arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Lyle Ungar

Publications and source records attributed to Lyle Ungar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

PersonaMem-v3: Toward Omni-Platform Personal Intelligence for Holistic User Understanding, Recommendation, and Agentic Tasks

Personal intelligence is becoming a central frontier for user-facing AI agents. To be helpful in everyday life, agents must understand users across the digital contexts where their preferences, intents, habits, social relationships, and needs unfold over time. Today's systems can personalize within individual apps or tasks, but personal intelligence as a whole remains under-measured: how agents build cross-context user understanding, support steerable recommendation systems, act proactively across platforms, and avoid over-personalization. We introduce PersonaMem-v3, a real-world-grounded benchmark and evaluation harness for omni-platform personal intelligence. PersonaMem-v3 is seeded from more than one million anonymized real-world engagement histories, most of which are implicit signals, and uses them to construct time-indexed user digital worlds across social media, chatbot, calendar, and AI-companion with preference evolvement over time. The benchmark brings personalization, LLM-powered recommendation, proactiveness, agentic tool use, and geo-temporal reasoning into one framework, anchored in psychology, social-linguistics, and user-behavior theories. It evaluates whether AI agents can infer holistic user understanding from cross-platform evidence, personalize responses, rerank recommendations on social media, follow user steering through natural language, and hold back when personalization would be inappropriate, repetitive, outdated, or unnecessary. PersonaMem-v3 points toward LLM-powered personal intelligent agents that work with existing scalable recommendation infrastructure while making personalization more interactive, agentic, and aligned with how real users experience their digital lives.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

AI-Assisted Submissions in Online Research Are Rare and Highly Concentrated but Routinely Approved

Online research platforms underpin much of what science claims about people, on the assumption that a human produced each response. Generative AI threatens that assumption by letting participants delegate responses to a chatbot, yet how often they do so remains unclear because prior estimates rely on self-report or automated detection rather than direct observation. We surveyed 2,500 workers on a high quality online research platform and directly observed AI assistance by linking donated ChatGPT histories to platform submission records of weekly ChatGPT users, covering 712,930 submissions across more than 127,000 studies. Although one in eight surveyed workers reported ever using AI on a study and 68% of observed workers had done so, assistance appeared in only 1% of submissions, with no detectable increase over more than 3 years. Assistance was often temporally localized within tasks and highly concentrated among workers, with 5% accounting for 64% of assisted submissions. Where assistance occurred, workers were virtually always paid, even when study instructions prohibited AI use, with overall approval rates similar to those for unassisted submissions. Half of assisted submissions involved bounded responses, outside the scope of the platform's LLM detector for open-ended responses. Taken together, our results do not support the view that AI assistance currently poses an existential threat to online research, but reveal limited payment consequences for prohibited use and gaps in platform safeguards, leaving platforms poorly prepared should that threat materialize.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

AgentWorld: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Collaboration of Multi-agent LLMs

Existing multi-agent benchmarks primarily test in competitive settings, short-horizon interactions under 20 steps, or simply aggregate individual performance, failing to isolate and highlight genuine collaboration capabilities of LLM-based agents. We introduce AgentWorld, a benchmark of 100 human-annotated tasks (with 100 augmented variants) for evaluating long-horizon, multi-agent collaboration. Tasks span 50+ interaction rounds across a rich MMORPG sandbox and require 3-20 agents with asymmetric roles and abilities to coordinate through communication, joint planning, and resource sharing under a blackbox setting where each agent acts independently without access to others' internal states. To quantify collaboration effectiveness in addition to conventional binary task success, we propose Causal Collaboration Effectiveness (CCE), a graph-based metric that traces causal dependencies between agent actions and measures what fraction of a team's effort actually contributed to the outcome. Experiments with Gemini 3 Flash, Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5 Mini, and DeepSeek R1-70B show that even the best model achieves only 52.0% task success, with systematic failure modes including communication breakdowns, role confusion, and inability to maintain shared plans across rounds. AgentWorld is fully open-source.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

