arXiv subjects

Mathieu Molina

Publications and source records attributed to Mathieu Molina.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Kernel Methods for Refined Prophet Inequalities

The single-selection prophet inequality is a canonical Bayesian online selection problem in which independent nonnegative values arrive sequentially and the decision-maker must irrevocably select at most one. Classical single-threshold guarantees are tight in the worst case, but the hard instances that prove tightness are highly irregular: the prophet's advantage is driven by rare, very large realizations of the maximum. We refine this worst-case picture by imposing a bound on the relative variance of the prophet's value, $\mathrm{Var}(\max_{i\in[n]}X_i)/\mathbb E[\max_{i\in[n]}X_i]^2$. This yields a nonparametric complexity measure that interpolates between deterministic instances, where the full prophet value can be recovered, and the unrestricted worst-case regime. Our main technical contribution is a general kernel method for single-threshold prophet inequalities. The method represents an instance by the quantile function of the maximum and rewrites the payoff of a threshold as a linear kernel functional of this quantile. This turns the worst-case analysis into an infinite-dimensional convex program, restores strong minimax duality in quantile space, and reduces the bounded-variance adversary's problem to a one-parameter variational family. Applying this framework, we obtain an exact characterization of the IID bounded-variance curve and asymptotically optimal finite-horizon thresholds, a closed-form expression for the fixed-order non-identical model, and a prophet-secretary lower-bound program together with a strict separation from the IID benchmark at every positive finite variance constraint. As a further application of the same kernel viewpoint, we derive an exact formula for IID random horizons under a convexity condition on the horizon pgf, which includes monotone-hazard-rate horizons, highlighting the broad applicability of this new technique for single threshold settings.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Prophet Inequalities under Local Differential Privacy

Many online decision platforms, from hiring marketplaces to auctions, face a tension between efficient decision-making and the protection of participants' privacy. Personal information, such as a candidate's test score or a bidder's valuation linked to protected data, is sensitive, and fear of data resale or reputational harm can make participants reluctant to share it. Furthermore, platforms can be untrusted or even incentivized to resell data, making local privacy guarantees that do not rely on a trusted centralized curator preferable. We initiate the study of optimal stopping and prophet inequalities under local differential privacy (LDP). Each of $n$ independent arriving values is observed only through reports generated by an $\varepsilon$-LDP mechanism. The decision maker must design the $\varepsilon$-LDP mechanisms, and choose an irrevocable stopping time to maximise the expected selected true value. We characterize the optimal online stopping rule under LDP and show that simple binary mechanisms suffice: an optimal LDP stopping rule can be implemented via a randomized-response-type report and a dynamic-programming threshold rule. We then quantify performance via tight competitive ratios against two benchmarks. Relative to the optimal non-private online policy, we prove a tight worst-case competitive ratio of $e^{\varepsilon}/(n - 1 + e^{\varepsilon})$, interpolating between $1/n$ (full privacy) and $1$ (no privacy). Relative to an LDP prophet, who designs $\varepsilon$-LDP mechanisms but observes the full privatized sequence before deciding what to select, we prove a tight competitive ratio of $(1 + e^{-\varepsilon})/2$, interpolating between $1$ (full privacy) and the classical $1/2$ bound (no privacy). Notably, increasing privacy shrinks the LDP prophet's advantage faster than it degrades online performance, closing the performance gap.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Tight $L_\infty$ Sample Complexity for Low-Degree and Sparse Boolean Polynomials

Motivated by the optimization of bounded binary black-box functions, we study the problem of learning polynomial surrogates over the Boolean hypercube. To ensure that optimizing the surrogate yields good solutions for the underlying objective, we require uniform $L_\infty$-error guarantees rather than the usual $L_2$-type guarantees. We characterize the minimax sample complexity of uniform estimation under subgaussian noise for two classes of bounded polynomials. First, for polynomials of degree at most $d$ on $n$ variables, the sample complexity scales as $n^{d+1}$. Second, for $s$-sparse Fourier-Walsh polynomials with $s \leq n$, it scales as $ns^2$. These rates differ structurally from the noiseless setting, where uniform exact recovery scales as $n^d$ and $ns$, respectively. Our lower bounds hold even for arbitrary adaptive learners, showing that the additional factors are intrinsic to the noisy cases. Standard Fourier-analysis tools for the $L_2$-norm do not naturally extend to the $L_\infty$-setting in a way that yields uniform guarantees. Our proofs overcome this difficulty by relying on suitably chosen auxiliary norms that serve as proxies for controlling the $L_\infty$-error. Together, our results provide a tight characterization of the sample complexity of learning optimization-safe polynomial surrogates.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2024

