arXiv subjects

Matteo Castiglioni

Publications and source records attributed to Matteo Castiglioni.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Fair Team Contracts

A principal selects a team of agents for collaborating on a joint project. The principal aims to design a revenue-optimal contract that incentivizes the team of agents to exert costly effort while satisfying fairness constraints. We show that the optimal fair contract ensures that there is a minimum share, and every agent receives a linear contract weakly higher than the minimum share that is sufficient to incentivize them to exert costly effort. Leveraging this structural characterization, we design an FPTAS for additive success functions and a constant approximation algorithm for submodular success functions. Moreover, we show that the optimal fair contract can outperform the non-discriminatory one by a factor $1.445$, and this bound is tight for both additive and submodular success functions.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

A Subsampling Theorem for Constraint Satisfaction Problems with Large Arity

Subsampling theorems for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) guarantee that the value of the CSP is approximately preserved after restricting it to small random subsets of variables. We provide the first subsampling theorem for CSPs, which requires a sample size that is polynomial in the arity $k$ and error $\varepsilon$, and polylogarithmic in the alphabet size $q$. This improves upon the subsampling theorem of Barak, Hardt, Holenstein, and Steurer (SODA '11), which achieves a polynomial dependency on $\varepsilon$ and polylogarithmic in $q$ only in the constant-arity regime. Our subsampling theorem has applications in interactive proofs and property testing. In interactive proofs, it provides a key missing ingredient for the proof of Aaronson, Impagliazzo, and Moshkovitz (CCC '14) that $\textsf{AM}(\textsf{poly})=\textsf{AM}$ (where $\textsf{AM}(k)$ is the class of languages decidable by Arthur-Merlin protocols with $k$ non-communicating Merlins with independent questions). In property testing, it yields the first one-sided tester for satisfiability with sample size polynomial in the arity $k$ and the error $\varepsilon^{-1}$, and polylogarithmic in the alphabet size $q$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A Unifying Framework for Quasi-Polynomial Optimization of Fixed-degree Polynomials

We study the simultaneous approximation of constant-degree polynomials over convex sets. For any family of $m$ degree-$d$ polynomials and any convex set ${H} \subseteq \mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^n$, we construct an $ε$-Cover of the joint value set $\{(f_1(x), \dots, f_m(x)) : x \in {H}\}$ in the $\ell_\infty$-norm. This cover is of size $n^{O(\log(mn)/ε^2)}$, provided the polynomials have constant range over the smallest $\ell_1$-ball inscribing ${H}$. Our approach extends classical net-based sparsifications for linear functions (e.g., Lipton, Markakis, and Mehta [2003]) to arbitrary families of constant-degree polynomials over general convex sets. We use a two-step scheme: first, we construct a quasi-polynomial pre-cover of the family on the smallest $\ell_1$-ball containing ${H}$ by using a concentration argument and leveraging a connection between Bernstein approximation and multinomial distributions; we then compress the pre-cover to ${H}$ by using a recursive degree reduction and feasibility programs anchored at points of the pre-cover. The existence of these covers immediately yields a unified framework for Quasi-Polynomial Time Approximation Schemes (QPTAS) across a wide range of a problems, including fixed-degree polynomial minimization over polyhedral sets, Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs), Free Games, variational inequalities with polynomial operators (which implies guarantees for local Nash equilibria in polynomial games), and additive approximation for normalized densest $k$-subhypergraph on $O(1)$-uniform hypergraphs.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Breaking the $T^{3/4}$ Barrier for Regret Minimization With Bi-Dimensional CDFs

We study regret minimization for learning CDF-related objectives of the form \[ g(x)\cdot\mathbb{P}_{X\sim\mathcal{D}}(X\le x), \] over $[0,1]^2$, where $g$ is a known Lipschitz function and $\mathcal{D}$ is an unknown distribution. At each round $t$, the learner selects a point $x_t$ and observes the binary feedback $\mathbb{I}(X_t\le x_t)$, where $X_t\sim\mathcal{D}$. We design an algorithm achieving regret $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{7/10})$, improving over the previous best-known bound of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{3/4})$ and showing that the curse of dimensionality can be at least partially lifted for this class of objectives, though a gap remains with the $Ω(T^{2/3})$ lower bound. As an application, our techniques yield the same $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{7/10})$ regret bound for profit maximization in repeated bilateral trade with fixed prices.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Regret Minimization for Piecewise Linear Rewards: Contracts, Auctions, and Beyond

