arXiv subjects

Marco Scaringi

Publications and source records attributed to Marco Scaringi.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Are cryptocurrencies real financial bubbles? Evidence from quantitative analyses

The growth of peer-to-peer exchanges and the blockchain technology has led to a proliferation of cryptocurrencies and to a massive increase in the number of investors who actually negotiate digital money. Cryptocurrencies trade at prices mainly driven by investor sentiment, becoming a potential source of financial bubbles and instabilities. In this work, we apply quantitative models to the study of Bitcoin and Ether, two of the most famous cryptocurrencies. Our bubble detection methodology combines the Log Periodic Power Law (LPPL) model, originally created by Johansen, Ledoit and Sornette (JLS), and the statistical model developed by Phillips, Shi, and Yu (PSY). In particular, we employ three different versions of JLS model, i.e. Ordinary Least Square (OLS), Generalised Least Squares (GLS) and Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), and two PSY statistical tests (BSADF and BSADF*). We find that, during the sample period 1st December 2016 - 16th January 2018, Bitcoin shows typical hallmarks of a bubble phase in mid December 2017 and in the first half of January 2018, anticipating the large crashes observed thereafter. Also the Ether price dynamics reveals bubble evidence in mid June 2017, anticipating the crash observed on 12th June, and a weaker signal around 12th January 2018, anticipating the crash observed in the same days. This paper confirms the high risk of speculative bubbles associated with cryptocurrencies, related to investor exuberance pumping market prices far away from their fundamental values, thus creating critical situations subject to possible crashes. Our methodology is general and can be applied to virtually any financial time series, and may support investing and risk management strategies.

q-fin.RM↗

arXiv2025

Sharpening Shapley Allocation: from Basel 2.5 to FRTB

Risk allocation, the decomposition of a portfolio-wide risk measure into component contributions, is a fundamental problem in financial risk management due to the non-additive nature of risk measures, the layered organizational structures of financial institutions, and the range of possible allocation strategies characterized by different rationales and properties. In this work, we conduct a systematic review of the major risk allocation strategies typically used in finance, comparing their theoretical properties, practical advantages, and limitations. To this scope we set up a specific testing framework, including both simplified settings, designed to highlight basic intrinsic behaviours, and realistic financial portfolios under different risk regulations, i.e. Basel 2.5 and FRTB. Furthermore, we develop and test novel practical solutions to manage the issue of negative risk allocations and of multi-level risk allocation in the layered organizational structure of financial institutions, while preserving the additivity property. Finally, we devote particular attention to the computational aspects of risk allocation. Our results show that, in this context, the Shapley allocation strategy offers the best compromise between simplicity, mathematical properties, risk representation and computational cost. The latter is still acceptable even in the challenging case of many business units, provided that an efficient Monte Carlo simulation is employed, which offers excellent scaling and convergence properties. While our empirical applications focus on market risk, our methodological framework is fully general and applicable to other financial context such as valuation risk, liquidity risk, credit risk, and counterparty credit risk.

q-fin.RM↗

arXiv2025

No Fear of Discounting - How to Manage the Transition from EONIA to ESTR

An important step in the Financial Benchmarks Reform was taken on 13th September 2018, when the ECB Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates recommended the Euro Short-Term Rate ESTR as the new benchmark rate for the euro area, to replace the Euro OverNight Index Average (EONIA) which will be discontinued at the end of 2021. This transition has a number of important consequences on financial instruments, OTC derivatives in particular. In this paper we show in detail how the switch from EONIA to ESTR affects the pricing of OIS, IRS and XVAs. We conclude that the adoption of the "clean discounting" approach recommended by the the ECB, based on ESTR only, is theoretically sound and leads to very limited impacts on financial valuations. This finding ensures the possibility, for the financial industry, to switch all EUR OTC derivatives, either cleared with Central Counterparties, or subject to bilateral collateral agreements, or non-collateralised, in a safe and consistent manner. The transition to such EONIA-free pricing framework is essential for the complete elimination of EONIA before its discontinuation scheduled on 31st December 2021.