What Users Cannot See: Evaluating LLM Emotional Support Beyond User Preference

People increasingly turn to LLMs for emotional support, yet common evaluations reward responses that feel helpful and may miss consequential response behaviors. We introduce a theory-informed measurement framework that decomposes LLM emotional-support responses into Soothe (affective comfort), Reframe (cognitive perspective-shift), and Endorse (agreement with a user's causal or moral framing). Across 9,000 GPT-5.6 responses to 3,000 venting and advice-seeking Reddit posts, friend- and therapist-style personas both increased Soothe relative to default but moved Reframe and Endorse in opposite directions: friend prompting increased Endorse and reduced Reframe, a pattern that could reinforce users' existing appraisals and plausibly contribute to escalation risk, whereas therapist prompting did the reverse. Two independent LLM judges substantially agreed with clinically trained raters, yet lay raters detected only 60% of expert-confirmed Endorse instances and rated the personas similarly helpful and desirable. Preference-based evaluation thus has a blind spot: supportive presentation can obscure appraisal-reinforcing, potentially escalatory behavior.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Optimized but Unowned: How AI-Authored Goals Undermine the Motivation They Are Meant to Drive

As AI tools become embedded in productivity and self-improvement contexts, a pressing question emerges: what happens when AI does the goal-setting for us? In a preregistered experiment (N = 470), we compared self-authored goals against LLM-authored goals derived from a personal reflection. LLM-generated goals scored higher on SMART criteria (|d| = 2.26), yet participants in the LLM condition reported lower psychological ownership (|d| = 1.38), commitment (|d| = 1.19), and perceived importance (|d| = 1.13). At two-week follow-up, 72.8% of self-authored participants had acted on two or more of their goals, compared to 46.6% in the LLM condition. Psychological ownership, not goal quality, mediated every downstream motivational outcome. Individuals low in trait self-efficacy, those most likely to seek AI assistance, experienced the steepest ownership erosion. These findings reveal a quality-motivation dissociation in AI-assisted goal-setting and identify authorship preservation as a design priority for AI tools deployed in identity-relevant, behavior-dependent tasks.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Effects of Static and Conversational AI-Generated Messages on Colorectal Cancer Screening Intent: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Large language model chatbots show increasing promise in persuasive communication, but their clinical utility remains uncertain, particularly in settings where sustained conversations are difficult to scale. In a randomized clinical trial, 915 U.S. adults (ages 45-75) who had never completed colorectal cancer (CRC) screening were randomized to no-message control, expert-written patient materials, single AI-generated message, or motivational interviewing (MI) chatbot. Both AI interventions significantly increased stool-test intentions by over 12 points (12.9-13.8/100), compared to a 7.5 gain for expert materials (p<.001). While AI interventions outperformed the no-message control for colonoscopy intent, neither showed improvement over expert materials. Notably, we did not detect a statistically significant difference between the longer, interactive chatbot and the simpler single AI message, despite participants spending 3 minutes more on average engaging with it. These findings suggest concise, demographically tailored AI messages may offer a scalable approach to increasing CRC screening intentions, although effects on completed screening remain unknown.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Real-Time Deadlines Reveal Fragile Temporal Adaptation in LLM Strategic Dialogues

Large Language Models (LLMs) generate text token-by-token in discrete time, yet real-world communication, from therapy sessions to business negotiations, critically depends on continuous time constraints. We use simulated negotiations between paired agents under strict deadlines to study adaptation to real-time pressure. Agents either receive only the initial deadline or explicit remaining-time updates at each turn. Remaining-time feedback raises deal closure from 4% to 32% for GPT-5.1-chat-latest and increases offer acceptance more than sixfold. The same model achieves near-perfect closure under turn-based limits, showing that poor wall-clock performance is not simply due to insufficient negotiation competence. Across additional interface conditions, qualitative urgency cues can outperform numeric countdowns, repeated deadline reminders do not consistently reproduce their benefits, and directed time tracking can help or hurt depending on the model. Across additional negotiation scenarios and model configurations, we find real-time temporal adaptation is fragile, model-dependent, and sensitive to how temporal constraints are presented. Code available at https://github.com/sehgal-neil/llm-temporal-awareness

