite that can be used to compare the behaviour of different shapes technologies when confronted with recursive definitions. The tool has been used to evaluate and understand the differences in the implementation of recursive shapes in ShEx and SHACL. It provides a framework for testing and comparing the behaviour of different shape engines, helping to identify inconsistencies and potential issues, and providing a basis for further research and development in the field of shape-based validation of RDF data.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2026

Validation of graph databases against PG-Schema

The problem of validating a given graph database instance against a given PG-Schema graph type without integrity constraints is NP- complete in terms of combined complexity and in PTIME in terms of data complexity. The combined complexity drops to PTIME when the alternation between type combinations and unions is suitably restricted

cs.DB↗

arXiv2026

A Community Survey on SHACL and ShEx: Briding Gaps in RDF Validation

This paper examines RDF validation practices and challenges to understand stakeholder applications, their needs, and identify areas for improvement in technologies and methodologies, thereby guiding future research and standardization efforts. A community survey was conducted, targeting a diverse group of RDF validation technology users across academia and industry. The survey collected data on current practices, tool usage, perceived benefits, limitations, and desired enhancements to gain a broad overview of the validation landscape. Our analysis shows that while RDF validation is widely adopted and valued for enhancing data quality, significant challenges remain. In particular, users report a need for better documentation, improved tool support, enhanced performance, and greater language expressiveness to handle complex large-scale validation tasks effectively. This work provides crucial insights into the RDF validation landscape, highlighting current practices and key areas for development. It offers a foundation for researchers, developers, and standardization bodies to address current limitations and advance validation technologies, ultimately improving data quality and usability in knowledge graphs.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2026

Common Foundations for Recursive Shape Languages

As schema languages for RDF data become more mature, we are seeing efforts to extend them with recursive semantics, applying diverse ideas from logic programming and description logics. While ShEx has an official recursive semantics based on greatest fixpoints (GFP), the discussion for SHACL is ongoing and seems to be converging towards least fixpoints (LFP). A practical study we perform shows that, indeed, ShEx validators implement GFP, whereas SHACL validators are more heterogeneous. This situation creates tension between ShEx and SHACL, as their semantic commitments appear to diverge, potentially undermining interoperability and predictability. We aim to clarify this design space by comparing the main semantic options in a principled yet accessible way, hoping to engage both theoreticians and practitioners, especially those involved in developing tools and standards. We present a unifying formal semantics that treats LFP, GFP, and supported model semantics (SMS), clarifying their relationships and highlighting a duality between LFP and GFP on stratified fragments. Next, we investigate to which extent the directions taken by SHACL and ShEx are compatible. We show that, although ShEx and SHACL seem to be going in different directions, they include large fragments with identical expressive power. Moreover, there is a strong correspondence between these fragments through the aforementioned principle of duality. Finally, we present a complete picture of the data and combined complexity of ShEx and SHACL validation under LFP, GFP, and SMS, showing that SMS comes at a higher computational cost under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Graph-Native Normalization

In recent years, knowledge graphs (KGs) - in particular in the form of labeled property graphs (LPGs) - have become essential components in a broad range of applications. Although the absence of strict schemas for KGs facilitates structural issues that lead to redundancies and subsequently to inconsistencies and anomalies, the problem of KG quality has so far received only little attention. Inspired by normalization using functional dependencies for relational data, a first approach exploiting dependencies within nodes has been proposed. However, real-world KGs also expose functional dependencies involving edges. In this paper, we therefore propose graph-native normalization, which considers dependencies within nodes, edges, and their combination. We define a range of graph-native normal forms and graph object functional dependencies and propose algorithms for transforming graphs accordingly. We evaluate our contributions using a broad range of synthetic and native graph datasets.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2024

RDFGraphGen: An RDF Graph Generator based on SHACL Shapes

Developing and testing modern RDF-based applications often requires access to RDF datasets with certain characteristics. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to publicly find domain-specific knowledge graphs that conform to a particular set of characteristics. Hence, in this paper we propose RDFGraphGen, an open-source RDF graph generator that uses characteristics provided in the form of SHACL (Shapes Constraint Language) shapes to generate synthetic RDF graphs. RDFGraphGen is domain-agnostic, with configurable graph structure, value constraints, and distributions. It also comes with a number of predefined values for popular schema.org classes and properties, for more realistic graphs. Our results show that RDFGraphGen is scalable and can generate small, medium, and large RDF graphs in any domain.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2022

Expressiveness of SHACL Features and Extensions for Full Equality and Disjointness Tests

SHACL is a W3C-proposed schema language for expressing structural constraints on RDF graphs. Recent work on formalizing this language has revealed a striking relationship to description logics. SHACL expressions can use three fundamental features that are not so common in description logics. These features are equality tests; disjointness tests; and closure constraints. Moreover, SHACL is peculiar in allowing only a restricted form of expressions (so-called targets) on the left-hand side of inclusion constraints. The goal of this paper is to obtain a clear picture of the impact and expressiveness of these features and restrictions. We show that each of the four features is primitive: using the feature, one can express boolean queries that are not expressible without using the feature. We also show that the restriction that SHACL imposes on allowed targets is inessential, as long as closure constraints are not used. In addition, we show that enriching SHACL with "full" versions of equality tests, or disjointness tests, results in a strictly more powerful language.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Shape Fragments

In constraint languages for RDF graphs, such as ShEx and SHACL, constraints on nodes and their properties in RDF graphs are known as "shapes". Schemas in these languages list the various shapes that certain targeted nodes must satisfy for the graph to conform to the schema. Using SHACL, we propose in this paper a novel use of shapes, by which a set of shapes is used to extract a subgraph from an RDF graph, the so-called shape fragment. Our proposed mechanism fits in the framework of Linked Data Fragments. In this paper, (i) we define our extraction mechanism formally, building on recently proposed SHACL formalizations; (ii) we establish correctness properties, which relate shape fragments to notions of provenance for database queries; (iii) we compare shape fragments with SPARQL queries; (iv) we discuss implementation options; and (v) we present initial experiments demonstrating that shape fragments are a feasible new idea.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2021

Fixpoint Semantics for Recursive SHACL

SHACL is a W3C-proposed language for expressing structural constraints on RDF graphs. The recommendation only specifies semantics for non-recursive SHACL; recently, some efforts have been made to allow recursive SHACL schemas. In this paper, we argue that for defining and studying semantics of recursive SHACL, lessons can be learned from years of research in non-monotonic reasoning. We show that from a SHACL schema, a three-valued semantic operator can directly be obtained. Building on Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT), this operator immediately induces a wide variety of semantics, including a supported, stable, and well-founded semantics, related in the expected ways. By building on AFT, a rich body of theoretical results becomes directly available for SHACL. As such, the main contribution of this short paper is providing theoretical foundations for the study of recursive SHACL, which can later enable an informed decision for an extension of the W3C recommendation.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2021

SHACL: A Description Logic in Disguise

SHACL is a W3C-proposed language for expressing structural constraints on RDF graphs. In recent years, SHACL's popularity has risen quickly. This rise in popularity comes with questions related to its place in the semantic web, particularly about its relation to OWL (the de facto standard for expressing ontological information on the web) and description logics (which form the formal foundations of OWL). We answer these questions by arguing that SHACL is in fact a description logic. On the one hand, our answer is surprisingly simple, some might even say obvious. But, on the hand, our answer is also controversial. By resolving this issue once and for all, we establish the field of description logics as the solid formal foundations of SHACL.

cs.LO↗