Most microeconomic models of interest involve optimizing a piecewise linear function. These include contract design in hidden-action principal-agent problems, selling an item in posted-price auctions, and bidding in first-price auctions. When the relevant model parameters are unknown and determined by some (unknown) probability distributions, the problem becomes learning how to optimize an unknown and stochastic piecewise linear reward function. Such a problem is usually framed within an online learning framework, where the decision-maker (learner) seeks to minimize the regret of not knowing an optimal decision in hindsight. This paper introduces a general online learning framework that offers a unified approach to tackle regret minimization for piecewise linear rewards, under a suitable monotonicity assumption commonly satisfied by microeconomic models. We design a learning algorithm that attains a regret of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{nT})$, where $n$ is the number of ``pieces'' of the reward function and $T$ is the number of rounds. This result is tight when $n$ is \emph{small} relative to $T$, specifically when $n \leq T^{1/3}$. Our algorithm solves two open problems in the literature on learning in microeconomic settings. First, it shows that the $\widetilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret bound obtained by Zhu et al. [Zhu+23] for learning optimal linear contracts in hidden-action principal-agent problems is not tight when the number of agent's actions is small relative to $T$. Second, our algorithm demonstrates that, in the problem of learning to set prices in posted-price auctions, it is possible to attain suitable (and desirable) instance-independent regret bounds, addressing an open problem posed by Cesa-Bianchi et al. [CBCP19].

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Strict Fairness at What Cost? Envy-Free Contracts with Subsidies

We study algorithmic fair contract design, where a principal designs task-level contracts and fairly delegates a set of tasks to a set of agents. Prior work reveals a fairness-revenue dilemma: exact envy-free (EF) contracts may have an unbounded price of fairness (PoF), while approximate notions avoid this unboundedness only by weakening strict fairness. To address this dilemma, we propose a novel scheme, called {\it Envy-free Contracts with Subsidies} (EFS), in which the principal may additionally offer agent-specific subsidies to restore strict fairness. Our main technical result is a tight characterization of the price of fairness for EFS contracts. In sharp contrast to EF contracts, whose PoF can be unbounded, we show that the PoF of EFS contracts is $n^{n+O(1)}$, where $n$ is the number of agents. Moreover, EFS contracts can outperform EF contracts by an arbitrarily large factor in terms of the principal's revenue. Finally, we present the complexity landscape: computing optimal EFS contracts is NP-hard in general, whereas a polynomial-time algorithm exists when the number of tasks is constant.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Slater's Condition in Online CMDPs with Stochastic and Adversarial Constraints

We study \emph{online episodic Constrained Markov Decision Processes} (CMDPs) under both stochastic and adversarial constraints. We provide a novel algorithm whose guarantees greatly improve those of the state-of-the-art best-of-both-worlds algorithm introduced by Stradi et al. (2025). In the stochastic regime, \emph{i.e.}, when the constraints are sampled from fixed but unknown distributions, our method achieves $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ regret and constraint violation without relying on Slater's condition, thereby handling settings where no strictly feasible solution exists. Moreover, we provide guarantees on the stronger notion of \emph{positive} constraint violation, which does not allow to recover from large violation in the early episodes by playing strictly safe policies. In the adversarial regime, \emph{i.e.}, when the constraints may change arbitrarily between episodes, our algorithm ensures sublinear constraint violation without Slater's condition, and achieves sublinear $α$-regret with respect to the \emph{unconstrained} optimum, where $α$ is a suitably defined multiplicative approximation factor. We further validate our results through synthetic experiments, showing the practical effectiveness of our algorithm.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Decoupling Corruption and Horizon in Robust Contextual Pricing

We study robust repeated contextual pricing, where valuations depends linearly on the features. At each round $t\in[T]$, a seller observes a context, posts a price, and receives only a possibly corrupted binary sale feedback. The seller knows an upper bound $C$ on the number of corrupted rounds. We design an algorithm with regret $\mathcal O(Cd+d^2\log T)$, where $d$ is the context dimension. This is the first guarantee for robust contextual pricing that separates the dependence on the corruption budget $C$ from the horizon $T$, closing the problem left open by Gupta, Guruganesh, Paes Leme, and Schneider (2025).

