arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Mahbub Ul Alam

Publications and source records attributed to Mahbub Ul Alam.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PAUSE: A Privacy-Preserving Self-Reflection Tool for AI-Associated Cognitive Offloading

Cognitive offloading is the use of external aids, such as notes, calculators, or search engines, to reduce mental effort. Large language models (LLMs) extend this to thinking itself, and by AI-associated cognitive offloading, I mean the pattern where a person routinely substitutes LLM output for their own reasoning, idea generation, learning, or communication. Recent empirical work reports associations between some patterns of LLM use and changes in critical thinking effort, neural engagement during assisted tasks, creative diversity, learning behaviour, and social dependence. Validated instruments for AI reliance, dependence, and literacy have begun to appear. I describe PAUSE (Patterns of AI Use: Self-Examination), a privacy-by-design web tool (link: https://anondo1969.github.io/pause) that occupies a different niche from these. It is a lightweight, non-diagnostic reflection aid for private individual use. PAUSE is organised around how a person's own LLM use may relate to cognitive offloading across four everyday domains ('reasoning & critical thinking', 'creativity & originality', 'research & learning', and 'social & communicative capacity'). It delivers a short, free, no-login self-check, scores it entirely in the browser, and returns descriptive, domain-aware reflections. The self-check pairs reverse-scored behavioural items with a claim-evaluation reasoning probe, an alternative-uses creativity probe, and a small retrospective before-and-after block. PAUSE does not assume that AI use is harmful. It only addresses where AI substitutes for effort a person may want to preserve. The application is privacy-preserving by design: scoring is deterministic and runs client-side, no personal data is required, nothing is transmitted or stored beyond the browser session, and no LLM is involved in production. PAUSE is a self-reflection tool. It is not a validated psychological instrument.

cs.HC

Where Do Your Citations Come From? Citation-Constellation: A Free, Open-Source, No-Code, and Auditable Tool for Citation Network Decomposition with Complementary BARON and HEROCON Scores

Standard citation metrics treat all citations as equal, obscuring the social and structural pathways through which scholarly influence propagates. I introduce Citation-Constellation, a freely available no-code tool for citation network analysis with two complementary bibliometric scores that decompose a researcher's citation profile by network proximity between citing and cited authors. BARON (Boundary-Anchored Research Outreach Network score) is a strict binary metric counting only citations from outside the detected collaborative network. HEROCON (Holistic Equilibrated Research Outreach CONstellation score) applies graduated weights assigning partial credit to in-group citations based on relationship proximity. The gap between scores serves as a diagnostic of inner-circle dependence. An extended abstract with full details appears in the paper. The tool implements this through a phased architecture: (1) self-citation analysis, (2) co-authorship graph traversal, (3) temporal institutional affiliation matching via ROR, and (4) AI-agent-driven venue governance extraction using a local LLM. Phases 1-3 are fully operational; Phase 4 is under development. Key design choices include ORCID-validated author identity resolution, an UNKNOWN classification for citations with insufficient metadata, and comprehensive audit trails documenting every classification decision. A no-code web interface enables researchers to compute scores without programming, installation, or registration. I present these scores as structural diagnostics, not quality indicators. BARON and HEROCON describe where in the social graph citations originate. They should not be used for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. HEROCON weights are experimental and require empirical calibration.

cs.DL

SHAMSUL: Systematic Holistic Analysis to investigate Medical Significance Utilizing Local interpretability methods in deep learning for chest radiography pathology prediction

The interpretability of deep neural networks has become a subject of great interest within the medical and healthcare domain. This attention stems from concerns regarding transparency, legal and ethical considerations, and the medical significance of predictions generated by these deep neural networks in clinical decision support systems. To address this matter, our study delves into the application of four well-established interpretability methods: Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP). Leveraging the approach of transfer learning with a multi-label-multi-class chest radiography dataset, we aim to interpret predictions pertaining to specific pathology classes. Our analysis encompasses both single-label and multi-label predictions, providing a comprehensive and unbiased assessment through quantitative and qualitative investigations, which are compared against human expert annotation. Notably, Grad-CAM demonstrates the most favorable performance in quantitative evaluation, while the LIME heatmap score segmentation visualization exhibits the highest level of medical significance. Our research underscores both the outcomes and the challenges faced in the holistic approach adopted for assessing these interpretability methods and suggests that a multimodal-based approach, incorporating diverse sources of information beyond chest radiography images, could offer additional insights for enhancing interpretability in the medical domain.

eess.IV