Mario Berk | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Effort-Based Criticality Metrics for Evaluating 3D Perception Errors in Autonomous Driving

Criticality metrics such as time-to-collision (TTC) quantify collision urgency but do not distinguish the operational consequences of false-positive (FP) and false-negative (FN) perception errors. We formulate two error-specific effort metrics: False Speed Reduction (FSR), the cumulative velocity loss associated with persistent phantom detections, and Maximum Deceleration Rate (MDR), the peak braking demand associated with missed objects under a longitudinal kinematic model. These longitudinal metrics are complemented by Lateral Evasion Acceleration (LEA), adapted from prior lateral-evasion kinematics and coupled with reachability-based collision timing. The collision check quantifies the minimum steering effort required to avoid a predicted collision. A dynamically conservative, semantically unfiltered reachability gate selects candidate interactions before frame-level scoring and track-level aggregation. Evaluation on nuScenes and Argoverse 2 shows that 65% to 93% of errors fall below the chosen criticality thresholds. Correlation and threshold analysis indicate that the proposed metrics provide complementary rankings for screening and mining perception failures and are not substitutes for closed-loop safety validation.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Contour Errors: Ego-Centric Matching for 3D Multi-Object Tracking Performance Evaluation

Open-loop performance evaluation of 3D multi-object tracking in autonomous driving requires matching criteria that effectively penalize translational, shape, and orientation errors from the ego vehicle perspective. The prevailing criteria for determining true positives are Intersection over Union (IoU) and Centre-Point Distances (CPD). When IoU is extended from the 2D image plane to 3D volumetric overlap, it often falls below its acceptance threshold even with minor yaw misalignments, whereas CPD disregards orientation entirely. To address this limitation, we propose Contour Errors (CE) as an ego-centric criterion that employs Hausdorff-type reasoning to sparse bounding-box corner geometry by selecting the k-nearest ego-centric corners. This method provides a graded orientation sensitivity between the extremes of IoU, which overpenalizes, and CPD, which is orientation-blind. We evaluate Contour Errors against six baselines using the HOTA evaluation protocol on the nuScenes dataset, conditioned on proximity, yaw error, and a confidence threshold. At the standard IoU vehicle threshold, 47% of car and 75% of pedestrian CE-valid matches are rejected by IoU despite close contour proximity, while fewer than 0.1% of IoU-valid matches fail CE. These results establish the ego-centric matching criterion as a primary factor for improving open-loop perception evaluation in safety-critical autonomous driving.

cs.CV↗