q-fin.PR↗

arXiv2025

Risk-aware Trading Portfolio Optimization

We investigate portfolio optimization in financial markets from a trading and risk management perspective. We term this task Risk-Aware Trading Portfolio Optimization (RATPO), formulate the corresponding optimization problem, and propose an efficient Risk-Aware Trading Swarm (RATS) algorithm to solve it. The key elements of RATPO are a generic initial portfolio P, a specific set of Unique Eligible Instruments (UEIs), their combination into an Eligible Optimization Strategy (EOS), an objective function, and a set of constraints. RATS searches for an optimal EOS that, added to P, improves the objective function repecting the constraints. RATS is a specialized Particle Swarm Optimization method that leverages the parameterization of P in terms of UEIs, enables parallel computation with a large number of particles, and is fully general with respect to specific choices of the key elements, which can be customized to encode financial knowledge and needs of traders and risk managers. We showcase two RATPO applications involving a real trading portfolio made of hundreds of different financial instruments, an objective function combining both market risk (VaR) and profit&loss measures, constrains on market sensitivities and UEIs trading costs. In the case of small-sized EOS, RATS successfully identifies the optimal solution and demonstrates robustness with respect to hyper-parameters tuning. In the case of large-sized EOS, RATS markedly improves the portfolio objective value, optimizing risk and capital charge while respecting risk limits and preserving expected profits. Our work bridges the gap between the implementation of effective trading strategies and compliance with stringent regulatory and economic capital requirements, allowing a better alignment of business and risk management objectives.

q-fin.RM↗

arXiv2021

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About XVA Model Risk but Were Afraid to Ask

Valuation adjustments, collectively named XVA, play an important role in modern derivatives pricing to take into account additional price components such as counterparty and funding risk premia. They are an exotic price component carrying a significant model risk and computational effort even for vanilla trades. We adopt an industry-standard realistic and complete XVA modelling framework, typically used by XVA trading desks, based on multi-curve time-dependent volatility G2++ stochastic dynamics calibrated on real market data, and a multi-step Monte Carlo simulation including both variation and initial margins. We apply this framework to the most common linear and non-linear interest rates derivatives, also comparing the MC results with XVA analytical formulas. Within this framework, we identify the most relevant model risk sources affecting the precision of XVA figures and we measure the corresponding computational effort. In particular, we show how to build a parsimonious and efficient MC time simulation grid able to capture the spikes arising in collateralized exposure during the margin period of risk. As a consequence, we also show how to tune accuracy vs performance, leading to sufficiently robust XVA figures in a reasonable time, a very important feature for practical applications. Furthermore, we provide a quantification of the XVA model risk stemming from the existence of a range of different parameterizations according to the EU prudent valuation regulation. Finally, this work also serves as an handbook containing step-by-step instructions for the implementation of a complete, realistic and robust modelling framework of collateralized exposure and XVA.

q-fin.PR↗

arXiv2021

Learning Bermudans

American and Bermudan-type financial instruments are often priced with specific Monte Carlo techniques whose efficiency critically depends on the effective dimensionality of the problem and the available computational power. In our work we focus on Bermudan Swaptions, well-known interest rate derivatives embedded in callable debt instruments or traded in the OTC market for hedging or speculation purposes, and we adopt an original pricing approach based on Supervised Learning (SL) algorithms. In particular, we link the price of a Bermudan Swaption to its natural hedges, i.e. the underlying European Swaptions, and other sound financial quantities through SL non-parametric regressions. We test different algorithms, from linear models to decision tree-based models and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), analyzing their predictive performances. All the SL algorithms result to be reliable and fast, allowing to overcome the computational bottleneck of standard Monte Carlo simulations; the best performing algorithms for our problem result to be Ridge, ANN and Gradient Boosted Regression Tree. Moreover, using feature importance techniques, we are able to rank the most important driving factors of a Bermudan Swaption price, confirming that the value of the maximum underlying European Swaption is the prevailing feature.

q-fin.PR↗

arXiv2016

Brexit or Bremain ? Evidence from bubble analysis

We applied the Johansen-Ledoit-Sornette (JLS) model to detect possible bubbles and crashes related to the Brexit/Bremain referendum scheduled for 23rd June 2016. Our implementation includes an enhanced model calibration using Genetic Algorithms. We selected a few historical financial series sensitive to the Brexit/Bremain scenario, representative of multiple asset classes. We found that equity and currency asset classes show no bubble signals, while rates, credit and real estate show super-exponential behaviour and instabilities typical of bubble regime. Our study suggests that, under the JLS model, equity and currency markets do not expect crashes or sharp rises following the referendum results. Instead, rates and credit markets consider the referendum a risky event, expecting either a Bremain scenario or a Brexit scenario edulcorated by central banks intervention. In the case of real estate, a crash is expected, but its relationship with the referendum results is unclear.

q-fin.RM↗