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Depression Symptoms and Relational Patterns in 187k ChatGPT Histories

Large language models are increasingly used as private, always-available conversational systems, but little is known about how people with depressive symptoms use them. Building on CSCW work on disclosure and peer support, we examine ChatGPT as an emerging informal support infrastructure: private, persistent, responsive, and available outside ordinary hours. We analyze 187,093 ChatGPT conversations from 766 participants who completed the PHQ-8, comparing those below the moderate-symptom threshold (score of 10) with those at or above it. Higher-PHQ participants used ChatGPT more for mental-health, interpersonal, loneliness, self-focused, and support-seeking conversations, with pronounced late-night and recurring month-level patterns. Their language contained more first-person singular pronouns and absolutist terms. They more often engaged ChatGPT in high-disclosure contexts, but professional redirection was not higher. Language-based prediction was modest and insufficient for screening (AUROC 0.591). We argue these histories should not be treated as clinical screening data but as evidence LLMs are increasingly used as informal support infrastructure.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Large Language Model Chatbot Conversations vs Public Health Materials and Parental HPV Vaccination Intentions: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Health care systems are increasingly considering large language model (LLM)-based chatbots for vaccine communication, but evidence that they improve durable, behaviorally relevant outcomes beyond existing health materials is limited. This randomized clinical trial tested whether brief, multiturn LLM chatbot interactions increased parental intention to vaccinate children against human papillomavirus (HPV) compared with no intervention and government public health materials, and whether effects persisted. Parents in the US, Canada, and UK were recruited online from March 3 to May 25, 2025, with follow-up at 15 and 45 days. Eligible participants were adults with at least one HPV vaccine-eligible child who was unvaccinated or whose vaccination status was unknown. Participants were randomized to no-message control, country-matched government materials with at least 3 minutes of exposure, or a 3-minute GPT-4o chatbot interaction using either a default persuasive style or a shorter conversational style. The primary outcome was self-reported likelihood of vaccinating the child against HPV within 12 months, measured immediately after intervention on a 0-100 scale. Follow-up outcomes included vaccination intent and self-reported vaccination at 15 and 45 days. In total, 1297 participants were randomized (mean age 42.84 years; 72.1% female). Compared with no intervention, public health materials increased immediate vaccination intent (Cohen d = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.70), as did the default chatbot (d = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.65) and conversational chatbot (d = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.49). At 45 days, neither chatbot increased intent relative to controls, whereas public health materials maintained modest effects. No intervention increased self-reported vaccination uptake. Findings suggest well-designed public health materials may match or exceed short LLM chatbot conversations for HPV vaccine promotion.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Narrative Sharpens Gender Gaps: Surveying Film Characters with LLM Agents

Mainstream film is one of the richest sources of cultural content that AI systems learn from. Yet we have few tools for measuring the gender values it encodes. We present a proof-of-concept framework that turns fictional film characters into surveyable LLM agents. Using 160 U.S. films (1990--2019), we build 734 character agents from script dialogue and scene descriptions, condense their personas via expert-style reflections, and simulate World Values Survey gender-attitude responses. Agents reproduce systematic gender differences without explicit demographic prompting, suggesting attitudes emerge from behavior rather than identity labels. Benchmarked against historical survey data, agents exaggerate gender gaps and show greater decade-to-decade volatility than real populations. Narrative sharpens rather than homogenizes gender contrasts, complicating the consistent-input assumption underlying cultivation theory's mainstreaming mechanism. AI systems trained on such corpora may inherit this stylization before any model-level amplification occurs.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

T-FIX: Text-Based Explanations with Features Interpretable to eXperts

As LLMs are deployed in knowledge-intensive settings (e.g., surgery, astronomy, therapy), users are often domain experts who expect not just answers, but explanations that mirror professional reasoning. Yet evaluating whether an LLM "thinks like an expert" remains difficult: existing approaches rely on per-example expert annotation, making them costly, hard to scale, and tied to a single notion of correct reasoning within each domain. To address this gap, we introduce T-FIX, a unified evaluation framework that operationalizes expert alignment as a desired attribute of LLM-generated explanations. T-FIX spans seven scientific tasks across three domains, with each task evaluated against expert-defined criteria that capture domain-grounded reasoning rather than generic explanation quality. Our framework enables automatic, personalizable evaluation of expert alignment that generalizes to unseen explanations without ongoing expert involvement. Code is available at https://github.com/BrachioLab/FIX-2/.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Contrastive Conceptor Activation Steering (COAST): Unlocking Vision-Language-Action Models through Hidden States

