arXiv subjects

Luca Grilli

Publications and source records attributed to Luca Grilli.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Stack and Queue Layouts with Defects

Linear layouts of graphs -- particularly \emph{stack} and \emph{queue} layouts -- are well-established types of representations in graph drawing, thanks to their connection with numerous theoretical and practical problems. In such layouts, all vertices are linearly ordered and the edges are partitioned into sets that avoid specific forbidden configurations: in a stack layout no two independent edges within the same set cross, whereas in a queue layout no two independent edges within the same set are nested. A central problem in this context is to determine, for a given graph $G$, its \emph{stack number} or \emph{queue number}, that is, the minimum number of sets into which the edges can be partitioned so that a corresponding stack or queue layout of $G$ exists. In this work, we introduce a relaxation of stack and queue layouts, which allows some forbidden patterns for the edges in the same set. Namely, for a given integer $k > 0$, a \emph{$k$-defective stack layout} (resp. a \emph{$k$-defective queue layout}) allows an edge to be in a crossing (resp. nesting) relationship with at most~$k$ edges within the same set. Our motivation is to extend the classes of graphs that admit linear layouts using a limited number of edge-partition sets, at the cost of allowing some defects. We study defective linear layouts both from a combinatorial and from an algorithmic perspective, providing an array of results across different graph classes and parameters.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2025

On Planar Straight-Line Dominance Drawings

We study the following question, which has been considered since the 90's: Does every $st$-planar graph admit a planar straight-line dominance drawing? We show concrete evidence for the difficulty of this question, by proving that, unlike upward planar straight-line drawings, planar straight-line dominance drawings with prescribed $y$-coordinates do not always exist and planar straight-line dominance drawings cannot always be constructed via a contract-draw-expand inductive approach. We also show several classes of $st$-planar graphs that always admit a planar straight-line dominance drawing. These include $st$-planar $3$-trees in which every stacking operation introduces two edges incoming into the new vertex, $st$-planar graphs in which every vertex is adjacent to the sink, $st$-planar graphs in which no face has the left boundary that is a single edge, and $st$-planar graphs that have a leveling with span at most two.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2023

The Parametrized Complexity of the Segment Number

Given a straight-line drawing of a graph, a segment is a maximal set of edges that form a line segment. Given a planar graph $G$, the segment number of $G$ is the minimum number of segments that can be achieved by any planar straight-line drawing of $G$. The line cover number of $G$ is the minimum number of lines that support all the edges of a planar straight-line drawing of $G$. Computing the segment number or the line cover number of a planar graph is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete and, thus, NP-hard. We study the problem of computing the segment number from the perspective of parameterized complexity. We show that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to each of the following parameters: the vertex cover number, the segment number, and the line cover number. We also consider colored versions of the segment and the line cover number.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2022

Small Point-Sets Supporting Graph Stories

In a graph story the vertices enter a graph one at a time and each vertex persists in the graph for a fixed amount of time $\omega$, called viewing window. At any time, the user can see only the drawing of the graph induced by the vertices in the viewing window and this determines a sequence of drawings. For readability, we require that all the drawings of the sequence are planar. For preserving the user's mental map we require that when a vertex or an edge is drawn, it has the same drawing for its entire life. We study the problem of drawing the entire sequence by mapping the vertices only to $\omega+k$ given points, where $k$ is as small as possible. We show that: $(i)$ The problem does not depend on the specific set of points but only on its size; $(ii)$ the problem is NP-hard and is FPT when parameterized by $\omega+k$; $(iii)$ there are families of graph stories that can be drawn with $k=0$ for any $\omega$, while for $k=0$ and small values of $\omega$ there are families of graph stories that can be drawn and others that cannot; $(iv)$ there are families of graph stories that cannot be drawn for any fixed $k$ and families of graph stories that require at least a certain $k$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Greedy Rectilinear Drawings

A drawing of a graph is greedy if for each ordered pair of vertices u and v, there is a path from u to v such that the Euclidean distance to v decreases monotonically at every vertex of the path. The existence of greedy drawings has been widely studied under different topological and geometric constraints, such as planarity, face convexity, and drawing succinctness. We introduce greedy rectilinear drawings, in which each edge is either a horizontal or a vertical segment. These drawings have several properties that improve human readability and support network routing. We address the problem of testing whether a planar rectilinear representation, i.e., a plane graph with specified vertex angles, admits vertex coordinates that define a greedy drawing. We provide a characterization, a linear-time testing algorithm, and a full generative scheme for universal greedy rectilinear representations, i.e., those for which every drawing is greedy. For general greedy rectilinear representations, we give a combinatorial characterization and, based on it, a polynomial-time testing and drawing algorithm for a meaningful subset of instances.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2017