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Algorithmic Fair Contracts

We initiate the algorithmic study of fair contract design. A principal assigns multiple tasks to heterogeneous agents and chooses task-level linear contracts; agents differ in costs and success probabilities, and fairness requires each agent to prefer her own task-contract bundle to any other agent's. Unlike envy-free allocations of indivisible items, envy-free full-allocation contracts always exist, but optimizing revenue under this constraint is computationally difficult: no polynomial-time algorithm can achieve any constant-factor approximation in general. We therefore identify tractable regimes. With a constant number of tasks, optimal EF, EF1, and $ε$-EF contracts are computable in polynomial time. With a constant number of agents, exact EF remains hard, even for three agents, while EF1 and $ε$-EF admit additive FPTAS against the EF benchmark. We also show that exact EF can have an unbounded price of fairness, whereas $ε$-EF and EF1 can restore bounded revenue loss.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Bridging Rested and Restless Bandits with Graph-Triggering: Rising and Rotting

Rested and Restless Bandits are two well-known bandit settings that are useful to model real-world sequential decision-making problems in which the expected reward of an arm evolves over time due to the actions we perform or due to the nature. In this work, we propose Graph-Triggered Bandits (GTBs), a unifying framework to generalize and extend rested and restless bandits. In this setting, the evolution of the arms' expected rewards is governed by a graph defined over the arms. An edge connecting a pair of arms $(i,j)$ represents the fact that a pull of arm $i$ triggers the evolution of arm $j$, and vice versa. Interestingly, rested and restless bandits are both special cases of our model for some suitable (degenerated) graph. As relevant case studies for this setting, we focus on two specific types of monotonic bandits: rising, where the expected reward of an arm grows as the number of triggers increases, and rotting, where the opposite behavior occurs. For these cases, we study the optimal policies. We provide suitable algorithms for all scenarios and discuss their theoretical guarantees, highlighting the complexity of the learning problem concerning instance-dependent terms that encode specific properties of the underlying graph structure.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2026

The Complexity of Min-Max Optimization for Quadratic Polynomials

We prove that computing approximate stationary points of min-max optimization over the hypercube is PPAD-hard for quadratic polynomials. This holds even when the polynomials are multilinear, each variable appears in at most three monomials, and the approximation factor is inverse polynomial. As a direct consequence, we obtain the first PPAD-hardness results for two-team zero-sum polymatrix games.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Improved Hardness Results for Min-Max Optimization with Coupled Constraints

We investigate the computational complexity of min-max optimization under coupled constraints. The work of Daskalakis, Skoulakis, and Zampetakis [DSZ21] was the first to study min-max optimization through the lens of computational complexity, showing that min-max problems with nonconvex-nonconcave objectives are PPAD-hard under coupled constraints. By carefully exploiting the coupled constraints rather than the structure of the objective function, we are able to significantly simplify and strengthen the proof of the hardness result. More precisely, the first contribution of this paper is a fundamentally new proof of their main result, which improves it in multiple directions: it holds for degree-$2$ polynomials which are quadratic-linear, it improves the dependence on the parameters of the problem (also yielding constant inapproximability for gradient descent-ascent in $\ell_\infty$-norm), and it is much simpler than previous approaches. Second, we show that with general constraints (i.e., the min player and max player have different constraints), even convex-concave (bilinear) min-max optimization becomes PPAD-hard. Along the way, we also provide PPAD-membership of a general problem related to quasi-variational inequalities, which has applications beyond our problem.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Min-Max Optimization Requires Exponentially Many Queries

We study the query complexity of min-max optimization of a nonconvex-nonconcave function $f$ over $[0,1]^d \times [0,1]^d$. We show that, given oracle access to $f$ and to its gradient $\nabla f$, any algorithm that finds an $\varepsilon$-approximate stationary point must make a number of queries that is exponential in $1/\varepsilon$ or $d$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

The Sample Complexity of Uniform Approximation for Multi-Dimensional CDFs and Fixed-Price Mechanisms

We study the sample complexity of learning a uniform approximation of an $n$-dimensional cumulative distribution function (CDF) within an error $ε> 0$, when observations are restricted to a minimal one-bit feedback. This serves as a counterpart to the multivariate DKW inequality under ''full feedback'', extending it to the setting of ''bandit feedback''. Our main result shows a near-dimensional-invariance in the sample complexity: we get a uniform $ε$-approximation with a sample complexity $\frac{1}{ε^3}{\log\left(\frac 1 ε\right)^{\mathcal{O}(n)}}$ over a arbitrary fine grid, where the dimensionality $n$ only affects logarithmic terms. As direct corollaries, we provide tight sample complexity bounds and novel regret guarantees for learning fixed-price mechanisms in small markets, such as bilateral trade settings.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Regret Minimization in Bilateral Trade With Perturbed Markets

