arXiv subjects

Marcel Musiałek

Publications and source records attributed to Marcel Musiałek.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

CyFM: Cylindrical Optimal Transport for Few-Step Complex-Valued Flow Matching

Complex-valued signals like MRI and audio spectrograms are typically modelled as flat two-channel Euclidean data. The inherited Euclidean metric $dA^2 + A^2 dθ^2$ vanishes at the origin, leaving phase unpenalised exactly where the signal is weakest. We replace it with the decoupled product metric $dA^2 + dθ^2$ on the cylindrical closure $[0, \infty) \times S^1$, which stays non-degenerate at $A = 0$. We measure what this substitution costs and buys. Exact analytical bridges across synthetic fields, fastMRI knee data, and LibriSpeech spectrograms show Cartesian paths induce a heavy-tailed angular velocity distribution (Pareto index $\approx 1$). Under independent coupling, 43%-49% of signal energy falls on paths turning faster than $π$ rad per unit time. Cylindrical paths never reach this speed. We formulate Cylindrical Flow Matching (CyFM) to strictly bound the angular regression target, coupling noise and data via exact minibatch Optimal Transport jointly over whole fields. This coupling reduces few-step generation error by 3%-60%. CyFM achieves lower generative error than the best Cartesian baseline at every step up to $k = 8$ on synthetic fields and speech spectrograms, with all seeds separated. On knee MRI, the single-step advantage is 1.8x. At convergence ($k = 100$), the two geometries show no significant difference. Finally, a prior-only control exposes the cost of flat parametrisation: on synthetic fields, a single Cartesian Euler step performs worse than the unintegrated noise prior (0.376 vs. 0.150).

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

CEL: Comprehensive Counterfactual Explanations Library and Benchmark

Counterfactual explanations are a prominent approach in explainable artificial intelligence (xAI), providing actionable guidance on what input changes would alter a model's prediction to a desired outcome. While early methods primarily focused on minimal feature changes, recent work incorporates additional properties such as sparsity, actionability and plausibility. Despite this progress, fair and systematic evaluation remains challenging. Existing studies often rely on different data splits, predictive models, and evaluation metrics, which limits objective comparison across methods. To fill this gap, we introduce CEL (Counterfactual Explanations Library), a unified library and benchmark for counterfactual explanations designed to support consistent implementation and evaluation. CEL includes 18 datasets of varying size and complexity and provides implementations or reimplementations of 14 widely used counterfactual methods. Using this standardized setup, we conduct a comprehensive quantitative comparison across a variety of methods on datasets that differ in size, number, and types of attributes. The evaluation protocol incorporates multiple complementary metrics capturing validity, coverage, sparsity, proximity, and distributional plausibility, including density- and outlier-based measures to assess the realism of generated counterfactuals. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive benchmark that systematically evaluates recent counterfactual explanation methods within a unified and reproducible framework. While prior libraries and benchmarking efforts exist in the literature, many are outdated, limited in scope, or lack consistent evaluation protocols. The proposed benchmark aims to improve reproducibility, enable fair comparison, and establish a workbench for the development of future counterfactual explanation methods.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Open-Set Vein Biometric Recognition with Deep Metric Learning

Most state-of-the-art vein recognition methods rely on closed-set classification, which inherently limits their scalability and prevents the adaptive enrollment of new users without complete model retraining. We rigorously evaluate the computational boundaries of Deep Metric Learning (DML) under strict open-set constraints. Unlike standard closed-set approaches, we analyze the impact of data scarcity and domain shift on recognition performance. Our approach learns discriminative L2-normalised embeddings and employs prototype-based matching with a calibrated similarity threshold to effectively distinguish between enrolled users and unseen impostors. We evaluate the framework under a strict subject-disjoint protocol across four diverse datasets covering finger, wrist, and dorsal hand veins (MMCBNU 6000, UTFVP, FYO, and a dorsal hand-vein dataset). On the large-scale MMCBNU 6000 benchmark, our best model (ResNet50-CBAM) achieves an OSCR of 0.9945, AUROC of 0.9974, and EER of 1.57%, maintaining high identification accuracy (99.6% Rank-1) while robustly rejecting unknown subjects. Cross-dataset experiments evaluate the framework's generalisation across different acquisition setups, confirming that while the model handles large-scale data robustly, performance remains sensitive to domain shifts in low-data regimes. Ablation studies demonstrate that triplet-based objectives combined with a simple 1-NN classifier offer an optimal trade-off between accuracy and efficiency, enabling real-time deployment on commodity hardware.

cs.CV↗