arXiv subjects

Malte Baumecker

Publications and source records attributed to Malte Baumecker.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Distributed Santa Claus via Global Rounding

In this paper, we initiate the study of a new class of problems in the CONGEST model: Mixed packing and covering linear programs (LP). Previously, the design of optimization algorithms in the distributed setting was heavily focused on solving linear programs with either packing or covering constraints. We are the first to explore the class of linear programs with both packing and covering constraints by providing a general-purpose CONGEST solver for such LPs and by studying the sequentially well-studied Santa Claus problem as a central representative. This NP-hard problem can be modeled as a bipartite graph of children and gifts where an edge indicates that a child desires a gift. The goal is to assign the gifts to the children such that the least happy child is as happy as possible. Even though this is a well-studied problem in the sequential setting, we provide the first results in the distributed setting. In particular, we show that the complexity of computing an $\mathcal{O}(\log n/\log \log n)$-approximation is $\widehat Θ(\sqrt n+D)$ rounds, where our $\widetildeΩ(\sqrt n+D)$-round lower bound even holds for any approximation.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Near-Optimal Distributed 2-Ruling Sets on Graphs with Low Arboricity

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, a $β$-ruling set is a subset of nodes $S\subseteq V$ that is independent, and each node in $V$ is at distance at most $β$ from some node in $S$. In this paper, we present almost optimal distributed algorithms for finding $2$-ruling sets in the classical LOCAL model. Our main contribution is a randomized algorithm that w.h.p. computes a $2$-ruling set on any $n$-node graph with bounded arboricity in $O(\log \log n)$ rounds. In fact, the algorithm works up to arboricity $O(\log\log n)$, improves exponentially over the prior state of the art that can be achieved by combining [Barenboim, Elkin, Pettie, Schneider; JACM'16], [Ghaffari; SODA'16], and [Bisht, Kothapalli and Pemmaraju; PODC'14], and nearly matches the lower bound of $Ω(\log \log n / \log \log \log n)$ [Balliu, Brandt, Kuhn, Olivetti; FOCS'20]. The domination parameter $β=2$ is optimal for algorithms with runtime $\log^{o(1)}n$: on graphs with arboricity $2$, there is a lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{\log n})$ rounds for MIS (i.e., $β= 1$) [Khoury, Schild; FOCS'25]. Additionally, we obtain improved algorithms for larger arboricity. For general graphs with arboricity $α$, we present a randomized algorithm that computes a $2$-ruling set in $\widetilde{O}(\log^{5/8} α+\log^{5/3} \log n)$ rounds. This improves exponentially over the state of the art for a large range of non-constant arboricity. Our techniques extend beyond distributed computing. We present an $O(\log \log \log n)$-round algorithm in the low-space Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model that w.h.p. computes a $2$-ruling set on any graph with arboricity up to $2^{poly (\log \log n)}$, improving exponentially over the state of the art from [Kothapalli, Pai, Pemmaraju; FSTTCS'20] combined with [Fischer, Giliberti, Grunau; SPAA'23].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Near-Optimal Distributed Ruling Sets for Trees and High-Girth Graphs

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, a $β$-ruling set is a subset $S\subseteq V$ that is i) independent, and ii) every node $v\in V$ has a node of $S$ within distance $β$. In this paper we present almost optimal distributed algorithms for finding ruling sets in trees and high girth graphs in the classic LOCAL model. As our first contribution we present an $O(\log\log n)$-round randomized algorithm for computing $2$-ruling sets on trees, almost matching the $Ω(\log\log n/\log\log\log n)$ lower bound given by Balliu et al. [FOCS'20]. Second, we show that $2$-ruling sets can be solved in $\widetilde{O}(\log^{5/3}\log n)$ rounds in high-girth graphs. Lastly, we show that $O(\log\log\log n)$-ruling sets can be computed in $\widetilde{O}(\log\log n)$ rounds in high-girth graphs matching the lower bound up to triple-log factors. All of these results either improve polynomially or exponentially on the previously best algorithms and use a smaller domination distance $β$.

cs.DS↗