We address the problem of maximizing Gain from Trade (GFT) in repeated buyer-seller exchanges subject to global budget balance constraints. While this problem is well-understood in purely adversarial and stochastic settings, these environments exhibit a sharp dichotomy: adversarial environments allow for no-regret learning against the best fixed-price mechanism, whereas stochastic environments allow for no-regret learning against the best distribution over prices that is budget balanced in expectation. This gap is significant, as policies balanced in expectation can increase the GFT by a multiplicative factor of two. In this work, we bridge these extremes by studying perturbed markets, where an underlying stochastic distribution is subject to an adversarial corruption $C$. We design an algorithm that adaptively scales with the level of corruption, achieving an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{3/4}) + \mathcal{O}(C\log(T))$ regret bound against the best budget-balanced distribution over prices. Simultaneously, our algorithm maintains the worst-case $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{3/4})$ regret bound relative to a per-round budget-balanced baseline, ensuring optimality even in fully adversarial environments.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Online Resource Allocation With General Constraints

Online resource allocation (ORA) is a fundamental framework for sequential decision-making problems under budget constraints, with applications ranging from online advertising to revenue management. In this work, we study a broader setting that includes both budget constraints and general constraints, extending the classical budget-only model. This extension is essential for modeling critical economic requirements, such as Return-on-Investment (ROI) constraints. We develop an algorithm that achieves best-of-both-world guarantees within this generalized framework. In particular, against a dynamic benchmark, our algorithm achieves $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret in the \emph{stochastic} regime and $α$-regret of order $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(\sqrt{T})$ in the \emph{adversarial} regime, where $α$ depends on the feasibility margin of the corresponding offline problem. At the same time, our algorithm guarantees strict satisfaction of the budget constraints and $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(\sqrt{T})$ cumulative violation for the general ones. From a technical perspective, introducing general constraints alongside budgets precludes the use of standard budget-focus methods. While budget methods rely on a zero-consumption ``safe'' action to ensure feasibility, general constraints are much less ``aligned'' towards feasibility. We overcome these difficulties with a new analysis that exploits \emph{weak adaptivity} to get boundedness of the Lagrangian multipliers and best-of-both-world guarantees.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Multi-Armed Bandits With Best-Action Queries

We study \emph{multi-armed bandits} (MABs) augmented with \emph{best-action queries}, in which the learner may additionally query an oracle that reveals the best arm in the current round. This setting was recently characterized by Russo et al. [2024] in the \emph{full-feedback} model, where the learner observes the rewards of all arms after each round. They show that, in both \emph{stochastic} and \emph{adversarial} environments, $k$ best-action queries reduce the optimal $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ regret to $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\min\{T/k,\sqrt{T}\})$. Whether this improvement extends to the more realistic \emph{bandit-feedback} model -- where the learner observes only the reward of the played arm -- was left as an open problem. We fully resolve this question. When rewards are stochastic but correlated among arms, we show that the full-feedback result does not carry over: any algorithm must incur regret at least $Ω(\sqrt{T-k})$. This lower bound directly extends to adversarial environments. On the positive side, we show that $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\min\{T/k,\sqrt{T-k}\})$ regret is still achievable when rewards are stochastic and i.i.d., and establish a matching lower bound, up to logarithmic factors. Together, these results provide a complete characterization of the benefits of \emph{best-action queries} in the \emph{bandit-feedback} model.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Toward Optimal Regret in Robust Pricing: Decoupling Corruption and Time

We design the first regret guarantees for robust dynamic pricing that decouple the dependence on the corruption $C$ and the time horizon $T$. In dynamic pricing, a seller with unlimited supply of a good interacts with a stream of buyers over $ T $ rounds, with the goal of maximizing revenue. At each round $t$, the seller posts a price $p_t$, and the buyer purchases the good only if their unknown valuation $v^\star$ exceeds this price. The seller observes only the binary feedback $\mathbb{I} \left\{ p_t \leq v^\star \right\}$, indicating whether a sale occurred. In the \emph{robust} pricing setting, a malicious adversary is allowed to corrupt this feedback in at most $C$ rounds. Even if the learner knows the corruption $C$, the best known regret bound is $\mathcal{O}(C\log\log T)$ by Gupta et al. [2025]. This leaves as an open problem to ``decouple'' the dependence on $C$ and $T$. In this work, we resolve this open problem. In particular, we develop a robust variant of binary search that achieves regret $\mathcal{O}(C+\log T)$ when the corruption $C$ is known and $\mathcal{O}(C+\log^2 T)$ when the corruption is unknown.

cs.LG↗