arXiv subjects

Marc Ohm

Publications and source records attributed to Marc Ohm.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Insecure Ingredients? Exploring Dependency Update Patterns of Bundled JavaScript Packages on the Web

Reusable software components, typically distributed as packages, are a central paradigm of modern software development. The JavaScript ecosystem serves as a prime example, offering millions of packages with their use being promoted as idiomatic. However, download statistics on npm raise security concerns as they indicate a high popularity of vulnerable package versions while their real prevalence on production websites remains unknown. Package version detection mechanisms fill this gap by extracting utilized packages and versions from observed artifacts on the web. Prior research focuses on mechanisms for either hand-selected popular packages in bundles or for single-file resources utilizing the global namespace. This does not allow for a thorough analysis of modern web applications' dependency update behavior at scale. In this work, we improve upon this by presenting Aletheia, a package-agnostic method which dissects JavaScript bundles to identify package versions through algorithms originating from the field of plagiarism detection. We show that this method clearly outperforms the existing approaches in practical settings. Furthermore, we crawl the Tranco top 100,000 domains to reveal that 5% - 20% of domains update their dependencies within 16 weeks. Surprisingly, from a longitudinal perspective, bundled packages are updated significantly faster than their CDN-included counterparts, with consequently up to 10 times fewer known vulnerable package versions included. Still, we observe indicators that few widespread vendors seem to be a major driving force behind timely updates, implying that quantitative measures are not painting a complete picture.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

How Reliable Are FOSS Popularity Metrics? Analyzing the Effort Required for Spoofing Common Software Popularity Metrics

Quantitative metrics derived from software repositories and package ecosystems are widely used to assess the impact, popularity, maintenance, and criticality of free and open source software (FOSS) projects. However, these metrics are often assumed to be reliable despite their potential susceptibility to manipulation. Prior empirical software engineering and security research deployed these in a variety of ways which assume they indeed capture project impact and popularity. Yet, the extent to which these underlying signals can be spoofed in practice, and the consequences this has for downstream uses of the metrics, has received little focused attention. To address this gap, the paper decomposes existing combined metrics into atomic metric categories, analyzes their spoofing effort under a maintainer-centered threat model, and investigates a real-world sybil attack on npm connected to an impact-based reward mechanism. The analysis finds that many metric categories, especially commit data, issue-tracker activity, downloads, repository contents, and dependency relations, are manipulable with low to moderate effort, and it identifies a sybil attack comprising more than 70,000 spam packages on npm. These results imply that quantitative FOSS metrics should be used with much greater caution in software engineering research and practice, particularly for ranking, dataset construction, and any allocation or evaluation process that turns metrics into optimization targets.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

SoK: Towards Reproducibility for Software Packages in Scripting Language Ecosystems

The disconnect between distributed software artifacts and their supposed source code enables attackers to leverage the build process for inserting malicious functionality. Past research in this field focuses on compiled language ecosystems, mostly analysing Linux distribution packages. However, the popular scripting language ecosystems potentially face unique issues given the systematic difference in distributed artifacts. This SoK provides an overview of existing research, aiming to highlight future directions, as well as chances to transfer existing knowledge from compiled language ecosystems. To that end, we work out key aspects in current research, systematize identified challenges for software reproducibility, and map them between the ecosystems. We find that the literature is sparse, focusing on few individual problems and ecosystems. This allows us to effectively identify next steps to improve reproducibility in this field.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2023

You Can Run But You Can't Hide: Runtime Protection Against Malicious Package Updates For Node.js

Maliciously prepared software packages are an extensively leveraged weapon for software supply chain attacks. The detection of malicious packages is undoubtedly of high priority and many academic and commercial approaches have been developed. In the inevitable case of an attack, one needs resilience against malicious code. To this end, we present a runtime protection for Node.js that automatically limits a package's capabilities to an established minimum. The detection of required capabilities as well as their enforcement at runtime has been implemented and evaluated against known malicious attacks. Our approach was able to prevent 9/10 historic attacks with a median install-time overhead of less than 0.6 seconds and a median runtime overhead of less than 0.2 seconds.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2020

Supporting the Detection of Software Supply Chain Attacks through Unsupervised Signature Generation

Trojanized software packages used in software supply chain attacks constitute an emerging threat. Unfortunately, there is still a lack of scalable approaches that allow automated and timely detection of malicious software packages and thus most detections are based on manual labor and expertise. However, it has been observed that most attack campaigns comprise multiple packages that share the same or similar malicious code. We leverage that fact to automatically reproduce manually identified clusters of known malicious packages that have been used in real world attacks, thus, reducing the need for expert knowledge and manual inspection. Our approach, AST Clustering using MCL to mimic Expertise (ACME), yields promising results with a $F_{1}$ score of 0.99. Signatures are automatically generated based on characteristic code fragments from clusters and are subsequently used to scan the whole npm registry for unreported malicious packages. We are able to identify and report six malicious packages that have been removed from npm consequentially. Therefore, our approach can support analysts by reducing manual labor and hence may be employed to timely detect possible software supply chain attacks.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2020

Backstabber's Knife Collection: A Review of Open Source Software Supply Chain Attacks

A software supply chain attack is characterized by the injection of malicious code into a software package in order to compromise dependent systems further down the chain. Recent years saw a number of supply chain attacks that leverage the increasing use of open source during software development, which is facilitated by dependency managers that automatically resolve, download and install hundreds of open source packages throughout the software life cycle. This paper presents a dataset of 174 malicious software packages that were used in real-world attacks on open source software supply chains, and which were distributed via the popular package repositories npm, PyPI, and RubyGems. Those packages, dating from November 2015 to November 2019, were manually collected and analyzed. The paper also presents two general attack trees to provide a structured overview about techniques to inject malicious code into the dependency tree of downstream users, and to execute such code at different times and under different conditions. This work is meant to facilitate the future development of preventive and detective safeguards by open source and research communities.

cs.CR↗