Gap-planar Graphs

We introduce the family of $k$-gap-planar graphs for $k \geq 0$, i.e., graphs that have a drawing in which each crossing is assigned to one of the two involved edges and each edge is assigned at most $k$ of its crossings. This definition is motivated by applications in edge casing, as a $k$-gap-planar graph can be drawn crossing-free after introducing at most $k$ local gaps per edge. We present results on the maximum density of $k$-gap-planar graphs, their relationship to other classes of beyond-planar graphs, characterization of $k$-gap-planar complete graphs, and the computational complexity of recognizing $k$-gap-planar graphs.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2016

On the $\mathcal{NP}$-hardness of GRacSim Drawing and k-SEFE Problems

We study the complexity of two problems in simultaneous graph drawing. The first problem, GRacSim Drawing, asks for finding a simultaneous geometric embedding of two graphs such that only crossings at right angles are allowed. The second problem, k-SEFE, is a restricted version of the topological simultaneous embedding with fixed edges (SEFE) problem, for two planar graphs, in which every private edge may receive at most $k$ crossings, where $k$ is a prescribed positive integer. We show that GRacSim Drawing is $\mathcal{NP}$-hard and that k-SEFE is $\mathcal{NP}$-complete. The $\mathcal{NP}$-hardness of both problems is proved using two similar reductions from 3-Partition.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2016

Visibility Representations of Boxes in 2.5 Dimensions

We initiate the study of 2.5D box visibility representations (2.5D-BR) where vertices are mapped to 3D boxes having the bottom face in the plane $z=0$ and edges are unobstructed lines of sight parallel to the $x$- or $y$-axis. We prove that: $(i)$ Every complete bipartite graph admits a 2.5D-BR; $(ii)$ The complete graph $K_n$ admits a 2.5D-BR if and only if $n \leq 19$; $(iii)$ Every graph with pathwidth at most $7$ admits a 2.5D-BR, which can be computed in linear time. We then turn our attention to 2.5D grid box representations (2.5D-GBR) which are 2.5D-BRs such that the bottom face of every box is a unit square at integer coordinates. We show that an $n$-vertex graph that admits a 2.5D-GBR has at most $4n - 6 \sqrt{n}$ edges and this bound is tight. Finally, we prove that deciding whether a given graph $G$ admits a 2.5D-GBR with a given footprint is NP-complete. The footprint of a 2.5D-BR $\Gamma$ is the set of bottom faces of the boxes in $\Gamma$.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2014

On the Recognition of Fan-Planar and Maximal Outer-Fan-Planar Graphs

Fan-planar graphs were recently introduced as a generalization of 1-planar graphs. A graph is fan-planar if it can be embedded in the plane, such that each edge that is crossed more than once, is crossed by a bundle of two or more edges incident to a common vertex. A graph is outer-fan-planar if it has a fan-planar embedding in which every vertex is on the outer face. If, in addition, the insertion of an edge destroys its outer-fan-planarity, then it is maximal outer-fan-planar. In this paper, we present a polynomial-time algorithm to test whether a given graph is maximal outer-fan-planar. The algorithm can also be employed to produce an outer-fan-planar embedding, if one exists. On the negative side, we show that testing fan-planarity of a graph is NP-hard, for the case where the rotation system (i.e., the cyclic order of the edges around each vertex) is given.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2013

Algorithms and Bounds for Drawing Non-planar Graphs with Crossing-free Subgraphs

We initiate the study of the following problem: Given a non-planar graph G and a planar subgraph S of G, does there exist a straight-line drawing {\Gamma} of G in the plane such that the edges of S are not crossed in {\Gamma} by any edge of G? We give positive and negative results for different kinds of connected spanning subgraphs S of G. Moreover, in order to enlarge the subset of instances that admit a solution, we consider the possibility of bending the edges of G not in S; in this setting we discuss different trade-offs between the number of bends and the required drawing area.

cs.CG↗