Prophet Inequalities: Competing with the Top $\ell$ Items is Easy

We explore a prophet inequality problem, where the values of a sequence of items are drawn i.i.d. from some distribution, and an online decision maker must select one item irrevocably. We establish that $\mathrm{CR}_{\ell}$ the worst-case competitive ratio between the expected optimal performance of an online decision maker compared to that of a prophet who uses the average of the top $\ell$ items is exactly the solution to an integral equation. This quantity $\mathrm{CR}_{\ell}$ is larger than $1-e^{-\ell}$. This implies that the bound converges exponentially fast to $1$ as $\ell$ grows. In particular for $\ell=2$, $\mathrm{CR}_{2} \approx 0.966$ which is much closer to $1$ than the classical bound of $0.745$ for $\ell=1$. Additionally, we prove asymptotic lower bounds for the competitive ratio of a more general scenario, where the decision maker is permitted to select $k$ items. This subsumes the $k$ multi-unit i.i.d. prophet problem and provides the current best asymptotic guarantees, as well as enables broader understanding in the more general framework. Finally, we prove a tight asymptotic competitive ratio when only static threshold policies are allowed.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Equitable Auctions

We initiate the study of how auction design affects the division of surplus among buyers. We propose a parsimonious measure for equity and apply it to the family of standard auctions for homogeneous goods. Our surplus-equitable mechanism is efficient, Bayesian-Nash incentive compatible, and achieves surplus parity among winners ex-post. The uniform-price auction is equity-optimal if and only if buyers have a pure common value. Against intuition, the pay-as-bid auction is not always preferred in terms of equity if buyers have pure private values. In auctions with price mixing between pay-as-bid and uniform prices, we provide prior-free bounds on the equity-preferred pricing rule under a common regularity condition on signals.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2024

The Price of Opportunity Fairness in Matroid Allocation Problems

We consider matroid allocation problems under opportunity fairness constraints: resources need to be allocated to a set of agents under matroid constraints (which include classical problems such as bipartite matching). Agents are divided into $C$ groups according to a sensitive attribute, and an allocation is opportunity-fair if each group receives the same share proportional to the maximum feasible allocation it could achieve in isolation. We study the Price of Fairness (PoF), i.e., the ratio between maximum size allocations and maximum size opportunity-fair allocations. We first provide a characterization of the PoF leveraging the underlying polymatroid structure of the allocation problem. Based on this characterization, we prove bounds on the PoF in various settings from fully adversarial (worst-case) to fully random. Notably, one of our main results considers an arbitrary matroid structure with agents randomly divided into groups. In this setting, we prove a PoF bound as a function of the (relative) size of the largest group. Our result implies that, as long as there is no dominant group (i.e., the largest group is not too large), opportunity fairness constraints do not induce any loss of social welfare (defined as the allocation size). Overall, our results give insights into which aspects of the problem's structure affect the trade-off between opportunity fairness and social welfare.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Trading-off price for data quality to achieve fair online allocation

We consider the problem of online allocation subject to a long-term fairness penalty. Contrary to existing works, however, we do not assume that the decision-maker observes the protected attributes -- which is often unrealistic in practice. Instead they can purchase data that help estimate them from sources of different quality; and hence reduce the fairness penalty at some cost. We model this problem as a multi-armed bandit problem where each arm corresponds to the choice of a data source, coupled with the online allocation problem. We propose an algorithm that jointly solves both problems and show that it has a regret bounded by $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T})$. A key difficulty is that the rewards received by selecting a source are correlated by the fairness penalty, which leads to a need for randomization (despite a stochastic setting). Our algorithm takes into account contextual information available before the source selection, and can adapt to many different fairness notions. We also show that in some instances, the estimates used can be learned on the fly.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2022

Bounding and Approximating Intersectional Fairness through Marginal Fairness

Discrimination in machine learning often arises along multiple dimensions (a.k.a. protected attributes); it is then desirable to ensure \emph{intersectional fairness} -- i.e., that no subgroup is discriminated against. It is known that ensuring \emph{marginal fairness} for every dimension independently is not sufficient in general. Due to the exponential number of subgroups, however, directly measuring intersectional fairness from data is impossible. In this paper, our primary goal is to understand in detail the relationship between marginal and intersectional fairness through statistical analysis. We first identify a set of sufficient conditions under which an exact relationship can be obtained. Then, we prove bounds (easily computable through marginal fairness and other meaningful statistical quantities) in high-probability on intersectional fairness in the general case. Beyond their descriptive value, we show that these theoretical bounds can be leveraged to derive a heuristic improving the approximation and bounds of intersectional fairness by choosing, in a relevant manner, protected attributes for which we describe intersectional subgroups. Finally, we test the performance of our approximations and bounds on real and synthetic data-sets.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2022

On Preemption and Learning in Stochastic Scheduling

We study single-machine scheduling of jobs, each belonging to a job type that determines its duration distribution. We start by analyzing the scenario where the type characteristics are known and then move to two learning scenarios where the types are unknown: non-preemptive problems, where each started job must be completed before moving to another job; and preemptive problems, where job execution can be paused in the favor of moving to a different job. In both cases, we design algorithms that achieve sublinear excess cost, compared to the performance with known types, and prove lower bounds for the non-preemptive case. Notably, we demonstrate, both theoretically and through simulations, how preemptive algorithms can greatly outperform non-preemptive ones when the durations of different job types are far from one another, a phenomenon that does not occur when the type durations are known.

cs.LG↗