arXiv subjects

Mantek Singh

Publications and source records attributed to Mantek Singh.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Efficient Reasoning Distillation: Small Video-Language Models via Synthetic CoT and Difficulty-Aware Fine-Tuning

We present an efficient method to distill reasoning capabilities into compact video-language models (VLMs) for video question answering (VideoQA). Our approach fine-tunes a 2B-parameter model using only $\sim$900 uncertainty-selected examples, each augmented with synthetic chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales generated by a 4B teacher. Despite its minimal compute cost - under two hours on a single A100 GPU - our method enables the 2B model to outperform VLMs up to 4$\times$ larger, and generalize across CinePile, ActivityNet-QA, and MLVU, approaching the performance of its own 4B teacher. A key finding is that placing CoT rationales after the answer - contrary to standard prompting - substantially improves reasoning in compact models. This insight challenges prevailing CoT conventions and reveals new alignment strategies under limited model capacity. Our findings offer a practical blueprint for training deployable, reasoning-rich VLMs suited for mobile and edge applications.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

LLMs as Master Forgers: Generating Synthetic Time Series Data for Manufacturing

This paper presents a novel framework leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate synthetic time series data for manufacturing processes. Motivated by the scarcity of labeled time-series data in real-world manufacturing settings, which hinders the development of robust machine learning models, we explore the potential of LLMs to learn complex temporal dependencies and generate realistic synthetic data. Our approach involves fine-tuning pre-trained LLMs on manufacturing process instructions and employing a Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) technique to enhance data diversity and realism. We evaluate our method against traditional time series modeling techniques like ARIMA and LSTMs, using quantitative metrics, PCA analysis, and downstream task performance (anomaly detection). Results demonstrate that our LLM-driven framework outperforms these baselines, generating high-quality synthetic time series data that effectively captures temporal dependencies and statistical properties of real manufacturing data, leading to improvements in downstream task performance.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

SI-Agent: An Agentic Framework for Feedback-Driven Generation and Tuning of Human-Readable System Instructions for Large Language Models

System Instructions (SIs), or system prompts, are pivotal for guiding Large Language Models (LLMs) but manual crafting is resource-intensive and often suboptimal. Existing automated methods frequently generate non-human-readable "soft prompts," sacrificing interpretability. This paper introduces SI-Agent, a novel agentic framework designed to automatically generate and iteratively refine human-readable SIs through a feedback-driven loop. SI-Agent employs three collaborating agents: an Instructor Agent, an Instruction Follower Agent (target LLM), and a Feedback/Reward Agent evaluating task performance and optionally SI readability. The framework utilizes iterative cycles where feedback guides the Instructor's refinement strategy (e.g., LLM-based editing, evolutionary algorithms). We detail the framework's architecture, agent roles, the iterative refinement process, and contrast it with existing methods. We present experimental results validating SI-Agent's effectiveness, focusing on metrics for task performance, SI readability, and efficiency. Our findings indicate that SI-Agent generates effective, readable SIs, offering a favorable trade-off between performance and interpretability compared to baselines. Potential implications include democratizing LLM customization and enhancing model transparency. Challenges related to computational cost and feedback reliability are acknowledged.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Surfacing Semantic Orthogonality Across Model Safety Benchmarks: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Various AI safety datasets have been developed to measure LLMs against evolving interpretations of harm. Our evaluation of five recently published open-source safety benchmarks reveals distinct semantic clusters using UMAP dimensionality reduction and kmeans clustering (silhouette score: 0.470). We identify six primary harm categories with varying benchmark representation. GretelAI, for example, focuses heavily on privacy concerns, while WildGuardMix emphasizes self-harm scenarios. Significant differences in prompt length distribution suggests confounds to data collection and interpretations of harm as well as offer possible context. Our analysis quantifies benchmark orthogonality among AI benchmarks, allowing for transparency in coverage gaps despite topical similarities. Our quantitative framework for analyzing semantic orthogonality across safety benchmarks enables more targeted development of datasets that comprehensively address the evolving landscape of harms in AI use, however that is defined in the future.

cs.LG↗