arXiv subjects

Luke Munn

Publications and source records attributed to Luke Munn.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

Other Worlds: Using AI to Revisit Cybersyn and Rethink Economic Futures

Neoliberalism has become orthodoxy in the present, erasing competing paradigms and alternative imaginings. Chile's radical Cybersyn project from 1971 to 1973 offers a departure point for an alternative path, albeit one that was abruptly and violently extinguished. We revisit this moment by fine-tuning AI language models on the words and writing of Salvador Allende, the Chilean President, and Stafford Beer, the cyberneticist who helped to design the project. We conduct interviews with these simulated personas, focusing on how their revolutionary ideas might be taken up in the present. We then use an AI model to generate five-year-plans from 1973 to the present, simulating an alternate history guided by Cybersyn and a progressive agenda. We frame these interventions as socialist infrastructuring that cultivates a more expansive socialist imagining. This work is not about the viability of planned economies, but about the 'inspirability' of exploring other value-systems in the present, allowing us to break out of our future-on-rails to envision alternative ways of organizing economy and society.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2023

Inclusive Online Learning in Australia: Barriers and Enablers

While the pandemic highlighted the critical role technology plays in children's lives, not all Australian children have reliable access to technology. This situation exacerbates educational disadvantage for children who are already amongst our nation's most vulnerable. In this research project, we carried out a pilot project with three schools in Western Australia, conducting a series of workshops and interviews with students, parents, school staff members, and teachers. Drawing on rich empirical material, we identify key barriers and enablers for digitally inclusive online learning at the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and infrastructural levels. Of particular importance is that technology is only part of this story - an array of social, environmental, and skills "infrastructure" is needed to facilitate inclusive online learning. Building on this finding, we ran a Digital Inclusion Studio to address this holistic set of issues with strongly positive feedback from participants. We conclude with a set of recommendations for stakeholders (parents, schools, government agencies) who wish to support more digitally inclusive learning.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2023

(Re)framing Built Heritage through the Machinic Gaze

Built heritage has been both subject and product of a gaze that has been sustained through moments of colonial fixation on ruins and monuments, technocratic examination and representation, and fetishisation by aglobal tourist industry. We argue that the recent proliferation of machine learning and vision technologies create new scopic regimes for heritage: storing and retrieving existing images from vast digital archives, and further imparting their own distortions upon its visual representation. We introduce the term `machinic gaze' to conceptualise the reconfiguration of heritage representation via AI models. To explore how this gaze reframes heritage, we deploy an image-text-image pipeline that reads, interprets, and resynthesizes images of several UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Employing two concepts from media studies -- heteroscopia and anamorphosis -- we describe the reoriented perspective that machine vision systems introduce. We propose that the machinic gaze highlights the artifice of the human gaze and its underlying assumptions and practices that combine to form established notions of heritage.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2023

Unmaking AI Imagemaking: A Methodological Toolkit for Critical Investigation

AI image models are rapidly evolving, disrupting aesthetic production in many industries. However, understanding of their underlying archives, their logic of image reproduction, and their persistent biases remains limited. What kind of methods and approaches could open up these black boxes? In this paper, we provide three methodological approaches for investigating AI image models and apply them to Stable Diffusion as a case study. Unmaking the ecosystem analyzes the values, structures, and incentives surrounding the model's production. Unmaking the data analyzes the images and text the model draws upon, with their attendant particularities and biases. Unmaking the output analyzes the model's generative results, revealing its logics through prompting, reflection, and iteration. Each mode of inquiry highlights particular ways in which the image model captures, "understands," and recreates the world. This accessible framework supports the work of critically investigating generative AI image models and paves the way for more socially and politically attuned analyses of their impacts in the world.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2023

Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models

As AI technologies are rolled out into healthcare, academia, human resources, law, and a multitude of other domains, they become de-facto arbiters of truth. But truth is highly contested, with many different definitions and approaches. This article discusses the struggle for truth in AI systems and the general responses to date. It then investigates the production of truth in InstructGPT, a large language model, highlighting how data harvesting, model architectures, and social feedback mechanisms weave together disparate understandings of veracity. It conceptualizes this performance as an operationalization of truth, where distinct, often conflicting claims are smoothly synthesized and confidently presented into truth-statements. We argue that these same logics and inconsistencies play out in Instruct's successor, ChatGPT, reiterating truth as a non-trivial problem. We suggest that enriching sociality and thickening "reality" are two promising vectors for enhancing the truth-evaluating capacities of future language models. We conclude, however, by stepping back to consider AI truth-telling as a social practice: what kind of "truth" do we as listeners desire?

cs.CY↗

arXiv2022

Structured Like a Language Model: Analysing AI as an Automated Subject

Drawing from the resources of psychoanalysis and critical media studies, in this paper we develop an analysis of Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated subjects. We argue the intentional fictional projection of subjectivity onto LLMs can yield an alternate frame through which AI behaviour, including its productions of bias and harm, can be analysed. First, we introduce language models, discuss their significance and risks, and outline our case for interpreting model design and outputs with support from psychoanalytic concepts. We trace a brief history of language models, culminating with the releases, in 2022, of systems that realise state-of-the-art natural language processing performance. We engage with one such system, OpenAI's InstructGPT, as a case study, detailing the layers of its construction and conducting exploratory and semi-structured interviews with chatbots. These interviews probe the model's moral imperatives to be helpful, truthful and harmless by design. The model acts, we argue, as the condensation of often competing social desires, articulated through the internet and harvested into training data, which must then be regulated and repressed. This foundational structure can however be redirected via prompting, so that the model comes to identify with, and transfer, its commitments to the immediate human subject before it. In turn, these automated productions of language can lead to the human subject projecting agency upon the model, effecting occasionally further forms of countertransference. We conclude that critical media methods and psychoanalytic theory together offer a productive frame for grasping the powerful new capacities of AI-driven language systems.

cs.CY↗