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models leverage powerful perceptual priors from web-scale Vision-Language Model (VLM) pre-training, yet they remain surprisingly brittle in practice, frequently failing at simple robotic tasks. To mitigate this, we propose Contrastive Conceptor Activation Steering (COAST). COAST builds on the notion of a "conceptor", a linear operator that soft-projects data into the principal components of a target distribution. COAST uses conceptors to identify success-critical subspaces for a target robotic task from a few examples of success and failure rollouts. At inference time, it steers VLA latents into these identified success subspaces to improve task outcomes. Across three architecturally distinct neural policies (flow-matching VLA, autoregressive VLA, and Diffusion Policy), COAST improves absolute mean simulation and real-robot task success rate by over 20 and 40% respectively. The activation subspace geometry reveals that failure modes share substantial structure across tasks while success representations remain largely task-specific. When tasks share similar failure modes, this structure enables previously fitted conceptors to improve performance on new tasks without refitting. Ultimately, our results suggest that current VLAs retain substantial task-relevant knowledge in their latent representations, and that the action expert's decoding bottleneck could be mitigated by steering its residual stream toward task-relevant subspaces. COAST provides a lightweight, training-free path to unlocking these latent capabilities by steering the model towards its own "success" distributions.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Conceptors for Semantic Steering

Activation-based steering provides control of LLM behavior at inference time, but the dominant paradigm reduces each concept to a single direction whose geometry is left largely unexamined. Rather than selecting a single steering direction, we use conceptors: soft projection matrices estimated from activations pooled across both poles of a bipolar concept, which preserve the concept's full multidimensional subspace. A geometric analysis shows the bipolar subspace strictly subsumes the single-vector baseline. We further show that the conceptor quota provides a parameter-free layer-selection diagnostic, predicting concept separability with Pearson correlations up to r=0.96 across three instruction-tuned models and three semantic dimensions. Beyond selection, conceptors admit a closed-form Boolean algebra (AND, OR, NOT): we evaluate conceptor compositionality on thematically related sub-concepts. Across a systematic five-axis design-space evaluation, conceptors match or outperform additive baselines at layers where concept subspaces are multi-dimensional while producing substantially fewer degenerate outputs. Conceptor steering is a geometrically principled, compositional, and practically safer alternative to single-direction steering from a limited number of contrastive pairs.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Closing the Confidence-Faithfulness Gap in Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) tend to verbalize confidence scores that are largely detached from their actual accuracy, yet the geometric relationship governing this behavior remain poorly understood. In this work, we present a mechanistic interpretability analysis of verbalized confidence, using linear probes and contrastive activation addition (CAA) steering to show that calibration and verbalized confidence signals are encoded linearly but are orthogonal to one another -- a finding consistent across three open-weight models and four datasets. Interestingly, when models are prompted to simultaneously reason through a problem and verbalize a confidence score, the reasoning process disrupts the verbalized confidence direction, exacerbating miscalibration. We term this the "Reasoning Contamination Effect." Leveraging this insight, we introduce a two-stage adaptive steering pipeline that reads the model's internal accuracy estimate and steers verbalized output to match it, substantially improving calibration alignment across all evaluated models.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Self-Reported Side Effects of Semaglutide and Tirzepatide in Online Communities

Social media can reveal patient experiences with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) that extend beyond clinical trial data. We analyzed 410,198 Reddit posts (May 2019-June 2025) mentioning semaglutide or tirzepatide. A total of 67,008 users self-reported using these medications, and 43.5% described at least one side effect. Gastrointestinal symptoms predominated, including nausea (36.9%), fatigue (16.7%), vomiting (16.3%), constipation (15.3%), and diarrhea (12.6%). Notably, reproductive symptoms (e.g., menstrual irregularities) and temperature-related complaints (e.g., chills, hot flashes) emerged as unrecognized potential effects. These findings highlight patient concerns not well captured in current labeling or trials. Large-scale social media analysis can complement traditional pharmacovigilance by detecting emerging safety signals and expanding understanding of the real-world safety profile of GLP-1 RAs.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Coach not crutch: Evidence that AI can improve writing skill despite reducing effort

In a series of highly-powered empirical studies, we examine the intuition that by sparing effort, using AI inevitably hinders learning. First, in a nationally representative survey of young adults, the majority expressed the view that using AI makes people lazier and less capable. Next, in a random-assignment experiment, we gave participants a tutorial on best practices in professional writing, then provided one group with access to an AI writing tool and asked another to practice writing on their own. Those who practiced with AI indeed exerted less effort while practicing -- yet wrote better cover letters in no-AI writing tests. In a second experiment with more rigorous control conditions, access to AI improved writing more than either googling cover letter examples and tips or receiving personalized feedback on their practice letters from experienced human editors. A third experiment explained these learning gains by showing that AI can teach by example: participants who viewed a cover letter that had been revised by the AI tool but did no further practice improved their writing as much as those who practiced writing with the original AI tool. Collectively, these pre-registered experiments suggest that AI can exert opposing effects on effort and learning rate -- making it possible in at least some cases to work less and learn more.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

ZeroTuning: Unlocking the Initial Token's Power to Enhance Large Language Models Without Training

Token-level attention tuning, a class of training-free methods including Post-hoc Attention Steering (PASTA) and Attention Calibration (ACT), has emerged as a promising approach for improving frozen LLMs via interpretable interventions. However, these methods rely on auxiliary heuristics to identify important task-specific tokens, which can introduce bias and limit applicability when token importance is ambiguous or when optimized kernels make attention maps inaccessible. We propose a simpler alternative: intervening only on the initial token (e.g., BOS in LLaMA). We theoretically show that adding lightweight biases to this token's attention logits systematically shifts and reshapes downstream attention patterns - an effect amplified by its natural role as an attention sink. Empirically, we find that this tuning can improve LLM performance and better elicit pretrained knowledge, with stronger effects in early layers and distinct scaling preferences across attention heads. Building on these findings, we introduce ZeroTuning, a training-free method that improves LLM performance by applying head-specific attention adjustments to the initial token, requiring no parameter updates. We present two variants: a supervised mode that calibrates on validation examples, and an unsupervised mode that directly minimizes output entropy. ZeroTuning requires no KV-cache or decoding changes and is kernel-agnostic (works with SDPA and FlashAttention). It requires only four lines of modification to the standard LlamaAttention code, achieves gains across 15 datasets, and outperforms prior, more complex methods. For example, on Llama-3.1-8B, it yields relative improvements of 19.9% on classification, 4.5% on question answering, and 2.1% on dialogue. ZeroTuning also works out of the box with quantized inference and maintains its improvements as context length increases.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Voice-Based Chatbots for English Speaking Practice in Multilingual Low-Resource Indian Schools: A Multi-Stakeholder Study

Spoken English proficiency is a powerful driver of economic mobility for low-income Indian youth, yet opportunities for spoken practice remain scarce in schools. We investigate the deployment of a voice-based chatbot for English conversation practice across four low-resource schools in Delhi. Through a six-day field study combining observations and interviews, we captured the perspectives of students, teachers, and principals. Findings confirm high demand across all groups, with notable gains in student speaking confidence. Our multi-stakeholder analysis surfaced a tension in long-term adoption vision: students favored open-ended conversational practice, while administrators emphasized curriculum-aligned assessment. We offer design recommendations for voice-enabled chatbots in low-resource multilingual contexts, highlighting the need for more intelligible speech output for non-native learners, one-tap interactions with simplified interfaces, and actionable analytics for educators. Beyond language learning, our findings inform the co-design of future AI-based educational technologies that are socially sustainable within the complex ecosystem of low-resource schools.

cs.HC↗